UNITED STATES
Form 10-Q
þ
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR
15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 | ||
or | ||
o
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR
15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
For the transition period from to |
Commission file number 1-8972
IndyMac Bancorp, Inc.
Delaware
|
95-3983415 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
155 North Lake Avenue, Pasadena, California (Address of principal executive offices) |
91101-7211 (Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes þ No o
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Common stock outstanding as of April 23, 2004: 57,844,832 shares
FORM 10-Q QUARTERLY REPORT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Form 10-Q contains statements that may be deemed to be forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Forward-looking statements include statements regarding our projected financial condition and results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance and business. Forward-looking statements typically include the words anticipate, believe, estimate, expect, project, plan, forecast, intend and other similar expressions. These statements reflect our current views with respect to future events and financial performance. They are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause future results to differ materially from historical results or from the results anticipated. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of their dates or as of the date hereof if no other date is identified. We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. For further information on our key operating risks, refer to IndyMacs annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.
References to IndyMac Bancorp or the Parent Company refer to the parent company alone while references to IndyMac, the Company, or we refer to IndyMac Bancorp, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries. References to IndyMac Bank or the Bank refer to our subsidiary IndyMac Bank, F.S.B. and its consolidated subsidiaries. The following discussion addresses the Companys financial condition and results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2004.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
HIGHLIGHTS FOR THE QUARTER
Highlights for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, were as follows:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||
March 31, | March 31, | December 31, | ||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2003 | ||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions, except per share data) | ||||||||||||||
Income Statement
|
||||||||||||||
Net interest income after provision for loan
losses
|
$ | 92 | $ | 60 | $ | 94 | ||||||||
Gain on sale of loans
|
$ | 84 | $ | 84 | $ | 80 | ||||||||
Other income
|
$ | 9 | $ | 13 | $ | 4 | ||||||||
Net revenues
|
$ | 185 | $ | 157 | $ | 178 | ||||||||
Operating expenses
|
$ | 115 | $ | 96 | $ | 107 | ||||||||
Net earnings
|
$ | 42 | $ | 37 | $ | 43 | ||||||||
Per Share Data
|
||||||||||||||
Basic earnings per share
|
$ | 0.74 | $ | 0.67 | $ | 0.78 | ||||||||
Diluted earnings per share
|
$ | 0.70 | $ | 0.66 | $ | 0.75 | ||||||||
Dividends paid per share
|
$ | 0.25 | $ | 0.10 | $ | 0.20 | ||||||||
Book value per share at end of quarter
|
$ | 18.26 | $ | 15.99 | $ | 17.93 | ||||||||
Closing price per share
|
$ | 36.29 | $ | 19.45 | $ | 29.79 | ||||||||
Average common shares (in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||
Basic
|
56,997 | 54,827 | 55,878 | |||||||||||
Diluted
|
59,791 | 55,979 | 58,024 |
2
Three Months Ended | |||||||||||||
March 31, | March 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2003 | |||||||||||
(Dollars in millions, except per share data) | |||||||||||||
Performance Ratios
|
|||||||||||||
Return on average equity (annualized)
|
16.16 | % | 17.20 | % | 17.20 | % | |||||||
Return on average assets (annualized)
|
1.16 | % | 1.49 | % | 1.24 | % | |||||||
Dividend payout ratio(1)
|
35.71 | % | 14.93 | % | 26.67 | % | |||||||
Net interest income to pretax income
|
135.53 | % | 103.29 | % | 137.70 | % | |||||||
Average cost of funds
|
2.32 | % | 3.20 | % | 2.36 | % | |||||||
Net interest margin
|
2.82 | % | 2.80 | % | 3.08 | % | |||||||
Efficiency ratio(2)
|
62 | % | 60 | % | 59 | % | |||||||
Capital to net revenue ratio(3)
|
1.40 | % | 1.36 | % | 1.37 | % | |||||||
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio(4)
|
87 | % | 81 | % | 81 | % | |||||||
Operating expenses to loan production
|
1.61 | % | 1.45 | % | 1.63 | % | |||||||
Balance Sheet and Asset Quality
Ratios
|
|||||||||||||
Debt to equity ratio(5)
|
12.7:1 | 9.7:1 | 12.0:1 | ||||||||||
Core capital ratio(6)
|
7.50 | % | 9.14 | % | 7.56 | % | |||||||
Risk-based capital ratio(6)
|
13.25 | % | 14.83 | % | 12.95 | % | |||||||
Non-performing assets to total assets
|
0.75 | % | 1.03 | % | 0.76 | % | |||||||
Allowance for loan losses to total loans held for
investment
|
0.78 | % | 1.20 | % | 0.71 | % | |||||||
Allowance for loan losses and other reserves to
non-performing loans
|
80 | % | 83 | % | 87 | % | |||||||
Allowance for loan losses to annualized net
charge-offs
|
645 | % | 347 | % | 395 | % | |||||||
Provision for loan losses to net charge-offs
|
74.3 | % | 85.8 | % | 104.9 | % | |||||||
Provision to net charge-offs (core loan
portfolio)(7)
|
40.0 | % | 115.9 | % | 150.8 | % | |||||||
Other Selected Items
|
|||||||||||||
Loans serviced(8)
|
$ | 38,930 | $ | 30,944 | $ | 36,858 | |||||||
Loan production(9)
|
$ | 7,146 | $ | 6,585 | $ | 6,577 | |||||||
Pipeline of mortgage loans in process
|
$ | 5,949 | $ | 6,044 | $ | 4,116 | |||||||
Loans sold
|
$ | 4,907 | $ | 5,524 | $ | 4,641 | |||||||
Net margin on sale of loans
|
1.71 | % | 1.52 | % | 1.72 | % |
(1) | Dividends declared per common share as a percentage of diluted earnings per share. |
(2) | Defined as operating expenses divided by net interest income and other income. |
(3) | Average equity divided by net interest income and other income. |
(4) | Efficiency ratio multiplied by the capital to net revenue ratio. |
(5) | Debt includes deposits. |
(6) | IndyMac Bank, F.S.B. (excludes unencumbered cash at the Parent Company available for investment in IndyMac Bank). Risk based capital ratio is based on the regulatory standard risk weighting. With IndyMacs additional subprime risk weightings, the ratios are 12.61%, 13.76% and 12.29% for the quarters ended March 31, 2004, March 31, 2003 and December 31, 2003, respectively. |
(7) | Represents the total loan portfolio excluding amounts of loans from discontinued product lines. |
(8) | Represents entire servicing portfolio including IndyMac owned loans and loans subserviced for others on an interim basis. |
(9) | Includes newly originated commitments on construction loans. |
3
OVERALL RESULTS
We believe IndyMacs performance in the first quarter of 2004 was strong and marked a good start for us in this mortgage industry transition year. Our mortgage production increased 10% this quarter relative to the fourth quarter of 2003, outperforming the overall mortgage industry, which reflected a 7% decline in overall mortgage loans produced according to the Mortgage Bankers Association. Additionally, we continue to execute successfully our strategies to optimize our balance sheet and thrift infrastructure with growth of 6.0% and 5.6%, respectively, in our earning assets and mortgage loan servicing portfolio compared with the fourth quarter of 2003. Throughout all of this, we continued to focus on solid enterprise risk management and the mitigation of interest rate risk in a period of highly volatile interest rates.
Comparing first quarter 2004 to first quarter 2003, net revenues increased 18%, primarily driven by a 49% increase in net interest income, and operating expenses increased 20%, resulting in net earnings of $41.9 million, up 14% over the prior year.
OUR BUSINESS
IndyMac is structured to achieve synergies among its operations and enhance customer service. Operating through its four main segments, IndyMac Mortgage Bank, IndyMac Consumer Bank, Home Equity Division and the Investment Portfolio Group, the common denominator of the Companys business is providing consumers with single-family residential mortgages through relationships with each segments core customers. IndyMac Mortgage Bank is focused on providing consumers with mortgage products through relationships with the Companys business customers mortgage brokers, mortgage bankers, financial institutions, real estate professionals and homebuilders. IndyMac Consumer Bank provides the platform for the mortgage and deposit services that IndyMac offers directly to consumers The Home Equity Division was previously included in the Consumer Bank Segment and has been designated as a separate operating segment this quarter as this unit is now evaluated directly by our CEO in deciding resource allocations and assessing performance. The Home Equity Division is a product focused division that supports the production of home equity lines of credit (HELOCs) and other home equity products through all of IndyMacs relationship and consumer direct production channels. The Investment Portfolio Group serves as the main link to customers whose mortgages we service. Through its investments in single-family residential (SFR) mortgages, mortgage-backed securities (MBS) and mortgage servicing rights (MSRs), the Investment Portfolio Group generates core spread and fee income and provides critical support to IndyMacs mortgage lending operations.
While our segments are structured to achieve synergies with our varying customer base and marketing strategies, our operating activities primarily consist of three broad categories: mortgage banking activities, investing activities and HELOC activities. All of these activities are performed to varying degrees by each of our main segments as shown in the tables that follow. Mortgage banking activities are characterized by high asset turnover (the production and sale of mortgage loans) and efficient utilization of capital but can be cyclical in nature depending on interest rates. Revenues generated by mortgage banking activities include gain on sale of mortgage loans, fee income and net spread (interest) income during the period loans are held pending sale. Investing and HELOC activities tend to provide a source of revenues which is generally counter-cyclical to mortgage banking revenues, comprised primarily of net interest income and servicing fees. IndyMac is strategically focused on increasing the relative size of its portfolios of mortgage loans and mortgage servicing and investments in HELOC-related assets to achieve greater balance between its mortgage banking activities and its core investing activities. We believe that our investing activities will increasingly act to stabilize IndyMacs core income. In addition to its revenue contribution, the Investment Portfolio Group performs the mortgage servicing function, which includes payment processing, customer service, default management and reporting to investors in our securitizations. The mortgage servicing function creates added opportunities to retain customers when the interest rate environment makes it attractive for them to refinance, and cross-market customers with other Company products. Default management, which includes the processes of collections, loss mitigation, foreclosures, bankruptcies, and foreclosed assets management, enables IndyMac to proactively manage credit risk for the Company and its investors in its securities.
4
The following tables summarize the Companys financial results for the three months ended March 31, 2004, illustrating the revenues earned in its mortgage banking activities, investing and HELOC activities by each of its divisions. The profitability of each operating segment is measured on a fully-leveraged basis after allocating capital based on regulatory capital rules. The Company uses a fund transfer pricing (FTP) system to allocate interest income and expense to the operating segments. Each operating segment is allocated funding with maturities and interest rates matched with the expected lives and repricing frequencies of the segments assets. The Retail Bank division within the Consumer Banking Group receives a funding credit for deposits using a similar methodology. The difference between these allocations and the Companys actual net interest income and capital levels resulting from centralized management of funding costs is reported in the Treasury unit. Corporate overhead costs related to managing the Company as a whole are not allocated to the operating segments.
5
The following table summarizes the segment financial highlights for the three months ended March 31, 2004:
Investment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage | Consumer | Home Equity | Portfolio | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bank | Bank | Division | Group | Other | Company | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Results
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage Banking Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
$ | 29,632 | $ | 4,488 | $ | | $ | 7,680 | $ | | $ | 41,800 | ||||||||||||||||
Gain (loss) on sale of loans
|
57,773 | 20,347 | | 13,810 | (8,262 | ) | 83,668 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other income (expense)
|
8,646 | 3,326 | | (2 | ) | 137 | 12,107 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net revenues (expense)
|
96,051 | 28,161 | | 21,488 | (8,125 | ) | 137,575 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
42,217 | 19,850 | | 687 | | 62,754 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Pretax income (loss)
|
53,834 | 8,311 | | 20,801 | (8,125 | ) | 74,821 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Investing Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
17,127 | | | 34,713 | 1,958 | 53,798 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses
|
(200 | ) | | | (1,197 | ) | (3 | ) | (1,400 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Service fee (expense) income
|
| | | (5,562 | ) | 2,223 | (3,339 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Loss) gain on sale of securities
|
| | | (5,793 | ) | 806 | (4,987 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other income
|
1,341 | | | 1,239 | 708 | 3,288 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net revenues
|
18,268 | | | 23,400 | 5,692 | 47,360 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
9,995 | | | 11,478 | | 21,473 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Pretax income
|
8,273 | | | 11,922 | 5,692 | 25,887 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
HELOC Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
2,946 | 1,288 | 746 | | | 4,980 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses
|
(72 | ) | (24 | ) | (4 | ) | | | (100 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Service fee income
|
| | 195 | | | 195 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other income
|
319 | 246 | 151 | | | 716 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net revenues
|
3,193 | 1,510 | 1,088 | | | 5,791 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
422 | 277 | 911 | | | 1,610 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Pretax income
|
2,771 | 1,233 | 177 | | | 4,181 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Financing and Other Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income (loss)
|
| 4,705 | | | (11,350 | ) | (6,645 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other income
|
| 494 | | | 117 | 611 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net revenues (expense)
|
| 5,199 | | | (11,233 | ) | (6,034 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
| 5,035 | | | 24,514 | 29,549 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Pretax income (loss)
|
| 164 | | | (35,747 | ) | (35,583 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total pretax income (loss)
|
64,878 | 9,708 | 177 | 32,723 | (38,180 | ) | 69,306 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss)
|
$ | 39,251 | $ | 5,873 | $ | 107 | $ | 19,798 | $ | (23,099 | ) | $ | 41,930 | |||||||||||||||
Ratios
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percentage of assets
|
33.61 | % | 4.88 | % | 0.78 | % | 55.99 | % | 4.74 | % | 100 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Percentage of total revenue (expense)
|
63.63 | % | 18.88 | % | 0.59 | % | 24.30 | % | (7.40 | )% | 100 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Percentage of pretax income (loss)
|
93.61 | % | 14.01 | % | 0.26 | % | 47.22 | % | (55.10 | )% | 100 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet Data
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average interest-earning assets(1)
|
$ | 4,800,908 | $ | 666,902 | $ | 104,253 | $ | 7,489,153 | $ | 325,677 | $ | 13,386,893 | ||||||||||||||||
Average total assets
|
$ | 4,889,239 | $ | 709,612 | $ | 113,104 | $ | 8,145,785 | $ | 690,632 | $ | 14,548,372 | ||||||||||||||||
Allocated capital
|
$ | 324,541 | $ | 50,406 | $ | 10,040 | $ | 478,766 | $ | 179,569 | $ | 1,043,322 | ||||||||||||||||
Capital allocated to mortgage banking activities
|
$ | 156,107 | $ | 27,147 | $ | | $ | 18,877 | $ | | $ | 202,131 | ||||||||||||||||
Capital allocated to investing activities
|
$ | 134,090 | $ | | $ | | $ | 459,889 | $ | | $ | 593,979 | ||||||||||||||||
Capital allocated to HELOC activities
|
$ | 34,344 | $ | 22,019 | $ | 10,040 | $ | | $ | | $ | 66,403 | ||||||||||||||||
Capital allocated to financing and other
activities
|
$ | | $ | 1,240 | $ | | $ | | $ | 179,569 | $ | 180,809 | ||||||||||||||||
Allocated capital/total average assets
|
6.64 | % | 7.10 | % | 8.88 | % | 5.88 | % | 26.00 | % | 7.17 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Loans Produced
|
$ | 5,862,720 | $ | 967,021 | $ | 34,716 | $ | 281,642 | $ | | $ | 7,146,099 | ||||||||||||||||
Purchase mortgages
|
46 | % | 10 | % | N/A | 0 | % | N/A | 39 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Cash out refinance mortgages
|
35 | % | 57 | % | N/A | 0 | % | N/A | 37 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Rate and term refinance mortgages
|
19 | % | 33 | % | N/A | 100 | % | N/A | 24 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Performance Ratios
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Return on equity (ROE)
|
49 | % | 47 | % | 4 | % | 17 | % | N/A | 16 | % | |||||||||||||||||
ROE mortgage banking activities
|
84 | % | 74 | % | | 268 | % | N/A | 90 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
ROE investing activities
|
15 | % | | | 6 | % | N/A | 11 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
ROE HELOC activities
|
20 | % | 14 | % | 4 | % | | N/A | 15 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
ROE financing and other activities
|
| 32 | % | | | N/A | (48 | )% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Return on assets (ROA)
|
3.23 | % | 3.33 | % | 0.38 | % | 0.98 | % | N/A | 1.16 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Net interest margin
|
4.16 | % | 6.32 | % | 2.88 | % | 2.28 | % | N/A | 2.82 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Efficiency ratio
|
45 | % | 72 | % | 83 | % | 26 | % | N/A | 62 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio
|
31 | % | 26 | % | 192 | % | 69 | % | N/A | 87 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Average FTE
|
1,947 | 857 | 15 | 481 | 621 | 3,921 |
(1) | The allowance for loan losses is excluded from average loan balances for purposes of calculating average interest-earning assets. |
6
The following table provides additional detail on the segment results for IndyMac Mortgage Bank for the three months ended March 31, 2004:
Relationship Businesses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
IndyMac Mortgage Bank | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
B2B | B2R | HCL | HBD | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Results
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage Banking Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
$ | 24,332 | $ | 546 | $ | 3,880 | $ | 874 | $ | 29,632 | ||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of loans
|
50,573 | 1,664 | 3,866 | 1,670 | 57,773 | |||||||||||||||||||
Other income
|
6,393 | 253 | 1,761 | 239 | 8,646 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net revenues
|
81,298 | 2,463 | 9,507 | 2,783 | 96,051 | |||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
35,737 | 3,585 | 779 | 2,116 | 42,217 | |||||||||||||||||||
Pretax income (loss)
|
45,561 | (1,122 | ) | 8,728 | 667 | 53,834 | ||||||||||||||||||
Investing Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
| | 10,297 | 6,830 | 17,127 | |||||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses
|
| | (100 | ) | (100 | ) | (200 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Service fee income
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Loss on sale of securities
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Other income
|
| | 1,241 | 100 | 1,341 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net revenues
|
| | 11,438 | 6,830 | 18,268 | |||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
| | 7,968 | 2,027 | 9,995 | |||||||||||||||||||
Pretax income
|
| | 3,470 | 4,803 | 8,273 | |||||||||||||||||||
HELOC Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
2,707 | 126 | 39 | 74 | 2,946 | |||||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses
|
(67 | ) | (3 | ) | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | (72 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Service fee income
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Other income
|
284 | 21 | 9 | 5 | 319 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net revenues
|
2,924 | 144 | 47 | 78 | 3,193 | |||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
378 | 30 | 6 | 8 | 422 | |||||||||||||||||||
Pretax income
|
2,546 | 114 | 41 | 70 | 2,771 | |||||||||||||||||||
Financing and Other Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Other income
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Net revenues
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Pretax income
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Total pretax income (loss)
|
48,107 | (1,008 | ) | 12,239 | 5,540 | 64,878 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss)
|
$ | 29,105 | $ | (610 | ) | $ | 7,405 | $ | 3,351 | $ | 39,251 | |||||||||||||
Ratios
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percentage of assets
|
17.80 | % | 0.54 | % | 10.49 | % | 4.78 | % | 33.61 | % | ||||||||||||||
Percentage of total revenue
|
45.60 | % | 1.41 | % | 11.37 | % | 5.25 | % | 63.63 | % | ||||||||||||||
Percentage of pretax income (loss)
|
69.41 | % | (1.45 | )% | 17.66 | % | 7.99 | % | 93.61 | % | ||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet Data
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average interest-earning assets
|
$ | 2,514,066 | $ | 76,873 | $ | 1,519,899 | $ | 690,070 | $ | 4,800,908 | ||||||||||||||
Average total assets
|
$ | 2,590,331 | $ | 78,492 | $ | 1,525,436 | $ | 694,980 | $ | 4,889,239 | ||||||||||||||
Allocated capital
|
$ | 169,220 | $ | 5,157 | $ | 80,078 | $ | 70,086 | $ | 324,541 | ||||||||||||||
Capital allocated to mortgage banking activities
|
$ | 137,902 | $ | 3,277 | $ | 10,009 | $ | 4,919 | $ | 156,107 | ||||||||||||||
Capital allocated to investing activities
|
$ | | $ | | $ | 69,654 | $ | 64,436 | $ | 134,090 | ||||||||||||||
Capital allocated to HELOC activities
|
$ | 31,318 | $ | 1,880 | $ | 415 | $ | 731 | $ | 34,344 | ||||||||||||||
Capital allocated to financing and other
activities
|
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||||||
Allocated capital/total average assets
|
6.53 | % | 6.57 | % | 5.25 | % | 10.08 | % | 6.64 | % | ||||||||||||||
Loans Produced
|
$ | 4,472,381 | $ | 109,027 | $ | 872,339 | $ | 408,973 | $ | 5,862,720 | ||||||||||||||
Purchase mortgages
|
34 | % | 51 | % | 99 | % | 84 | % | 46 | % | ||||||||||||||
Cash out refinance mortgages
|
43 | % | 34 | % | 0 | % | 11 | % | 35 | % | ||||||||||||||
Rate and term refinance mortgages
|
23 | % | 15 | % | 1 | % | 5 | % | 19 | % | ||||||||||||||
Performance Ratios
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Return on equity (ROE)
|
69 | % | (48 | )% | 37 | % | 19 | % | 49 | % | ||||||||||||||
ROE mortgage banking activities
|
80 | % | (83 | )% | 212 | % | 33 | % | 84 | % | ||||||||||||||
ROE investing activities
|
| | 12 | % | 18 | % | 15 | % | ||||||||||||||||
ROE HELOC activities
|
20 | % | 15 | % | 24 | % | 23 | % | 20 | % | ||||||||||||||
ROE financing and other activities
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Return on assets (ROA)
|
4.52 | % | (3.13 | )% | 1.95 | % | 1.94 | % | 3.23 | % | ||||||||||||||
Net interest margin
|
4.33 | % | 3.52 | % | 3.76 | % | 4.53 | % | 4.16 | % | ||||||||||||||
Efficiency ratio
|
43 | % | 139 | % | 41 | % | 42 | % | 45 | % | ||||||||||||||
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio
|
22 | % | 68 | % | 39 | % | 76 | % | 31 | % | ||||||||||||||
Average FTE
|
1,378 | 134 | 278 | 157 | 1,947 |
IndyMac Mortgage Bank Divisions | ||
B2B
|
Business-to-Business division, its major lending channels are via relationships with mortgage professionals: mortgage brokers, mortgage bankers and financial institutions | |
B2R
|
Business-to-Realtor division, provides mortgage loan services through relationships with Realtors | |
HCL
|
Home Construction Lending division, provides construction-to-permanent mortgages and lot loans to individuals who are in the process of building their own homes, through IndyMacs B2B relationships and directly with consumers | |
HBD
|
Homebuilder division, provides financing to subdivision developers and generates mortgage loans through its relationships with these entities |
7
The following table provides additional details on the segment results for IndyMac Consumer Bank and Home Equity Division for the three months ended March 31, 2004:
Consumer Direct Businesses | ||||||||||||||||||||
IndyMac Consumer Bank | ||||||||||||||||||||
Home Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||
B2C | Retail Bank | Total | Division | |||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Results
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage Banking Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
$ | 4,171 | $ | 317 | $ | 4,488 | $ | | ||||||||||||
Gain on sale of loans
|
18,706 | 1,641 | 20,347 | | ||||||||||||||||
Other income
|
3,132 | 194 | 3,326 | | ||||||||||||||||
Net revenues
|
26,009 | 2,152 | 28,161 | | ||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
18,362 | 1,488 | 19,850 | | ||||||||||||||||
Pretax income
|
7,647 | 664 | 8,311 | | ||||||||||||||||
Investing Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
| | | | ||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses
|
| | | | ||||||||||||||||
Service fee income
|
| | | | ||||||||||||||||
Loss on sale of securities
|
| | | | ||||||||||||||||
Other income
|
| | | | ||||||||||||||||
Net revenues
|
| | | | ||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
| | | | ||||||||||||||||
Pretax income
|
| | | | ||||||||||||||||
HELOC Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
1,158 | 130 | 1,288 | 746 | ||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses
|
(21 | ) | (3 | ) | (24 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||||||||||
Service fee income
|
| | | 195 | ||||||||||||||||
Other income
|
226 | 20 | 246 | 151 | ||||||||||||||||
Net revenues
|
1,363 | 147 | 1,510 | 1,088 | ||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
248 | 29 | 277 | 911 | ||||||||||||||||
Pretax income
|
1,115 | 118 | 1,233 | 177 | ||||||||||||||||
Financing and Other Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
| 4,705 | 4,705 | | ||||||||||||||||
Other income
|
| 494 | 494 | | ||||||||||||||||
Net revenues
|
| 5,199 | 5,199 | | ||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
| 5,035 | 5,035 | | ||||||||||||||||
Pretax income
|
| 164 | 164 | | ||||||||||||||||
Total pretax income
|
8,762 | 946 | 9,708 | 177 | ||||||||||||||||
Net income
|
$ | 5,301 | $ | 572 | $ | 5,873 | $ | 107 | ||||||||||||
Ratios
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Percentage of assets
|
4.31 | % | 0.57 | % | 4.88 | % | 0.78 | % | ||||||||||||
Percentage of total revenue
|
14.82 | % | 4.06 | % | 18.88 | % | 0.59 | % | ||||||||||||
Percentage of pretax income
|
12.64 | % | 1.36 | % | 14.01 | % | 0.26 | % | ||||||||||||
Balance Sheet Data
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Average interest-earning assets
|
$ | 605,488 | $ | 61,414 | $ | 666,902 | $ | 104,253 | ||||||||||||
Average total assets
|
$ | 626,627 | $ | 82,985 | $ | 709,612 | $ | 113,104 | ||||||||||||
Allocated capital
|
$ | 45,212 | $ | 5,194 | $ | 50,406 | $ | 10,040 | ||||||||||||
Capital allocated to mortgage banking activities
|
$ | 25,478 | $ | 1,669 | $ | 27,147 | $ | | ||||||||||||
Capital allocated to investing activities
|
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||||
Capital allocated to HELOC activities
|
$ | 19,735 | $ | 2,284 | $ | 22,019 | $ | 10,040 | ||||||||||||
Capital allocated to financing and other
activities
|
$ | | $ | 1,240 | $ | 1,240 | $ | | ||||||||||||
Allocated capital/total average assets
|
7.22 | % | 6.26 | % | 7.10 | % | 8.88 | % | ||||||||||||
Loans Produced(1)
|
$ | 878,494 | $ | 88,527 | $ | 967,021 | $ | 34,716 | ||||||||||||
Purchase mortgages
|
8 | % | 26 | % | 10 | % | N/A | |||||||||||||
Cash out refinance mortgages
|
58 | % | 51 | % | 57 | % | N/A | |||||||||||||
Rate and term refinance mortgages
|
34 | % | 23 | % | 33 | % | N/A | |||||||||||||
Performance Ratios
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Return on equity (ROE)
|
47 | % | 44 | % | 47 | % | 4 | % | ||||||||||||
ROE mortgage banking activities
|
73 | % | 97 | % | 74 | % | | |||||||||||||
ROE investing activities
|
| | | | ||||||||||||||||
ROE HELOC activities
|
14 | % | 13 | % | 14 | % | 4 | % | ||||||||||||
ROE financing and other activities
|
| 32 | % | 32 | % | | ||||||||||||||
Return on assets (ROA)
|
3.40 | % | N/A | 3.33 | % | 0.38 | % | |||||||||||||
Net interest margin
|
3.54 | % | N/A | 6.32 | % | 2.88 | % | |||||||||||||
Efficiency ratio
|
68 | % | 87 | % | 72 | % | 83 | % | ||||||||||||
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio
|
28 | % | 15 | % | 26 | % | 192 | % | ||||||||||||
Average FTE
|
599 | 258 | 857 | 15 |
IndyMac Consumer Bank Divisions | ||
B2C
|
Business-to-Consumer division, offers SFR mortgage loans directly to consumers via the Internet and centralized call center | |
Retail Bank
|
Retail Bank division, offers direct lending and deposit products to our depositors through our retail branch network, on-line contact center, and institutional money desk |
8
The following table provides additional details on the segment results for the Investment Portfolio Group for the three months ended March 31, 2004:
Investment Portfolio Group | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Servicing-Related | SFR Mortgage | Discontinued | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Assets(1) | Loans(2) | MBS(3) | Products(4) | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Results
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage Banking Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
$ | 7,680 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 7,680 | ||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of loans
|
13,514 | 296 | | | 13,810 | |||||||||||||||||||
Other (loss) income
|
(2 | ) | | | | (2 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Net revenues
|
21,192 | 296 | | | 21,488 | |||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
687 | | | | 687 | |||||||||||||||||||
Pretax income
|
20,505 | 296 | | | 20,801 | |||||||||||||||||||
Investing Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
7,234 | 18,334 | 8,044 | 1,101 | 34,713 | |||||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses
|
| (97 | ) | | (1,100 | ) | (1,197 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Service fee expense
|
(5,562 | ) | | | | (5,562 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
(Loss) gain on sale of securities
|
(6,693 | ) | | 900 | | (5,793 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Other income
|
484 | 755 | | | 1,239 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net (expense) revenues
|
(4,537 | ) | 18,992 | 8,944 | 1 | 23,400 | ||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
9,203 | 918 | 305 | 1,052 | 11,478 | |||||||||||||||||||
Pretax (loss) income
|
(13,740 | ) | 18,074 | 8,639 | (1,051 | ) | 11,922 | |||||||||||||||||
HELOC Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Service fee income
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Other income
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Net revenues
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Pretax income
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Financing and Other Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Other income
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Net revenues
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Pretax income
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Total pretax income (loss)
|
6,765 | 18,370 | 8,639 | (1,051 | ) | 32,723 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss)
|
$ | 4,093 | $ | 11,114 | $ | 5,227 | $ | (636 | ) | $ | 19,798 | |||||||||||||
Ratios
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percentage of assets
|
11.13 | % | 33.34 | % | 11.11 | % | 0.42 | % | 55.99 | % | ||||||||||||||
Percentage of total revenue
|
9.02 | % | 10.44 | % | 4.84 | % | 0.00 | % | 24.30 | % | ||||||||||||||
Percentage of pretax income (loss)
|
9.76 | % | 26.51 | % | 12.47 | % | (1.52 | )% | 47.22 | % | ||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet Data
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average interest-earning assets
|
$ | 991,723 | $ | 4,839,307 | $ | 1,590,575 | $ | 67,548 | $ | 7,489,153 | ||||||||||||||
Average total assets
|
$ | 1,618,683 | $ | 4,850,752 | $ | 1,615,815 | $ | 60,535 | $ | 8,145,785 | ||||||||||||||
Allocated capital
|
$ | 200,874 | $ | 234,973 | $ | 37,009 | $ | 5,910 | $ | 478,766 | ||||||||||||||
Capital allocated to mortgage banking activities
|
$ | 18,877 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 18,877 | ||||||||||||||
Capital allocated to investing activities
|
$ | 181,997 | $ | 234,973 | $ | 37,009 | $ | 5,910 | $ | 459,889 | ||||||||||||||
Capital allocated to HELOC activities
|
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||||||
Capital allocated to financing and other
activities
|
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||||||
Allocated capital/ total average assets
|
12.41 | % | 4.84 | % | 2.29 | % | 9.76 | % | 5.88 | % | ||||||||||||||
Loans Produced
|
$ | 281,642 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 281,642 | ||||||||||||||
Performance Ratios
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Return on equity (ROE)
|
8 | % | 19 | % | 57 | % | (43 | )% | 17 | % | ||||||||||||||
ROE mortgage banking activities
|
264 | % | | | | 268 | % | |||||||||||||||||
ROE investing activities
|
(18 | )% | 19 | % | 57 | % | (43 | )% | 6 | % | ||||||||||||||
ROE HELOC activities
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
ROE financing and other activities
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Return on assets (ROA)
|
1.02 | % | 0.92 | % | 1.30 | % | (4.23 | )% | 0.98 | % | ||||||||||||||
Net interest margin
|
6.05 | % | 1.52 | % | 2.03 | % | 6.56 | % | 2.28 | % | ||||||||||||||
Efficiency ratio
|
59 | % | 5 | % | 3 | % | 96 | % | 26 | % | ||||||||||||||
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio
|
179 | % | 14 | % | 4 | % | 128 | % | 69 | % | ||||||||||||||
Average FTE
|
437 | 11 | 4 | 29 | 481 |
(1) | Mortgage servicing-related assets include the following: (i) MSRs, interest-only strips and residual securities, (ii) securities held as hedges of such assets, including principal-only securities, agency debentures and U.S. treasury bonds, (iii) loans acquired through clean-up calls or through the Investment Portfolio Groups customer retention programs, and (iv) investment and non-investment grade securities. |
(2) | Assets include all single-family residential loans held for investment other than discontinued products. |
(3) | Assets include AAA-rated agency and private label MBS. |
(4) | Discontinued products are home improvement and manufactured housing loans. |
9
The following table provides additional details on the segment results for all others for the three months ended March 31, 2004:
Treasury | Corporate | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Group(1) | Subtotal | Overhead | Eliminations | Company | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Results
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage Banking Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
$ | | $ | 41,800 | $ | | $ | | $ | 41,800 | ||||||||||||||
Gain (loss) on sale of loans
|
| 91,930 | | (8,262 | ) | 83,668 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other income
|
| 11,970 | | 137 | 12,107 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net revenues (expense)
|
| 145,700 | | (8,125 | ) | 137,575 | ||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
| 62,754 | | | 62,754 | |||||||||||||||||||
Pretax income (loss)
|
| 82,946 | | (8,125 | ) | 74,821 | ||||||||||||||||||
Investing Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
| 51,840 | | 1,958 | 53,798 | |||||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses
|
| (1,397 | ) | | (3 | ) | (1,400 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Service fee (expense) income
|
| (5,562 | ) | | 2,223 | (3,339 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
(Loss) gain on sale of securities
|
| (5,793 | ) | | 806 | (4,987 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Other income
|
| 2,580 | 708 | | 3,288 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net revenues
|
| 41,668 | 708 | 4,984 | 47,360 | |||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
| 21,473 | | | 21,473 | |||||||||||||||||||
Pretax income
|
| 20,195 | 708 | 4,984 | 25,887 | |||||||||||||||||||
HELOC Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
| 4,980 | | | 4,980 | |||||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses
|
| (100 | ) | | | (100 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Service fee income
|
| 195 | | | 195 | |||||||||||||||||||
Other income
|
| 716 | | | 716 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net revenues
|
| 5,791 | | | 5,791 | |||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
| 1,610 | | | 1,610 | |||||||||||||||||||
Pretax income
|
| 4,181 | | | 4,181 | |||||||||||||||||||
Financing and Other Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest loss
|
(10,682 | ) | (5,977 | ) | (668 | ) | | (6,645 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Other income
|
114 | 608 | | 3 | 611 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net (expense) revenues
|
(10,568 | ) | (5,369 | ) | (668 | ) | 3 | (6,034 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
873 | 5,908 | 23,641 | | 29,549 | |||||||||||||||||||
Pretax (loss) income
|
(11,441 | ) | (11,277 | ) | (24,309 | ) | 3 | (35,583 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total pretax (loss) income
|
(11,441 | ) | 96,045 | (23,601 | ) | (3,138 | ) | 69,306 | ||||||||||||||||
Net (loss) income
|
$ | (6,922 | ) | $ | 58,107 | $ | (14,279 | ) | $ | (1,898 | ) | $ | 41,930 | |||||||||||
Ratios
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percentage of assets
|
3.55 | % | 98.81 | % | 1.19 | % | 0.00 | % | 100 | % | ||||||||||||||
Percentage of total (expense) revenue
|
(5.72 | )% | 101.68 | % | 0.02 | % | (1.70 | )% | 100 | % | ||||||||||||||
Percentage of pretax (loss) income
|
(16.51 | )% | 138.59 | % | (34.06 | )% | (4.53 | )% | 100 | % | ||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet Data
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average interest-earning assets
|
$ | 317,084 | $ | 13,378,300 | $ | 8,593 | $ | | $ | 13,386,893 | ||||||||||||||
Average total assets
|
$ | 516,485 | $ | 14,374,225 | $ | 174,147 | $ | | $ | 14,548,372 | ||||||||||||||
Allocated capital
|
$ | 27,378 | $ | 891,131 | $ | 152,191 | $ | | $ | 1,043,322 | ||||||||||||||
Capital allocated to mortgage banking activities
|
$ | | $ | 202,131 | $ | | $ | | $ | 202,131 | ||||||||||||||
Capital allocated to investing activities
|
$ | | $ | 593,979 | $ | | $ | | $ | 593,979 | ||||||||||||||
Capital allocated to HELOC activities
|
$ | | $ | 66,403 | $ | | $ | | $ | 66,403 | ||||||||||||||
Capital allocated to financing and other
activities
|
$ | 27,378 | $ | 28,618 | $ | 152,191 | $ | | $ | 180,809 | ||||||||||||||
Allocated capital/ total average assets
|
5.30 | % | 6.20 | % | 87.39 | % | | 7.17 | % | |||||||||||||||
Loans Produced
|
$ | | $ | 7,146,099 | $ | | $ | | $ | 7,146,099 | ||||||||||||||
Purchase mortgages
|
N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 39 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Cash out refinance mortgages
|
N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 37 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Rate and term refinance mortgages
|
N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 24 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Performance Ratios
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Return on equity (ROE)
|
N/A | 26 | % | N/A | N/A | 16 | % | |||||||||||||||||
ROE mortgage banking
|
N/A | 100 | % | N/A | N/A | 90 | % | |||||||||||||||||
ROE investing activities
|
N/A | 8 | % | N/A | N/A | 11 | % | |||||||||||||||||
ROE HELOC activities
|
N/A | 15 | % | N/A | N/A | 15 | % | |||||||||||||||||
ROE financing and other activities
|
N/A | (96 | )% | N/A | N/A | (48 | )% | |||||||||||||||||
Return on assets (ROA)
|
N/A | 1.63 | % | N/A | N/A | 1.16 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Net interest margin
|
N/A | 2.79 | % | N/A | N/A | 2.82 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Efficiency ratio
|
N/A | 48 | % | N/A | N/A | 62 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio
|
N/A | 57 | % | N/A | N/A | 87 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Average FTE
|
25 | 3,325 | 596 | N/A | 3,921 |
(1) | During the three months ended March 31, 2004, the Treasury Group reported net interest expense of $10.7 million. This amount includes interest expenses related to the trust preferred debentures issued by the Company in 2003 and 2001, which is not allocated to the business units. The Treasury Group also credits the Retail Bank and Investment Portfolio Group amounts in addition to their normal FTP credit to reward their raising of core deposits. Additionally, the net expense in Treasury reflects the cost of maintaining adequate corporate liquidity, as well as certain fixed rate deposits with longer maturities raised in prior years, the higher cost of which is not allocated to the business units. |
10
The following table compares the quarterly detail segment results of operations by period:
Relationship Businesses IndyMac Mortgage Bank | ||||||||||||||||||||
B2B | B2R | HCL | HBD | Total | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage Banking Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Q1 04 Pretax income (loss)
|
$ | 45,561 | $ | (1,122 | ) | $ | 8,728 | $ | 667 | $ | 53,834 | |||||||||
Q4 03 Pretax income (loss)
|
44,648 | (159 | ) | 13,161 | 1,087 | 58,737 | ||||||||||||||
Annualized Percent Change
|
8 | % | (2,423 | )% | (135 | )% | (155 | )% | (33 | )% | ||||||||||
Q1 03 Pretax income (loss)
|
55,221 | (197 | ) | 8,363 | 882 | 64,269 | ||||||||||||||
Percent Change
|
(17 | )% | (470 | )% | 4 | % | (24 | )% | (16 | )% | ||||||||||
Investing Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Q1 04 Pretax income
|
| | 3,470 | 4,803 | 8,273 | |||||||||||||||
Q4 03 Pretax income
|
| | 3,467 | 5,076 | 8,543 | |||||||||||||||
Annualized Percent Change
|
NM | NM | 0 | % | (22 | )% | (13 | )% | ||||||||||||
Q1 03 Pretax income
|
| | 3,820 | 5,491 | 9,311 | |||||||||||||||
Percent Change
|
NM | NM | (9 | )% | (13 | )% | (11 | )% | ||||||||||||
HELOC Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Q1 04 Pretax income
|
2,546 | 114 | 41 | 70 | 2,771 | |||||||||||||||
Q4 03 Pretax income
|
1,634 | 55 | 34 | 41 | 1,764 | |||||||||||||||
Annualized Percent Change
|
223 | % | 429 | % | 82 | % | 283 | % | 228 | % | ||||||||||
Q1 03 Pretax income
|
928 | 79 | 52 | 7 | 1,066 | |||||||||||||||
Percent Change
|
174 | % | 44 | % | (21 | )% | 900 | % | 160 | % | ||||||||||
Financing and Other Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Q1 04 Pretax income
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Q4 03 Pretax income
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Q1 03 Pretax income
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Net Income
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Q1 04 Net income (loss)
|
29,105 | (610 | ) | 7,405 | 3,351 | 39,251 | ||||||||||||||
Q4 03 Net income (loss)
|
28,001 | (63 | ) | 10,081 | 3,753 | 41,772 | ||||||||||||||
Annualized Percent Change
|
16 | % | (3,473 | )% | (106 | )% | (43 | )% | (24 | )% | ||||||||||
Q1 03 Net income (loss)
|
33,970 | (71 | ) | 7,402 | 3,860 | 45,161 | ||||||||||||||
Percent Change
|
(14 | )% | (759 | )% | 0 | % | (13 | )% | (13 | )% | ||||||||||
Performance Ratios
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Q1 04
|
||||||||||||||||||||
ROE
|
69 | % | (48 | )% | 37 | % | 19 | % | 49 | % | ||||||||||
ROA
|
4.52 | % | (3.13 | )% | 1.95 | % | 1.94 | % | 3.23 | % | ||||||||||
NIM
|
4.33 | % | 3.52 | % | 3.76 | % | 4.53 | % | 4.16 | % | ||||||||||
Efficiency ratio
|
43 | % | 139 | % | 41 | % | 42 | % | 45 | % | ||||||||||
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio
|
22 | % | 68 | % | 39 | % | 76 | % | 31 | % | ||||||||||
Average FTE
|
1,378 | 134 | 278 | 157 | 1,947 | |||||||||||||||
Q4 03
|
||||||||||||||||||||
ROE
|
73 | % | (4 | )% | 55 | % | 23 | % | 56 | % | ||||||||||
ROA
|
4.77 | % | (0.30 | )% | 2.95 | % | 2.32 | % | 3.76 | % | ||||||||||
NIM
|
4.24 | % | 4.23 | % | 4.06 | % | 4.90 | % | 4.28 | % | ||||||||||
Efficiency ratio
|
41 | % | 102 | % | 35 | % | 37 | % | 41 | % | ||||||||||
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio
|
20 | % | 44 | % | 25 | % | 60 | % | 26 | % | ||||||||||
Average FTE
|
1,411 | 146 | 258 | 137 | 1,952 | |||||||||||||||
Q1 03
|
||||||||||||||||||||
ROE
|
95 | % | (4 | )% | 49 | % | 22 | % | 65 | % | ||||||||||
ROA
|
6.28 | % | (0.26 | )% | 2.67 | % | 2.33 | % | 4.47 | % | ||||||||||
NIM
|
4.66 | % | 4.04 | % | 4.39 | % | 4.94 | % | 4.62 | % | ||||||||||
Efficiency ratio
|
34 | % | 102 | % | 35 | % | 33 | % | 36 | % | ||||||||||
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio
|
14 | % | 41 | % | 28 | % | 58 | % | 22 | % | ||||||||||
Average FTE
|
1,074 | 145 | 211 | 90 | 1,520 |
The Mortgage Bank segments net income decreased by 6%, or $2.5 million compared to the fourth quarter 2003, and 13% or $5.9 million from the first quarter 2003. The decrease was primarily due to the increase in operating expenses, partially offset by the increase in net interest income. Our operating expenses increased as we expanded our sales force to support the continuing growth in our mortgage production. Additionally, we incurred additional marketing costs to promote our product offerings and gain market share. The increase in net interest income was attributable to the increase in average interest-earning assets, as we sold a smaller percentage of loans to loans produced while our production volume went up.
11
The following table compares the quarterly detail segment results of operations by period, continued:
Consumer Direct Businesses | ||||||||||||||||
IndyMac Consumer Bank | ||||||||||||||||
Home Equity | ||||||||||||||||
B2C | Retail Bank | Total | Division | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Mortgage Banking Activities
|
||||||||||||||||
Q1 04 Pretax income
|
$ | 7,647 | $ | 664 | $ | 8,311 | $ | | ||||||||
Q4 03 Pretax income
|
8,406 | 368 | 8,774 | | ||||||||||||
Annualized Percent Change
|
(36 | )% | 322 | % | (21 | )% | | |||||||||
Q1 03 Pretax income
|
16,249 | 674 | 16,923 | | ||||||||||||
Percent Change
|
(53 | )% | (1 | )% | (51 | )% | | |||||||||
Investing Activities
|
||||||||||||||||
Q1 04 Pretax income
|
| | | | ||||||||||||
Q4 03 Pretax income
|
| | | | ||||||||||||
Annualized Percent Change
|
NM | NM | % | | ||||||||||||
Q1 03 Pretax income
|
| | | | ||||||||||||
Percent Change
|
NM | NM | % | | ||||||||||||
HELOC Activities
|
||||||||||||||||
Q1 04 Pretax income
|
1,115 | 118 | 1,233 | 177 | ||||||||||||
Q4 03 Pretax income
|
604 | 45 | 649 | 153 | ||||||||||||
Annualized Percent Change
|
338 | % | 649 | % | 360 | % | 63 | % | ||||||||
Q1 03 Pretax income
|
472 | 78 | 550 | (560 | ) | |||||||||||
Percent Change
|
136 | % | 51 | % | 124 | % | 132 | % | ||||||||
Financing and Other Activities
|
||||||||||||||||
Q1 04 Pretax income
|
| 164 | 164 | | ||||||||||||
Q4 03 Pretax income
|
| 209 | 209 | | ||||||||||||
Q1 03 Pretax loss
|
| (3,344 | ) | (3,344 | ) | | ||||||||||
Net Income
|
||||||||||||||||
Q1 04 Net income
|
5,301 | 572 | 5,873 | 107 | ||||||||||||
Q4 03 Net income
|
5,451 | 376 | 5,827 | 93 | ||||||||||||
Annualized Percent Change
|
(11 | )% | 209 | % | 3 | % | 60 | % | ||||||||
Q1 03 Net income (loss)
|
10,116 | (1,568 | ) | 8,548 | (339 | ) | ||||||||||
Percent Change
|
(48 | )% | 136 | % | (31 | )% | 132 | % | ||||||||
Performance Ratios
|
||||||||||||||||
Q1 04
|
||||||||||||||||
ROE
|
47 | % | 44 | % | 47 | % | 4 | % | ||||||||
ROA
|
3.40 | % | | 3.33 | % | 0.38 | % | |||||||||
NIM
|
3.54 | % | | 6.32 | % | 2.88 | % | |||||||||
Efficiency ratio
|
68 | % | 87 | % | 72 | % | 83 | % | ||||||||
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio
|
28 | % | 15 | % | 26 | % | 192 | % | ||||||||
Average FTE
|
599 | 258 | 857 | 15 | ||||||||||||
Q4 03
|
||||||||||||||||
ROE
|
50 | % | 31 | % | 48 | % | 5 | % | ||||||||
ROA
|
3.51 | % | NM | 3.33 | % | 0.46 | % | |||||||||
NIM
|
3.60 | % | NM | 6.61 | % | 3.15 | % | |||||||||
Efficiency ratio
|
63 | % | 91 | % | 69 | % | 62 | % | ||||||||
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio
|
27 | % | 15 | % | 25 | % | 184 | % | ||||||||
Average FTE
|
613 | 251 | 864 | 15 | ||||||||||||
Q1 03
|
||||||||||||||||
ROE
|
94 | % | (73 | )% | 66 | % | (84 | )% | ||||||||
ROA
|
6.54 | % | NM | 4.97 | % | (8.49 | )% | |||||||||
NIM
|
3.89 | % | NM | 4.75 | % | (7.55 | )% | |||||||||
Efficiency ratio
|
46 | % | 176 | % | 59 | % | 226 | % | ||||||||
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio
|
16 | % | 114 | % | 22 | % | 229 | % | ||||||||
Average FTE
|
553 | 202 | 755 | 9 |
The Consumer Bank segments first quarter 2004 net income was comparable to the fourth quarter 2003, while decreased by $2.7 million compared to the first quarter a year ago. The decrease in net income year over year was primarily due to lower mortgage production, consistent with the overall market trends.
The Home Equity Division (the Division) generated net income of $107,000 during the first quarter 2004 as compared to a net income of $93,000 in the fourth quarter 2003, and a net loss of $339,000 in the first quarter 2003. The increase in net income from both quarters was driven by the increase in net interest income, resulting from increase in average interest-earning assets as the Division continues to grow.
12
The following table compares the quarterly detail segment results of operations by period, continued:
Investment Portfolio Group | ||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage | ||||||||||||||||||||
Servicing- | SFR | |||||||||||||||||||
Related | Mortgage | Discontinued | ||||||||||||||||||
Assets | Loans | MBS | Products | Total | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage Banking Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Q1 04 Pretax income
|
$ | 20,505 | $ | 296 | $ | | $ | | $ | 20,801 | ||||||||||
Q4 03 Pretax income
|
29,366 | 1,593 | | | 30,959 | |||||||||||||||
Annualized Percent Change
|
(121 | )% | (326 | )% | | | (131 | )% | ||||||||||||
Q1 03 Pretax income
|
11,578 | | | | 11,578 | |||||||||||||||
Percent Change
|
77 | % | | | | 80 | % | |||||||||||||
Investing Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Q1 04 Pretax (loss) income
|
(13,740 | ) | 18,074 | 8,639 | (1,051 | ) | 11,922 | |||||||||||||
Q4 03 Pretax (loss) income
|
(12,949 | ) | 15,295 | 6,838 | (786 | ) | 8,398 | |||||||||||||
Annualized Percent Change
|
(24 | )% | 73 | % | 105 | % | (135 | )% | 168 | % | ||||||||||
Q1 03 Pretax (loss) income
|
(4,878 | ) | 6,453 | (2,461 | ) | (842 | ) | (1,728 | ) | |||||||||||
Percent Change
|
(182 | )% | 180 | % | 451 | % | (25 | )% | 790 | % | ||||||||||
HELOC Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Q1 04 Pretax income
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Q4 03 Pretax income
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Annualized Percent Change
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Q1 03 Pretax income
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Percent Change
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Financing and Other Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Q1 04 Pretax income
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Q4 03 Pretax income
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Q1 03 Pretax income
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Net Income
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Q1 04 Net income (loss)
|
4,093 | 11,114 | 5,227 | (636 | ) | 19,798 | ||||||||||||||
Q4 03 Net income (loss)
|
9,932 | 10,217 | 4,137 | (476 | ) | 23,810 | ||||||||||||||
Annualized Percent Change
|
(235 | )% | 35 | % | 105 | % | (134 | )% | (67 | )% | ||||||||||
Q1 03 Net income (loss)
|
4,054 | 3,904 | (1,489 | ) | (509 | ) | 5,960 | |||||||||||||
Percent Change
|
1 | % | 185 | % | 451 | % | (25 | )% | 232 | % | ||||||||||
Performance Ratios
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Q1 04
|
||||||||||||||||||||
ROE
|
8 | % | 19 | % | 57 | % | (43 | )% | 17 | % | ||||||||||
ROA
|
1.02 | % | 0.92 | % | 1.30 | % | (4.23 | )% | 0.98 | % | ||||||||||
NIM
|
6.05 | % | 1.52 | % | 2.03 | % | 6.56 | % | 2.28 | % | ||||||||||
Efficiency ratio
|
59 | % | 5 | % | 3 | % | 96 | % | 26 | % | ||||||||||
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio
|
179 | % | 14 | % | 4 | % | 128 | % | 69 | % | ||||||||||
Average FTE
|
437 | 11 | 4 | 29 | 481 | |||||||||||||||
Q4 03
|
||||||||||||||||||||
ROE
|
18 | % | 20 | % | 52 | % | (29 | )% | 20 | % | ||||||||||
ROA
|
1.75 | % | 0.96 | % | 1.13 | % | (2.89 | )% | 1.18 | % | ||||||||||
NIM
|
6.00 | % | 1.61 | % | 2.04 | % | 7.21 | % | 2.70 | % | ||||||||||
Efficiency ratio
|
37 | % | 6 | % | 4 | % | 65 | % | 22 | % | ||||||||||
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio
|
80 | % | 17 | % | 5 | % | 79 | % | 48 | % | ||||||||||
Average FTE
|
396 | 9 | 3 | 33 | 441 | |||||||||||||||
Q1 03
|
||||||||||||||||||||
ROE
|
8 | % | 20 | % | (14 | )% | (25 | )% | 7 | % | ||||||||||
ROA
|
1.11 | % | 0.83 | % | (0.41 | )% | (2.42 | )% | 0.49 | % | ||||||||||
NIM
|
5.12 | % | 1.43 | % | (0.84 | )% | 7.04 | % | 1.72 | % | ||||||||||
Efficiency ratio
|
54 | % | 10 | % | (7 | )% | 55 | % | 46 | % | ||||||||||
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio
|
183 | % | 27 | % | 32 | % | 70 | % | 180 | % | ||||||||||
Average FTE
|
404 | 6 | 4 | 36 | 450 |
The Investment Portfolio Group segments net income in the first quarter of 2004 increased $13.8 million compared to the first quarter of 2003. The increase was largely due to the net interest income and gain on sale of loans from the clean-up call activities and the servicing retention program implemented during 2003. This increase was somewhat offset by declines in servicing income due to declining interest rates in the first quarter 2004. However, compared to the fourth quarter 2003, the net income decreased due to lesser clean-up call activities and acquiring lower yielding loans from clean-up calls, resulting in reductions in gain on sale of loans and net interest income, partially offset by the improvements on losses on service fee, net of hedges.
13
The following table compares the quarterly detail segment results of operations by period, continued:
Treasury | Corporate | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Group | Subtotal | Overhead | Eliminations | Company | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage Banking Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Q1 04 Pretax income (loss)
|
$ | | $ | 82,946 | $ | | $ | (8,125 | ) | $ | 74,821 | |||||||||
Q4 03 Pretax income (loss)
|
| 98,470 | | (16,248 | ) | 82,222 | ||||||||||||||
Annualized Percent Change
|
| (63 | )% | | 200 | % | (36 | )% | ||||||||||||
Q1 03 Pretax income (loss)
|
| 92,770 | | (7,771 | ) | 84,999 | ||||||||||||||
Percent Change
|
| (11 | )% | | (5 | )% | (12 | )% | ||||||||||||
Investing Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Q1 04 Pretax income
|
| 20,195 | 708 | 4,984 | 25,887 | |||||||||||||||
Q4 03 Pretax income
|
| 16,941 | 1 | 3,128 | 20,070 | |||||||||||||||
Annualized Percent Change
|
| 77 | % | NM | 237 | % | 116 | % | ||||||||||||
Q1 03 Pretax income
|
| 7,583 | | 1,081 | 8,664 | |||||||||||||||
Percent Change
|
| 166 | % | | 361 | % | 199 | % | ||||||||||||
HELOC Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Q1 04 Pretax income
|
| 4,181 | | | 4,181 | |||||||||||||||
Q4 03 Pretax income
|
| 2,566 | | | 2,566 | |||||||||||||||
Annualized Percent Change
|
| 252 | % | | | 252 | % | |||||||||||||
Q1 03 Pretax income
|
| 1,056 | | | 1,056 | |||||||||||||||
Percent Change
|
| 296 | % | | | 296 | % | |||||||||||||
Financing and Other Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Q1 04 Pretax income
|
(11,441 | ) | (11,277 | ) | (24,309 | ) | 3 | (35,583 | ) | |||||||||||
Q4 03 Pretax income
|
(10,815 | ) | (10,606 | ) | (23,127 | ) | 3 | (33,730 | ) | |||||||||||
Q1 03 Pretax income
|
(9,788 | ) | (13,132 | ) | (20,567 | ) | | (33,699 | ) | |||||||||||
Net Income
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Q1 04 Net (loss) income
|
(6,922 | ) | 58,107 | (14,279 | ) | (1,898 | ) | 41,930 | ||||||||||||
Q4 03 Net (loss) income
|
(6,543 | ) | 64,959 | (13,710 | ) | (7,936 | ) | 43,313 | ||||||||||||
Annualized Percent Change
|
(23 | )% | (42 | )% | (17 | )% | 304 | % | (13 | )% | ||||||||||
Q1 03 Net (loss) income
|
(5,922 | ) | 53,408 | (12,443 | ) | (4,048 | ) | 36,917 | ||||||||||||
Percent Change
|
(17 | )% | 9 | % | (15 | )% | 53 | % | 14 | % | ||||||||||
Performance Ratios
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Q1 04
|
||||||||||||||||||||
ROE
|
| 26 | % | | | 16 | % | |||||||||||||
ROA
|
| 1.63 | % | | | 1.16 | % | |||||||||||||
NIM
|
| 2.79 | % | | | 2.82 | % | |||||||||||||
Efficiency ratio
|
| 48 | % | | | 62 | % | |||||||||||||
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio
|
| 57 | % | | | 87 | % | |||||||||||||
Average FTE
|
25 | 3,325 | 596 | | 3,921 | |||||||||||||||
Q4 03
|
||||||||||||||||||||
ROE
|
| 31 | % | | | 17 | % | |||||||||||||
ROA
|
| 1.88 | % | | | 1.24 | % | |||||||||||||
NIM
|
| 3.07 | % | | | 3.08 | % | |||||||||||||
Efficiency ratio
|
| 43 | % | | | 59 | % | |||||||||||||
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio
|
| 46 | % | | | 81 | % | |||||||||||||
Average FTE
|
22 | 3,294 | 560 | | 3,854 | |||||||||||||||
Q1 03
|
||||||||||||||||||||
ROE
|
| 32 | % | | | 17 | % | |||||||||||||
ROA
|
| 2.19 | % | | | 1.49 | % | |||||||||||||
NIM
|
| 2.77 | % | | | 2.80 | % | |||||||||||||
Efficiency ratio
|
| 45 | % | | | 60 | % | |||||||||||||
Capital adjusted efficiency ratio
|
| 46 | % | | | 81 | % | |||||||||||||
Average FTE
|
22 | 2,756 | 529 | | 3,285 |
14
MORTGAGE BANKING ACTIVITIES
Loan Production
During the first three months of 2004, the Company produced $7.1 billion of loans, which was a 9% increase over the $6.6 billion of loans produced during the first and fourth quarters of 2003. Our focus on less cyclical products, such as Alt-A, subprime, HELOCs and consumer construction, resulted in significant growth in each of these products in the first quarter of 2004 compared to the first quarter of 2003. This increase more than offset the decrease in our agency conforming and jumbo products which are more cyclical in nature, closely tracking changes in the overall mortgage market. Additionally, we continued to further penetrate the purchase market, increasing our purchase transactions 44% year over year. Further, our Investment Portfolios customer retention program continues to show strong production, originating $282 million in loans, a 109% increase over the fourth quarter 2003 volume.
Total production by loan type was as follows:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, | March 31, | Percent | December 31, | Percent | ||||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | Change | 2003 | Change | ||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Volume by product
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Prime(1)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Alt-A
|
$ | 4,584 | $ | 3,017 | 52 | % | $ | 3,893 | 18 | % | ||||||||||||
Agency conforming
|
608 | 1,421 | (57 | )% | 701 | (13 | )% | |||||||||||||||
Jumbo
|
407 | 1,013 | (60 | )% | 368 | 11 | % | |||||||||||||||
Subprime(1)
|
458 | 384 | 19 | % | 486 | (6 | )% | |||||||||||||||
Home equity line of credit(2)
|
244 | 180 | 36 | % | 259 | (6 | )% | |||||||||||||||
Consumer construction(2)
|
603 | 440 | 37 | % | 586 | 3 | % | |||||||||||||||
Subtotal mortgage production
|
6,904 | 6,455 | 7 | % | 6,293 | 10 | % | |||||||||||||||
Subdivision construction commitments
|
242 | 130 | 86 | % | 284 | (15 | )% | |||||||||||||||
Total production volume
|
$ | 7,146 | $ | 6,585 | 9 | % | $ | 6,577 | 9 | % | ||||||||||||
Mortgage Web-based
production
|
$ | 4,319 | $ | 4,920 | (12 | )% | $ | 4,270 | 1 | % | ||||||||||||
Mortgage pipeline at period end(3)
|
$ | 5,949 | $ | 6,044 | (2 | )% | $ | 4,116 | 45 | % |
(1) | Fundings. |
(2) | New commitments. |
(3) | Includes rate lock commitments for loans in process plus loans that have been submitted for processing, but not yet rate locked. |
15
The following table details the mix of our production and pipeline between purchase, cash-out refinance and rate/term refinance transactions as of and for the quarters ended March 31, 2004, March 31, 2003, and December 31, 2003. Consistent with the overall market trends, compared to the fourth quarter 2003, the decline in interest rates during the latter part of the first quarter 2004 reduced our mix of purchase business as a percent of total productions.
As of and for the Quarters Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, | March 31, | Percent | December 31, | Percent | ||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | Change | 2003 | Change | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage loan production:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase transactions
|
$ | 2,669 | $ | 1,854 | 44 | % | $ | 2,720 | (2 | )% | ||||||||||
Cash-out refinance transactions
|
2,562 | 2,531 | 1 | % | 2,335 | 10 | % | |||||||||||||
Rate/term refinance transactions
|
1,673 | 2,070 | (19 | )% | 1,238 | 35 | % | |||||||||||||
Total mortgage loan production
|
$ | 6,904 | $ | 6,455 | 7 | % | $ | 6,293 | 10 | % | ||||||||||
% purchase transactions
|
39 | % | 29 | % | 43 | % | ||||||||||||||
Mortgage pipeline:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase transactions
|
$ | 2,249 | $ | 1,439 | 56 | % | $ | 1,586 | 42 | % | ||||||||||
Cash-out refinance transactions
|
1,900 | 2,423 | (22 | )% | 1,568 | 21 | % | |||||||||||||
Rate/term refinance transactions
|
1,800 | 2,182 | (18 | )% | 962 | 87 | % | |||||||||||||
Mortgage pipeline at period end
|
$ | 5,949 | $ | 6,044 | (2 | )% | $ | 4,116 | 45 | % | ||||||||||
% purchase transactions
|
38 | % | 24 | % | 39 | % |
Mortgage Production by Division and Channel
IndyMac generates its mortgage production through multiple channels on a nationwide basis with a concentration in those regions of the country in which we have regional offices or in which there are higher home prices, including California, Florida, New Jersey and New York. Our highest concentration of mortgage loans relates to properties in California, which is the largest market in the U.S. Mortgages secured by California properties accounted for 45% of the mortgage loans we produced in the first three months of 2004 based on dollar value, and 37% based on number of loans. This is a decrease from the level of concentration during the fourth quarter of 2003, which totaled 47% and 40%, respectively. We expect this trend to continue to be diluted in the future as we execute on our plan to double the number of regional offices outside of California over the next five years.
IndyMac Mortgage Bank produces mortgages through its Business-to-Business (B2B), Business-to-Realtor (B2R), Consumer Construction (Home Construction Lending or HCL) and Homebuilder (HBD) divisions. IndyMac Consumer Bank produces mortgages through its Business-to-Consumer (B2C) and Retail Bank divisions. The Home Equity Division supports the production of HELOCs through all of IndyMac channels of production and markets directly to consumers through targeted marketing and cross selling activities. The Investment Portfolio Group generates loan production through its customer retention program in connection with its servicing portfolio.
16
The following table shows production and key performance indicators of the various relationship businesses of IndyMac Mortgage Bank during the three months ended March 31, 2004.
Relationship Businesses | ||||||||||||||||||||||
IndyMac Mortgage Bank | ||||||||||||||||||||||
B2B | B2R | HCL | HBD | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Volume by Channel and Customer
Source
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Wholesale
|
$ | 2,123 | $ | | $ | 432 | $ | | $ | 2,555 | ||||||||||||
Correspondent/ Mortgage bankers
|
1,108 | | 269 | | 1,377 | |||||||||||||||||
Correspondent/ Financial institutions
|
71 | | | | 71 | |||||||||||||||||
Conduit
|
1,170 | | | | 1,170 | |||||||||||||||||
Realtors
|
| 109 | | | 109 | |||||||||||||||||
Builder/ Builder affiliates
|
| | 38 | 167 | 205 | |||||||||||||||||
Consumer direct marketing by HCL
|
| | 133 | | 133 | |||||||||||||||||
Subtotal mortgage production
|
4,472 | 109 | 872 | 167 | 5,620 | |||||||||||||||||
Builder and subdivision construction commitments
|
| | | 242 | 242 | |||||||||||||||||
Total relationship businesses production volume
|
$ | 4,472 | $ | 109 | $ | 872 | $ | 409 | $ | 5,862 | ||||||||||||
Percentage of total production
|
62.6 | % | 1.5 | % | 12.2 | % | 5.8 | % | 82.1 | % | ||||||||||||
Total production first quarter 2003.
|
$ | 4,003 | $ | 246 | $ | 681 | $ | 222 | $ | 5,152 | ||||||||||||
Total production fourth quarter 2003.
|
$ | 4,096 | $ | 133 | $ | 863 | $ | 411 | $ | 5,503 | ||||||||||||
Composition of mortgage production
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase transactions
|
34 | % | 51 | % | 99 | % | 84 | % | 46 | % | ||||||||||||
Cash-out refinance transactions
|
43 | % | 34 | % | 0 | % | 11 | % | 35 | % | ||||||||||||
Rate/term refinance transactions
|
23 | % | 15 | % | 1 | % | 5 | % | 19 | % | ||||||||||||
Key Performance Indicators for the Three
Months
Ended March 31, 2004 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Active Customers:(1)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Average monthly active customers
|
2,060 | 123 | 325 | 35 | 2,543 | |||||||||||||||||
Active customers during the quarter
|
3,609 | 264 | 777 | 61 | 4,711 | |||||||||||||||||
Net new customers during the quarter(2)
|
731 | 255 | N/A | 17 | 1,003 | |||||||||||||||||
Sales personnel
|
417 | 69 | 88 | 45 | 619 | |||||||||||||||||
Cost per funded mortgage loan (bps)
|
76 | 369 | 98 | 165 | N/A | |||||||||||||||||
Percentage Change for the Three Months Ended
March 31, 2004 vs. March 31, 2003
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Active Customers:(1)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Average monthly active customers
|
3 | % | (45 | )% | 64 | % | 40 | % | 4 | % | ||||||||||||
Active customers during the quarter
|
14 | % | (42 | )% | 60 | % | 53 | % | 14 | % | ||||||||||||
Sales personnel
|
34 | % | 2 | % | 47 | % | 137 | % | 36 | % | ||||||||||||
Cost per funded mortgage loan (bps)
|
0 | % | 78 | % | 27 | % | 46 | % | N/A |
(1) | Active customers are defined as customers who funded at least one loan during the period. The HCL division utilizes the B2B marketing relationships with mortgage brokers and mortgage bankers to produce consumer construction loans. As a result, there is some overlap of the two active customer statistics and new customers are reported under the B2B channel only. The sales and marketing personnel under the HCL division are primarily focused on marketing the consumer construction product directly to consumers. |
(2) | Net new customers is the number of new customers signed up during the quarter less those terminated. |
IndyMac Mortgage Banks production increase of 14% from the three months ended March 31, 2003 to the three months ended March 31, 2004 was higher than anticipated due to the unexpectedly strong refinance market
17
Our primary channel B2B experienced record active customers. HCL and HBD continued to take advantage of the strong purchase market as new home construction starts remain near seasonally adjusted record levels. HCL new commitment origination volumes approximated fourth quarter 2003 levels, overcoming seasonal downturn pressure, and the annualized origination volumes represent approximately 5.9% of the estimated $40 billion custom residential construction market. Overall, HCL enters 2004 as the second largest custom residential lender in the nation and the largest in California. During the first quarter 2004, HBD entered into new tract construction commitments of $242 million, up 86% or $112 million from the first quarter of 2003. HBD expects to generate future mortgage loans through our relationships with these subdivision developers as well as post construction home loans with their buyers.
During the first quarter 2004, our Realtor channel B2R refocused on its core purpose, which is to capture purchase volume and build long-term relationships with Realtors. Realtor purchase volume was a majority of B2Rs production in the first quarter, reflecting the effort to reduce reliance on refinance volumes. Additional action steps were taken to improve execution. Specifically, we created internal sales support groups to ensure prompt and close follow-up on all leads and we aligned operations teams for consistent collaboration with customers. Based on current pipeline and execution improvements, we anticipate strong growth going forward with volumes increasing approximately one-third in the second quarter, and we expect our revamped business model to show improvement with Realtors as the year progresses.
The following table shows production and other key performance indicators of the various consumer direct businesses of IndyMac Consumer Bank and Home Equity Division during the three months ended March 31, 2004. In addition, during the first quarter ended March 31, 2004, as shown below, our Investment Portfolio Group generated $282 million of loans through its customer retention program in connection with its servicing portfolio.
Consumer Direct Businesses | ||||||||||||||||||||||
IndyMac Consumer Bank | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Home | Investment | |||||||||||||||||||||
Retail | Equity | Portfolio | ||||||||||||||||||||
B2C | Bank | Total | Division(1) | Group | ||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Volume by Channel and Source
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Web-based Production:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Direct at www.indymacmortgage.com
|
$ | 109 | $ | | $ | 109 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||||
Indirect Web-based leads
|
139 | | 139 | | | |||||||||||||||||
Cross-marketing and portfolio refinancing
|
447 | 34 | 481 | | 282 | |||||||||||||||||
Direct telemarketing and affinity relationships
|
183 | | 183 | 35 | | |||||||||||||||||
Retail banking branches
|
| 55 | 55 | | | |||||||||||||||||
Total consumer direct production volume
|
$ | 878 | $ | 89 | $ | 967 | $ | 35 | $ | 282 | ||||||||||||
Percentage of total production
|
12.3 | % | 1.2 | % | 13.5 | % | 0.5 | % | 3.9 | % | ||||||||||||
Total production first quarter 2003.
|
$ | 1,314 | $ | 78 | $ | 1,392 | $ | 41 | N/A | |||||||||||||
Total production fourth quarter 2003.
|
$ | 802 | $ | 73 | $ | 875 | $ | 57 | $ | 135 | ||||||||||||
Composition of mortgage production:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase transactions
|
8 | % | 26 | % | 10 | % | N/A | 0 | % | |||||||||||||
Cash-out refinance transactions
|
58 | % | 51 | % | 57 | % | N/A | 0 | % | |||||||||||||
Rate/term refinance transactions
|
34 | % | 23 | % | 33 | % | N/A | 100 | % |
(1) | The amount represents the loans produced only by the Home Equity Division. HELOC loans produced by other business divisions totaled $209 million during the first quarter of 2004. HELOC loans produced by business divisions other than the Home Equity Division are included in the production volume of the respective originating business division. |
18
B2Cs production volume declined 33% for the three months ended March 31, 2004, compared to the three months ended March 31, 2003, which is in line with expectations as this business is expected to be more cyclical as a result of changes in interest rates. The Home Equity Division was established during 2002 to facilitate targeted marketing of our HELOC product directly to consumers in addition to the production of HELOCs within our other production channels. Through a streamlined application process and competitive pricing, this division provides homeowners the ability to easily access the excess equity in their homes for a variety of uses. Currently, we hold the HELOC-related assets on our balance sheet, as the underlying HELOCs are prime rate based, high FICO scores and have combined loan-to-value less than 80%. The HELOC product also tends to be somewhat counter-cyclical to the mortgage industry. As interest rates rise, consumers who want to access the equity in their home are more inclined to utilize a HELOC product rather than a cash-out refinance of their existing low-rate mortgage loan. As a result, we expect the Home Equity Divisions production to increase as the market transitions to a higher interest rate environment.
Loan Sales
The Company sold $4.9 billion and $5.5 billion of loans during the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The Companys gain on sale of loans of $84 million in the first quarter of 2004 is comparable to the $84 million gain on sale of loans in the first quarter of 2003; however, the net profit margin has improved from 1.52% at March 31, 2003 to 1.71% at March 31, 2004. The increase in the net margin after hedging is due to a combination of factors including: (1) an increase in the sale of higher margin subprime and called loans; (2) an increase in the sale of higher margin adjustable rate loans; and (3) increased demand for mortgage-backed securities that resulted in higher sale margins as spreads tightened.
The Company hedges the interest rate risk inherent in its pipeline of rate locks and mortgage loans held for sale to protect its margin on sale of loans. Hedging practices can vary significantly from company to company ranging across a broad spectrum. At one extreme, a mortgage banker may choose not to hedge its pipeline at all. Mortgage bankers who choose not to hedge their pipeline will typically report higher earnings and profit margins in a falling interest rate environment, and lower earnings and profit margins in a rising interest rate environment. This will be the most profitable strategy over an indefinite period of time as more production is done in the declining rate environment, assuming the rates rise as often as they fall. However, this strategy results in highly volatile earnings and could result in losses for an extended period of time potentially risking the depletion of capital reserves. Conversely, at the other extreme, a mortgage banker can choose to hedge 100% of its pipeline with option-based instruments to closely offset the free option enjoyed by the mortgage loan applicant to not close on his or her loan (i.e. fallout). This hedging strategy will generally produce stable and consistent results, but profitability is significantly reduced as the cost of the options can be prohibitive.
Generally, prudent mortgage bankers will choose a strategy that falls along the spectrum of the above extremes. IndyMac tends to utilize instruments such as forward sale agreements whose change in value as interest rates change is expected to offset the change in value of its underlying mortgage pipeline based on expected closing ratios. Utilizing this strategy we focus on trying to maintain stable profit margins with an emphasis on forecasting expected fallout to more precisely estimate our required hedge coverage ratio and minimize hedge costs. By closely monitoring key factors such as product type, business units, progress or status of transactions, as well as changes in market interest rates since we committed a rate to the borrower (rate lock commitments), the Company seeks to quantify the optional component of each rate lock, and in turn, the aggregate rate lock pipeline. By accurately evaluating these factors, the Company has been able to minimize the purchase of options and also stabilize gain on sale margins over different rate environments. Companies with lower coverage ratios may tend to follow the market increasing their hedge costs and reducing their profit margins as interest rates rise. In comparing financial results, investors should be aware of the varying results that can be achieved under different hedge strategies.
19
The following table illustrates the impact of the Companys pipeline hedging activities.
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, | March 31, | Percent | December 31, | Percent | ||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | Change | 2003 | Change | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Gross gain on mortgage loan sales
|
$ | 126 | $ | 118 | 7 | % | $ | 97 | 30 | % | ||||||||||
Gross margin before hedging
|
2.58 | % | 2.14 | % | 21 | % | 2.09 | % | 23 | % | ||||||||||
Hedging (losses)
|
$ | (42 | ) | $ | (34 | ) | 26 | % | $ | (17 | ) | 153 | % | |||||||
Net gains on sale
|
$ | 84 | $ | 84 | 0 | % | $ | 80 | 5 | % | ||||||||||
Net margin after hedging
|
1.71 | % | 1.52 | % | 13 | % | 1.72 | % | (1 | )% |
Included in the pipeline are rate lock commitments in addition to mortgage loans held for sale. Rate lock commitments on mortgage loans that are intended to be sold are considered to be derivatives pursuant to SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, (SFAS 133) and, therefore, are recorded at fair value. The Company hedges the risk of changes in fair value of rate lock commitments by selling forward contracts on securities of Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac as the Company deems appropriate to prudently manage this risk. These forward contracts are also accounted for as derivatives and recorded at fair value.
In measuring the fair value of rate lock commitments, the proceeds expected upon eventual loan sale are used. This value excludes the value of the MSRs inherent in the loan except for certain high quality, liquid, conventional mortgages where whole loan sale prices including servicing rights are readily available. These values are calculated using the same methodologies that are used in our loan sales, adjusted using an anticipated fallout factor for rate lock commitments that will likely not be funded. This method of calculating the value of the derivative has the effect of recognizing a portion of the gain from mortgage loans before the loans are funded. As of March 31, 2004, the fair value of the rate lock commitments, net of related hedges, was $30.8 million.
On March 9, 2004, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 105, Application of Accounting Principles to Loan Commitments, which provides guidance regarding loan commitments that are accounted for as derivative instruments. In this Bulletin, the SEC determined that an interest rate lock commitment should generally be valued at zero at inception. The rate locks will continue to be adjusted for changes in value resulting from changes in market interest rates. The Company will adopt this new standard prospectively as of April 1, 2004. Under the new accounting guidance, the Company will no longer recognize any revenue at the inception of the rate lock. Profits inherent in the rate lock will be recognized at the time of the underlying loans are sold. The implementation of the standard is expected to have a one-time negative impact on gain on sales totaling approximately $24 to $27 million after-tax in the second quarter of 2004. This amount is an estimate based on our current estimate of rate lock volume in the second quarter. The ultimate amount of the impact will be affected by actual rate lock volumes in the second quarter, as well as profit margins on such rate locks and the volume of loan sales during the quarter. The ultimate amount of the impact will not be known until the end of the second quarter. This accounting change affects the timing of revenue recognition and offsetting mark-to-market gains and losses, generally by one quarter or less, but not the ultimate amount of revenue recognized over time.
20
The following table presents the gain on sale margins by product type for the quarters ended March 31, 2004, and December 31, 2003:
Three Months Ended March 31, 2004 | Three Months Ended December 31, 2003 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Gain on Sale Margins | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
by Product Type | Amount Sold | Gain on Sale | Margin | Amount Sold | Gain on Sale | Margin | ||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alt-A and Jumbo
|
$ | 3,463 | $ | 53.9 | 1.56 | % | $ | 2,815 | $ | 48.6 | 1.73 | % | ||||||||||||
Agency conforming
|
725 | 6.5 | 0.89 | % | 1,061 | 12.3 | 1.16 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Subprime
|
426 | 14.9 | 3.50 | % | 286 | 7.1 | 2.48 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Loans acquired through clean-up calls
|
293 | 8.4 | 2.86 | % | 325 | 8.7 | 2.68 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Lot loan and income property
|
| | | % | 154 | 3.2 | 2.08 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total gain on sale of loans
|
$ | 4,907 | $ | 83.7 | 1.71 | % | $ | 4,641 | $ | 79.9 | 1.72 | % | ||||||||||||
Although the total gain on sale margin was comparable for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, to December 31, 2003 there were changes by product type. Subprime gain on sale margins increased due to an increased demand for whole loans. Others decreased due to more competitive pricing. The increase in the gain on sale margin for called loans was the result of the loans sold having a lower cost basis than those sold in the previous quarter.
In addition to the gain on sale, IndyMac earns spread and fee income on its mortgage loans held for sale. It is important to look at the entire mortgage banking revenue stream in evaluating performance, as these components may vary in differing interest rate environments and sale strategies. The following table depicts the total revenue margin on mortgage loans sold, which is calculated by dividing the sum of gain on sale of loans, net interest income, and fee income by the amount of loans sold:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, | % of loans | March 31, | % of loans | December 31, | % of loans | |||||||||||||||||||
2004 | sold | 2003 | sold | 2003 | sold | |||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of loans
|
$ | 83,668 | 1.70 | % | $ | 83,784 | 1.51 | % | $ | 79,883 | 1.72 | % | ||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
41,800 | 0.85 | % | 36,441 | 0.66 | % | 45,856 | 0.99 | % | |||||||||||||||
Fee income
|
12,107 | 0.25 | % | 14,791 | 0.27 | % | 12,170 | 0.26 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total mortgage banking revenue
|
$ | 137,575 | 2.80 | % | $ | 135,016 | 2.44 | % | $ | 137,909 | 2.97 | % | ||||||||||||
Loans sold
|
$ | 4,906,724 | $ | 5,523,701 | $ | 4,641,318 | ||||||||||||||||||
The following table shows the various channels through which loans were distributed.
Three Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, | Distribution | March 31, | Distribution | December 31, | Distribution | ||||||||||||||||||||
2004 | Percentages | 2003 | Percentages | 2003 | Percentages | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales to the GSEs(1)
|
$ | 2,304 | 45 | % | $ | 3,464 | 58 | % | $ | 2,777 | 42 | % | |||||||||||||
Private-label securitizations
|
1,085 | 21 | % | 1,471 | 25 | % | 1,018 | 16 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Whole loan sales
|
1,518 | 30 | % | 589 | 10 | % | 846 | 13 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Subtotal sales
|
4,907 | 96 | % | 5,524 | 93 | % | 4,641 | 71 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Investment portfolio acquisitions(2)
|
195 | 4 | % | 403 | 7 | % | 1,911 | 29 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total loan distribution
|
$ | 5,102 | 100 | % | $ | 5,927 | 100 | % | $ | 6,552 | 100 | % | |||||||||||||
21
(1) | Government-sponsored enterprises. |
(2) | Loan production that IndyMac elected to retain in its investment portfolio. |
In conjunction with the sale of mortgage loans in private-label securitizations and government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) transactions, the Company generally retains certain assets. The primary assets retained include MSRs and, to a lesser degree, AAA-rated and agency interest-only strips, non-investment grade securities and residual securities. The allocated cost of the retained assets at the time of sale is recorded as an asset with an offsetting increase to the gain on sale of loans (or a reduction in the cost basis of the loans sold). The calculation of the $84 million in gain on sale of loans earned during the three months ended March 31, 2004, included the retention of $86 million of servicing-related assets and $11 million of other investment and non-investment grade securities. Additionally, the Company has also created approximately $19 million in retained assets from the HELOC securitization, which was structured as a secured borrowings for which no gain was recognized. Cash flow collected during the three months ended March 31, 2004 from assets previously retained amounted to $47.8 million. More information on the valuation assumptions related to IndyMacs retained assets and the HELOC securitization can be found under the headings, Valuation of Servicing-Related Assets and HELOC Portfolio, respectively, below.
22
INVESTING AND HELOC ACTIVITIES
The following table details the assets associated with our investing and HELOC activities as of March 31, 2004, and December 31, 2003:
March 31, | December 31, | ||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||
SFR mortgage loans held for
investment
|
$ | 4,440,540 | $ | 4,945,439 | |||||||
Consumer construction
|
1,225,347 | 1,145,526 | |||||||||
Builder construction
|
500,490 | 484,397 | |||||||||
HELOC
|
322,351 | 711,494 | |||||||||
Income property
|
9,315 | 36,285 | |||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities and agency
notes:
|
|||||||||||
Trading securities:
|
|||||||||||
AAA-rated and agency interest-only strips
|
149,152 | 146,179 | |||||||||
AAA-rated principal-only securities
|
43,270 | 8,518 | |||||||||
Other investment grade securities
|
9,048 | 8,922 | |||||||||
Other non-investment grade securities
|
1,588 | 1,760 | |||||||||
Non-investment grade residual securities
|
47,948 | 58,253 | |||||||||
Subtotal trading securities
|
251,006 | 223,632 | |||||||||
Available for sale securities:
|
|||||||||||
AAA-rated non-agency securities
|
2,576,496 | 1,407,984 | |||||||||
AAA-rated agency securities
|
21,288 | 25,193 | |||||||||
AAA-rated agency notes
|
| 143,689 | |||||||||
Other investment grade securities
|
23,325 | 26,926 | |||||||||
Other non-investment grade securities
|
16,903 | 10,182 | |||||||||
Non-investment grade HELOC residual securities
|
17,684 | | |||||||||
Subtotal available for sale securities
|
2,655,696 | 1,613,974 | |||||||||
Total mortgage-backed securities and agency notes
|
2,906,702 | 1,837,606 | |||||||||
Mortgage servicing rights
|
414,358 | 443,688 | |||||||||
Other assets
|
235,907 | 280,467 | |||||||||
Total
|
$ | 10,055,010 | $ | 9,884,902 | |||||||
Percentage of securities portfolio rated
investment grade
|
97 | % | 96 | % | |||||||
Percentage of securities portfolio rated AAA
|
96 | % | 94 | % |
As indicated above, our HELOC loan portfolio has decreased by approximately $389 million from December 31, 2003, to March 31, 2004, primarily due to the recharacterization of $500 million HELOC loans into mortgage-backed securities via an on-balance sheet securitization in March 2004. Additionally, our AAA-rated non-agency securities increased from $1.4 billion at December 31, 2003, to $2.6 billion at March 31, 2004, resulting from the recharacterization of $500 million HELOC loans and reclassification of $346 million of SFR mortgage loans that were securitized and retained as mortgage-backed securities available for sale during the quarter. Please refer to Investing Activities and HELOC Activities sections below for further discussions on SFR Mortgage and HELOC securitizations, respectively.
AAA-rated and agency interest-only strips, and non-investment grade residual securities and securities used to hedge these securities, are classified as trading securities. Changes in the fair value of these securities are recorded in earnings. All other mortgage-backed securities and HELOC residuals are classified as available for sale.
23
The following table shows average annualized net returns for all of our investing and HELOC activities, which is calculated by dividing the sum of net interest income after allocated interest expense (see Note 4: Segment Reporting in the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements for further information on our method of allocating interest expense to the operating segments) and provision for loan losses, service fee income and related net gains or losses by the average balance of investment assets. Service fee income includes contractual servicing fees, gross service fee income, amortization of MSRs, valuation adjustments and net hedging gains and losses. Gross service fee income is comprised of reinvestment income, prepayment and late fee income net of compensating interest paid to borrowers and investors.
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||
March 31, | March 31, | December 31, | ||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2003 | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Net interest income after provision for loan
losses
|
$ | 57,278 | $ | 31,324 | $ | 52,195 | ||||||
Service fee (loss) income
|
(3,144 | ) | 2,383 | (5,951 | ) | |||||||
(Loss) on mortgage-backed securities, net
|
(4,987 | ) | (6,910 | ) | (6,037 | ) | ||||||
Other income
|
4,004 | 2,493 | 3,156 | |||||||||
Average balance of interest-earning assets and
MSRs
|
$ | 9,698,243 | $ | 6,398,441 | $ | 9,367,980 | ||||||
Investing activities return on
interest-earning assets and MSRs (annualized)
|
2.20 | % | 1.86 | % | 1.92 | % | ||||||
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
IndyMacs Investment Portfolio Group complements the Companys mortgage banking activities and serves to diversify the Companys revenue stream through its investments in single-family residential mortgage loans, mortgage-backed securities and MSRs. The Investment Portfolio Group also invests in certain of the mortgage assets that are created through the securitization or sale of loans in the secondary market.
The Investment Portfolio Groups investment in prime SFR loans, mortgage-backed securities and mortgage loan servicing also helps to provide a source of income to counterbalance the cyclical nature of mortgage production. Should loan production decline due to factors such as increasing interest rates, the value of the Investment Portfolio Groups MSRs generally rises, as there is less incentive for borrowers to refinance at a higher interest rate. Similarly, when loan production increases, the value of the MSRs generally decrease. We believe this serves to stabilize the Companys revenue stream through increased interest income and servicing fees when production slows.
In addition to the Investment Portfolio Groups investments, certain investing activities through investments in construction loans also take place in IndyMac Mortgage Bank.
SFR Mortgage Loans Held for Investment
The Companys portfolio of mortgage loans held for investment is comprised primarily of SFR mortgage loans, with a concentration in adjustable-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage loans to mitigate interest rate risk. The Company plans on increasing its portfolio of mortgage loans held for investment to achieve better balance in its investing activities relative to its mortgage banking activities, which tend to be more cyclical. During the quarter, the Company added $195 million of mortgage loans in accordance with this strategy; however, the portfolio actually declined relative to December 31, 2003. The decline resulted primarily from the Companys decision to securitize $516 million of SFR mortgage loans held for investment during the first quarter and retain approximately 68% of these portfolio loans in the form of AAA-rated mortgage-backed securities, AAA-rated interest-only strips, and investment and non-investment grade securities. The Company plans to continue to securitize its SFR mortgage loans held for investment periodically, with the intent to retain most of the securities, to optimize return on equity, reduce hedging costs
24
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||||
2004 | 2003 | |||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||
SFR mortgage loans held for investment
|
$ | 4,440,540 | $ | 4,945,439 | ||||||
Average loan size
|
$ | 270 | $ | 286 | ||||||
Non-performing loans as a percentage of SFR loans
|
0.47 | % | 0.38 | % | ||||||
Estimated average life in years(1)
|
2.4 | 3.1 | ||||||||
Estimated average duration in years(2)
|
1.1 | 1.4 | ||||||||
Yield
|
4.16 | % | 4.43 | % | ||||||
Fixed-rate mortgages
|
7 | % | 6 | % | ||||||
Adjustable-rate mortgages
|
46 | % | 39 | % | ||||||
Hybrid adjustable-rate mortgages
|
47 | % | 55 | % | ||||||
Additional Information as of March 31, 2004 | ||||||||||
Average FICO score(3)
|
707 | |||||||||
Average loan to value ratio
|
73 | % | ||||||||
Geographic distribution:
|
||||||||||
Southern California
|
38 | % | ||||||||
Northern California
|
22 | % | ||||||||
Michigan
|
4 | % | ||||||||
New York
|
4 | % | ||||||||
Florida
|
3 | % | ||||||||
Georgia
|
3 | % | ||||||||
New Jersey
|
2 | % | ||||||||
Colorado
|
2 | % | ||||||||
Other (each individually less than 2%)
|
22 | % | ||||||||
Total
|
100 | % | ||||||||
(1) | Represents the estimated length of time, on average, the SFR loan portfolio will remain outstanding based on the Banks estimates for prepayments. |
(2) | Average duration measures the volatility of the value of a financial instrument in response to changes in interest rates and the corresponding changes in prepayments. |
(3) | FICO scores are the result of a credit scoring system developed by Fair Isaacs and Co. and are generally used by lenders to evaluate a borrowers credit history. FICO scores of 700 or higher are generally considered in the mortgage industry to be very high quality borrowers with low risk of default, but in general, the secondary market will consider FICO scores of 620 or higher to be prime. |
Mortgage-Backed Securities and Agency Notes
The Companys portfolio of mortgage-backed securities and agency notes totaled $2.9 billion and $1.8 billion at March 31, 2004, and December 31, 2003, respectively. These securities are recorded at fair value. The Company invests in high quality mortgage-backed securities to provide net interest income. At March 31, 2004, 97% of the portfolio was rated AAA with an expected weighted-average life of 3.2 years. AAA-rated principal-only securities are retained from securitizations or purchased in the secondary market to hedge MSR related assets. The Company periodically trades its hedging instruments to rebalance its portfolio into instruments we believe will most effectively hedge the underlying asset, after considering changing market conditions.
25
The fair value of other investment grade and non-investment grade securities by credit rating as of March 31, 2004, and December 31, 2003, follows:
December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Current | (Discount) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Face | To Face | Amortized | Fair | ||||||||||||||||||
Value | Value | Cost | Value | Fair Value | |||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Investment grade mortgage-backed
securities:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
AAA
|
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 8,001 | |||||||||||
AA
|
674 | (7 | ) | 667 | 678 | | |||||||||||||||
A
|
306 | (22 | ) | 284 | 289 | | |||||||||||||||
BBB
|
28,430 | (1,508 | ) | 26,922 | 27,655 | 24,198 | |||||||||||||||
BBB-
|
4,000 | (249 | ) | 3,751 | 3,751 | 3,649 | |||||||||||||||
Total other investment grade mortgage-backed
securities
|
$ | 33,410 | $ | (1,786 | ) | $ | 31,624 | $ | 32,373 | $ | 35,848 | ||||||||||
Non-investment grade mortgage-backed
securities:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
BB
|
$ | 14,751 | $ | (2,720 | ) | $ | 12,031 | $ | 12,184 | $ | 7,896 | ||||||||||
B
|
5,194 | (3,081 | ) | 2,113 | 2,178 | 186 | |||||||||||||||
CCC
|
| | | | 1,165 | ||||||||||||||||
C
|
10,058 | (7,588 | ) | 2,470 | 2,960 | 1,934 | |||||||||||||||
D
|
2,228 | (1,605 | ) | 623 | 623 | 676 | |||||||||||||||
NR
|
4,150 | (3,653 | ) | 497 | 546 | 85 | |||||||||||||||
Total other non-investment grade mortgage-backed
securities
|
$ | 36,381 | $ | (18,647 | ) | $ | 17,734 | $ | 18,491 | $ | 11,942 | ||||||||||
At March 31, 2004, of the total other investment grade and non-investment grade mortgage-backed securities, $35.6 million was collateralized by prime loans, $13.7 million by subprime loans and $1.6 million by manufactured housing loans.
Mortgage Servicing and Mortgage Servicing Rights
In addition to its own loans, IndyMac serviced $32.1 billion of mortgage loans owned by others at March 31, 2004, with a weighted average coupon of 6.36%. In comparison, IndyMac serviced $30.8 billion of mortgage loans owned by others at December 31, 2003, with a weighted average coupon of 6.53%. The table below shows the activity in the servicing portfolios during the quarter ended March 31, 2004.
Three Months | ||||
Ended | ||||
March 31, 2004 | ||||
(In millions) | ||||
Unpaid principal balance at beginning of period
|
$ | 30,774 | ||
Additions
|
4,691 | |||
Clean-up calls exercised
|
(319 | ) | ||
Loan payments and prepayments
|
(3,024 | ) | ||
Unpaid principal balance at March 31, 2004.
|
$ | 32,122 | ||
26
The capitalized value of MSRs totaled $414.4 million as of March 31, 2004 and $443.7 million as of December 31, 2003, reflecting a decrease of $29.3 million. The table below shows the activity in MSRs.
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||
March 31, | March 31, | December 31, | ||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2003 | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of period
|
$ | 443,688 | $ | 300,539 | $ | 406,917 | ||||||
Additions
|
50,753 | 67,742 | 51,447 | |||||||||
Clean-up calls exercised
|
(3,790 | ) | (2,475 | ) | (3,754 | ) | ||||||
Scheduled amortization
|
(22,860 | ) | (21,150 | ) | (20,049 | ) | ||||||
Valuation (impairment) adjustment
|
(53,433 | ) | (1,112 | ) | 9,127 | |||||||
Balance at end of period
|
$ | 414,358 | $ | 343,544 | $ | 443,688 | ||||||
Although we have been hedging our MSRs using interest rate swaps on an economic basis, we elected not to designate fair value hedge accounting on MSRs prior to January 1, 2004, and they were carried at lower of the initial carrying value, adjusted for amortization, or fair value. On January 1, 2004, we started to designate fair value hedges on certain selected tranches of MSRs. The changes in the fair value of the designated MSRs, and the fair value of the designated interest rate swaps, are recorded through income, if the hedging relationships are proven to be effective under the provisions of SFAS No. 133. This designation did not produce any difference in our reported quarterly income as the value of our MSRs decreased during the first quarter 2004.
Each quarter, we evaluate the MSRs for impairment in accordance with SFAS 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities. We first stratify our MSRs based on predominant risk characteristics, underlying loan type, interest rate type, and interest rate band. Then, for each stratum, we determine the fair value of MSRs using our valuation models, which are validated quarterly by third party opinions of value. If the carrying value exceeds the fair value by individual stratum, a valuation allowance is recorded as a charge to service fee income in current earnings. However, if such impairment is determined to be other-than-temporary and the recoverability of the value is remote, we recognize a direct write-down. Unlike a valuation allowance, a direct write-down permanently reduces the carrying value of the MSR asset and the related valuation allowance, precluding subsequent reversals. For the three months ended March 31, 2004, the valuation allowance on MSRs totaled $90.2 million. The significant increase in the valuation adjustment was due to an increase in prepayment rates as a result of declines in market interest rates during the first quarter 2004.
AAA-Rated and Agency Interest-Only Strips and Residuals
We evaluate the carrying value of our AAA-rated and agency interest-only strips and residual securities by discounting estimated net future cash flows. For these securities, estimated net future cash flows are primarily based on assumptions related to prepayment speeds, in addition to expected credit loss assumptions on the residual securities.
27
A summary of the activity in the AAA-rated and agency interest-only strips and residual securities portfolios for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, and for the three months ended December 31, 2003, follows:
Three Months Ended | |||||||||||||
March 31, | March 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2003 | |||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||
AAA-rated interest-only strips
|
|||||||||||||
Beginning balance
|
$ | 146,179 | $ | 187,060 | $ | 155,258 | |||||||
Retained investments from securitizations
|
33,578 | 13,416 | 11,293 | ||||||||||
Clean-up calls exercised
|
(1,151 | ) | (12,048 | ) | (13,936 | ) | |||||||
Cash received, net of accretion
|
(11,770 | ) | (14,071 | ) | (10,933 | ) | |||||||
Valuation (losses) gains before hedges
|
(17,684 | ) | (18,145 | ) | 4,497 | ||||||||
Ending balance
|
$ | 149,152 | $ | 156,212 | $ | 146,179 | |||||||
Residual securities
|
|||||||||||||
Beginning balance
|
$ | 58,253 | $ | 78,740 | $ | 54,743 | |||||||
Retained investments from securitizations
|
18,706 | 14,626 | 4,853 | ||||||||||
Sales
|
| (10,525 | ) | | |||||||||
Clean-up calls exercised
|
159 | | | ||||||||||
Cash received, net of accretion
|
(11,679 | ) | (6,865 | ) | (2,388 | ) | |||||||
Valuation gains before hedges
|
193 | 2,022 | 1,045 | ||||||||||
Ending balance
|
$ | 65,632 | $ | 77,998 | $ | 58,253 | |||||||
Cash received, net of accretion, increased from $2.4 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2003 to $11.7 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, primarily due to receiving $10 million cash on residual securities from exercising clean-up calls.
28
Valuation of Servicing-Related Assets
MSRs, AAA-rated and agency interest-only strips and residual securities are recorded at fair market value. MSRs are further subject to lower of cost or market limitations. Relevant information and assumptions used to value the Companys servicing related assets and residual securities at March 31, 2004, and December 31, 2003 are shown below.
Actual | Valuation Assumptions | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross Wtd. | Servicing | 3-Month | Weighted | Lifetime | 3-Month | Remaining | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Book | Collateral | Average | Fee/Interest | Prepayment | Average | Prepayment | Prepayment | Discount | Cumulative | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value | Balance | Coupon | Strip | Speeds | Multiple | Speeds(1) | Speeds(1) | Yield | Loss Rate(2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2004
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AAA-rated/agency interest-only strips
|
$ | 149,152 | $ | 13,559,779 | 6.68 | % | 0.43 | % | 33.7 | % | 2.56 | 20.1 | % | 35.9 | % | 9.1 | % | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Prime residual securities
|
$ | 23,183 | $ | 3,903,460 | 6.94 | % | 1.89 | % | 55.6 | % | 0.31 | 27.5 | % | 37.6 | % | 15.9 | % | 0.5 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Subprime and HELOC residual securities(3)
|
42,448 | $ | 1,545,047 | 7.69 | % | 4.21 | % | 35.4 | % | 0.65 | 38.2 | % | 38.7 | % | 21.5 | % | 2.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total non-investment grade residual securities
|
$ | 65,631 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MSRs(4)
|
$ | 414,358 | $ | 32,121,562 | 6.36 | % | 0.32 | % | 29.2 | % | 3.97 | 18.9 | % | 32.1 | % | 9.0 | % | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2003
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AAA-rated/agency interest-only strips
|
$ | 146,179 | $ | 13,640,307 | 6.90 | % | 0.38 | % | 34.0 | % | 2.81 | 17.2 | % | 35.5 | % | 9.8 | % | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Prime residual securities
|
$ | 25,614 | $ | 3,506,638 | 7.00 | % | 1.48 | % | 60.0 | % | 0.49 | 26.3 | % | 36.0 | % | 15.8 | % | 0.5 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Subprime residual securities
|
32,639 | $ | 1,286,694 | 8.65 | % | 4.34 | % | 38.4 | % | 0.58 | 33.4 | % | 32.9 | % | 23.6 | % | 2.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total non-investment grade residual securities
|
$ | 58,253 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MSRs
|
$ | 443,688 | $ | 30,773,545 | 6.53 | % | 0.32 | % | 31.0 | % | 4.51 | 16.8 | % | 31.5 | % | 10.0 | % | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2003
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AAA-rated/agency interest-only strips
|
$ | 156,212 | $ | 12,924,037 | 7.68 | % | 0.51 | % | 38.8 | % | 2.37 | 21.9 | % | 46.6 | % | 8.9 | % | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Prime residual securities
|
$ | 42,703 | $ | 3,537,589 | 7.27 | % | 1.46 | % | 38.5 | % | 0.83 | 21.8 | % | 36.1 | % | 15.2 | % | 0.6 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Subprime residual securities
|
35,295 | $ | 1,636,487 | 9.34 | % | 4.04 | % | 34.0 | % | 0.53 | 33.3 | % | 35.7 | % | 22.9 | % | 2.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total non-investment grade residual securities
|
$ | 77,998 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MSRs
|
$ | 343,544 | $ | 29,834,709 | 7.27 | % | 0.33 | % | 39.5 | % | 3.49 | 21.2 | % | 42.9 | % | 9.5 | % | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Assumed prepayment speeds are higher in the short term and lower in the long term based on the market forward curve for interest rates rising over the life of the asset. |
(2) | As a percentage of the original pool balance, the actual cumulative loss rate to date totaled 0.06% and 1.41% for prime and subprime residuals, respectively, at March 31, 2004. |
(3) | As of March 31, 2004, subprime and HELOC residual securities include residuals from the securitization of home equity loans in the amount of $17.7 million. Although our HELOC loans are to high credit quality, prime borrowers, the assumptions on HELOC-related residuals are similar to subprime as they are second trust deed loans. |
(4) | At March 31, 2004, the capitalized servicing asset was comprised of $32.1 billion of loans serviced for others. In addition to the loans serviced for others, we also service $6.8 billion of IndyMac-owned loans and loans subserviced for others on an interim basis for a total servicing portfolio of $38.9 billion. |
The lifetime prepayment speeds represent the annual constant prepayment rate (CPR) we estimate for the remaining life of the collateral supporting the asset. For MSRs and AAA-rated and agency interest-only strips, we project prepayment rates using four-factor prepayment models, which incorporate relative weighted average note rate, seasoning, seasonality and burn-out of the pool of loans relative to expectations of future rates implied by the market forward LIBOR/swap curve.
The weighted average multiple for MSRs, AAA-rated and agency interest-only strips and residual securities represents the book value divided by the product of collateral balance and servicing fee/interest strip. While the weighted average life of such assets is a function of the undiscounted cash flows, the multiple is a function of the discounted cash flows. With regard to AAA-rated and agency interest-only strips, the marketplace frequently uses calculated multiples to assess the overall impact valuation assumptions have on
29
The prepayment speed assumptions have increased compared to December 31, 2003 due to a 42 basis-point drop in 10-year Treasury rates. The discount rate assumptions decreased reflecting the drop in benchmark rates and the shortening of the expected life of the underlying loans.
Hedging Interest Rate Risk on Servicing-Related Assets
With respect to the investment in servicing-related assets (AAA-rated and agency interest-only strips, non-investment grade residual securities and MSRs), the Company is exposed to interest rate risk as a result of other than predicted prepayment of loans. Our Investment Portfolio Group is responsible for the management of interest rate and prepayment risks in the Investment Portfolio, subject to policies and procedures established by, and oversight from, our management level Asset and Liability Committee (ALCO) and our Board of Directors level ALCO.
The objective of our hedging strategy is to mitigate the impact of changes in interest rates on the net economic value of the balance sheet and quarterly earnings, not to speculate on interest rates. As such, we manage the comprehensive interest rate risk of our servicing-related assets using financial instruments and our servicing portfolio retention efforts. Historically, we have hedged servicing-related assets using a mix of securities on our balance sheet, such as AAA-rated principal-only securities, buying and/or selling mortgage-backed or U.S. Treasury securities, as well as derivatives such as futures, floors, swaps, or options. Recently, we have added clean-up call revenues and retention programs to our overall servicing asset management program. As there are no hedge instruments that would be perfectly correlated with these hedged assets, we use a mix of the above instruments designed to correlate well with the hedged servicing assets and our anticipated servicing retention rates.
With interest rates continuing to be near historic low levels and the drop in 10-year Treasury rates of 42 basis-points, we recorded a $53.4 million valuation write-down in mortgage servicing assets, which was not fully offset by the derivative hedge gains. However, as shown in the servicing related assets segment results, our realization of $21.2 million income from clean-up calls and servicing portfolio retention resulted in a positive return for the portfolio during the quarter. These activities are a direct result of the ownership of servicing rights and we consider these activities when evaluating overall portfolio performance.
30
The following table breaks out the components of service fee (expense) income and the net loss on mortgage-backed securities.
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||
March 31, | March 31, | December 31, | ||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2003 | ||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||
Service fee (expense) income:
|
||||||||||||||
Gross service fee income
|
$ | 28,080 | $ | 24,057 | $ | 27,489 | ||||||||
Amortization
|
(22,860 | ) | (21,150 | ) | (20,049 | ) | ||||||||
Service fee income net of amortization
|
5,220 | 2,907 | 7,440 | |||||||||||
Valuation adjustments on MSRs
|
(53,433 | ) | (1,112 | ) | 9,127 | |||||||||
Hedges gains (losses) on MSRs
|
45,069 | 588 | (22,518 | ) | ||||||||||
Total service fee (expense) income
|
$ | (3,144 | ) | $ | 2,383 | $ | (5,951 | ) | ||||||
Net (loss) on mortgage-backed securities:
|
||||||||||||||
Realized gain on available-for-sale securities
|
$ | 900 | $ | | $ | 58 | ||||||||
Impairment on available-for-sale securities
|
(101 | ) | (580 | ) | (201 | ) | ||||||||
Unrealized (loss) gain on AAA interest-only
strips and residual securities
|
(17,492 | ) | (16,123 | ) | 5,542 | |||||||||
Net gain (loss) on trading securities and other
instruments used to hedge AAA interest-only strips and residual
securities
|
11,706 | 9,793 | (11,436 | ) | ||||||||||
Total (loss) on mortgage-backed securities, net
|
$ | (4,987 | ) | $ | (6,910 | ) | $ | (6,037 | ) | |||||
Total Clean-up Call and Retention Program Income
|
$ | 21,192 | $ | 10,900 | $ | 29,346 |
The clean-up call and retention programs income is recognized as a component of gain on sale and net interest income in the Investment Portfolio Groups mortgage banking activities. As shown in our segment results on page 9, the effect of the clean-up call and retention program activities allowed the mortgage servicing business to generate positive returns during the historical refinance boom periods.
The clean-up call and retention programs income totaled $21 million during the first quarter of 2004, an approximately $8 million reduction compared to the quarter ended December 31, 2003. The reduction is primarily due to the decrease in net interest income as the remaining call loans and loans acquired through retention programs had lower weighted average coupon rates.
As master servicer for our various securitizations, we maintain the right to call selected deals when the outstanding loan balances in the securitization trust decline to a specified level, typically 10% of the original collateral balance. During the quarter ended March 31, 2004, we sold approximately $291 million of called loans with a pretax gain of $9.5 million, and $370 million loans acquired through retention programs for a pretax gain of $5.3 million. We expect to exercise our option to call additional loans of approximately $344 million in 2004, the exact timing and amount of which is dependent upon the future interest rate environment and borrower prepayment behavior.
Construction Lending
IndyMac provides construction financing for individual consumers who are in the process of building their own home (consumer construction) and for residential subdivision developers (builder construction). With respect to consumer construction, the primary product is a construction-to-permanent residential mortgage loan. This product provides financing for the 9-12 month term of construction and automatically converts to a permanent mortgage loan at the end of construction. As a result, this product represents a hybrid activity between our investing activities and mortgage banking activities. The Company earns net interest income during the construction phase. When the loan converts to permanent status, the loan is transferred into the
31
With respect to builder construction loans, our activities have been increasingly focused on those homebuilders that provide our mortgage loans to their customers when they sell the completed residence. Builder construction loans are typically based on prime rates. During the first quarter 2004, we entered into new tract construction commitments of $242 million, up 86%, or $112 million, from the first quarter 2003. Builder loans outstanding at March 31, 2004, including construction and land and other mortgage loans, was $660.0 million, resulting in a $55 million, or 9%, increase compared to December 31, 2003. A substantial portion of our builder construction loans is secured by corporate or personal guarantees of the builders as well as the real estate.
The following tables present further information on our construction loan portfolios.
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2004 | December 31, 2003 | |||||||||||||||
Consumer | Builder | Consumer | Builder | |||||||||||||
Construction | Construction | Construction | Construction | |||||||||||||
Loans | Loans | Loans | Loans | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Construction loans
|
$ | 1,225,347 | $ | 500,490 | $ | 1,145,526 | $ | 484,397 | ||||||||
Land and other mortgage loans
|
$ | 161,963 | $ | 159,536 | $ | 87,045 | $ | 120,751 | ||||||||
Outstanding commitments
|
$ | 2,273,345 | $ | 1,164,609 | $ | 2,091,853 | $ | 1,120,893 | ||||||||
Average construction loan commitment
|
$ | 379 | $ | 2,760 | $ | 391 | $ | 3,046 | ||||||||
Non-performing loans
|
0.68 | % | 1.83 | % | 0.78 | % | 1.60 | % | ||||||||
Yield
|
5.64 | % | 6.30 | % | 5.81 | % | 6.63 | % | ||||||||
Fixed-rate loans
|
90 | % | 0 | % | 94 | % | 1 | % | ||||||||
Adjustable-rate loans
|
10 | % | 98 | % | 6 | % | 97 | % | ||||||||
Hybrid adjustable-rate loans
|
0 | % | 2 | % | 0 | % | 2 | % |
Additional Information as of March 31, 2004
Consumer | Builder | ||||||||||
Construction | Construction | ||||||||||
Loans | Loans | ||||||||||
Average loan to value ratio(1)
|
74 | % | 72 | % | |||||||
Average FICO score(2)
|
705 | N/A | |||||||||
Geographic distribution(3)
|
|||||||||||
Southern California
|
31 | % | Southern California | 44 | % | ||||||
Northern California
|
18 | % | Northern California | 25 | % | ||||||
New York
|
6 | % | Illinois | 13 | % | ||||||
Hawaii
|
5 | % | Florida | 5 | % | ||||||
Florida
|
4 | % | |||||||||
Colorado
|
3 | % | |||||||||
Connecticut
|
3 | % | |||||||||
Washington
|
3 | % | |||||||||
Other (each individually< 2%)
|
27 | % | Other (each individually< 2%) | 13 | % | ||||||
Total Consumer Construction
|
100 | % | Total Builder Construction | 100 | % | ||||||
32
(1) | The average loan to value ratio is based on the estimated appraised value of the completed project compared to the commitment amount at March 31, 2004. |
(2) | FICO scores are not calculated for corporate entities and, therefore, are not applicable to the builder construction portfolio. |
(3) | Geographic distribution is based on outstanding balances. Some projects are continuing to be built out in states in which we no longer solicit new loans. |
For information related to the Companys balance of non-performing assets and related credit reserves, see discussion in Credit Risk and Reserves at page 37.
HELOC Portfolio
The Company financed $500 million in HELOC balances through a securitization trust. The trust issued AAA-rated asset-backed certificates that are guaranteed by a third party insurer. The Company pledged the certificates to secure $500 million of nonrecourse debt. As a result of this transaction, the net book value of the HELOCs was recharacterized as securities available for sale and servicing rights. The nonrecourse notes are reflected in other borrowings. The Company recognized no gain or loss on this secured financing transaction. The primary objectives of these transactions were to (1) lower our cost of funds, (2) improve our liquidity profile, and (3) improve our risk profile through the use of mortgage insurance.
The following table presents information on HELOCs as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2004, and December 31, 2003. All HELOC loans are adjustable rate loans and indexed to the prime rate.
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||
March 31, | December 31, | Variance | ||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | Percent | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Outstanding book value
|
$ | 322,351 | $ | 711,494 | (54.69 | )% | ||||||
Outstanding commitments(1)
|
$ | 638,210 | $ | 1,189,213 | (46.33 | )% | ||||||
Average spread over prime
|
2.07 | % | 1.92 | % | 7.81 | % | ||||||
Average FICO score
|
711 | 710 | 0.14 | % | ||||||||
Average CLTV ratio(2)
|
76 | % | 77 | % | (1.30 | )% |
Total Unpaid | Average Loan | 30+ Days | |||||||||||||||||||
Principal | Commitment | Average Spread | Average | Delinquency | |||||||||||||||||
CLTV | Balance | Balance | Over Prime | FICO | Percentage | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||
>= 96% &< = 100%
|
$ | 10,098 | $ | 53 | 3.85 | % | 723 | 3.48 | % | ||||||||||||
>= 91% &< = 95%
|
35,478 | 51 | 3.45 | % | 709 | 1.06 | % | ||||||||||||||
>= 81% &< = 90%
|
122,765 | 53 | 2.63 | % | 694 | 1.37 | % | ||||||||||||||
>= 71% &< = 80%
|
84,197 | 83 | 1.27 | % | 711 | 1.38 | % | ||||||||||||||
70%
|
69,813 | 85 | 1.08 | % | 728 | 1.10 | % | ||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 322,351 | $ | 68 | 2.07 | % | 711 | 1.34 | % | ||||||||||||
(1) | On funded loans. |
(2) | The CLTV combines the loan to value on both the first mortgage loan and the HELOC. |
33
NET INTEREST INCOME
The following table sets forth information regarding our consolidated average balance sheets (all segments are combined), along with the total dollar amounts of interest income and interest expense and the weighted average interest rates for the periods presented. Average balances are calculated on a daily basis. Non-performing loans are included in the average balances for the periods presented. The allowance for loan losses is excluded from the average loan balances.
Three Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2004 | March 31, 2003 | December 31, 2003 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Yield | Average | Yield | Average | Yield | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance | Interest | Rate | Balance | Interest | Rate | Balance | Interest | Rate | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities
|
$ | 2,105,468 | $ | 26,855 | 5.13 | % | $ | 1,920,645 | $ | 20,961 | 4.43 | % | $ | 2,038,330 | $ | 26,395 | 5.14 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Loans held for sale
|
3,688,650 | 54,746 | 5.97 | % | 2,867,547 | 45,201 | 6.39 | % | 3,376,349 | 54,743 | 6.43 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage loans held for investment
|
5,608,258 | 58,042 | 4.16 | % | 2,759,900 | 35,962 | 5.28 | % | 5,314,934 | 59,360 | 4.43 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Builder construction and income property
|
506,668 | 8,039 | 6.38 | % | 570,886 | 9,720 | 6.91 | % | 506,955 | 8,649 | 6.77 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer construction
|
1,140,371 | 15,995 | 5.64 | % | 839,772 | 14,396 | 6.95 | % | 1,076,853 | 15,765 | 5.81 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock and
other
|
337,478 | 2,882 | 3.43 | % | 181,268 | 1,957 | 4.38 | % | 317,133 | 2,917 | 3.65 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-earning assets
|
13,386,893 | 166,559 | 5.00 | % | 9,140,018 | 128,197 | 5.69 | % | 12,630,554 | 167,829 | 5.27 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other
|
1,161,479 | 894,643 | 1,177,305 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets
|
$ | 14,548,372 | $ | 10,034,661 | $ | 13,807,859 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits
|
$ | 3,838,511 | 22,482 | 2.36 | % | $ | 2,736,822 | 21,687 | 3.21 | % | $ | 3,579,379 | 21,929 | 2.43 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank
|
5,207,135 | 30,920 | 2.39 | % | 2,709,008 | 25,558 | 3.83 | % | 4,888,567 | 30,208 | 2.45 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other borrowings
|
3,532,004 | 19,224 | 2.19 | % | 2,812,407 | 17,927 | 2.59 | % | 3,268,244 | 17,747 | 2.15 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
12,577,650 | 72,626 | 2.32 | % | 8,258,237 | 65,172 | 3.20 | % | 11,736,190 | 69,884 | 2.36 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other
|
927,400 | 906,201 | 1,072,435 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities
|
13,505,050 | 9,164,438 | 12,808,625 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shareholders equity
|
1,043,322 | 870,223 | 999,234 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
$ | 14,548,372 | $ | 10,034,661 | $ | 13,807,859 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
$ | 93,933 | $ | 63,025 | $ | 97,945 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest spread
|
2.68 | % | 2.49 | % | 2.91 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest margin
|
2.82 | % | 2.80 | % | 3.08 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The net interest margin during the first quarter 2004 was comparable to that of the first quarter 2003 and compressed from fourth quarter 2003. The yield on interest earning assets declined during the first quarter due to high prepayment speeds, and compression of spread in mortgage rates and the 10-year treasury rate. The effect of the prepayments during the period was partially offset by recently acquired higher yielding clean-up call loans. The decrease in cost of funds was largely the result of the repricing of higher interest rate CDs and term FHLB advances to lower rates.
34
The dollar amounts of interest income and interest expense fluctuate depending upon changes in the average balances and interest rates of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The following table details changes attributable to (i) changes in volume (changes in average outstanding balances multiplied by the prior periods rate), (ii) changes in the rate (changes in the average interest rate multiplied by the prior periods volume), and (iii) changes in rate/volume (mix) (changes in rates times the changes in volume).
Three Months Ended March 31, 2004 vs. 2003 | |||||||||||||||||
Increase/(Decrease) Due to | |||||||||||||||||
Volume | Rate | Mix | Total Change | ||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||
Interest income
|
|||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities
|
$ | 2,209 | $ | 3,334 | $ | 351 | $ | 5,894 | |||||||||
Loans held for sale
|
13,428 | (2,994 | ) | (889 | ) | 9,545 | |||||||||||
Mortgage loans held for investment
|
37,725 | (7,635 | ) | (8,009 | ) | 22,080 | |||||||||||
Builder construction and income property
|
(1,021 | ) | (737 | ) | 77 | (1,681 | ) | ||||||||||
Consumer construction
|
5,317 | (2,715 | ) | (1,003 | ) | 1,599 | |||||||||||
Investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock and
other
|
1,721 | (422 | ) | (370 | ) | 925 | |||||||||||
Total interest income
|
59,375 | (11,169 | ) | (9,844 | ) | 38,362 | |||||||||||
Interest expense
|
|||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits
|
8,984 | (5,790 | ) | (2,399 | ) | 795 | |||||||||||
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank
|
23,979 | (9,605 | ) | (9,012 | ) | 5,362 | |||||||||||
Other borrowings
|
4,774 | (2,746 | ) | (731 | ) | 1,297 | |||||||||||
Total interest expense
|
37,737 | (18,141 | ) | (12,142 | ) | 7,454 | |||||||||||
Net interest income
|
$ | 21,638 | $ | 6,972 | $ | 2,298 | $ | 30,908 | |||||||||
35
OVERALL INTEREST RATE RISK MANAGEMENT
In addition to our hedging activities to mitigate the interest rate risk in our pipeline of mortgage loans held for sale and our investment in servicing-related assets, we perform extensive overall interest rate risk analyses. The primary measurement tool used to evaluate interest rate risk over the comprehensive balance sheet is a net portfolio value (NPV) analysis that simulates the effects changes in interest rates have on the fair value of shareholders equity.
March 31, 2004 | December 31, 2003 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effect of Change | Effect of Change | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
in Interest Rates | in Interest Rates | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Decrease | Increase | Decrease | Increase | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value | 100 bps | 100 bps | Fair Value | 100 bps | 100 bps | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$ | 200,096 | $ | 200,096 | $ | 200,096 | $ | 111,203 | $ | 111,203 | $111,203 | ||||||||||||||
Trading securities
|
237,024 | 214,319 | 263,822 | 206,484 | 180,197 | 228,880 | |||||||||||||||||||
Available for sale securities
|
2,057,016 | 2,103,465 | 1,998,246 | 1,611,958 | 1,662,715 | 1,553,103 | |||||||||||||||||||
Loans held for sale
|
3,544,675 | 3,612,181 | 3,454,695 | 2,573,248 | 2,606,028 | 2,519,059 | |||||||||||||||||||
Loans held for investment
|
6,716,664 | 6,753,550 | 6,645,607 | 7,396,475 | 7,448,389 | 7,304,464 | |||||||||||||||||||
MSRs
|
414,358 | 302,239 | 506,825 | 443,688 | 311,777 | 534,672 | |||||||||||||||||||
Other assets
|
661,290 | 674,276 | 648,298 | 683,213 | 697,356 | 669,062 | |||||||||||||||||||
Derivatives
|
41,643 | 14,063 | 108,659 | 106,119 | 91,598 | 169,246 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total assets
|
$ | 13,872,766 | $ | 13,874,189 | $ | 13,826,248 | $ | 13,132,388 | $ | 13,109,263 | $13,089,689 | ||||||||||||||
Deposits
|
$ | 4,772,939 | $ | 4,814,835 | $ | 4,734,880 | $ | 4,367,400 | $ | 4,404,900 | $4,335,433 | ||||||||||||||
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank
|
4,790,378 | 4,822,174 | 4,757,471 | 4,949,477 | 4,979,962 | 4,919,147 | |||||||||||||||||||
Other borrowings
|
2,797,939 | 2,800,060 | 2,795,610 | 2,438,695 | 2,440,538 | 2,436,665 | |||||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities
|
160,390 | 160,493 | 160,267 | 156,711 | 156,800 | 156,599 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities
|
12,521,646 | 12,597,562 | 12,448,228 | 11,912,283 | 11,982,200 | 11,847,844 | |||||||||||||||||||
Shareholders equity (NPV)
|
$ | 1,351,120 | $ | 1,276,627 | $ | 1,378,020 | $ | 1,220,105 | $ | 1,127,063 | $1,241,845 | ||||||||||||||
% Change from base case
|
(5.51 | )% | 1.99 | % | (7.63 | )% | 1.78 | % | |||||||||||||||||
The increase in the net present value of equity from December 31, 2003, to March 31, 2004, is primarily due to retained earnings of $44.1 million and improvement in Loans HFI values. The March 31, 2004, results indicate that the Bank is better positioned for rising rates in an up 100 basis point scenario. It should be noted that this analysis does not reflect changes in volumes and profits from our mortgage banking operations that would be expected to result from the interest rate environment.
The assumptions inherent in our interest rate models include expected valuation changes in an instantaneous and parallel interest rate shock and assumptions as to the degree of correlation between our hedge positions and the hedged assets and liabilities. These assumptions may not accurately predict factors such as the spread-widening or spread-tightening risk that may result from changes in rates on either the Treasury or LIBOR/swap curve and mortgages. In addition, the sensitivity analysis described in the prior paragraph is limited by the fact that it is performed at a particular point in time and does not incorporate other factors that would impact our financial performance in these scenarios. These factors include, but are not limited to, expected increases in income associated with the expected increase in production volume that could result from a decrease in interest rates and changes in the asset, liability and derivative mix during interest rate changes. Consequently, the preceding simulation should not be viewed as a forecast, as it is reasonable to expect that actual results will vary significantly from the analyses discussed above.
The Companys Board of Directors level and management level ALCOs monitor our hedging activities to determine whether the value of our hedge positions, their correlation to the balance sheet item being hedged, and the amounts being hedged, continue to provide adequate protection against interest rate risk. While there
36
CREDIT RISK AND RESERVES
GENERAL
The following table summarizes the Companys allowance for loan losses/credit discounts and non-performing assets as of March 31, 2004.
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance | Reserves as a | Non- | Net Charge | |||||||||||||||||||||||
For Loan | Credit | Percentage of | Performing | Offs/Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Type of Loan | Book Value | Losses | Discounts | Book Value | Assets | REO (Gains) | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Held for investment portfolio
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SFR mortgage loans and HELOCs
|
$ | 4,697,377 | $ | 19,313 | $ | | 0.41 | % | $ | 14,402 | $ | 925 | ||||||||||||||
Land and other mortgage
|
164,981 | 3,169 | | 1.92 | % | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Builder construction and income property
|
509,805 | 12,689 | | 2.49 | % | 12,057 | | |||||||||||||||||||
Consumer construction
|
1,225,347 | 9,872 | | 0.81 | % | 9,428 | 76 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total core held for investment loans
|
6,597,510 | 45,043 | | 0.68 | % | 35,887 | 1,001 | |||||||||||||||||||
Discontinued product lines(1)
|
65,514 | 7,083 | | 10.81 | % | 6,431 | 1,018 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total held for investment portfolio
|
6,663,024 | $ | 52,126 | | 0.78 | % | 42,318 | 2,019 | ||||||||||||||||||
Held for sale portfolio
|
3,545,240 | $ | 13,923 | 0.39 | % | 39,794 | | |||||||||||||||||||
Total loans
|
$ | 10,208,264 | 82,112 | $ | 2,019 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Foreclosed assets
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Core portfolios | 25,547 | $ | (460 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Discontinued product lines | 988 | 217 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total foreclosed assets | 26,535 | $ | (243 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total non-performing assets | $ | 108,647 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total non-performing assets as a percentage of total assets | 0.75 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Discontinued product lines include manufactured home loans and home improvement loans. |
37
The following tables provide additional comparative data on non-performing assets relative to the allowance for loan losses.
March 31, | March 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2003 | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||
Loans held for investment
|
|||||||||||||||
Portfolio loans
|
|||||||||||||||
SFR mortgage loans
|
$ | 14,402 | $ | 10,862 | $ | 12,414 | |||||||||
Land and other mortgage loans
|
| 2,730 | 71 | ||||||||||||
Builder construction
|
12,057 | 8,541 | 9,704 | ||||||||||||
Consumer construction
|
9,428 | 12,670 | 8,954 | ||||||||||||
Total portfolio non-performing loans
|
35,887 | 34,803 | 31,143 | ||||||||||||
Discontinued product lines
|
6,431 | 9,529 | 6,449 | ||||||||||||
Total non-performing loans held for investment
|
42,318 | 44,332 | 37,592 | ||||||||||||
Non-performing loans held for sale
|
39,794 | 25,734 | 38,855 | ||||||||||||
Total non-performing loans
|
82,112 | 70,066 | 76,447 | ||||||||||||
Foreclosed assets
|
26,535 | 27,871 | 23,677 | ||||||||||||
Total non-performing assets
|
$ | 108,647 | $ | 97,937 | $ | 100,124 | |||||||||
Total non-performing assets to total assets
|
0.75 | % | 1.03 | % | 0.76 | % | |||||||||
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans
held for investment
|
123 | % | 113 | % | 140 | % | |||||||||
The following shows the activity in the allowance for loan losses during the indicated periods:
Three Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
March 31, | March 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2003 | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||
Core portfolio loans
|
|||||||||||||||
Balance, beginning of period
|
$ | 45,644 | $ | 41,314 | $ | 44,886 | |||||||||
Provision for loan losses
|
400 | 1,525 | 2,250 | ||||||||||||
Charge-offs net of recoveries SFR mortgage loans
|
(925 | ) | (1,166 | ) | (1,018 | ) | |||||||||
Land and other mortgage loans
|
| | (11 | ) | |||||||||||
Consumer construction
|
(76 | ) | | (102 | ) | ||||||||||
Builder construction
|
| (149 | ) | (361 | ) | ||||||||||
Charge-offs net of recoveries
|
(1,001 | ) | (1,315 | ) | (1,492 | ) | |||||||||
Balance, end of period
|
45,043 | 41,524 | 45,644 | ||||||||||||
Discontinued product lines
|
|||||||||||||||
Balance, beginning of period
|
7,001 | 9,447 | 7,595 | ||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses
|
1,100 | 1,575 | 1,250 | ||||||||||||
Charge-offs net of recoveries
|
(1,018 | ) | (2,300 | ) | (1,844 | ) | |||||||||
Balance, end of period
|
7,083 | 8,722 | 7,001 | ||||||||||||
Total allowance for loan losses
|
$ | 52,126 | $ | 50,246 | $ | 52,645 | |||||||||
Annualized charge-offs to average loans
|
0.15 | % | 0.07 | % | 0.16 | % | |||||||||
Core portfolio loans only:
|
|||||||||||||||
Annualized charge-offs to average loans
|
0.07 | % | 0.05 | % | 0.07 | % |
38
Total credit-related reserves, including the allowance for loan losses and the market valuation reserves, amounted to $66.0 million at March 31, 2004, compared to $66.6 million at December 31, 2003. The allowance for loan losses of $52.1 million for loans held for investment at March 31, 2004, represented 0.78% of total loans held for investment. This compares to an allowance for loan losses of $50.2 million, or 1.20% of total loans held for investment, at March 31, 2003. Charge-offs were significantly improved during the first quarter 2004, both in our core and non-core portfolios. Total net charge-offs of $2.0 million for the first quarter 2004 were 44% lower than net charge-offs in the first quarter 2003. This improved credit performance combined with the fact that the substantial loan portfolio growth over the past twelve months consists predominantly of high quality SFR mortgage loans held for investment, which have low expected defaults and loss severities, support a lower ratio of allowance to total loans.
The ratio of non-performing assets to total assets was 0.75% at March 31, 2004, comparable to 0.76% at December 31, 2003. Total non-performing assets increased from $100.1 million at December 31, 2003 to $108.6 million at March 31, 2004, made up of a $5.7 million increase in non-performing loans and a $2.9 million increase in foreclosed assets. The increase in non-performing loans was driven by a $4.7 million increase in loans held for investment primarily due to two large loans from our builder construction portfolio. We do not expect to incur any losses from these two loans based on subsequent payment performance. The increase of $2.9 million in foreclosed assets was primarily due to foreclosed assets acquired through clean-up calls exercised during the first quarter 2004. Included in the non-performing loans held for investment balance at March 31, 2004 is a matured construction loan in amount of $8.1 million. Given the current value of the collateral and the credit of the guarantor, we do not expect to incur any losses on this loan at this time. The non-performing loans held for sale amounted to $39.8 million at March 31, 2004, approximately 56% of which are attributable to called loans.
With respect to the portfolio of loans held for investment in IndyMacs core businesses, the allowance for loan losses at March 31, 2004 was $45.0 million or 0.68% of the loan balance, compared to the 0.62% of total loan balance at December 31, 2003.
With respect to IndyMacs non-core liquidating portfolios, consisting primarily of manufactured housing and home improvement loans, net charge-offs totaled $1.0 million during the first quarter of 2004, down from the $2.3 million of net charge-offs on these portfolios during the first quarter of 2003. After provision for loan losses of $1.1 million, the allocated allowance for loan losses was $7.1 million, or 10.81% of the remaining principal balance of such liquidating portfolios, compared to the 10.07% reserve coverage at December 31, 2003, and coverage of 9.56% at March 31, 2003.
Our determination of the level of the allowance for loan losses and, correspondingly, the provision for loan losses, is based on managements judgments and assumptions regarding various matters, including general economic conditions, loan portfolio composition, delinquency trends and prior loan loss experience. In assessing the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, management reviews the performance in the portfolios of loans held for investment and the non-core portfolio of discontinued product lines.
While we consider the allowance for loan losses to be adequate based on information currently available, future adjustments to the allowance may be necessary due to changes in economic conditions, delinquency levels, foreclosure rates, or loss rates. The level of our allowance for loan losses is also subject to review by our federal regulator, the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS). Our regulator may require that our allowance for loan losses be increased based on their evaluation of the information available to it at the time of its examination of the Bank.
With respect to mortgage loans held for sale, IndyMac does not provide an allowance for loan losses, pursuant to the applicable accounting rules. Instead, a component for credit risk related to loans held for sale is embedded in the market valuation for these loans. Market valuation reserve on loans held for sale totaled $13.9 million at March 31, 2004.
39
SECONDARY MARKET RESERVE
We generally do not sell loans with recourse in our loan sale activities. However, we can be required to repurchase loans from investors when our loan sales contain individual loans that are not in conformity with the representations and warranties we make at the time of sale. We have made significant investments in our pre-production and post-production quality control processes to identify potential systemic issues that could cause repurchases. We believe that these efforts have improved our production quality; however, possible increases in default rates due to an economic slowdown could cause the overall rate of repurchases to remain constant or even increase. Since inception in 1993, the Company has repurchased only a very small amount of loans from its securitization trusts. The increase in repurchase activity in recent years has been primarily a function of IndyMacs diversification of its loan sale channels to whole loan and GSE sales. While sales through these channels generate enhanced cash flows, they tend to have a greater level of representation and warranty risk. The following table shows the amount of loans, including the unpaid principal balance related to indemnity payments to investors in lieu of repurchasing a loan, we have repurchased from each distribution channel, since the Company began active lending operations in January 1993.
Amount | Percentage | |||||||||||||
Repurchased | Total Sold | Repurchased | ||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||
Loans sold:
|
||||||||||||||
GSEs and whole loans
|
$ | 116.4 | $ | 57,732 | 0.20 | % | ||||||||
Securitization trusts
|
9.3 | 45,197 | 0.02 | % | ||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 125.7 | $ | 102,929 | 0.12 | % | ||||||||
The Company maintains secondary market reserves for losses that could arise in connection with loans that we are required to repurchase from whole loan sales or securitization transactions. These reserves, which totaled $34.0 million at March 31, 2004, have two general components: reserves for repurchases arising from representation and warranty claims, and reserves for disputes with investors and vendors with respect to contractual obligations pertaining to mortgage operations. The table below shows the activity in the reserves during the three months ended March 31, 2004.
(Dollars in | ||||
thousands) | ||||
Balance, December 31, 2003.
|
$ | 34,000 | ||
Additions/provisions
|
8,486 | |||
Claims reimbursement and estimated discounts on
loans held for sale/charge-offs
|
(9,096 | ) | ||
Recoveries on previous claims
|
610 | |||
Balance, March 31, 2004.
|
$ | 34,000 | ||
Reserve levels are a function of expected losses based on actual pending claims and repurchase requests, historical experience, loan volume and loan sales distribution channels and the assessment of probable vendor or investor claims. While the ultimate amount of repurchases and claims is uncertain, we believe that the reserves are adequate. We will continue to evaluate the adequacy of our reserves and may continue to allocate a portion of our gain on sale proceeds to these reserves going forward. Changes in the level of provision to this reserve impacts the overall gain on sale margin from quarter to quarter. The entire balances of our secondary market reserves are included on the consolidated balance sheets as a component of other liabilities.
40
OPERATING EXPENSES
A summary of operating expenses follows:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||
March 31, | March 31, | December 31, | ||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2003 | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Salaries and related
|
$ | 63,038 | $ | 53,094 | $ | 55,706 | ||||||
Premises and equipment
|
9,593 | 8,306 | 9,864 | |||||||||
Loan purchase costs
|
7,307 | 7,058 | 6,872 | |||||||||
Professional services
|
5,073 | 4,610 | 5,429 | |||||||||
Data processing
|
8,591 | 6,764 | 9,911 | |||||||||
Office
|
5,979 | 5,260 | 5,509 | |||||||||
Advertising and promotion
|
8,856 | 6,064 | 7,454 | |||||||||
Operations and sale of foreclosed assets
|
2,135 | 956 | 1,316 | |||||||||
Other
|
4,626 | 3,546 | 4,845 | |||||||||
$ | 115,198 | $ | 95,658 | $ | 106,906 | |||||||
General and administrative expenses, including salaries, increased during the quarter ended March 31, 2004, to $115.2 million, compared to $95.7 million during the same period in 2003. The increase was largely driven by increases in salaries and infrastructure and technology related expenses as a result of the Companys increased mortgage loan production and operational expansions. Mortgage loan production increased 9% year over year, from $6.6 billion for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, to $7.1 billion for the quarter ended March 31, 2004. In a continuing effort to penetrate the market and gain market share, the Company also incurred costs to expand its sales force infrastructure with dedicated resources focused on new customer activation, customer training and support, and improving its conversion of loan submissions to fundings. As a result of the increased production volume and investments made in sales and customer service, the Companys average full-time equivalent employees increased during the year by 19%, from 3,286 during the quarter ended March 31, 2003 to 3,921 during the quarter ended March 31, 2004. Additionally, the Company continues to increase its investment in direct marketing costs to further promote its new product offerings, subprime and HELOC products. Furthermore, during 2003 the Company made investments in data processing costs to (1) enhance its quality controls and compliance structure to ensure continued improvement in asset quality and support the growth of higher margin products; (2) strengthen its technology platform; and (3) enhance its customer service response performance.
DIVIDEND POLICY
IndyMacs Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.30 per share for the second quarter of 2004, up 20% from the dividend declared and paid in the first quarter of this year. The cash dividend is payable June 10, 2004, to shareholders of record on May 13, 2004.
FUTURE OUTLOOK
On average, U.S. mortgage debt outstanding has grown approximately 7% to 8% per year over the last 2 decades and is projected, based on economic demographics, to continue this level of approximate growth. At this rate, mortgage debt outstanding roughly doubles every decade. We believe, based on our confidence in our employees, hybrid thrift/ mortgage banking business model, capital strength and ability to gain market share, that we are positioned to grow earnings per share at a compounded growth rate of approximately 15% over the long run, or approximately double the rate of the industry. In fact, IndyMacs historical track record has exceeded this target over the last eleven years with compounded annual growth of 27% under its current management team.
41
With that said, the past three years have been extraordinary years for the mortgage industry. Industry mortgage production has achieved historic highs as a result of historically low interest rates, which led to record refinancing of mortgages. The industry is in the midst of a major transition from these historic highs back to more normalized levels. The Mortgage Bankers Association of America is projecting that industry production will decline 33% in 2004. Given the significant industry transition, IndyMac expects that its earnings per share in 2004 will lag its long-term growth rate as we make this transition.
Declining interest rates in February gave rise to a mini refinance boom during the first quarter, translating to an improvement in the overall industry volumes and led to the significant increase in our pipeline of loans in process which will result in increased production volumes in the second quarter. However, economic indicators are now pointing to an improving economy and accordingly interest rates have significantly increased from those earlier lows. The volatility in interest rates continues to make forecasting more challenging and less precise. What does seem increasingly clear at this point is that while the overall industry volumes may be somewhat higher than originally anticipated at the start of the year, our industry will continue its transition to more normal levels over the course of this year. Given IndyMacs performance in the first quarter, our strong pipeline as we enter the second quarter and our expectations for the remainder of this year, we now expect that earnings per share will range from $3.10 to $3.30 in 2004, a modest improvement in our outlook from three months earlier.
The 2004 earnings projection above represents a proforma number that excludes the impact to earnings and EPS for a prospective change in industry accounting for rate locks pursuant to Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 105 published by the SEC during the first quarter with an effective implementation date of April 1, 2004. This change delays the revenue recognition on the pipeline of rate locks and funded loans by approximately one quarter and will have a one-time negative effect on earnings during the second quarter of this year. The impact of this change in accounting in the second quarter of this year is expected to range from $24 million to $27 million after tax, or $0.40 to $0.45 per share. IndyMac plans to report both GAAP and proforma EPS in the second quarter so that results can be evaluated on a consistent accounting basis. This change has no economic impact on IndyMacs business or operations.
This Future Outlook section contains certain forward-looking statements. See the section of this Form 10-Q entitled Forward Looking Statements for a description of factors which may cause our actual results to differ from those anticipated.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
OVERVIEW
During the quarter ended March 31, 2004, we had average total liquidity of $984.4 million, which is represented by unpledged liquid assets on hand plus amounts that may be immediately raised through the pledging of other available assets as collateral pursuant to committed financing facilities. We currently believe that our liquidity level is in excess of that necessary to satisfy our operating requirements and meet our obligations and commitments in a timely and cost effective manner.
PRINCIPAL SOURCES OF CASH
Our principal financing needs are to fund acquisitions of mortgage loans and our investment in mortgage loans, mortgage-backed securities and MSRs. Our primary sources of funds used to meet these financing needs are loan sales and securitizations, deposits, advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank, borrowings and retained earnings. The sources used vary depending on such factors as rates paid, collateral requirements, maturities and the impact on our capital.
42
Loan Sales and Securitizations
Our business model relies heavily upon selling the majority of our mortgage loans shortly after acquisition. The proceeds of these sales are a critical component of the liquidity necessary for our ongoing operations. During the three months ended March 31, 2004, we sold our loans through three channels: (1) GSEs; (2) private label securitizations; and (3) whole loan sales. If any of our sales channels were disrupted, our liquidity could be negatively impacted. Disruptions in our whole loan sales and mortgage securitization transactions can occur as a result of the performance of our existing securitizations, as well as economic events or other factors beyond our control.
Deposits/Retail Bank
We solicit deposits from the general public and institutions by offering a variety of accounts and rates through our network of 10 branches in Southern California, telebanking and Internet channels. Through our Web site at www.indymacbank.com, consumers can access their accounts 24-hours a day, seven days a week. Online banking allows customers to access their accounts, view balances, transfer funds between accounts, view transactions, download account information and pay their bills conveniently from any computer terminal.
Our deposit products include regular savings accounts, demand deposit accounts, money market accounts, certificates of deposit and individual retirement accounts.
The following table sets forth the balance of deposits, by deposit category, as of the following period ends.
March 31, 2004 | March 31, 2003 | December 31, 2003 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
% of | % of | % of | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | Total | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount | Deposits | Amount | Deposits | Amount | Deposits | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-interest-bearing checking
|
$ | 48,231 | 1 | % | $ | 40,221 | 1 | % | $ | 44,353 | 1 | % | |||||||||||||
Interest-bearing checking
|
42,727 | 1 | % | 42,068 | 1 | % | 39,761 | 1 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Savings
|
1,637,665 | 34 | % | 932,141 | 27 | % | 1,515,771 | 35 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Custodial accounts
|
658,387 | 14 | % | 557,041 | 16 | % | 528,724 | 12 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total core deposits
|
2,387,010 | 50 | % | 1,571,471 | 45 | % | 2,128,609 | 49 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Certificates of deposit
|
2,362,759 | 50 | % | 1,904,710 | 55 | % | 2,222,164 | 51 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total deposits
|
$ | 4,749,769 | 100 | % | $ | 3,476,181 | 100 | % | $ | 4,350,773 | 100 | % | |||||||||||||
The increase in our savings deposits from $1,515.8 million at December 31, 2003 to $1,637.7 million at March 31, 2004, is mainly due to our continuing offer of the top tier money market products.
The following table sets forth the balance of deposits, by deposit channel, as of the following period ends:
March 31, 2004 | March 31, 2003 | December 31, 2003 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
% of | % of | % of | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | Total | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount | Deposits | Amount | Deposits | Amount | Deposits | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Branch
|
$ | 1,780,396 | 37 | % | $ | 1,402,724 | 40 | % | $ | 1,717,314 | 39 | % | |||||||||||||
Telebanking
|
462,997 | 11 | % | 478,338 | 14 | % | 463,755 | 11 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Internet
|
523,622 | 10 | % | 398,242 | 12 | % | 555,029 | 13 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Money desk
|
1,324,367 | 28 | % | 639,836 | 18 | % | 1,085,951 | 25 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Custodial
|
658,387 | 14 | % | 557,041 | 16 | % | 528,724 | 12 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total deposits
|
$ | 4,749,769 | 100 | % | $ | 3,476,181 | 100 | % | $ | 4,350,773 | 100 | % | |||||||||||||
43
Included in deposits at March 31, 2004, and December 31, 2003, were non-interest-bearing custodial accounts, primarily related to our GSE servicing portfolio, totaling $658.4 million and $528.7 million, respectively.
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank
The Federal Home Loan Bank system functions as a borrowing source for regulated financial depositories and similar institutions that are engaged in residential housing finance. As a member of the FHLB of San Francisco, we are required to own capital stock of the FHLB and are authorized to apply for advances from the FHLB, on a secured basis, in amounts determined by reference to available collateral. SFR mortgage loans, agency and AAA-rated mortgage-backed securities are the principal collateral that may be used to secure these borrowings, although certain other types of loans and other assets may also be accepted pursuant to FHLB policies and statutory requirements. Currently, the Bank is approved for collateralized advances of up to $5.8 billion, of which $4.8 billion were outstanding at March 31, 2004. The FHLB offers several credit programs, each with its own fixed or floating interest rate, and a range of maturities.
Trust Preferred Securities and Warrants
On November 14, 2001, we completed an offering of Warrants and Income Redeemable Equity Securities (WIRES) to investors. Gross proceeds of the transaction were $175 million. The securities were offered as units consisting of a trust preferred security, issued by a trust formed by us, and a warrant to purchase IndyMac Bancorps common stock. In both the months of July and December 2003, we issued an additional $30 million of trust preferred securities, yielding 6.05% and 6.30%, respectively. The proceeds of these securities will also be used in operations. These securities did not contain any warrants on IndyMac Bancorp common stock.
Upon the adoption of FASB Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin (ARB) No. 51, on July 1, 2003, the trusts have been deconsolidated from the financial statements of the Company. Trust preferred debentures, representing the liabilities due from IndyMac Bancorp to IndyMac Capital Trusts, amounted to $183.8 million and $183.6 million at March 31, 2004, and December 31, 2003, respectively. These debentures are included in Other Borrowings on the consolidated balance sheets.
Other Borrowings, Excluding Trust Preferred Debentures
Other borrowings, excluding trust preferred debentures, consist of loans and securities sold under committed financing facilities and uncommitted agreements to repurchase, CMO collateral and notes payable. Total other borrowings increased to $3,392.7 million at March 31, 2004, from $2,438.5 million at December 31, 2003. The increase of $954.2 million was primarily the result of additional draws on our credit facilities to fund mortgage loan originations, the issuance of $500 million non-recourse AAA-rated HELOC-backed notes during the first quarter 2004, and reductions of other borrowings that previously financed HELOC loans. Additionally, we continued to use borrowed funds to fund mortgage loans originated during the three months ended March 31, 2004.
At March 31, 2004, we had $3.9 billion in committed financing facilities, of which $2.2 billion was utilized. For the first quarter 2004, we had an average of $707.5 million in operating liquidity available for use, based on eligible collateral. Decisions by our lenders and investors to make additional funds available to us in the future will depend upon a number of factors. These include our compliance with the terms of existing credit arrangements, our financial performance, eligible collateral, changes in our credit rating, industry and market trends in our various businesses, the general availability and interest rates applicable to financing and investments, the lenders and/or investors own resources and policies concerning loans and investments and the relative attractiveness of alternative investment or lending opportunities. As of March 31, 2004, we believe we were in compliance with all representations, warranties and financial covenants under our borrowing facilities.
44
PRINCIPAL USES OF CASH
In addition to the financing sources discussed above, cash uses are funded by net cash flows from operations, sales of mortgage-backed securities and principal and interest payments on loans and securities. The amounts of net acquisitions of loans held for sale and trading securities included as components of net cash provided by (used in) operating activities totaled $1.4 million during the first quarter 2004 and $(131.0) million during first quarter 2003. Excluding the purchase and sale activity for loans held for sale and trading securities, the net cash provided by the Companys operating activities totaled $112.2 million and $53.3 million for the quarters ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. During the third quarter 2003, the Company started to purchase swaptions and more caps and floors to hedge certain liabilities and servicing-related assets. The net (increase) decrease in premiums for these derivative instruments totaled $26.6 million and $(14.5) million for the quarters ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The net cash provided by the Companys operating activities before the activities for trading securities, loans held for sale and purchase of derivative instruments amounted to $85.6 million and $67.9 million for the quarters ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
Accumulated other comprehensive loss was $(36.7) million at March 31, 2004, compared to $(26.5) million at December 31, 2003. This change was the net result of the decline in fair value of certain interest rate swaps and swaptions designated as cash flow hedges of floating rate borrowings exceeded the underlying gain in securities classified as available for sale. It should be noted that accumulated other comprehensive loss does not include the increases in the fair value of loans held for investment that are funded by borrowings that are hedged by a portion of these interest rate swaps and swaptions. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss is not a component of the determination of regulatory capital.
REGULATORY CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS
The Bank is subject to regulatory capital regulations administered by the federal banking agencies. In addition, as a condition to its approval of our acquisition of SGV Bancorp, Inc. in July 2000, the OTS required that the Bank hold Tier 1 (core) capital of at least 8% of adjusted total assets for three years following the consummation of the transaction and maintain a total risk-based capital position of at least 10% of total risk-weighted assets. This particular condition expired on July 1, 2003, and the Bank has committed to the OTS to maintain total risk-based capital and Tier 1 risk-based capital (core capital minus the deduction for low-level recourse and residual interests) equal to at least 10% and 6%, respectively, of total risk-weighted assets. As of March 31, 2004, the Bank met all of the requirements of a well-capitalized institution under the general regulatory capital regulations.
During 2001, the OTS issued guidance for subprime lending programs, which requires a lender to quantify the additional risks in its subprime lending activities and determine the appropriate amounts of allowances for loan losses and capital it needs to offset those risks. During the fourth quarter of 2003, the Company revised its approach to conform to this guidance, and this revised approach was accepted by the OTS. Whereas, in the past, subprime loans were determined based on increasing risk levels using secondary marketing and rating agency securitization models, the revised approach now generally classifies as subprime all loans in a first lien position with a FICO score less than 620 and all loans in a second lien position with a FICO score less than 660. As of December 31, 2003, loans meeting this revised definition were supported by capital equal to two times that of similar prime assets. We report our subprime loan calculation in an addendum to the Thrift Financial Report that we file with the OTS. As of March 31, 2004, subprime loans totaled $585.8 million as calculated for regulatory reporting purposes, of which $445.5 million were loans held for sale.
45
The following table presents the Banks actual and required capital ratios and the minimum required capital ratios to be categorized as well-capitalized at March 31, 2004. The impact of the additional risk weighting criteria related to subprime loans had the effect of reducing IndyMacs total risk-based capital by 64 basis points as noted in the table below.
As Reported | Adjusted for | ||||||||||||
Pre-Subprime | Additional Subprime | Well-Capitalized | |||||||||||
Risk-Weighting | Risk-Weighting | Minimum | |||||||||||
Capital Ratios:
|
|||||||||||||
Tangible
|
7.50 | % | 7.50 | % | 2.00 | % | |||||||
Tier 1 core
|
7.50 | % | 7.50 | % | 5.00 | % | |||||||
Tier 1 risk-based
|
12.67 | % | 12.05 | % | 6.00 | % | |||||||
Total risk-based
|
13.25 | % | 12.61 | % | 10.00 | % |
We believe that, under current regulations, the Bank will continue to meet its well-capitalized minimum capital requirements in the foreseeable future. The Banks regulatory capital compliance could be impacted, however, by a number of factors, such as changes to applicable regulations, adverse action by our regulators, changes in the our mix of assets, interest rate fluctuations, loan loss provisions and credit losses, or significant changes in the economy in areas where we have most of our loans. Any of these factors could cause our actual future results to vary from anticipated future results and consequently could have an adverse impact on the ability of the Bank to meet its future minimum capital requirements.
SHARE REPURCHASES
In June of 1999, our Board of Directors approved a $100 million share repurchase program, which has since been amended to increase to $500 million and include a special repurchase of 3,640,860 shares from Countrywide Credit Industries, Inc. From the share repurchase programs inception through December 31, 2002, we repurchased 28 million shares in open market transactions and from Countrywide at an average price of approximately $18.02 per share, for an aggregated investment of $504.4 million. At March 31, 2004, we had $63.6 million of remaining capacity to repurchase under the current authorization from the Board of Directors. No share repurchases under this program were made during the first quarter 2004.
From time to time, we also repurchase shares from certain employees and officers under the Companys internal benefit programs. The following table summarizes the share repurchase activities from our employees and officers during the first quarter of 2004:
January | February | March | Total | |||||||||||||
Number of Shares
|
15,275 | | 2,177 | 17,452 | ||||||||||||
Weighted Average Price Per Share
|
$ | 29.84 | | $ | 35.23 | $ | 30.51 |
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
In the ordinary course of our business, we engage in financial transactions that are not recorded on our balance sheet. These transactions are structured to manage our interest rate, credit or liquidity risks, diversify funding sources or to optimize our capital.
Substantially all of our off-balance sheet arrangements relate to the securitization of mortgage loans. Our mortgage loan securitizations are normally structured as sales in accordance with SFAS 140, which involves the transfer of the mortgage loans to qualifying special-purpose entities that are not subject to consolidation. In a securitization, an entity transferring the assets is able to convert those assets into cash. Special-purpose entities used in such securitizations obtain cash to acquire the assets by issuing securities to investors. We also, generally, have the right to repurchase mortgage loans from the special-purpose entity if the remaining outstanding balance of the mortgage loans falls to a level where the cost of servicing the loans exceeds the revenues we earn.
46
In connection with loan sales that are securitization transactions, there are $22.5 billion in loans owned by off-balance sheet trusts as of March 31, 2004. The trusts have issued bonds secured by these loans. We have no obligation to provide funding support to either the third party investors or the off-balance sheet trusts. The third party investors or the trusts generally have no recourse to our assets or us and have no ability to require us to repurchase their loans other than for non-credit-related recourse that can arise under standard representations and warranties. We maintain secondary market reserves for losses that could arise in connection with loans that we are required to repurchase from whole loan sales or securitization transactions.
We often retain certain interests, which may include subordinated classes of securities, MSRs, AAA-rated and agency interest-only strips and residual securities in the securitization trust. The performance of the loans in the trusts will impact our ability to realize the current estimated fair value of these assets that are included on our balance sheet.
Management does not believe that any of its off-balance sheet arrangements have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future material effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
AGGREGATE CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
The following table summarizes our material contractual obligations as of March 31, 2004. The payment amounts represent those amounts contractually due to the recipient and do not include any unamortized premiums or discounts, hedge basis adjustments, or other similar carrying value adjustments. There have been no material changes outside the ordinary course of our business in any specified contractual obligations during the first quarter 2004.
Payment Due | ||||||||||||||||||||
April 1, 2004 | January 1, | January 1, | ||||||||||||||||||
through | 2005 through | 2008 through | After | |||||||||||||||||
December 31, | December 31, | December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2007 | 2009 | 2009 | Total | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits without a stated maturity
|
$ | 2,387,010 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 2,387,010 | ||||||||||
Custodial Accounts and Certificates of Deposits
|
1,610,280 | 746,807 | 5,672 | | 2,362,759 | |||||||||||||||
FHLB Advances
|
3,654,923 | 875,000 | 230,000 | | 4,759,923 | |||||||||||||||
Repurchase Agreements
|
2,894,573 | | | | 2,894,573 | |||||||||||||||
HELOC Notes
|
| 497,964 | | | 497,964 | |||||||||||||||
CMOs
|
| | | 203 | 203 | |||||||||||||||
Trust Preferred
|
| | | 183,798 | 183,798 | |||||||||||||||
Accrued Interest Payable
|
29,119 | | | | 29,119 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred Compensation
|
| | | 23,631 | 23,631 | |||||||||||||||
Operating Leases
|
9,214 | 36,601 | 18,469 | 6,616 | 70,900 | |||||||||||||||
Purchase Obligations
|
5,852 | 13,883 | | | 19,735 | |||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 10,590,971 | $ | 2,170,255 | $ | 254,141 | $ | 214,248 | $ | 13,229,615 | ||||||||||
47
A schedule of significant commitments at March 31, 2004, follows:
Payment Due | |||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||
Investment portfolio commitments to:
|
|||||
Purchase loans pursuant to exercising clean up
calls
|
$ | 242,745 | |||
Undisbursed loan commitments:
|
|||||
Builder construction
|
507,306 | ||||
Consumer construction
|
939,064 | ||||
HELOCs
|
503,166 | ||||
Letters of credit
|
8,466 |
Additionally, in connection with standard representations and warranties on loan sales and securitizations, we are occasionally required to repurchase loans or make certain payments to settle breaches of these representations and warranties. From inception of our active mortgage banking operations on January 1, 1993, through March 31, 2004, we have sold $102.9 billion in loans, and repurchased $125.7 million loans, or 0.12% of total loans sold. To provide for probable future losses related to loans sold, we have established a reserve based on estimated losses on actual pending claims and repurchase requests, historical experience, loan sales volume and loan sale distribution channels, which is included in other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets. The balance in this reserve totaled $34 million at March 31, 2004. See the caption Secondary Market Reserve above for further information.
KEY OPERATING RISKS
Like all businesses, we assume a certain amount of risk in order to earn returns on our capital. The following is a summary discussion of key operating risks. For further information on these and other key operating risks, refer to IndyMacs annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.
INTEREST RATE RISK
Due to the characteristics of our financial assets and liabilities and the nature of our business activities, our financial position and results of operations may be materially affected by changes in interest rates in various ways. While we have devised and implemented a comprehensive asset/liability management strategy that seeks, on an economic and an accounting basis, to mitigate significant fluctuations in our financial position and results of operations likely to be caused by market interest rate changes, there can be no assurance that this strategy (including assumptions concerning the correlation thought to exist among different types of instruments) or its implementation will be successful in any particular interest rate environment.
VALUATION RISK
In connection with the loan sale process, we retain certain assets for which the market is limited and illiquid. As a result, valuations are derived using complex modeling and significant assumptions and judgments, in the absence of third party market quotations or sale information to value such assets. The assets include AAA-rated and agency interest-only securities, MSRs, non-investment grade securities and residuals. In addition, from time to time, we may acquire these types of securities from third party issuers. These assets represented 4% of total assets and 61% of total equity at March 31, 2004. The fair value of these assets could vary significantly as market conditions change.
CREDIT RISK
A significant portion of our Investment Portfolio consists of prime residential SFR loans held for investment, and non-investment grade securities and residuals collateralized by mortgage loans. We also provide construction lending to consumers and developers to build residential properties which have a higher
48
We also sell loans to GSEs, to outside investors, and to securitization trusts. In these instances, we are subject to repurchase risk in the event of breaches of representations or warranties we make in connection with the loan sales. While we have established what we believe to be adequate secondary marketing reserves, there can be no guarantee that the amount reserved is sufficient to cover all potential losses resulting from such repurchases.
LIQUIDITY RISK/ ACCESS TO CAPITAL MARKETS
We finance a substantial portion of our assets through deposits insured by the FDIC and through borrowings from the FHLB. We also obtain financing from investment and commercial banks. There is no guarantee that these sources of funds will continue to be available to us, or that our borrowings can be refinanced upon maturity, although we are not aware of any trends, events or uncertainties that we believe are reasonably likely to cause a decrease in our liquidity from these sources.
We utilize three sales channels to sell loans to the secondary market: whole loan sales, sales to the GSEs, and private-label securitizations. A disruption in the securitization market could adversely impact our ability to fund mortgage loans and our gains on sale, leading to a corresponding decrease in revenue and earnings. Likewise, a deterioration in the performance of our private-label securities could adversely impact the availability and pricing of future transactions.
GOVERNMENT REGULATION AND MONETARY POLICY
The banking industry in general is extensively regulated at the federal and state levels. Insured depository institutions and their holding companies are subject to comprehensive regulation and supervision by financial regulatory authorities covering all aspects of their organization, management and operations. The OTS and the FDIC are primarily responsible for the federal regulation and supervision of the Bank and its affiliated entities. In addition to their regulatory powers, these two agencies also have significant enforcement authority that they can use to address unsafe and unsound banking practices, violations of laws, and capital and operational deficiencies. Enforcement powers can be exercised in a number of ways, through either formal or informal actions. Informal enforcement actions customarily remain confidential between the regulator and the financial institution, while more formal enforcement actions are customarily publicly disclosed. Further, the Banks operations are subject to regulation at the state level, including a variety of consumer protection provisions. Banking institutions also are affected by the various monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, including those of the Federal Reserve Board, and these policies can influence financial regulatory actions. Accordingly, the actions of those governmental authorities responsible for regulatory, fiscal and monetary affairs can have a significant impact on the activities of financial services firms such as ours.
The Companys financial condition and results of operations are reported in accordance with U.S. GAAP. While not impacting economic results, future changes in accounting principles issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board could impact our operational results as reported under U.S. GAAP.
49
Additionally, political conditions could impact the Companys earnings. Acts or threats of war or terrorism, as well as actions taken by the U.S. or other governments in response to such acts or threats, could impact business and economic conditions in which the Company operates.
COMPETITION
We face significant competition in acquiring and selling loans. In our mortgage banking operations, we compete with other mortgage bankers, GSEs, established third party lending programs, investment banking firms, banks, savings and loan associations, and other lenders and entities purchasing mortgage assets. With regard to mortgage-backed securities issued through our mortgage banking operations, we face competition from other investment opportunities available to prospective investors. We estimate our market share of the U.S. mortgage market to be approximately 1%. A number of our competitors have significantly larger market share and financial resources. We seek to compete with financial institutions and mortgage companies through an emphasis on quality of service, diversified products and maximum use of technology.
The GSEs have made and we believe will continue to make significant technological and economic advances to broaden their customer bases. When the GSEs contract or expand, there are both positive and negative impacts on our mortgage banking lending operations. As GSEs expand, additional liquidity is brought to the market, and loan products can be resold more quickly. Conversely, expanding GSEs increase competition for loans, which may reduce profit margins on loan sales. We seek to address these competitive pressures by making a strong effort to maximize our use of technology, by diversifying into other residential mortgage products that are less affected by GSEs, and by operating in a more cost-effective manner than our competitors.
The primary competition for our Mortgage Banking Group comes from banks and other financial institutions and mortgage companies. We seek to compete with financial institutions and mortgage companies through an emphasis on quality of service, diversified products and maximum use of technology.
OTHER RISKS
We are subject to various other risks, including changes in the demand for mortgage loans, which historically tends to decrease as interest rates increase. Also, a majority of our loan acquisitions are geographically concentrated in certain states, including California, New York, Florida and New Jersey. Any adverse economic conditions in these markets could cause the number of loans acquired to decrease and delinquencies to increase, causing a corresponding decline in revenues. Lastly, there are no guarantees as to our degree of success in managing loan portfolio concentrations, anticipating and taking advantage of technological advances, or executing upon our growth plans for our mortgage banking operations.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Various elements of our accounting policies, by their nature, are inherently subject to estimation techniques, valuation assumptions and other subjective assessments. In particular, we have identified six policies, that, due to the judgments, estimates and assumptions inherent in those policies are critical to an understanding of our financial statements. These policies relate to (a) the valuation of AAA-rated and agency interest-only strips; (b) the valuation of MSRs; (c) the valuation of non-investment grade securities and residuals; (d) derivatives and other hedging instruments; (e) the methodology for determining our allowance for loan losses; and (f) the valuation of our secondary market reserve. Management discusses these critical accounting policies and related judgments with IndyMacs audit committee and external auditors on a quarterly basis. We believe that the judgments, estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements are appropriate given the factual circumstances at the time. However, given the sensitivity of our consolidated financial statements to these critical accounting policies, the use of other judgments, estimates and assumptions could result in material differences in our results of operations or financial condition. For further information on the Companys critical accounting policies and the impact of SAB No. 105 on our accounting policy for rate lock loan commitments, refer to IndyMacs annual report on
50
ITEM 3. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK |
See Overall Interest Rate Risk Management above for quantitative and qualitative disclosure about market risk on page 36.
51
ITEM 1. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) |
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$ | 200,863 | $ | 115,485 | ||||||||
Securities classified as trading
($107.0 million and $70.9 million pledged as
collateral for borrowings at March 31, 2004 and
December 31, 2003, respectively)
|
251,006 | 223,632 | ||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities and agency notes
available for sale, amortized cost of $2.6 billion and
$1.6 billion at March 31, 2004 and December 31,
2003, respectively ($2.1 billion and $1.5 billion
pledged as collateral for borrowings at March 31, 2004 and
December 31, 2003, respectively)
|
2,655,696 | 1,613,974 | ||||||||||
Loans receivable:
|
||||||||||||
Loans held for sale
|
||||||||||||
Prime
|
2,993,512 | 2,196,488 | ||||||||||
Subprime
|
381,287 | 295,008 | ||||||||||
Consumer lot loans
|
156,518 | 81,752 | ||||||||||
Total loans held for sale
|
3,531,317 | 2,573,248 | ||||||||||
Loans held for investment
|
||||||||||||
SFR mortgage
|
4,440,540 | 4,945,439 | ||||||||||
Consumer construction
|
1,225,347 | 1,145,526 | ||||||||||
Builder construction
|
500,490 | 484,397 | ||||||||||
HELOC
|
322,351 | 711,494 | ||||||||||
Land and other mortgage
|
164,981 | 126,044 | ||||||||||
Income property
|
9,315 | 36,285 | ||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses
|
(52,126 | ) | (52,645 | ) | ||||||||
Total loans held for investment
|
6,610,898 | 7,396,540 | ||||||||||
Total loans receivable ($7.8 billion and
$7.6 billion pledged as collateral for borrowings at
March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively)
|
10,142,215 | 9,969,788 | ||||||||||
Mortgage servicing rights
|
414,358 | 443,688 | ||||||||||
Investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at
cost
|
287,736 | 313,284 | ||||||||||
Interest receivable
|
60,928 | 51,758 | ||||||||||
Goodwill and other intangible assets
|
33,509 | 33,697 | ||||||||||
Foreclosed assets
|
26,535 | 23,677 | ||||||||||
Other assets
|
422,993 | 451,408 | ||||||||||
Total assets
|
$ | 14,495,839 | $ | 13,240,391 | ||||||||
52
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Continued)
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||||
2004 | 2003 | |||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY | ||||||||||
Deposits
|
$ | 4,749,769 | $ | 4,350,773 | ||||||
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank
|
4,759,923 | 4,934,911 | ||||||||
Other borrowings
|
3,576,538 | 2,622,094 | ||||||||
Other liabilities
|
354,305 | 315,182 | ||||||||
Total liabilities
|
13,440,535 | 12,222,960 | ||||||||
Shareholders Equity
|
||||||||||
Preferred stock authorized, 10,000,000
shares of $0.01 par value; none issued
|
| | ||||||||
Common stock authorized, 200,000,000
shares of $0.01 par value; issued 86,953,278 shares (57,781,587
outstanding) at March 31, 2004, and issued 85,914,552
shares (56,760,313 outstanding) at December 31, 2003.
|
869 | 859 | ||||||||
Additional paid-in-capital
|
1,064,900 | 1,043,856 | ||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
(36,724 | ) | (26,454 | ) | ||||||
Retained earnings
|
546,030 | 518,408 | ||||||||
Treasury stock, 29,171,691 shares and 29,154,239
shares at March 31, 2004, and December 31, 2003,
respectively
|
(519,771 | ) | (519,238 | ) | ||||||
Total shareholders equity
|
1,055,304 | 1,017,431 | ||||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
$ | 14,495,839 | $ | 13,240,391 | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
53
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
For the Three Months | ||||||||||
Ended March 31, | ||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | |||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||
(In thousands, | ||||||||||
except per share data) | ||||||||||
Interest income
|
||||||||||
Mortgage-backed and other securities
|
$ | 26,855 | $ | 20,961 | ||||||
Loans held for sale
|
||||||||||
Prime
|
44,331 | 37,425 | ||||||||
Subprime
|
8,508 | 6,243 | ||||||||
Consumer lot loans
|
1,907 | 1,533 | ||||||||
Total loans held for sale
|
54,746 | 45,201 | ||||||||
Loans held for investment
|
||||||||||
SFR mortgage
|
49,218 | 29,514 | ||||||||
Consumer construction
|
15,995 | 14,396 | ||||||||
Builder construction
|
7,526 | 8,601 | ||||||||
HELOC
|
6,359 | 4,147 | ||||||||
Land and other mortgage
|
2,464 | 2,301 | ||||||||
Income property
|
514 | 1,119 | ||||||||
Total loans held for investment
|
82,076 | 60,078 | ||||||||
Other
|
2,882 | 1,957 | ||||||||
Total interest income
|
166,559 | 128,197 | ||||||||
Interest expense
|
||||||||||
Deposits
|
22,482 | 21,687 | ||||||||
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank
|
30,920 | 25,558 | ||||||||
Borrowings
|
19,224 | 17,927 | ||||||||
Total interest expense
|
72,626 | 65,172 | ||||||||
Net interest income
|
93,933 | 63,025 | ||||||||
Provision for loan losses
|
1,500 | 3,100 | ||||||||
Net interest income after provision for loan
losses
|
92,433 | 59,925 | ||||||||
Other income
|
||||||||||
Gain on sale of loans
|
83,668 | 83,784 | ||||||||
Service fee (loss) income
|
(3,144 | ) | 2,383 | |||||||
Loss on mortgage-backed securities, net
|
(4,987 | ) | (6,910 | ) | ||||||
Fee and other income
|
16,722 | 17,727 | ||||||||
Total other income
|
92,259 | 96,984 | ||||||||
Net revenues
|
184,692 | 156,909 | ||||||||
Other expense
|
||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
115,198 | 95,658 | ||||||||
Amortization of other intangible assets
|
188 | 231 | ||||||||
Total other expense
|
115,386 | 95,889 | ||||||||
Earnings before provision for income taxes
|
69,306 | 61,020 | ||||||||
Provision for income taxes
|
27,376 | 24,103 | ||||||||
Net earnings
|
$ | 41,930 | $ | 36,917 | ||||||
Earnings per share
|
||||||||||
Basic
|
$ | 0.74 | $ | 0.67 | ||||||
Diluted
|
$ | 0.70 | $ | 0.66 | ||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding
|
||||||||||
Basic
|
56,997 | 54,827 | ||||||||
Diluted
|
59,791 | 55,979 | ||||||||
Dividend Declared per Share
|
$ | 0.30 | $ | 0.10 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
54
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional | Comprehensive | Total | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Common | Paid-In- | Income | Retained | Comprehensive | Treasury | Shareholders | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding | Stock | Capital | (Loss) | Earnings | Income | Stock | Equity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2002
|
54,829,486 | $ | 840 | $ | 1,007,936 | $ | (17,747 | ) | $ | 377,707 | $ | (518,771 | ) | $ | 849,965 | |||||||||||||||||
Common stock options exercised
|
222,020 | 3 | 3,313 | | | $ | | | 3,316 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Directors and officers notes
receivable
|
| | 25 | | | | | 25 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred compensation, restricted stock
|
161,696 | | 489 | | | | | 489 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss on mortgage- backed securities available
for sale, net of tax
|
| | | (558 | ) | | (558 | ) | | (558 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized loss on derivatives used in cash
flow hedges, net of tax
|
| | | (1,475 | ) | | (1,475 | ) | | (1,475 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases of common stock
|
(21,712 | ) | | | | | | (406 | ) | (406 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends
|
| | | | (5,490 | ) | | | (5,490 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net earnings
|
| | | | 36,917 | 36,917 | | 36,917 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income
|
| | | | | $ | 34,844 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at March 31, 2003
|
55,191,490 | $ | 843 | $ | 1,011,763 | $ | (19,780 | ) | $ | 409,134 | $ | (519,177 | ) | $ | 882,783 | |||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2003
|
56,760,313 | $ | 859 | $ | 1,043,856 | $ | (26,454 | ) | $ | 518,408 | $ | (519,238 | ) | $ | 1,017,431 | |||||||||||||||||
Common stock options exercised
|
944,774 | 10 | 20,507 | | | $ | | | 20,517 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Directors and officers notes
receivable
|
| | 33 | | | | | 33 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred compensation, restricted stock
|
93,952 | | 504 | | | | | 504 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net gain on mortgage- backed securities available
for sale, net of tax
|
| | | 11,849 | | 11,849 | | 11,849 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized loss on derivatives used in cash
flow hedges, net of tax
|
| | | (22,119 | ) | | (22,119 | ) | | (22,119 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases of common stock
|
(17,452 | ) | | | | | | (533 | ) | (533 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends
|
| | | | (14,308 | ) | | | (14,308 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net earnings
|
| | | | 41,930 | 41,930 | | 41,930 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income
|
| | | | | $ | 31,660 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at March 31, 2004
|
57,781,587 | $ | 869 | $ | 1,064,900 | $ | (36,724 | ) | $ | 546,030 | $ | (519,771 | ) | $ | 1,055,304 | |||||||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
55
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Three Months | |||||||||||
Ended March 31, | |||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||
(Unaudited) | |||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||
Cash flows from operating
activities:
|
|||||||||||
Net earnings
|
$ | 41,930 | $ | 36,917 | |||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash
(used in) operating activities:
|
|||||||||||
Total amortization and depreciation
|
43,313 | 49,893 | |||||||||
Provision for valuation adjustment of mortgage
servicing rights
|
53,433 | 1,112 | |||||||||
Gain on sale of loans
|
(83,668 | ) | (83,784 | ) | |||||||
Loss on mortgage-backed securities, net
|
4,987 | 6,910 | |||||||||
Provision for loan losses
|
1,500 | 3,100 | |||||||||
Net decrease (increase) in other assets and
liabilities
|
24,076 | 53,731 | |||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities before
activity for trading securities, premiums paid for derivative
instruments and loans held for sale
|
85,571 | 67,879 | |||||||||
Net (purchases of) and payment from trading
securities
|
(5,199 | ) | 527,366 | ||||||||
Net decrease (increase) on premiums for
derivative instruments
|
26,613 | (14,544 | ) | ||||||||
Net purchases of loans held for sale
|
(1,025,454 | ) | (658,369 | ) | |||||||
Net cash (used in) operating activities
|
(918,469 | ) | (77,668 | ) | |||||||
Cash flows from investing
activities:
|
|||||||||||
Net (purchase of) payments from loans held for
investment
|
(44,928 | ) | 24,900 | ||||||||
Net (purchases of) and payments from
mortgage-backed securities available for sale
|
(151,562 | ) | 184,193 | ||||||||
Net decrease (increase) in investment in
Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost
|
25,548 | (37,390 | ) | ||||||||
Net purchases of property, plant and equipment
|
(9,192 | ) | (5,096 | ) | |||||||
Net cash (used in) provided by investing
activities
|
(180,134 | ) | 166,607 | ||||||||
Cash flows from financing
activities:
|
|||||||||||
Net increase in deposits
|
398,996 | 335,679 | |||||||||
Net (decrease) increase in advances from
Federal Home Loan Bank
|
(175,000 | ) | 600,914 | ||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in borrowings
|
954,276 | (1,089,776 | ) | ||||||||
Net proceeds from stock options and notes
receivable
|
20,550 | 3,829 | |||||||||
Cash dividends paid
|
(14,308 | ) | (5,490 | ) | |||||||
Purchases of common stock
|
(533 | ) | (406 | ) | |||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing
activities
|
1,183,981 | (155,250 | ) | ||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash
equivalents
|
85,378 | (66,311 | ) | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
115,485 | 196,720 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 200,863 | $ | 130,409 | |||||||
Supplemental cash flow information:
|
|||||||||||
Cash paid for interest
|
$ | 63,121 | $ | 63,639 | |||||||
Cash paid for income taxes
|
$ | 4,443 | $ | 1,061 | |||||||
Supplemental disclosure of noncash investing
and financing activities:
|
|||||||||||
Net transfer of loans held for sale to
(from) loans held for investment
|
$ | 195,037 | $ | 261,833 | |||||||
Net transfer of loans held for investment to
mortgage-backed securities available for sale
|
$ | 500,012 | $ | | |||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
56
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1 Basis of Presentation
IndyMac Bancorp, Inc. is a savings and loan holding company. References to IndyMac Bancorp refer to the parent company alone while references to IndyMac or we refer to IndyMac Bancorp and its consolidated subsidiaries. Our primary business is single family residential mortgage lending, using a hybrid thrift business model including portfolio lending and thrift financing. We offer a wide array of home mortgage products using a technology-based approach, leveraged across multiple products, channels and customers.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of IndyMac Bancorp and its subsidiaries, including IndyMac Bank®, F.S.B. (IndyMac Bank). All significant intercompany balances and transactions with IndyMacs consolidated subsidiaries have been eliminated in consolidation. The consolidated financial statements of IndyMac are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (US GAAP). The foregoing financial statements are unaudited; however, in the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods have been included. Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2004, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2004. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in IndyMacs annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.
Note 2 Newly Issued Accounting Pronouncement
On March 9, 2004, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 105, Application of Accounting Principles to Loan Commitments, which provides guidance regarding loan commitments that are accounted for as derivative instruments. In this Bulletin, the SEC determined that an interest rate lock commitment should generally be valued at zero at inception. The rate locks will continue to be adjusted for changes in value resulting from changes in market interest rates. The Company will adopt this new standard prospectively as of April 1, 2004. Under the new accounting guidance, the Company will no longer recognize any revenue at the inception of the rate lock. Profits inherent in the rate lock will be recognized at the time of the underlying loans are sold. The implementation of the standard is expected to have a one-time negative impact on gain on sales totaling approximately $24 to $27 million after tax in the second quarter of 2004. This amount is an estimate based on our current estimate of rate lock volume in the second quarter. The ultimate amount of the impact will be affected by actual rate lock volumes in the second quarter, as well as profit margins on such rate locks and the volume of loan sales during the quarter. The ultimate amount of the impact will not be known until the end of the second quarter. This accounting change affects the timing of revenue recognition and offsetting mark-to-market gains and losses, generally by one quarter or less, but not the ultimate amount of revenue recognized over time.
57
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Note 3 Securities
The following table details our securities classified as trading and securities available for sale as of March 31, 2004, and December 31, 2003.
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||||
2004 | 2003 | |||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||
Securities Classified as Trading:
|
||||||||||
AAA-rated and agency interest-only strips
|
$ | 149,152 | $ | 146,179 | ||||||
AAA-rated principal-only securities
|
43,270 | 8,518 | ||||||||
Other investment grade securities
|
9,048 | 8,922 | ||||||||
Other non-investment grade securities
|
1,588 | 1,760 | ||||||||
Non-investment grade residual securities
|
47,948 | 58,253 | ||||||||
Total
|
$ | 251,006 | $ | 223,632 | ||||||
Mortgage-Backed Securities and Agency Notes
Classified as Available for Sale:
|
||||||||||
AAA-rated non-agency securities
|
$ | 2,576,496 | $ | 1,407,984 | ||||||
AAA-rated agency securities
|
21,288 | 25,193 | ||||||||
AAA-rated agency notes
|
| 143,689 | ||||||||
Other investment grade securities
|
23,325 | 26,926 | ||||||||
Other non-investment grade securities
|
16,903 | 10,182 | ||||||||
Non-investment grade HELOC residual securities
|
17,684 | | ||||||||
Total
|
$ | 2,655,696 | $ | 1,613,974 | ||||||
The significant increase in AAA-rated non-agency securities from $1.4 billion at December 31, 2003 to $2.6 billion at March 31, 2004 was primarily due to the reclassification of approximately $500 million HELOC loans to securities and the retention of a $346 million senior note from our SFR mortgage loans held for investment securitization during the first quarter 2004.
Note 4 Segment Reporting
IndyMac operates through its four main segments: IndyMac Mortgage Bank, IndyMac Consumer Bank, Home Equity Division, and Investment Portfolio Group. IndyMac Mortgage Bank is centered on providing consumers with mortgage products through relationships with the Companys business customers mortgage brokers, mortgage bankers, financial institutions, real estate professionals and homebuilders. The Home Equity Division was previously included in the IndyMac Consumer Bank segment and has been designated as a separate operating segment this quarter as this unit is now evaluated directly by our CEO in deciding resource allocations and assessing performance. IndyMac Consumer Bank provides the platform for the mortgage and deposit services that IndyMac offers directly to consumers. The Home Equity Division is a product focused division that supports the production of home equity products through all of IndyMacs relationship and consumer direct production channels. The Investment Portfolio Group serves as the main link to customers whose mortgages we service. Through its investments in single-family residential mortgages, mortgage-backed securities and mortgage servicing rights, it serves a critical support function for IndyMacs mortgage lending operations.
The profitability of each operating segment is measured on a fully-leveraged basis after allocating capital based on regulatory capital rules. The Company uses a match-funded transfer pricing system to allocate net interest income to the operating segments. Each operating segment is allocated funding with maturities and
58
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
interest rates matched with the expected lives, repricing frequencies and financing liquidities of the segments assets. Deposits receive a funding credit using a similar methodology. The difference between these allocations and the Companys actual net interest income and capital levels resulting from centralized management of funding costs is reported in the Other. Also included in the Other are unallocated corporate costs such as corporate salaries and related expenses, excess capital, and non-recurring corporate items.
Segment information for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, was as follows:
IndyMac | IndyMac | Home | Investment | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage | Consumer | Equity | Portfolio | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Bank | Bank | Division | Group | Other | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Three months ended March 31, 2004
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income (expense)
|
$ | 49,705 | $ | 10,481 | $ | 746 | $ | 42,393 | $ | (9,392 | ) | $ | 93,933 | ||||||||||||
Net revenues (loss)
|
117,512 | 34,870 | 1,088 | 44,888 | (13,666 | ) | 184,692 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net earnings (loss)
|
39,251 | 5,873 | 107 | 19,798 | (23,099 | ) | 41,930 | ||||||||||||||||||
Assets as of March 31, 2004
|
$ | 4,928,905 | $ | 564,555 | $ | 578,981 | $ | 7,824,628 | $ | 598,770 | $ | 14,495,839 | |||||||||||||
Three months ended March 31, 2003
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income (expense)
|
$ | 45,793 | $ | 7,652 | $ | (208 | ) | $ | 18,343 | $ | (8,555 | ) | $ | 63,025 | |||||||||||
Net revenues (loss)
|
118,081 | 34,846 | 350 | 19,550 | (15,918 | ) | 156,909 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net earnings (loss)
|
45,161 | 8,548 | (339 | ) | 5,960 | (22,413 | ) | 36,917 | |||||||||||||||||
Assets as of March 31, 2003
|
$ | 3,710,148 | $ | 647,990 | $ | 39,547 | $ | 4,724,595 | $ | 354,312 | $ | 9,476,592 |
Note 5 Stock-Based Compensation
We have two stock incentive plans, the 2002 Incentive Plan, as amended and restated, and the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended (collectively, the Plans), which provide for the granting of non-qualified stock options, incentive stock options, restricted stock awards, performance stock awards, stock bonuses and other awards to our employees (including officers and directors). Options and awards are granted at the average market price of our stock on the grant date, vest over varying periods generally beginning at least one year from the date of grant, and expire ten years from the date of grant.
59
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
As permitted by SFAS 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS 123), we continue to measure and recognize compensation expense using the intrinsic value method specified in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (APB 25). As required under the provisions of SFAS 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure, the following table discloses the pro forma net income and pro forma basic and diluted earnings per share had the fair value method been applied to all stock awards for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | |||||||||
(Dollars in thousands, | ||||||||||
except per share data) | ||||||||||
Net Earnings
|
||||||||||
As reported
|
$ | 41,930 | $ | 36,917 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation expense
|
(2,885 | ) | (5,010 | ) | ||||||
Tax effect
|
1,140 | 1,979 | ||||||||
Pro forma
|
$ | 40,185 | $ | 33,886 | ||||||
Basic Earnings Per Share
|
||||||||||
As reported
|
$ | 0.74 | $ | 0.67 | ||||||
Pro forma
|
$ | 0.71 | $ | 0.62 | ||||||
Diluted Earnings Per Share
|
||||||||||
As reported
|
$ | 0.70 | $ | 0.66 | ||||||
Pro forma
|
$ | 0.67 | $ | 0.61 |
In addition, during the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, we recognized compensation expense of $504 thousand ($305 thousand, net of taxes) and $489 thousand ($296 thousand, net of taxes), respectively, related to restricted stock awards. These expenses were included in net earnings as reported.
Note 6 Defined Benefit Pension Plan Net Periodic Cost
The Company provided a defined benefit pension plan (the DBP Plan) to substantially all of our employees hired prior to January 1, 2003. The net periodic benefit cost of our DBP Plan, which is based on actuarial assumptions, is presented in the following table for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003:
Three Months | ||||||||
Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2004 | 2003 | |||||||
(Dollars in | ||||||||
thousands) | ||||||||
Service cost
|
$ | 1,209 | $ | 932 | ||||
Interest cost
|
323 | 222 | ||||||
Expected return on assets
|
(294 | ) | (165 | ) | ||||
Amortization of net (gain) loss
|
73 | 47 | ||||||
Amortization of prior service cost
|
14 | 14 | ||||||
Net periodic benefit costs
|
$ | 1,325 | $ | 1,050 | ||||
60
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The actuarial assumptions used in accounting for the net periodic cost at March 31, 2004 and 2003 were as follows:
Three Months | ||||||||
Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2004 | 2003 | |||||||
Assumed discount rate
|
6.00% | 6.75% | ||||||
Rate of compensation increase
|
4.00% | 4.00% | ||||||
Expected return on assets
|
7.50% | 7.50% |
The Company is expected to contribute $6 million to the DBP Plan in 2004, which will be made as a one lump sum payment later in the year. No contribution was made during the quarter ended March 31, 2004.
Note 7 Legal Matters
On February 3, 2004, Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corporation filed a lawsuit against IndyMac in the Superior Court of the State of California. The lawsuit involves a contractual dispute about standard representations and warranties on single-family mortgage loans that were sold to PNC Mortgage Corporation during the period 1997 to 2000, prior to Washington Mutuals acquisition of PNC Mortgage Corporation in 2001. Washington Mutual alleges damages of approximately $50 million, the bulk of which includes the principal balance of the loans in question, with the remainder of the amount consisting of interest and alleged losses. The loans in question represent less than 1% of the nearly $6 billion in loans that were sold to PNC between 1997 and 2000. IndyMac maintains a reserve for potential losses related to its standard representations and warranties on loans sold and discusses such reserve in its financial statements filed with the SEC. Management believes that the resolution of this dispute will not have a material impact on the financial condition of IndyMac.
We are involved in other litigation arising from normal operations. In the opinion of management, none of these matters are likely to have a materially adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.
61
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
As of March 31, 2004, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Companys management, including the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, the Companys management, including the CEO and CFO, concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2004. There have been no significant changes in the Companys internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to March 31, 2004.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
On February 3, 2004, Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corporation filed a lawsuit against IndyMac in the Superior Court of the State of California. The lawsuit involves a contractual dispute about standard representations and warranties on single-family mortgage loans that were sold to PNC Mortgage Corporation during the period 1997 to 2000, prior to Washington Mutuals acquisition of PNC Mortgage Corporation in 2001. Washington Mutual alleges damages of approximately $50 million, the bulk of which includes the principal balance of the loans in question, with the remainder of the amount consisting of interest and alleged losses. The loans in question represent less than 1% of the nearly $6 billion in loans that were sold to PNC between 1997 and 2000. IndyMac maintains a reserve for potential losses related to its standard representations and warranties on loans sold and discusses such reserve in its financial statements filed with the SEC. Management believes that the resolution of this dispute will not have a material impact on the financial condition of IndyMac.
We are involved in other litigation arising from normal operations. In the opinion of management, none of these matters are likely to have a materially adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) Exhibits
4.1
|
2000 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended | |
4.2
|
2002 Incentive Plan, as amended and Restated as of March 4, 2003, as amended | |
10.1
|
Employment Agreement dated March 15, 2004 between IndyMac Bank and John DelPonti. | |
31.1
|
Chief Executive Officers Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
31.2
|
Chief Financial Officers Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.1
|
Chief Executive Officers Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.2
|
Chief Financial Officers Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
The Company furnished a report on Form 8-K on January 29, 2004. Items included: Item 9. Regulation FD Disclosure, and Item 12. Disclosure of Results of Operations and Financial Condition Press Release announcing results of operations and financial condition for the quarter ended December 31, 2003 and related webcast presentation.
62
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Pasadena, State of California, on April 27, 2004.
INDYMAC BANCORP, INC. (Registrant) |
||||
By: |
/s/ MICHAEL W. PERRY Michael W. Perry Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer |
|||
By: |
/s/ SCOTT KEYS Scott Keys Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
63