UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

FORM 10-Q

FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2004

OR

FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM            to

Commission file number:

VITRAN CORPORATION INC.

185 The West Mall, Suite 701, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M9C 5L5
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)

416-596-7664
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  [X]  No  [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes  [  ]  No  [X]

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

The number of shares of common stock outstanding at July 21 2004 was 12,301,978.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

2

Part I. Financial Information

Item 1: Financial Statements

VITRAN CORPORATION INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND RETAINED EARNINGS
(Unaudited)

(In thousands of United States dollars except for per share amounts)

     See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

3

VITRAN CORPORATION INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)

(In thousands of United States dollars)

     See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

4

VITRAN CORPORATION INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)

(In thousands of United States dollars)

     See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

5

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

(In thousands of United States dollars except for per share amounts)

1.		Accounting Policies
		The interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles with reconciliation to United States generally accepted accounting principles in note 7 and follow the same accounting principles and methods of application as the most recent annual consolidated financial statements. The interim consolidated financial statements do not contain all the disclosures required by Canadian and United States generally accepted accounting principles. The interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with instruction to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Annual Report and the Annual Report on Form 10-K.
		These unaudited consolidated interim financial statements reflect all adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to a fair presentation of the results of the interim period presented. Operating results for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that may be expected for the year ended December 31, 2004.
		All amounts in these consolidated interim financial statements are expressed in United States dollars, unless otherwise stated.
2.		Foreign Currency Translation
		The United States dollar is the functional currency of the Company’s operations in the U.S. The Canadian dollar is the functional currency of the Company’s Canadian operations.
		Each operation translates foreign currency denominated transactions into its functional currency using the rate of exchange in effect at the date of the transaction.
		Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currency are translated into the functional currency of the operation using the period-end rate of exchange giving rise to a gain or loss that is recognized in income during the current period.
		For reporting purposes, the Canadian operations are translated into United States dollars using the current rate method. Under this method, all assets and liabilities are translated at the period-end rate of exchange and all revenue and expense items are translated at the average rate of exchange for the period. The resulting translation adjustment is recorded as a separate component of shareholders equity. United States dollar debt of $22.3 million is designated as a hedge of the investment in the United States self-sustaining operations.

6

3.

Capital Stock

(a)		Authorized
		The Company’s capital stock consists of an unlimited number of Common Shares. On April 21, 2004 the shareholders of the Company voted to redesignate the Company’s Class A Voting shares as Common Shares and cancelled the previously unissued Class B non-voting shares and first preference shares.
(b)		Issued

(c)		Weighted average number of shares
		The Company uses the treasury-stock method to calculate diluted earnings per share. Under the treasury-stock method, the weighted average number of shares outstanding for basic earnings per share is adjusted to reflect the assumed exercise of the Company’s outstanding stock options less the shares that could otherwise be acquired from the assumed proceeds on exercise.

7

4.		Stock Option Plan
		Under the Company’s stock option plan, options to purchase Common Shares of the Company may be granted to key employees, officers and directors of the Company and its affiliates by the Board of Directors or by the Company’s Compensation Committee. There are 1,367,900 options authorized under the plan. The term of each option is ten years and the vesting period is generally five years. The exercise price for options is the trading price of the Common Shares of the Company on the Toronto Stock Exchange on the day of the grant. The Company has applied the fair value method for stock options granted on or after January 1, 2003. The Company has applied the pro forma disclosure provisions of the standard to awards granted during 2002, and consistent with the standard, the pro forma effect of stock options granted prior to January 1, 2002 have not been included. The following table outlines the impact:

		On March 9, 2004 the Board of Directors of the Company approved an amendment to the Company stock option plan to increase the aggregate number of Common Shares issuable under the Plan by an additional 750,000 Common Shares and granted 205,000 stock options to executive officers and certain non-executive employees of the Company. The stock options granted on March 9, 2004 were not expensed in the first quarter financial statements as the shareholders of the Company had yet to approve the increase to the aggregate number of Common Shares reserved under the stock plan. On April 21, 2004 the shareholders of the Company approved the amendment to the stock option plan. Accordingly, for the 205,000 stock options granted, the associated stock option expense of $58,000 pursuant to the fair value method has been recognized in the financial statements.
		The fair value of each stock option granted was estimated on April 21, 2004 using the Black-Scholes fair value option-pricing model with the following assumptions:

5.

Contingent Liabilities

There exists certain legal actions against the Company, none of which is expected to have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position or results of operations of the Company.

8

6.

Segmented Information

9

7.

Canadian and United States accounting policy differences:

(a)		Consolidated Statements of changes in shareholders’ equity
		United States GAAP requires the inclusion of a consolidated statement of changes in shareholders’ equity for each statement of income year. Shareholders’ equity under United States GAAP is as follows:

(b)		Consolidated statements of cash flows:
		Canadian GAAP permits the disclosure of a subtotal of the amount of cash provided by operations before changes in non-cash working capital items in the consolidated statements of cash flows. United States GAAP does not permit this subtotal to be included.
(c)		Statement of net income (loss) and comprehensive income (loss)
		The following table reconciles net income for the three-month and six-month periods as reported in the consolidated statement of operations to what would have been reported had the statements been prepared in accordance with United States GAAP.
		United States GAAP requires the disclosure of a Statement of Comprehensive Income. Comprehensive income generally encompasses all changes in shareholders’ equity, except those arising from transactions with shareholders.

10

(i) The change in the fair value of the Company’s obligation for its interest rate swap, which was designated as a cash flow hedge, has been included net of the income tax effect of nil (2003 - $78,000).

(d)

Earnings per share

(e)		Income from operations before depreciation
		United States GAAP requires that depreciation be included in the determination of income from operations. Further, U.S. GAAP does not permit the disclosure of a subtotal of the amount of income from continuing operations before this item. Canadian GAAP permits the disclosure of a subtotal of the amount of income from operations before this item.
(f)		Stock-based compensation:
		Pro forma stock option disclosure:
		The following table outlines the pro forma impact if the compensation cost for the Company’s stock options is determined under the fair value method for awards granted on or after January 1, 1995.

11

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operation

Forward-Looking Statements: This Quarterly Report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 concerning Vitran Corporation Inc.’s business, operations, and financial performance and condition. When used in this Quarterly Report, the words “believe”, “anticipate”, “intend”, “estimate”, “expect”, “project” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain such words. These forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and are naturally subject to uncertainty and changes in circumstances that may cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Factors that may cause such differences include but are not limited to technological change, regulatory change, the general health of the economy and competitive factors. More detailed information about these and other factors are included in the 2003 Annual Report and the Company’s Form 10-K in respect of 2003. Many of these factors are beyond the Company’s control; therefore, future events may vary substantially from what the Company currently foresees. You should not place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. Vitran Corporation Inc. is under no obligation to update or alter such forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Unless otherwise indicated all dollar references herein are in U.S. dollars. Definitions of non-GAAP measures are listed subsequent to the management discussion and analysis of results of operations.

Overview

The second quarter of 2004 marked another record quarter for Vitran. Net income increased 61.0% over the prior year second quarter and marked the eleventh consecutive quarter of improved earnings. All segments within the Company improved, posting both revenue and profitability increases. The LTL segment benefited from economic expansion in the Midwestern United States while continuing to make market shares gains in Canada and the United States. For the six-month period ended June 30, 2004 results exceeded the prior year six-month period despite the adverse impact of the five-week strike at CN Railway Co. (“CN”). Strike related issues disrupted linehaul operations at the Canadian LTL business unit, reducing revenue and considerably increasing operating costs in during February and March 2004. However, the Company efficiently diverted many shipments over-the-road during the strike, and quickly resumed normal operations once the strike ended. Strong results at both the Truckload and the Logistics segments also contributed to the improvement.

Consolidated Results

The following table summarizes the Consolidated Statements of Income for the periods ended:

12

Revenue increased 11.6% to $93.9 million for the second quarter of 2004 compared to $84.1 million in the second quarter of 2003. Revenue in the LTL segment increased 10.9% while revenue at the Logistics and Truckload segments grew 23.1% and 8.1% respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2004 revenue increased 12.1% to $181.1 million compared to $161.6 million for the same period in 2003.

Income from operations for the second quarter of 2004 improved 43.2% to $5.8 million compared to $4.1 million in the second quarter of 2003. All three segments, LTL, Logistics and Truckload, posted quarter over prior year quarter improvements of 28.3%, 130.2% and 104.6%, respectively. Economic growth, primarily in the Midwestern United States buoyed the results of the LTL and Truckload segments. Improved density and continuing focus on cost control also improved profitability. For the six months ended June 30, 2004 income from operations increased 28.9% to $7.9 million compared to $6.2 million for the same period in 2003. Improvements at the Logistics and Truckload segments as well as improving fundamentals in the LTL segment contributed to the increase. In addition, the Company changed the estimated useful life for its tractors from 7 years to 8 years and its trailers from 10 years to 12 years to more accurately reflect the actual useful life of its equipment and to bring the Company’s policy in line with its peer group. This change in estimate was recorded prospectively and resulted in a reduction in depreciation expense of $0.2 million for the 2004 second quarter and $0.4 million for the six month ended June 30, 2004. The net impact of the items discussed above was that the consolidated operating ratio for the second quarter of 2004 improved to 93.8% compared to 95.2% in the second quarter of 2003. The operating ratio for the six months ended June 30, 2004 improved to 95.6% compared to 96.2% for the same period in 2003.

Interest expense net of interest income was $0.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004 compared to $0.8 million in the six months ended June 30, 2003. This reduction was primarily due to the Company’s Cdn $35.3 million in short-term investments generating interest income of Cdn $0.3 million. As well, the Company repaid $4.0 million of its outstanding debt obligations and had a 50 basis point reduction in interest rate spreads starting in February 2004.

Income tax expense for the second quarter of 2004 was $1.4 million compared to $0.9 million in the second quarter of 2003. The effective tax rate was 24.8% for the second quarter of 2004 compared to 23.9% in the second quarter of 2003. For the six months ended June 30, 2004 the effective tax rate was 24.2% compared to 21.1% for the same period a year ago. The increase in effective rates can be attributed to an increase in statutory rates as well as a higher proportion of income being earned in higher tax jurisdictions.

Net income improved by 61.0% to $4.4 million for the second quarter of 2004, an all time record for Vitran, compared to $2.7 million in the second quarter of 2003. This resulted in $0.36 per share basic and $0.34 diluted for the quarter, compared to $0.29 per share basic and $0.27 per share diluted in 2003. The weighted average number of shares for the second quarter of 2004 was 12.3 million basic and 12.8 million diluted compared to 9.5 million basic and 9.9 million diluted shares in the second quarter of 2003. For the six months ended June 30, 2004 net income improved by 45.8% to $6.0 million compared to $4.1 million in the same period a year ago. This resulted in $0.50 per share basic and $0.47 diluted for the quarter, compared to $0.43 per share basic and $0.42 per share diluted in 2003. The weighted average number of shares for the six-

13

month period of 2004 was 12.2 million basic and 12.7 million diluted compared to 9.5 million basic and 9.9 million diluted shares in the six month period of 2003. The weighted average number of shares for 2004 reflects the Company’s 2.3 million share equity offering in the fourth quarter of 2003, and more dilution due to the fact that the majority of outstanding stock options were in the money in the three month and six month period ended June 30, 2004.

Segmented Results

Less-Than-Truckload (LTL)

The table below provides summary information for the LTL segment for the periods ended June 30:

The LTL segment posted another quarterly improvement in revenue, increasing 10.9%. Income from operations for the second quarter of 2004 improved 28.3% to $5.5 million, compared $4.3 million in 2003. Increased density throughout Canadian and U.S. infrastructure including a 47.5% increase in transborder revenue contributed to the improvement. The LTL segment’s operating ratio for the second quarter improved to 92.8% compared to 93.8% in the second quarter of 2003. Income from operations for the six-month period ended June 30, 2004 increased 8.8% to $7.4 million compared to $6.8 million in the same period a year ago. Income from operations for the six-month period include the adverse impact of approximately $1.0 million related to the CN strike. Transborder revenue increased 45.1% for the 2004 six-month period, partially offsetting the CN strike impact, contributing to the operating ratio of 94.9% compared to 94.8% in the 2003 six-month period.

The Canadian LTL business unit increased revenue in all of its lines of business: national, regional, expedited, and transborder. Market share gains and a firm pricing environment in the Canadian LTL unit helped grow revenue 10.3% in second quarter of 2004 compared to the same period in 2003. For the 2004 second quarter compared to the second quarter of 2003, shipments, tonnage and revenue per hundredweight increased 8.8%, 5.8% and 4.2% respectively.

The U.S. LTL business unit increased revenue by 9.8% to $44.5 million for the second quarter of 2004. The improvement in revenue was driven by increase in shipments of 4.0% and an increase in tonnage of 9.9%. Revenue per hundredweight declined 0.1% for the quarter driven by an increase in average shipment size of 5.6% and a change in freight mix.

14

Logistics

The table below provides summary information for the Logistics segment for the periods ended June 30:

Revenues for the Logistics segment were up 23.1% for the second quarter of 2004, and the operating ratio improved to 95.0% compared to 97.3% in the second quarter of 2003. Revenue and income from operation increases were attributable to improvements across all the logistics business units with strong growth coming from the Supply Chain unit that opened a new distribution centre during the quarter.

Truckload (TL)

The table below provides summary information for the TL segment for the periods ended June 30:

Revenue for the Truckload segment increased from 8.1% to $9.2 million in the second quarter of 2004 compared to $8.5 million in the second quarter of 2003. The Truckload segment is focusing on better yielding freight and successfully increased revenue per total mile by 14.2% and decreased empty miles by 27.3% while shipments declined by 16.9% for the second quarter of 2004 compared to the same period in 2003. The revenue increase and yield progress improved the operating ratio to 94.7% from 97.2% in the second quarter of 2003.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Cash flow from operations for the 2004 six-month period, before working capital changes, generated $8.4 million compared to $6.7 million in 2003. Non-cash working capital changes consumed $6.7 million in the 2004 six-month period compared to $4.0 million in 2003. The increase in accounts receivable at June 30, 2004 compared to December 31, 2003 was due to higher revenue. The increase was however mitigated by improved collections that resulted in 39.1 days sales outstanding at the end of June 2004 compared to 40.5 days at the end of December 2003.

15

Interest-bearing debt decreased to $22.3 million at June 30, 2004 from $26.2 million at the end of 2003. The interest-bearing debt is comprised of $22.2 million drawn under the term bank credit facility and a capital lease of $0.1 million. During the first six months the Company repaid $3.1 million of interest-bearing debt. At June 30, 2004, the Company had Cdn $21.5 million of unused credit facilities.

In December 2003, the Company issued and sold, in an underwritten public offering, 2,300,000 shares of Class A Voting stock in consideration for net proceeds of $29.4 million. The proceeds of the offering are to be used to fund possible future acquisitions and capital expenditures and may be used to repay amounts outstanding under the Company’s credit facilities. At June 30, 2004, the Company had $8.0 million of cash on hand as well as Cdn $35.3 million in investment grade short-term securities.

Capital expenditures amounted to $1.4 million for the second quarter and $3.1 million for six-month period of 2004 and were funded out of operating cash flows of the Company. The table below sets forth the Company’s capital expenditures for the periods ended June 30.

Management estimates that cash capital expenditures for the remainder of 2004 will be between $5.0 million and $7.0 million, the majority of which will be for tractors and trailers. The Company also anticipates entering into operating leases to fund the acquisition of equipment with a capital cost of between $3.0 and $5.0 million.

The Company has contractual obligations that include long-term debt consisting of a term debt facility, capital leases for operating equipment in the Logistics segment and off-balance sheet operating leases primarily consisting of tractor, trailing fleet and real estate leases. Operating leases form an integral part of the Company’s financial structure and operating methodology as it provides an alternative cost effective and flexible form of financing. The following table summarizes our significant contractual obligations and commercial commitments as of June 30, 2004:

16

In addition to the above noted contractual obligations, the Company, as at June 30, 2004, utilized the revolving credit facility for a standby letter of credit of $2.6 million expiring in November 2004. The letter of credit is used as collateral for self-insured retention of insurance claims.

A significant decrease in demand for our services could limit the Company’s ability to generate cash flow and affect its profitability. The Company’s credit agreement contains covenants that require the company to achieve stated levels of financial performance, which, if not achieved, could cause an acceleration of the payment schedules. Management does not anticipate a significant decline in business levels or financial performance and expects that existing working capital, together with available revolving facilities, is sufficient to fund operating and capital requirements in 2004 as well as service the contractual obligations.

OUTLOOK

The second quarter of 2004 was a record quarter for Vitran. All operating segments performed very well posting improved results over the prior year quarter. The positive signs indicated in the economy point toward continued improvement for the remainder of the year. Management intends to maintain its focus on improving results by focusing on revenue and yield improvement in its LTL segment. It is still the Company’s objective to use the proceeds from the December 2003 public offering to acquire an LTL operation in a new regional market contiguous to the existing network.

Definitions of non-GAAP measures:

(1)      Operating ratio (“OR”) is a non-GAAP financial measure which does not have any standardized meaning prescribed by GAAP. OR is the sum of operating expenses, selling, general and administrative expenses and depreciation expense, divided by revenue. Although OR is not a recognized financial measure defined by GAAP, it is a widely recognized measure in the transportation industry which the Company believes provides a comparable benchmark for evaluating its performance compared to its competitors. Investors should also note that the Company’s presentation of OR may not be comparable to similarly titled measures by other companies. OR is calculated as follows:

(2)

A shipment is a single movement of goods from a point of origin to its final destination as described on a bill of lading document.

(3)

Weight (tonnage) represents the total pounds shipped by each LTL business unit.

(4)

Revenue per mile represents TL revenue divided by the total number of miles for the period.

(5)

Revenue per hundredweight is the price obtained for transporting 100 pounds of LTL freight from point to point, calculated by dividing the revenue for an LTL shipment by the hundredweight (weight in pounds divided by 100) for a shipment.

(6)

Empty miles represents the number of miles driven during the period without a loaded shipment by a TL segment owner operator.

(7)

Total miles represents the sum of empty miles and loaded shipment miles driven during the period by a TL segment owner operator.

17

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

The Company is exposed to the impact of interest rate changes. The Company is exposed to changes in interest rates on its borrowings under the term bank facility that has a variable interest rate tied to the LIBOR rate. The term bank credit facility of $22.3 million had a weighted-average interest rate on borrowings of 2.53% in the first six months of 2004. We estimate that the fair value of the term credit facility approximates the carrying value.

The Company’s investment of Cdn $35.3 million in marketable securities is invested in short-term, highly rated government securities, treasury bills and investment grade commercial paper and realized average returns of 2.24% for the six months of 2004.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

a)		As of July 20, 2004, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures in accordance with Rule 13a-15 under the Exchange Act for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 and six-month period ended June 30, 2004. Based on their evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that Vitran’s disclosure controls and procedures enable Vitran to record, process, summarize and report in a timely manner the information that we are required to disclose in our Exchange Act reports.
b)		There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

18

Part II. Other Information

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

There exists certain legal actions against the Company, none of which is expected to have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position or results of operations of the Company.

Item 2. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds

In December of 2003 Vitran, using Avondale Partners as the lead underwriting firm, issued 2,300,000 Class A Voting common shares for gross proceeds of $31.6 million in a public offering. Commissions to the underwriters amounted to $1.6 million and other expenses of the offering amounted to $0.6 million resulting in net proceeds of $29.4 million. As of June 30, 2004, it is still the intention of Vitran’s management to use the net proceeds from the public offering to fund possible future acquisitions, capital expenditures and repay amounts outstanding under credit facilities.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities — None

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders — None

Item 5. Other Information — None

Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

(a)

Exhibits

(b)

Reports on Form 8-K

i) Vitran Corporation Inc. filed a Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 30, 2004 related to a press release to update investors that shareholders approved two new directors at the Company’s annual meeting.

ii) Vitran Corporation Inc. filed a Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 30, 2004 related to a press release to update investors that the Company will trade under a new stock symbol on the Toronto Stock Exchange.

19

iii) Vitran Corporation Inc. filed a Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 30, 2004 related to articles of amendment.

iv) Vitran Corporation Inc. filed a Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 30, 2004 related to an employment agreement between the Company and Rick E. Gaetz.

v) Vitran Corporation Inc. filed a Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 30, 2004 related to an employment agreement between the Company and the Kevin A. Glass.

vi) Vitran Corporation Inc. filed a Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 23, 2004 related to its financial results for the second quarter of 2004.

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

20