Back to GetFilings.com



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)

|X| QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003

OR

[_] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from __________________ to __________________

Commission file number: 1-16739

VECTREN UTILITY HOLDINGS, INC.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

INDIANA 35-2104850
- -------------------------------- -------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of (IRS Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification No.)



20 N.W. 4th Street, Evansville, Indiana, 47708
-------------------------------------------------------
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)

812-491-4000
-------------------------------------------------------
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes |X| No __

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as
defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes __ No |X|

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of
common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Common Stock - Without Par Value 10 August 1, 2003
------------------------------- -- --------------
Class Number of Shares Date


Table of Contents
Item Page
Number Number
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
1 Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Vectren Utility Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiary Companies
Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets 1-2
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income 3
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows 4
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements 5-19
2 Management's Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations 20-31
and Financial Condition
3 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 32
4 Controls and Procedures 32

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
1 Legal Proceedings 33
6 Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K 33
Signatures 34


Access to Information
Vectren Corporation makes available all SEC filings and recent annual reports
free of charge, including those of its wholly owned subsidiaries, through its
website at www.vectren.com, or by request, directed to Investor Relations at the
mailing address, phone number, or email address that follows:
Mailing Address: Phone Number: Investor Relations Contact:
P.O. Box 209 (812) 491-4000 Steven M. Schein
Evansville, Indiana Vice President, Investor Relations
47702-0209 [email protected]


Definitions
AFUDC: allowance for funds used during MMBTU: millions of British thermal
construction units
APB: Accounting Principles Board MW: megawatts

EITF: Emerging Issues Task Force MWh / GWh: megawatt hours / millions
of megawatt hours (gigawatt hours)
FASB: Financial Accounting Standards NOx: nitrogen oxide
Board
FERC: Federal Energy Regulatory OUCC: Indiana Office of the Utility
Commission Consumer Counselor
IDEM: Indiana Department of PUCO: Public Utilities Commission of
Environmental Management Ohio
IURC: Indiana Utility Regulatory SFAS: Statement of Financial
Commission Accounting Standards
MCF / BCF: millions / billions of USEPA: United States Environmental
cubic feet Protection Agency
MDth / MMDth: thousands / millions Throughput: combined gas sales and
of dekatherms gas transportation volumes





PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

VECTREN UTILITY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited - In millions)


June 30, December 31,
2003 2002
- ------------------------------------------------- --------- ------------
ASSETS As Restated,
------ See Note 3
------------
Current Assets
Cash & cash equivalents $ 9.3 $ 10.5
Accounts receivable-less reserves of $3.4 &
$5.5, respectively 87.0 131.9
Receivables due from other Vectren companies 0.2 56.3
Accrued unbilled revenues 38.8 112.7
Inventories 37.6 56.0
Recoverable fuel & natural gas costs 15.4 22.1
Prepayments & other current assets 71.8 86.5
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total current assets 260.1 476.0
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Utility Plant
Original cost 3,132.8 3,037.2
Less: accumulated depreciation & amortization 1,434.6 1,389.0
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net utility plant 1,698.2 1,648.2
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates 1.9 2.4
Other Investments 19.2 21.9
Non-Utility Property-Net 137.7 139.2
Goodwill-Net 202.2 202.2
Regulatory Assets 85.4 75.2
Other Assets 4.1 5.3
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL ASSETS $ 2,408.8 $ 2,570.4
===============================================================================

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated condensed
financial statements.





VECTREN UTILITY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited - In millions)





June 30, December 31,
2003 2002
- ------------------------------------------------------ ---------- ------------
LIABILITIES & SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY As Restated,
---------------------------------- See Note 3
------------

Current Liabilities
Accounts payable $ 21.7 $ 74.8
Accounts payable to affiliated companies 59.8 85.6
Accounts payable due to other Vectren companies 4.3 69.8
Accrued liabilities 91.6 83.2
Short-term borrowings 319.6 239.1
Short-term borrowings due to other Vectren companies - 86.9
Current maturities of long-term debt - 39.8
Long-term debt subject to tender - 26.6
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total current liabilities 497.0 705.8
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Long-term Debt-Net of Current Maturities &
Debt Subject to Tender 867.9 841.2

Deferred Income Taxes & Other Liabilities
Deferred income taxes 181.5 172.3
Deferred credits & other liabilities 81.1 82.2
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total deferred credits & other liabilities 262.6 254.5
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commitments & Contingencies (Notes 7 - 9)

Cumulative, Redeemable Preferred Stock of a Subsidiary 0.2 0.3

Common Shareholder's Equity
Common stock (no par value) 385.7 385.7
Retained earnings 394.9 382.4
Accumulated other comprehensive income 0.5 0.5
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total common shareholder's equity 781.1 768.6
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL LIABILITIES & SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY $ 2,408.8 $ 2,570.4
=================================================================================


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated condensed
financial statements.





VECTREN UTILITY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited - In millions)



Three Months Six Months
Ended June 30, Ended June 30,
---------------------- --------------------
2003 2002 2003 2002
- ---------------------------------------- ---------------------- --------------------
As Restated, As Restated,
See Note 3 See Note 3
------------ ------------

OPERATING REVENUES
Gas utility $ 165.1 $ 140.1 $ 674.6 $ 498.2
Electric utility 90.2 158.9 209.6 285.7
Other 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.2
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total operating revenues 255.5 299.1 884.6 784.1
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OPERATING EXPENSES
Cost of gas sold 104.3 82.1 469.4 312.6
Fuel for electric generation 20.6 19.1 41.4 36.9
Purchased electric energy 18.8 86.8 59.2 146.5
Other operating 53.9 48.8 110.5 100.1
Depreciation & amortization 29.6 26.3 58.4 53.1
Taxes other than income taxes 10.9 10.0 32.6 28.1
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total operating expenses 238.1 273.1 771.5 677.3
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OPERATING INCOME 17.4 26.0 113.1 106.8
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE) - NET
Equity in earnings (losses) of
unconsolidated affiliates 0.1 (0.4) (0.4) (0.5)
Other - net 0.2 3.7 (1.3) 5.8
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total other income (expense) - net 0.3 3.3 (1.7) 5.3
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interest expense 15.9 17.3 32.4 34.9
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES 1.8 12.0 79.0 77.2
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Income taxes 0.4 3.3 30.3 26.5
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NET INCOME $ 1.4 $ 8.7 $ 48.7 $ 50.7
=======================================================================================



The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated condensed
financial statements.





VECTREN UTILITY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited - In millions)



Six Months Ended June 30,
-------------------------
2003 2002
- ----------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------
As Restated,
See Note 3
------------

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income $ 48.7 $ 50.7
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash from
operating activities:
Depreciation & amortization 58.4 53.1
Deferred income taxes & investment tax credits 5.2 (6.2)
Equity in losses of unconsolidated affiliates 0.4 0.5
Net unrealized (gain) loss on derivative instruments (0.8) 2.9
Pension and postretirement expense 3.0 3.2
Other non-cash charges- net 6.4 0.1
Changes in working capital accounts:
Accounts receivable, including to Vectren companies
& accrued unbilled revenue 167.7 76.2
Inventories 18.4 17.8
Recoverable fuel & natural gas costs 6.7 26.2
Prepayments & other current assets 6.9 22.6
Accounts payable, including to Vectren companies
& affiliated companies (144.4) (40.2)
Accrued liabilities 13.2 44.3
Changes in other noncurrent assets (0.2) 0.6
Changes in other noncurrent liabilities (3.0) 0.1
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net cash flows from operating activities 186.6 251.9
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CASH FLOWS REQUIRED FOR FINANCING ACTIVITIES

Requirements for:
Retirement of long-term debt, including premiums paid (40.9) (6.3)
Dividends on common stock (36.2) (34.0)
Redemption of preferred stock of subsidiary (0.1) (0.2)
Net change in short-term borrowings, including to other
Vectren companies (6.4) (138.0)
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net cash flows required for financing activities (83.6) (178.5)
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CASH FLOWS REQUIRED FOR INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from:
Unconsolidated affiliate distributions 0.1 -
Notes receivable, including notes from other Vectren
companies & other collections - 10.4
Requirements for:
Capital expenditures, excluding AFUDC-equity (103.2) (81.4)
Unconsolidated affiliate and other investments (1.1) (1.0)
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net cash flows required for investing activities (104.2) (72.0)
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net increase (decrease) in cash & cash equivalents (1.2) 1.4
Cash & cash equivalents at beginning of period 10.5 5.3
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash & cash equivalents at end of period $ 9.3 $ 6.7
=======================================================================================


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated condensed
financial statements.





VECTREN UTILITY HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

1. Organization and Nature of Operations

Vectren Utility Holdings, Inc. (VUHI or the Company), an Indiana corporation,
was formed on March 31, 2000 to serve as the intermediate holding company for
Vectren Corporation's (Vectren) three operating public utilities, Indiana Gas
Company, Inc. (Indiana Gas), formerly a wholly owned subsidiary of Indiana
Energy, Inc. (Indiana Energy), Southern Indiana Gas and Electric Company
(SIGECO), formerly a wholly owned subsidiary of SIGCORP, Inc. (SIGCORP), and the
Ohio operations. VUHI also has other assets that provide information technology
and other services to the three utilities.

Indiana Gas provides natural gas distribution and transportation services to a
diversified customer base in 49 of Indiana's 92 counties. SIGECO provides
electric generation, transmission, and distribution services to 8 counties in
southwestern Indiana, including counties surrounding Evansville, and
participates in the wholesale power market. SIGECO also provides natural gas
distribution and transportation services to 10 counties in southwestern Indiana,
including counties surrounding Evansville. The Ohio operations, owned as a
tenancy in common by Vectren Energy Delivery of Ohio, Inc.(VEDO), a wholly owned
subsidiary, (53 % ownership) and Indiana Gas (47 % ownership), provide natural
gas distribution and transportation services to 17 counties in west central
Ohio, including counties surrounding Dayton.

Vectren is an energy and applied technology holding company headquartered in
Evansville, Indiana. The Company was organized on June 10, 1999 solely for the
purpose of effecting the merger of Indiana Energy and SIGCORP. On March 31,
2000, the merger of Indiana Energy with SIGCORP and into Vectren was consummated
with a tax-free exchange of shares and has been accounted for as a
pooling-of-interests in accordance with APB Opinion No. 16 "Business
Combinations" (APB 16).

Both Vectren and VUHI are exempt from registration pursuant to Section 3(a)(1)
and 3(c) of the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935.

2. Basis of Presentation

The interim consolidated condensed financial statements included in this report
have been prepared by the Company, without audit, as provided in the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and
note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
have been omitted as provided in such rules and regulations. The Company
believes that the information in this report reflects all adjustments necessary
to fairly state the results of the interim periods reported. These consolidated
condensed financial statements and related notes should be read in conjunction
with the Company's audited annual consolidated financial statements for the year
ended December 31, 2002, filed on Form 10-K/A. Because of the seasonal nature of
the Company's utility operations, the results shown on a quarterly basis are not
necessarily indicative of annual results.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the statements
and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.

3. Restatement of Previously Reported Information

Subsequent to the issuance of the Company's 2002 quarterly financial statements,
the Company's management determined that previously issued financial statements
should be restated. The restatement had the effect of decreasing net income for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2002 by $2.1 million after tax and $1.7
million after tax, respectively.

In the second quarter of 2002, the Company recorded $5.2 million ($3.2 million
after tax) of carrying costs for demand side management (DSM) programs pursuant
to existing IURC orders and based on an improved regulatory environment. During
the 2002 annual audit, management determined that the accrual of such carrying
costs was more appropriate in periods prior to 2000 when DSM program
expenditures were made. Therefore, such carrying costs originally reflected in
2002 quarterly results were reversed and reflected in common shareholders'
equity as of January 1, 2000. The Company also identified other adjustments for
various reconciliation errors and other errors related primarily to the
recording of estimates. These adjustments were not significant, either
individually or in the aggregate and increased previously reported pre-tax and
after tax earnings for the three months ended June 30, 2002 by approximately
$1.8 million and $1.1 million, respectively, and increased previously reported
pre-tax and after tax earnings for the six months ended June 30, 2002 by
approximately $2.5 million and $1.5 million, respectively.

In addition, on January 1, 2003, Vectren transferred certain information
technology systems and related assets and buildings from other entities within
its consolidated group to VUHI. These assets primarily support the operations of
VUHI's subsidiaries and VUHI's subsidiaries receive a charge for their use that
is included in their other operating expenses. The transfer required restatement
of VUHI's consolidated financial statements for all periods presented under
accounting rules governing combinations of entities under common control. The
reorganization increased previously reported earnings by $1.7 million after tax
for the three months ended June 30, 2002 and $2.7 million after tax for the six
months ended June 30, 2002. Total assets, liabilities, and equity transferred to
VUHI on January 1, 2003 were $133.8 million, $93.5 million, and $40.3 million,
respectively.

Following is a summary of the effects of the reorganization due to the transfer
of assets and the restatement on previously reported results of operations for
the three months ended June 30, 2002.




In millions
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Adjustments for
---------------------------
OPERATING REVENUES As reported Reorganization Restatement As Restated
----------- -------------- ----------- -----------

Gas utility $ 139.8 $ - $ 0.3 $ 140.1
Electric utility 158.9 - - 158.9
Energy services & other - 0.1 - 0.1
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total operating revenues 298.7 0.1 0.3 299.1
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OPERATING EXPENSES
Cost of gas sold 82.2 - (0.1) 82.1
Fuel for electric generation 19.0 - 0.1 19.1
Purchased electric energy 87.0 - (0.2) 86.8
Other operating 55.3 (5.5) (1.0) 48.8
Depreciation & amortization 23.9 2.4 - 26.3
Taxes other than income taxes 10.2 (0.2) - 10.0
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total operating expenses 277.6 (3.3) (1.2) 273.1
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OPERATING INCOME 21.1 3.4 1.5 26.0
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE) - NET
Equity in losses of unconsolidated
affiliates (0.4) - - (0.4)
Other - net 8.3 - (4.6) 3.7
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total other income (expense) - net 7.9 - (4.6) 3.3
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interest expense 16.3 0.7 0.3 17.3
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES 12.7 2.7 (3.4) 12.0
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Income taxes 3.6 1.0 (1.3) 3.3
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NET INCOME $ 9.1 $ 1.7 $ (2.1) $ 8.7
=============================================================================================






Following is a summary of the effects of the reorganization due to the transfer
of assets and the restatement on previously reported results of operations for
the six months ended June 30, 2002.



In millions
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Adjustments for
---------------------------
OPERATING REVENUES As reported Reorganization Restatement As Restated
----------- -------------- ----------- -----------

Gas utility $ 496.9 $ - $ 1.3 $ 498.2
Electric utility 285.7 - - 285.7
Energy services & other - 0.2 - 0.2
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total operating revenues 782.6 0.2 1.3 784.1
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OPERATING EXPENSES
Cost of gas sold 312.6 - - 312.6
Fuel for electric generation 36.8 - 0.1 36.9
Purchased electric energy 146.8 - (0.3) 146.5
Other operating 111.1 (11.1) 0.1 100.1
Depreciation & amortization 47.5 5.6 - 53.1
Taxes other than income taxes 28.1 - - 28.1
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total operating expenses 682.9 (5.5) (0.1) 677.3
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OPERATING INCOME 99.7 5.7 1.4 106.8
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE) - NET
Equity in losses of unconsolidated
affiliates (1.0) - 0.5 (0.5)
Other - net 10.1 - (4.3) 5.8
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total other income (expense) - net 9.1 - (3.8) 5.3
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interest expense 33.2 1.4 0.3 34.9
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES 75.6 4.3 (2.7) 77.2
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Income taxes 25.9 1.6 (1.0) 26.5
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NET INCOME $ 49.7 $ 2.7 $ (1.7) $ 50.7
=============================================================================================


4. Transactions with ProLiance Energy, LLC

ProLiance Energy, LLC (ProLiance), a nonregulated energy marketing affiliate of
Vectren and Citizens Gas and Coke Utility (Citizens Gas), provides natural gas
and related services to Indiana Gas, the Ohio operations, Citizens Gas and
others. ProLiance also began providing service to SIGECO and Vectren Retail, LLC
(Vectren's retail gas marketer) in 2002. ProLiance's primary businesses include
gas marketing, gas portfolio optimization, and other portfolio and energy
management services.

Purchases from ProLiance for resale and for injections into storage for the
three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 totaled $166.2 million and $108.5
million, respectively, and for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002
totaled $427.6 million and $236.3 million, respectively. Amounts owed to
ProLiance at June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002 for those purchases were $57.7
million and $83.7 million, respectively, and are included in accounts payable to
affiliated companies. Amounts charged by ProLiance for gas supply services are
established by supply agreements with each utility.

5. Subsidiary Guarantor and Consolidating Information

The Company's three operating utility companies, SIGECO, Indiana Gas, and VEDO
are guarantors of VUHI's $366.0 million in short-term credit facilities and
VUHI's $350.0 million unsecured senior notes outstanding at June 30, 2003. As a
result of the reorganization described in Note 3, VUHI has operations other than
those of the subsidiary guarantors. Pursuant to Article 3-10 of Regulation S-X,
disclosure of the results of operations and balance sheets of the subsidiary
guarantors separate from the parent company's operations is required. Following
are consolidating financial statements including information on the combined
operations of the subsidiary guarantors separate from the other operations of
the parent company.

Consolidating Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2003 (in millions):




ASSETS Subsidiary Parent
------ Guarantors Company Eliminations Consolidated
---------- --------- ------------ ------------

Current Assets
Cash & cash equivalents $ 9.4 $ (0.1) $ - $ 9.3
Accounts receivable-less reserves 86.8 0.2 - 87.0
Receivables due from other Vectren
companies 0.6 7.8 (8.2) 0.2
Accrued unbilled revenues 38.8 - - 38.8
Inventories 37.6 - - 37.6
Recoverable fuel & natural gas costs 15.4 - - 15.4
Prepayments & other current assets 71.4 0.4 - 71.8
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total current assets 260.0 8.3 (8.2) 260.1
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Utility Plant
Original cost 3,132.8 - - 3,132.8
Less: accumulated depreciation &
amortization 1,434.6 - - 1,434.6
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net utility plant 1,698.2 - - 1,698.2
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Investments in Consolidated Subsidiaries - 814.4 (814.4) -
Notes Receivable From Consolidated
Subsidiaries 17.8 507.0 (524.8) -
Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates 0.1 1.8 - 1.9
Other Investments 13.0 6.2 - 19.2
Non-Utility Property-Net 5.3 132.4 - 137.7
Goodwill-Net 202.2 - - 202.2
Regulatory Assets 81.0 4.4 - 85.4
Other Assets 4.1 - - 4.1
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL ASSETS $ 2,281.7 $ 1,474.5 $(1,347.4) $ 2,408.8
================================================================================================

LIABILITIES & SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY

Current Liabilities
Accounts payable $ 20.1 $ 1.6 $ - $ 21.7
Accounts payable to affiliated companies 59.3 0.5 - 59.8
Accounts payable due to other Vectren
companies 12.5 - (8.2) 4.3
Accrued liabilities 91.4 2.4 (2.2) 91.6
Short-term borrowings 1.0 318.6 - 319.6
Short-term borrowings due from
other Vectren companies 160.8 17.8 (178.6) -
Current maturities of long-term debt - - - -
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total current liabilities 345.1 340.9 (189.0) 497.0
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Long-Term Debt
Long-term debt-net of current maturities &
debt subject to tender 519.4 348.5 - 867.9
Long-term debt due to VUHI 344.0 - (344.0) -
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total long-term debt-net 863.4 348.5 (344.0) 867.9
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Deferred Income Taxes & Other Liabilities
Deferred income taxes 179.9 1.6 - 181.5
Deferred credits & other liabilities 78.7 2.4 - 81.1
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total deferred credits & other
liabilities 258.6 4.0 - 262.6
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cumulative, Redeemable Preferred Stock of a
Subsidiary 0.2 - - 0.2
Common Shareholder's Equity
Common stock (no par value) 461.3 385.7 (461.3) 385.7
Retained earnings 353.1 394.9 (353.1) 394.9
Accumulated other comprehensive income - 0.5 - 0.5
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total common shareholder's equity 814.4 781.1 (814.4) 781.1
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL LIABILITIES & SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY $ 2,281.7 $ 1,474.5 $(1,347.4) $ 2,408.8
===============================================================================================





Consolidating Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2002 (in millions):



ASSETS Subsidiary Parent
------ Guarantors Company Eliminations Consolidated
---------- --------- ------------ ------------

Current Assets
Cash & cash equivalents $ 10.2 $ 0.3 $ - $ 10.5
Accounts receivable-less reserves 130.8 1.1 - 131.9
Receivables due from other Vectren
companies 39.3 19.7 (2.7) 56.3
Accrued unbilled revenues 112.7 - - 112.7
Inventories 56.0 - - 56.0
Recoverable fuel & natural gas costs 22.1 - - 22.1
Prepayments & other current assets 86.2 0.3 - 86.5
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total current assets 457.3 21.4 (2.7) 476.0
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Utility Plant
Original cost 3,037.2 - - 3,037.2
Less: accumulated depreciation &
amortization 1,389.0 - - 1,389.0
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net utility plant 1,648.2 - - 1,648.2
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Investments in Consolidated Subsidiaries - 802.4 (802.4) -
Notes Receivable From Consolidated
Subsidiaries 8.5 493.9 (502.4) -
Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates 0.1 2.3 - 2.4
Other Investments 13.1 8.8 - 21.9
Non-Utility Property-Net 5.4 133.8 - 139.2
Goodwill-Net 202.2 - - 202.2
Regulatory Assets 70.3 4.9 - 75.2
Other Assets 4.9 0.4 - 5.3
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL ASSETS $ 2,410.0 $ 1,467.9 $(1,307.5) $ 2,570.4
=================================================================================================
LIABILITIES & SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY

Current Liabilities
Accounts payable $ 71.3 $ 3.5 $ - $ 74.8
Accounts payable to affiliated companies 85.2 0.4 - 85.6
Accounts payable due to other Vectren
companies 61.3 11.2 (2.7) 69.8
Accrued liabilities 83.8 1.7 (2.3) 83.2
Short-term borrowings - 239.1 - 239.1
Short-term borrowings due from
other Vectren companies 147.6 95.4 (156.1) 86.9
Current maturities of long-term debt 39.8 - - 39.8
Long-term debt subject to tender 26.6 - - 26.6
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total current liabilities 515.6 351.3 (161.1) 705.8
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Long-Term Debt
Long-term debt-net of current maturities &
debt subject to tender 492.8 348.4 - 841.2
Long-term debt due to VUHI 344.0 - (344.0) -
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total long-term debt-net 836.8 348.4 (344.0) 841.2
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Deferred Income Taxes & Other Liabilities
Deferred income taxes 174.6 (2.3) - 172.3
Deferred credits & other liabilities 80.3 1.9 - 82.2
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total deferred credits & other
liabilities 254.9 (0.4) - 254.5
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cumulative, Redeemable Preferred Stock of
a Subsidiary 0.3 - - 0.3
Common Shareholder's Equity
Common stock (no par value) 461.3 385.7 (461.3) 385.7
Retained earnings 341.1 382.4 (341.1) 382.4
Accumulated other comprehensive income - 0.5 - 0.5
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total common shareholder's equity 802.4 768.6 (802.4) 768.6
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL LIABILITIES & SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY $ 2,410.0 $ 1,467.9 $(1,307.5) $ 2,570.4
=================================================================================================





Consolidating Statement of Income for the three months ended June 30, 2003 (in
millions):



Subsidiary Parent
Guarantors Company Eliminations Consolidated
- ------------------------------------------- ---------- ------- ------------ ------------

OPERATING REVENUES
Gas utility $ 165.1 $ - $ - $ 165.1
Electric utility 90.2 - - 90.2
Other - 6.6 (6.4) 0.2
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total operating revenues 255.3 6.6 (6.4) 255.5
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OPERATING EXPENSES
Cost of gas sold 104.3 - - 104.3
Fuel for electric generation 20.6 - - 20.6
Purchased electric energy 18.8 - - 18.8
Other operating 59.8 0.5 (6.4) 53.9
Depreciation & amortization 25.6 4.0 - 29.6
Taxes other than income taxes 10.7 0.2 - 10.9
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------
Total operating expenses 239.8 4.7 (6.4) 238.1
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OPERATING INCOME 15.5 1.9 - 17.4
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE) - NET
Equity in losses of consolidated companies - (0.1) 0.1 -
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated
affiliates - 0.1 - 0.1
Other - net (0.1) 6.9 (6.6) 0.2
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------
Total other income (expense) - net (0.1) 6.9 (6.5) 0.3
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interest expense 15.4 7.1 (6.6) 15.9
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES - 1.7 0.1 1.8
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Income taxes 0.1 0.3 - 0.4
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NET INCOME (LOSS) $ (0.1) $ 1.4 $ 0.1 $ 1.4
==================================================================================================



Consolidating Statement of Income for the three months ended June 30, 2002 (in
millions):



Subsidiary Parent
Guarantors Company Eliminations Consolidated
- ---------------------------------------------- ---------- ------- ------------ ------------

OPERATING REVENUES
Gas utility $ 140.1 $ - $ - $ 140.1
Electric utility 158.9 - - 158.9
Other - 5.6 (5.5) 0.1
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total operating revenues 299.0 5.6 (5.5) 299.1
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OPERATING EXPENSES
Cost of gas sold 82.1 - - 82.1
Fuel for electric generation 19.1 - - 19.1
Purchased electric energy 86.8 - - 86.8
Other operating 53.8 0.5 (5.5) 48.8
Depreciation & amortization 23.9 2.4 - 26.3
Taxes other than income taxes 10.2 (0.2) - 10.0
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----------------------
Total operating expenses 275.9 2.7 (5.5) 273.1
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OPERATING INCOME 23.1 2.9 - 26.0
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE) - NET
Equity in earnings of consolidated companies - 7.2 (7.2) -
Equity in losses of unconsolidated affiliates - (0.4) - (0.4)
Other - net 2.2 7.5 (6.0) 3.7
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----------------------
Total other income (expense) - net 2.2 14.3 (13.2) 3.3
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interest expense 15.7 7.6 (6.0) 17.3
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----------------------
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES 9.6 9.6 (7.2) 12.0
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Income taxes 2.4 0.9 - 3.3
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NET INCOME $ 7.2 $ 8.7 $ (7.2) $ 8.7
================================================================================================


Consolidating Statement of Income for the six months ended June 30, 2003 (in
millions):



Subsidiary Parent
Guarantors Company Eliminations Consolidated
- ------------------------------------------- ---------- ------- ------------ ------------

OPERATING REVENUES
Gas utility $ 674.6 $ - $ - $ 674.6
Electric utility 209.6 - - 209.6
Other - 13.2 (12.8) 0.4
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total operating revenues 884.2 13.2 (12.8) 884.6
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OPERATING EXPENSES
Cost of gas sold 469.4 - - 469.4
Fuel for electric generation 41.4 - - 41.4
Purchased electric energy 59.2 - - 59.2
Other operating 122.5 0.8 (12.8) 110.5
Depreciation & amortization 50.9 7.5 - 58.4
Taxes other than income taxes 32.1 0.5 - 32.6
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------
Total operating expenses 775.5 8.8 (12.8) 771.5
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OPERATING INCOME 108.7 4.4 - 113.1
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE) - NET
Equity in earnings of consolidated companies - 48.4 (48.4) -
Equity in losses of unconsolidated
affiliates - (0.4) - (0.4)
Other - net 0.3 11.7 (13.3) (1.3)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------
Total other income (expense) - net 0.3 59.7 (61.7) (1.7)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interest expense 30.9 14.8 (13.3) 32.4
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES 78.1 49.3 (48.4) 79.0
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Income taxes 29.7 0.6 - 30.3
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NET INCOME $ 48.4 $ 48.7 $(48.4) $ 48.7
==============================================================================================


Consolidating Statement of Income for the six months ended June 30, 2002 (in
millions):



Subsidiary Parent
Guarantors Company Eliminations Consolidated
- ---------------------------------------------- ---------- ------- ------------ ------------

OPERATING REVENUES
Gas utility $ 498.2 $ - $ - $ 498.2
Electric utility 285.7 - - 285.7
Other - 11.2 (11.0) 0.2
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total operating revenues 783.9 11.2 (11.0) 784.1
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OPERATING EXPENSES
Cost of gas sold 312.6 - - 312.6
Fuel for electric generation 36.9 - - 36.9
Purchased electric energy 146.5 - - 146.5
Other operating 110.6 0.5 (11.0) 100.1
Depreciation & amortization 47.5 5.6 - 53.1
Taxes other than income taxes 28.2 (0.1) - 28.1
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total operating expenses 682.3 6.0 (11.0) 677.3
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OPERATING INCOME 101.6 5.2 - 106.8
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE) - NET
Equity in earnings of consolidated companies - 48.7 (48.7) -
Equity in losses of unconsolidated affiliates - (0.5) - (0.5)
Other - net 4.0 14.0 (12.2) 5.8
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total other income (expense) - net 4.0 62.2 (60.9) 5.3
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interest expense 31.6 15.5 (12.2) 34.9
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES 74.0 51.9 (48.7) 77.2
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Income taxes 25.3 1.2 - 26.5
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NET INCOME $ 48.7 $ 50.7 $(48.7) $ 50.7
=================================================================================================




Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2003 (in
millions):



Subsidiary Parent
Guarantors Company Eliminations Consolidated
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NET CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES $ 170.2 $ 16.4 $ - $ 186.6
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CASH FLOWS REQUIRED FOR FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Requirements for:
Retirement of long-term debt, including
premiums paid (40.9) - - (40.9)
Dividends on common stock (36.4) (36.2) 36.4 (36.2)
Redemption of preferred stock of
subsidiary (0.1) - - (0.1)
Net change in short-term borrowings,
including to other Vectren companies 14.2 1.9 (22.5) (6.4)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net cash flows required for financing
activities (63.2) (34.3) 13.9 (83.6)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CASH FLOWS FROM (REQUIRED FOR) INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from:
Consolidated subsidiary distributions - 36.4 (36.4) -
Unconsolidated affiliate distributions - 0.1 - 0.1
Requirements for:
Capital expenditures, excluding AFUDC-equity (98.4) (4.8) - (103.2)
Unconsolidated affiliate and other investments - (1.1) - (1.1)
Net change in notes receivable to other Vectren
companies (9.4) (13.1) 22.5 -
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net cash flows from (required for) investing
activities (107.8) 17.5 (13.9) (104.2)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net decrease in cash & cash equivalents (0.8) (0.4) - (1.2)
Cash & cash equivalents at beginning of period 10.2 0.3 - 10.5
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash & cash equivalents at end of period $ 9.4 $ (0.1) $ - $ 9.3
====================================================================================================


Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2002 (in
millions):



Subsidiary Parent
Guarantors Company Eliminations Consolidated
- ------------------------------------------------ ---------- ------- ------------ ------------

NET CASH FLOWS FROM (REQUIRED FOR)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES $ 265.5 $(13.6) $ - $ 251.9
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CASH FLOWS REQUIRED FOR FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Requirements for:
Retirement of long-term debt, including
premiums paid (6.3) - - (6.3)
Dividends on common stock (36.6) (34.0) 36.6 (34.0)
Redemption of preferred stock of subsidiary (0.2) - - (0.2)
Net change in short-term borrowings, including
to other Vectren companies (103.2) (84.8) 50.0 (138.0)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net cash flows required for financing
activities (146.3) (118.8) 86.6 (178.5)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CASH FLOWS FROM (REQUIRED FOR) INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from:
Consolidated subsidiary distributions - 36.6 (36.6) -
Notes receivable and other collections 1.4 9.0 - 10.4
Requirements for:
Capital expenditures, excluding AFUDC-equity (69.7) (11.7) - (81.4)
Unconsolidated affiliate investments - (1.0) - (1.0)
Net change in intercompany notes receivable (52.3) 102.3 (50.0) -
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net cash flows from (required for) investing
activities (120.6) 135.2 (86.6) (72.0)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net increase (decrease) in cash & cash equivalents (1.4) 2.8 - 1.4
Cash & cash equivalents at beginning of period 7.0 (1.7) - 5.3
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash & cash equivalents at end of period $ 5.6 $ 1.1 $ - $ 6.7
==================================================================================================







6. Transactions with Other Vectren Companies

Support Services and Purchases
Vectren and certain subsidiaries of Vectren provided corporate and general and
administrative services to the Company including legal, finance, tax, risk
management, human resources, which includes charges for restricted stock
compensation and for pension and other postretirement benefits not directly
charged to subsidiaries. These costs have been allocated using various
allocators, primarily number of employees, number of customers and/or revenues.
Allocations are based on cost. VUHI received corporate allocations totaling
$16.9 million and $16.2 million, respectively, for the three months ended June
30, 2003 and 2002 and $34.6 million and $33.6 million, respectively, for the six
months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002.

Vectren Fuels, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Vectren, owns and operates
coal mines from which SIGECO purchases fuel used for electric generation.
Amounts paid for such purchases for the three months ended June 30, 2003 and
2002, totaled $19.1 million and $15.0 million, respectively, and $38.3 million
and $28.2 million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and
2002.

Stock-Based Incentive Plans
VUHI does not have stock-based compensation plans separate from Vectren. An
insignificant number of VUHI's employees participate in Vectren's stock-based
compensation plans.

7. Commitments & Contingencies

Legal Proceedings
The Company is party to various legal proceedings arising in the normal course
of business. In the opinion of management, there are no legal proceedings
pending against the Company that are likely to have a material adverse effect on
its financial position or results of operations. See Note 8 regarding
environmental matters.

United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Informal Inquiry
As more fully described in Note 3 to these consolidated condensed financial
statements and in Note 3 to the 2002 consolidated financial statements filed on
Form 10-K/A, the Company restated its consolidated financial statements for
2000, 2001, and quarterly results issued in 2002. The Company is cooperating
with the SEC in an informal inquiry with respect to this previously announced
restatement, has met with the staff of the SEC, and is providing information in
response to their requests.

8. Environmental Matters

Clean Air Act

NOx SIP Call Matter
The Clean Air Act (the Act) requires each state to adopt a State Implementation
Plan (SIP) to attain and maintain National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)
for a number of pollutants, including ozone. If the USEPA finds a state's SIP
inadequate to achieve the NAAQS, the USEPA can call upon the state to revise its
SIP (a SIP Call).

In October 1998, the USEPA issued a final rule "Finding of Significant
Contribution and Rulemaking for Certain States in the Ozone Transport Assessment
Group Region for Purposes of Reducing Regional Transport of Ozone," (63 Fed.
Reg. 57355). This ruling found that the SIP's of certain states, including
Indiana, were substantially inadequate since they allowed for nitrogen oxide
(NOx) emissions in amounts that contributed to non-attainment with the ozone
NAAQS in downwind states. The USEPA required each state to revise its SIP to
provide for further NOx emission reductions. The NOx emissions budget, as
stipulated in the USEPA's final ruling, requires a 31% reduction in total NOx
emissions from Indiana.

In June 2001, the Indiana Air Pollution Control Board adopted final rules to
achieve the NOx emission reductions required by the NOx SIP Call. Indiana's SIP
requires the Company to lower its system-wide NOx emissions to .14 lbs./MMBTU by
May 31, 2004 (the compliance date). This is a 65% reduction from emission levels
existing in 1999 and 1998.

The Company has initiated steps toward compliance with the revised regulations.
These steps include installing Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) systems at
Culley Generating Station Unit 3 (Culley), Warrick Generating Station Unit 4,
and A.B. Brown Generating Station Units 1 and 2. SCR systems reduce flue gas NOx
emissions to atmospheric nitrogen and water using ammonia in a chemical
reaction. This technology is known to be the most effective method of reducing
NOx emissions where high removal efficiencies are required.

The IURC has issued orders that approve:
o the Company's proposed project to achieve environmental compliance by
investing in clean coal technology;
o a total capital cost investment for this project up to $244 million
(excluding AFUDC), subject to periodic review of the actual costs incurred;
o a mechanism whereby, prior to an electric base rate case, the Company may
recover through a rider that is updated every six months an 8 percent
return on its capital costs for the project; and
o ongoing recovery of operating costs, including depreciation and purchased
emission allowances through a rider mechanism, related to the clean coal
technology once the facility is in service.

Based on the level of system-wide emissions reductions required and the control
technology utilized to achieve the reductions, the current estimated clean coal
technology construction cost is consistent with amounts approved in the IURC's
orders and is expected to be expended during the 2001-2006 period. Through June
30, 2003, $102.8 million has been expended. After the equipment is installed and
operational, related annual operating expenses, including depreciation expense,
are estimated to be between $24 million and $27 million. Such expenses are
expected to commence later in 2003 when the Culley SCR is operational. The 8
percent return on capital investment approximates the return authorized in the
Company's last electric rate case in 1995 and includes a return on equity.

The Company expects to achieve timely compliance as a result of the project.
Construction of the first SCR at Culley was completed on schedule, and
construction of the Warrick 4 and Brown SCR's is proceeding on schedule.
Installation of SCR technology as planned is expected to reduce the Company's
overall NOx emissions to levels compliant with Indiana's NOx emissions budget
allotted by the USEPA. Therefore, the Company has recorded no accrual for
potential penalties that may result from noncompliance.

Culley Generating Station Litigation
In the late 1990's, the USEPA initiated an investigation under Section 114 of
the Act of SIGECO's coal-fired electric generating units in commercial operation
by 1977 to determine compliance with environmental permitting requirements
related to repairs, maintenance, modifications, and operations changes. The
focus of the investigation was to determine whether new source review permitting
requirements were triggered by such plant modifications, and whether the best
available control technology was, or should have been used. Numerous electric
utilities were, and are currently, being investigated by the USEPA under an
industry-wide review for compliance. In July 1999, SIGECO received a letter from
the Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance of the USEPA discussing the
industry-wide investigation, vaguely referring to an investigation of SIGECO and
inviting SIGECO to participate in a discussion of the issues. No specifics were
noted; furthermore, the letter stated that the communication was not intended to
serve as a notice of violation. Subsequent meetings were conducted in September
and October 1999 with the USEPA and targeted utilities, including SIGECO,
regarding potential remedies to the USEPA's general allegations.

On November 3, 1999, the USEPA filed a lawsuit against seven utilities,
including SIGECO. SIGECO's suit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the
Southern District of Indiana. The USEPA alleged that, beginning in 1992, SIGECO
violated the Act by (1) making modifications to its Culley Generating Station in
Yankeetown, Indiana without obtaining required permits (2) making major
modifications to the Culley Generating Station without installing the best
available emission control technology and (3) failing to notify the USEPA of the
modifications. In addition, the lawsuit alleged that the modifications to the
Culley Generating Station required SIGECO to begin complying with federal new
source performance standards at its Culley Unit 3. The USEPA also issued an
administrative notice of violation to SIGECO making the same allegations, but
alleging that violations began in 1977.

On June 6, 2003, SIGECO, the Department of Justice (DOJ), and the USEPA
announced a proposed agreement that would resolve the lawsuit. The agreement was
embodied in a consent decree filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern
District of Indiana. The mandatory public comment period has expired, and no
comments were received. SIGECO anticipates that the Court will enter the consent
decree.

Under the terms of the proposed agreement, the DOJ and USEPA have agreed to drop
all challenges of past maintenance and repair activities at the Culley
coal-fired units. In reaching the proposed agreement, SIGECO did not admit to
any allegations alleged in the government's complaint, and SIGECO continues to
believe that it acted in accordance with applicable regulations and conducted
only routine maintenance on the units. SIGECO has entered into this proposed
agreement to further its continued commitment to improve air quality and avoid
the cost and uncertainties of litigation.

Under the proposed agreement, SIGECO has committed to:
o either repower Culley Unit 1 (50 MW) with natural gas, which would
significantly reduce air emissions from this unit, and equip it with SCR
control technology for further reduction of nitrogen oxides, or cease
operation of the unit by December of 2006;
o operate the existing SCR control technology recently installed on Culley
Unit 3 (287 MW) year round at a lower emission rate than that currently
required under the NOx SIP Call, resulting in further nitrogen oxide
reductions;
o enhance the efficiency of the existing scrubber at Culley Units 2 and 3 for
additional removal of sulphur dioxide emissions;
o install a baghouse for further particulate matter reductions at Culley Unit
3 by June of 2007;
o conduct a Sulphuric Acid Reduction Demonstration Project as an
environmental mitigation project designed to demonstrate an advance in
pollution control technology for the reduction of sulfate emissions; and
o pay a $600,000 civil penalty.

The Company anticipates that the proposed settlement would result in total
capital expenditures through 2007 in a range between $16 million and $28
million. Other than the $600,000 civil penalty, which was accrued in the second
quarter of 2003, the implementation of the proposed settlement, including these
capital expenditures and related operating expenses, are expected to be
recovered through rates.

Information Request
On January 23, 2001, SIGECO received an information request from the USEPA under
Section 114 of the Act for historical operational information on the Warrick and
A.B. Brown generating stations. SIGECO has provided all information requested,
and no further action has occurred.

Manufactured Gas Plants

In the past, Indiana Gas and others operated facilities for the manufacture of
gas. Given the availability of natural gas transported by pipelines, these
facilities have not been operated for many years. Under currently applicable
environmental laws and regulations, Indiana Gas and others may now be required
to take remedial action if certain byproducts are found above the regulatory
thresholds at these sites.

Indiana Gas has identified the existence, location, and certain general
characteristics of 26 gas manufacturing and storage sites for which it may have
some remedial responsibility. Indiana Gas has completed a remedial
investigation/feasibility study (RI/FS) at one of the sites under an agreed
order between Indiana Gas and the IDEM, and a Record of Decision was issued by
the IDEM in January 2000. Although Indiana Gas has not begun an RI/FS at
additional sites, Indiana Gas has submitted several of the sites to the IDEM's
Voluntary Remediation Program and is currently conducting some level of remedial
activities including groundwater monitoring at certain sites where deemed
appropriate and will continue remedial activities at the sites as appropriate
and necessary.

In conjunction with data compiled by environmental consultants, Indiana Gas has
accrued the estimated costs for further investigation, remediation, groundwater
monitoring, and related costs for the sites. While the total costs that may be
incurred in connection with addressing these sites cannot be determined at this
time, Indiana Gas has recorded costs that it reasonably expects to incur
totaling approximately $20.4 million.

The estimated accrued costs are limited to Indiana Gas' proportionate share of
the remediation efforts. Indiana Gas has arrangements in place for 19 of the 26
sites with other potentially responsible parties (PRP), which serve to limit
Indiana Gas' share of response costs at these 19 sites to between 20% and 50%.

With respect to insurance coverage, Indiana Gas has received and recorded
settlements from all known insurance carriers in an aggregate amount
approximating $20.4 million.

Environmental matters related to manufactured gas plants have had no material
impact on earnings since costs recorded to date approximate PRP and insurance
settlement recoveries. While Indiana Gas has recorded all costs which it
presently expects to incur in connection with activities at these sites, it is
possible that future events may require some level of additional remedial
activities which are not presently foreseen.

In October 2002, the Company received a formal information request letter from
the IDEM regarding five manufactured gas plants owned and/or operated by SIGECO
and not currently enrolled in the IDEM's Voluntary Remediation Program. In
response SIGECO submitted to the IDEM the results of preliminary site
investigations conducted in the mid-1990's. These site investigations confirmed
that based upon the conditions known at the time, the sites posed no risk to
human health or the environment. Follow up reviews have recently been initiated
by the Company to confirm that the sites continue to pose no such risk.

9. Rate and Regulatory Matters

The following is an update on two regulatory matters in Ohio. Each of the
discussed matters is currently pending before the PUCO.

The first matter relates to an application made to the PUCO by VEDO, together
with other regulated Ohio gas utilities, for authority to establish a tariff
mechanism to recover expenses related to uncollectible accounts pursuant to an
automatic adjustment procedure. The application is pending before the PUCO and,
if granted, will enable VEDO to better match revenues with costs associated with
fulfilling its obligation to serve customers who are unable to pay their bills.
Presently, the amount provided for in VEDO's base rates is not adequate to cover
the total expenses relating to uncollectible accounts. The actual positive
impact of the tariff mechanism will vary with the as-billed price of natural gas
and the number of customers who are unable to pay their bills. While the Company
believes there is a sound basis for the PUCO to grant the application to recover
actual expenses relating to uncollectible accounts, no assurance can be provided
with respect to the ultimate outcome of this proceeding.

The second matter concerns the requirement in Ohio that gas utilities, including
VEDO, undergo a biannual audit of their gas acquisition practices in connection
with the gas cost recovery (GCR) mechanism. In the case of VEDO, on or about
August 15, 2003, a third-party consulting firm engaged by the Staff of the PUCO,
is scheduled to conclude an audit report to be filed with the PUCO. The audit
report will provide the results of that firm's review of VEDO's gas acquisition
practices for the biannual period commencing November 1, 2000 (the first day of
operations by VEDO) through October 31, 2002. The audit will provide the initial
opportunity, in the context of a PUCO GCR proceeding, for a review of the
portfolio administration arrangement between VEDO and ProLiance Energy, LLC.
Similar arrangements for the Company's other utility subsidiaries, Indiana Gas
and SIGECO, were previously reviewed and approved by the IURC. VEDO's prior gas
acquisition practices may be challenged in the audit report, including VEDO's
relationship with ProLiance, and, as a result, a gas cost disallowance may be
recommended. Should such a challenge be made, then, by the first of September
2003, VEDO would file its response. If a hearing is necessary, the earliest it
could occur would be mid-September 2003. After that hearing, the PUCO would
consider all of the evidence on the matter and make a determination on the
merits. Throughout this process VEDO could, and likely would, endeavor to engage
in efforts with the participants in the proceeding to resolve disputed issues
outside of administrative litigation. The Company believes that VEDO's gas
acquisition practices that are the subject of the audit were reasonable. If a
challenge is made with respect to VEDO's gas acquisition practices during the
audit period and that challenge was adopted by the PUCO, the Company believes
that it would not be reasonably likely to have a material effect on the
Company's results or financial condition. However, the Company can provide no
assurance as to the ultimate outcome of this proceeding.

10. Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Guidance

SFAS 143
In July 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement
Obligations" (SFAS 143). SFAS 143 requires entities to record the fair value of
a liability for an asset retirement obligation in the period in which it is
incurred. When the liability is initially recorded, the entity capitalizes a
cost by increasing the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. Over
time, the liability is accreted to its present value, and the capitalized cost
is depreciated over the useful life of the related asset. Upon settlement of the
liability, an entity either settles the obligation for its recorded amount or
incurs a gain or loss upon settlement. The Company adopted this statement on
January 1, 2003. The adoption was not material to the Company's results of
operations or financial condition.

In accordance with regulatory treatment, the Company collects an estimated net
cost of removal of its utility plant in rates through normal depreciation. As of
June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002 such removal costs approximated $385 million
of accumulated depreciation as presented in the condensed consolidated balance
sheets based upon the Company's latest depreciation studies.

SFAS 149
In April 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 149, "Amendment of Statement 133 on
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" (SFAS 149). SFAS 149 amends and
clarifies the accounting guidance on (1) derivative instruments (including
certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts) and (2) hedging
activities that fall within the scope of FASB Statement No. 133 (SFAS 133),
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. SFAS 149 amends
SFAS 133 to reflect decisions that were made (1) as part of the process
undertaken by the Derivatives Implementation Group (DIG), which necessitated
amending SFAS 133; (2) in connection with other projects dealing with financial
instruments; and (3) regarding implementation issues related to the application
of the definition of a derivative. SFAS 149 also amends certain other existing
pronouncements, which will result in more consistent reporting of contracts that
are derivatives in their entirety or that contain embedded derivatives that
warrant separate accounting. SFAS 149 is effective (1) for contracts entered
into or modified after June 30, 2003, with certain exceptions and (2) for
hedging relationships designated after June 30. The guidance is to be applied
prospectively. Although management is still evaluating the impact of SFAS 149 on
its financial position and results of operations, the adoption is not expected
to have a material effect.

SFAS 150
In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, "Accounting for Certain Financial
Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity" (SFAS 150).
SFAS 150 requires issuers to classify as liabilities the following three types
of freestanding financial instruments: mandatorily redeemable financial
instruments; obligations to repurchase the issuer's equity shares by
transferring assets; and certain obligations to issue a variable number of
shares. SFAS 150 is effective immediately for all financial instruments entered
into or modified after May 31, 2003. For all other instruments, SFAS 150 applies
to the Company's third quarter of 2003. The Company has approximately $200,000
of outstanding preferred stock of a subsidiary that is redeemable on terms
outside the Company's control. However, the preferred stock is not redeemable on
a specified or determinable date or upon an event that is certain to occur.
Therefore, SFAS 150's adoption will not affect the Company's results of
operations or financial condition.

FASB Interpretation (FIN) 45
In November 2002, the FASB issued Interpretation 45, "Guarantor's Accounting and
Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of
Indebtedness of Others" (FIN 45). FIN 45 clarifies the requirements for a
guarantor's accounting for and disclosure of certain guarantees issued and
outstanding and that a guarantor is required to recognize, at the inception of a
guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligations it has undertaken.
The initial recognition and measurement provisions are applicable on a
prospective basis to guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002.
Since that date, the adoption has not had a material effect on the Company's
results of operations or financial condition.

FIN 46
In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation 46, "Consolidation of Variable
Interest Entities" (FIN 46). FIN 46 addresses consolidation by business
enterprises of variable interest entities and significantly changes the
consolidation requirements for those entities. FIN 46 is intended to achieve
more consistent application of consolidation policies to variable interest
entities and, thus improves comparability between enterprises engaged in similar
activities when those activities are conducted through variable interest
entities. FIN 46 applies to variable interest entities created after January 31,
2003 and to variable interest entities in which an enterprise obtains an
interest after that date. FIN 46 applies to the Company's third quarter of 2003
for variable interest entities in which the Company holds a variable interest
acquired before February 1, 2003. Although management is still evaluating the
impact of FIN 46 on its financial position and results of operations, the
adoption is not expected to have a material effect.

11. Segment Reporting

As discussed in Note 3, on January 1, 2003, Vectren transferred certain
information technology systems and related assets and buildings from other
entities within its consolidated group to VUHI. These assets primarily support
the operations of VUHI's subsidiaries. The operations of these assets comprise
the Corporate and Other operating segment. The Company separates its operations
into three operating segments: Gas Utility Services, Electric Utility Services,
and Corporate and Other. The Company uses operating income as the measure of
profitability for its segments.

Gas Utility Services provides natural gas distribution and transportation
services in nearly two-thirds of Indiana and west central Ohio. Electric Utility
Services provides electricity primarily to southwestern Indiana, and includes
the Company's power generating and marketing operations. Corporate and Other
Operations provide information technology and other support services to those
utility operations.

Following is information regarding the Company's segments' operating data.

Three Months Six Months
Ended June 30, Ended June 30,
------------------ ------------------
In millions 2003 2002 2003 2002
- ------------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Operating Revenues
Gas Utility Services $ 165.1 $ 140.1 $ 674.6 $ 498.2
Electric Utility Services 90.2 158.9 209.6 285.7
Corporate & Other 6.6 5.6 13.2 11.2
Intersegment Eliminations (6.4) (5.5) (12.8) (11.0)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total operating revenues $ 255.5 $ 299.1 $ 884.6 $ 784.1
==========================================================================

Operating Income
Gas Utility Services $ 0.2 $ 4.7 $ 69.5 $ 66.8
Electric Utility Services 15.3 18.4 39.2 34.8
Corporate & other 1.9 2.9 4.4 5.2
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total operating income $ 17.4 $ 26.0 $ 113.1 $ 106.8
==========================================================================




Following is the Company's segments' identifiable assets.

June 30, December 31,
In millions 2003 2002
- ---------------------------------------------------------
Total Assets
Gas Utility Services $ 1,413.8 $ 1,555.1
Electric Utility Services 871.7 860.9
Corporate & Other 151.3 171.6
Eliminations (28.0) (17.2)
- ---------------------------------------------------------
Total Assets $ 2,408.8 $ 2,570.4
=========================================================

12. Subsequent Events

Debt Issuance
In July 2003, the Company issued senior unsecured notes with an aggregate
principal amount of $200 million in two $100 million tranches. The first tranche
are 10-year notes due August 2013, with an interest rate of 5.25% priced at
99.746% to yield 5.28% to maturity (2013 Notes). The second tranche are 15-year
notes due August 2018 with an interest rate of 5.75% priced at 99.177% to yield
5.80% to maturity (2018 Notes).

The notes are jointly and severally guaranteed by the Company's three public
utilities. In addition, they have no sinking fund requirements, and interest
payments are due semi-annually. The notes may be called by the Company, in whole
or in part, at any time for an amount equal to accrued and unpaid interest, plus
the greater of 100% of the principal amount or the sum of the present values of
the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest, discounted to the
redemption date on a semi-annual basis at the Treasury Rate, as defined in the
indenture, plus 20 basis points for the 2013 Notes and 25 basis points for the
2018 Notes.

Shortly before these issues, the Company entered into several treasury locks
with a total notional amount of $150.0 million. Upon issuance of the debt, the
treasury locks were settled resulting in the Company receiving $5.7 million. The
value received will be amortized as a reduction of interest expense over the
life of the issues.

The net proceeds from the sale of the senior notes and settlement of related
hedging arrangements approximated $203 million.

Vectren Equity Issuance
In August 2003, Vectren completed a public offering of 6.5 million shares of its
common stock, which was priced at $22.81 per share to yield total gross proceeds
$148.3 million. Vectren also has granted the underwriters a 30-day option to
purchase up to an additional 975,000 shares of its common stock at the public
offering price to cover over-allotments, if any. The public offering of the
shares closed on August 13, 2003 with net proceeds of approximately $143 million
proceeds (excluding any over-allotment option). Vectren intends to contribute
the net proceeds to VUHI.

SIGECO and Indiana Gas Debt Call
In August 2003, the Company initiated steps to call two first mortgage bonds
outstanding at SIGECO and a senior unsecured note outstanding at Indiana Gas.
The first SIGECO bond has a principal amount of $45.0 million, an interest rate
of 7.60%, was originally due in 2023, and may be redeemed at 103.745% of its
stated principal amount. The second SIGECO bond has a principal amount of $20.0
million, an interest rate of 7.625%, was originally due in 2025, and may be
redeemed at 103.763% of the stated principal amount. The Indiana Gas note has a
principal amount of $13.5 million, an interest rate of 6.75%, was originally due
in 2028, and may be redeemed at the principal amount. These transactions are
expected to take place in September 2003. Pursuant to regulatory authority, the
premium paid to retire the net carrying value of these notes will be deferred as
a regulatory asset.





ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND
FINANCIAL CONDITION

Description of the Business

Vectren Utility Holdings, Inc. (VUHI or the Company), an Indiana corporation,
was formed on March 31, 2000 to serve as the intermediate holding company for
Vectren Corporation's (Vectren) three operating public utilities, Indiana Gas
Company, Inc. (Indiana Gas), formerly a wholly owned subsidiary of Indiana
Energy, Inc. (Indiana Energy), Southern Indiana Gas and Electric Company
(SIGECO), formerly a wholly owned subsidiary of SIGCORP, Inc. (SIGCORP), and the
Ohio operations. VUHI also has other assets that provide information technology
and other services to the three utilities.

Indiana Gas provides natural gas distribution and transportation services to a
diversified customer base in 49 of Indiana's 92 counties. SIGECO provides
electric generation, transmission, and distribution services to 8 counties in
southwestern Indiana, including counties surrounding Evansville, and
participates in the wholesale power market. SIGECO also provides natural gas
distribution and transportation services to 10 counties in southwestern Indiana,
including counties surrounding Evansville. The Ohio operations, owned as a
tenancy in common by Vectren Energy Delivery of Ohio, Inc.(VEDO), a wholly owned
subsidiary, (53 % ownership) and Indiana Gas (47 % ownership), provide natural
gas distribution and transportation services to 17 counties in west central
Ohio, including counties surrounding Dayton.

Vectren is an energy and applied technology holding company headquartered in
Evansville, Indiana. The Company was organized on June 10, 1999 solely for the
purpose of effecting the merger of Indiana Energy and SIGCORP. On March 31,
2000, the merger of Indiana Energy with SIGCORP and into Vectren was consummated
with a tax-free exchange of shares and has been accounted for as a
pooling-of-interests in accordance with APB Opinion No. 16 "Business
Combinations" (APB 16).

Both Vectren and VUHI are exempt from registration pursuant to Section 3(a)(1)
and 3(c) of the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935.

Consolidated Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the
unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements and notes thereto.
Subsequent to the issuance of the Company's 2002 quarterly financial statements,
the Company's management determined that previously issued financial statements
should be restated. The restatement had the effect of decreasing net income for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2002 by $2.1 million after tax and $1.7
million after tax, respectively.

In addition, on January 1, 2003, Vectren transferred certain information
technology systems and related assets and buildings from other entities within
its consolidated group to VUHI. These assets primarily support the operations of
VUHI's subsidiaries and VUHI's subsidiaries receive a charge for their use that
is included in their other operating expenses. The transfer required restatement
of VUHI's consolidated financial statements for all periods presented under
accounting rules governing combinations of entities under common control. The
reorganization increased previously reported earnings by $1.7 million after tax
for the three months ended June 30, 2002 and $2.7 million after tax for the six
months ended June 30, 2002.

Note 3 to the consolidated condensed financial statements includes a summary of
the effects of the reorganization due to the transfer of assets and restatement
on previously reported results of operations. The results of operations give
effect to these restatements.

Net Income
For the three months ended June 30,
2003, net income was $1.4 million compared to net income of $8.7 million, for
the same period last year. For the six months ended June 30, 2003, earnings were
$48.7 million compared to $50.7 million for the same period in 2002.

The 2003 second quarter results declined an estimated $5.4 million as compared
to the same period in 2002 due primarily to milder weather affecting both
heating and cooling sales and the write-off of an investment. Heating weather
experienced in the second quarter 2003 was 9% warmer than the same period last
year and cooling sales were reduced by weather 51% milder than the same period
in 2002. The estimated quarter over quarter impact of milder weather was $4.3
million after tax.

The 2003 results include the write-off of the Company's investment in BABB
International, Inc. (BABB), an entity that processes fly ash into building
materials. Charges of $1.9 million, pre-tax and $2.0 million, pre-tax were
recorded in the second and first quarters, respectively, of 2003. The write-off
reduced net income for the second quarter by $1.1 million and the first six
months by $2.3 million.

Year to date earnings in 2003 were primarily driven by weather that on the year
was favorably impacted by an estimated $5.4 million after tax compared to last
year and increased wholesale and other margins, offset by the BABB investment
write-off and increased other operating costs.

Significant Fluctuations

Utility Margin

Gas Utility Margin
Gas utility margin by customer type and separated between volumes sold and
transported follows:

Three Months Six Months
Ended June 30, Ended June 30,
------------------ --------------------
In millions 2003 2002 2003 2002
- ----------------------------- ------------------ --------------------
Residential $ 38.7 $ 34.9 $ 132.5 $ 119.8
Commercial 10.0 13.7 42.5 40.6
Contract 8.8 8.6 24.4 23.6
Other 3.3 0.8 5.8 1.6
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total gas utility margin $ 60.8 $ 58.0 $ 205.2 $ 185.6
==============================================================================

Volumes in MMDth
Sold 14.6 15.9 78.5 67.6
Transported 17.6 19.3 45.8 46.2
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total throughput 32.2 35.2 124.3 113.8
==============================================================================

Gas margins were $60.8 million, an increase of $2.8 million over the same
quarter in 2002. The increase is primarily due to increased late payment
charges, an increase in Ohio's percent of income payment plan (PIPP) rate
recovery rider, recovery of Ohio customer choice implementation costs, recovery
of gross receipts and excise taxes on higher gas costs, and other items. The
increase was partially offset by heating weather which was normal and 9% warmer
than the prior year period. The estimated quarter over quarter impact of the
warmer weather on gas utility margins was a decrease of approximately $3.3
million. Weather and an overall decline in customer usage were the primary
factors resulting in the 8% decrease in throughput.

Gas margins were $205.2 million, an increase of $19.6 million over the first six
months of 2002. It is estimated that weather, 17% colder than the prior year and
7% colder than normal, contributed $12.0 million to the increased margin. The
remaining $7.6 million increase is primarily attributable to gross receipts and
excise taxes, increased late payment fees, and recovery of Ohio customer choice
implementation costs. The colder weather is the primary reason for the 9%
increase in throughput.

Higher gas costs and a slowly recovering economy have impacted customer usage.
The total average cost per dekatherm of gas purchased for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2003, was $6.48 and $6.51, respectively, compared to $4.46
for both periods in 2002.

Electric Utility Margin
Electric utility margin by customer type and non-firm wholesale margin separated
between realized margin and mark-to-market gains and losses follows:

Three Months Six Months
Ended June 30, Ended June 30,
------------------- -----------------
In millions 2003 2002 2003 2002
- --------------------------------- ------------------- -----------------
Retail & firm wholesale $ 46.9 $ 51.0 $ 96.9 $ 99.2
Non-firm wholesale 3.9 2.0 12.1 3.1
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total electric utility margin $ 50.8 $ 53.0 $109.0 $102.3
===============================================================================
Non-firm wholesale margin:
Realized margin $ 4.0 $ 2.0 $ 11.3 $ 6.0
Mark-to-market gains (losses) (0.1) - 0.8 (2.9)

Electric margins were $50.8 million, a decrease of $2.2 million compared to the
second quarter of 2002. The decrease in electric margin was due primarily to the
effect of milder cooling weather which was 43% cooler than normal and 51% cooler
than last year, offset by increased margins from wholesale power activities. The
estimated quarter over quarter decrease as a result of the milder weather on
electric utility margins was approximately $3.9 million. As a result of the mild
weather, volumes sold to retail and firm wholesale customers decreased 7% from
1.49 GWh in 2002 to 1.39 GWh in 2003. Non-firm wholesale electric utility
margins increased $1.9 million to $3.9 million in 2003 compared to 2002.

Electric margins were $109.0 million, an increase of $6.7 million over the first
six months of 2002 primarily due to increased non-firm wholesale power activity
resulting from price volatility, offset by lower retail sales due to milder
cooling weather. As a result of the mild weather which was 44% cooler than
normal and 51% cooler than last year, volumes sold to retail and firm wholesale
customers decreased 3% from 2.89 GWh in 2002 to 2.81 GWh in 2003 with an
estimated margin decrease of $2.9 million. Non-firm wholesale margins were $12.1
million, an increase of $9.0 million over 2002.

Periodically, generation capacity is in excess of that needed to serve retail
and firm wholesale customers. The Company markets this unutilized capacity to
optimize the return on its owned generation assets. The contracts entered into
are primarily short-term purchase and sale transactions that expose the Company
to limited market risk. For the three months ended June 30, 2003, volumes sold
into the wholesale market were 0.58 GWh compared to 3.17 GWh in 2002 while
volumes purchased from the wholesale market were 1.23 GWh in 2003 compared to
3.16 GWh in 2002. For the six months ended June 30, 2003 volumes sold into the
wholesale market were 2.02 GWh compared to 5.63 GWh in 2002 while volumes
purchased from the wholesale market were 2.48 GWh in 2003 compared to 5.49 GWh
in 2002. A portion of volumes purchased in the wholesale market is used to serve
retail and firm wholesale customers. In 2003, greater amounts of purchased power
have been required for native load due to scheduled outages and installation of
NOx equipment. While volumes both sold and purchased in the wholesale market
have decreased during 2003, which has resulted in decreased electric revenues
and purchased power, margins increased as noted above primarily from price
volatility.

Utility Group Operating Expenses

Other Operating
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, other operating expenses
increased $5.1 million and $10.4 million, respectively, compared to the same
periods in the prior year. The increased expenses were principally due to higher
uncollectible accounts expenses, the timing of electric plant maintenance
expenditures, and other costs such as PIPP and Ohio customer choice costs that
are recovered through margins. Year-to-date uncollectible accounts expense has
increased $2.7 million compared to the prior year.

Depreciation & Amortization
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, depreciation and amortization
increased $3.3 million and $5.3 million, respectively, due to additions to
utility plant. Since June 30, 2002, the Company has placed into service over
$100 million in utility plant including a new gas-fired peaker unit,
expenditures for implementing a choice program for Ohio gas customers, and other
upgrades to existing transmission and distribution facilities.

Taxes Other Than Income Taxes
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, taxes other than income taxes
increased $0.9 million and $4.5 million, respectively, compared to the prior
year. The increase results from higher utility receipts and excise taxes as a
result of higher gas prices and for the year to date period more volumes sold.

Utility Group Other Income (Expense)-Net

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, other income (expense)-net
decreased $3.0 million and $7.0 million, respectively, compared to the prior
year. The decreases are primarily the result of the write-off of the BABB
investment ($1.9 million for the quarter and $3.9 million for the year to date).
The remaining decreases result principally from sales of emission allowances and
other assets in the second quarter of 2002 totaling $1.8 million. Year to date
results are also affected by contributions of $1.2 million made in 2003 to low
income customer assistance programs resulting from the ProLiance settlement
previously approved by the IURC.

Utility Group Interest Expense

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, interest expense decreased
$1.4 million and $2.5 million, respectively, when compared to the same periods
last year. The decreases result primarily from lower interest rates. This was
partially offset by higher outstanding balances due primarily to funding of
capital expenditures and increased working capital requirements resulting from
the higher gas prices experienced during late 2002 and 2003.

Utility Group Income Tax

For the three months ended June 30, 2003, federal and state income taxes
decreased $2.9 million and for the six months ended June 30, 2003 increased $3.8
million when compared to 2002. The changes are primarily due to fluctuations in
pre-tax income. Year to date, the effective tax rate increased from 34.3% in
2002 to 38.4% in 2003 principally due to an increase in the Indiana state income
tax rate from 4.5 % to 8.5% that was effective January 1, 2003.

Environmental Matters

Clean Air Act

NOx SIP Call Matter
The Clean Air Act (the Act) requires each state to adopt a State Implementation
Plan (SIP) to attain and maintain National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)
for a number of pollutants, including ozone. If the USEPA finds a state's SIP
inadequate to achieve the NAAQS, the USEPA can call upon the state to revise its
SIP (a SIP Call).

In October 1998, the USEPA issued a final rule "Finding of Significant
Contribution and Rulemaking for Certain States in the Ozone Transport Assessment
Group Region for Purposes of Reducing Regional Transport of Ozone," (63 Fed.
Reg. 57355). This ruling found that the SIP's of certain states, including
Indiana, were substantially inadequate since they allowed for nitrogen oxide
(NOx) emissions in amounts that contributed to non-attainment with the ozone
NAAQS in downwind states. The USEPA required each state to revise its SIP to
provide for further NOx emission reductions. The NOx emissions budget, as
stipulated in the USEPA's final ruling, requires a 31% reduction in total NOx
emissions from Indiana.

In June 2001, the Indiana Air Pollution Control Board adopted final rules to
achieve the NOx emission reductions required by the NOx SIP Call. Indiana's SIP
requires the Company to lower its system-wide NOx emissions to .14 lbs./MMBTU by
May 31, 2004 (the compliance date). This is a 65% reduction from emission levels
existing in 1999 and 1998.

The Company has initiated steps toward compliance with the revised regulations.
These steps include installing Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) systems at
Culley Generating Station Unit 3 (Culley), Warrick Generating Station Unit 4,
and A.B. Brown Generating Station Units 1 and 2. SCR systems reduce flue gas NOx
emissions to atmospheric nitrogen and water using ammonia in a chemical
reaction. This technology is known to be the most effective method of reducing
NOx emissions where high removal efficiencies are required.

The IURC has issued orders that approve:
o the Company's proposed project to achieve environmental compliance by
investing in clean coal technology;
o a total capital cost investment for this project up to $244 million
(excluding AFUDC), subject to periodic review of the actual costs incurred;
o a mechanism whereby, prior to an electric base rate case, the Company may
recover through a rider that is updated every six months an 8 percent
return on its capital costs for the project; and
o ongoing recovery of operating costs, including depreciation and purchased
emission allowances through a rider mechanism, related to the clean coal
technology once the facility is placed into service.

Based on the level of system-wide emissions reductions required and the control
technology utilized to achieve the reductions, the current estimated clean coal
technology construction cost is consistent with amounts approved in the IURC's
orders and is expected to be expended during the 2001-2006 period. Through June
30, 2003, $102.8 million has been expended. After the equipment is installed and
operational, related annual operating expenses, including depreciation expense,
are estimated to be between $24 million and $27 million. A portion of such
expenses is expected to commence later in 2003 when the Culley SCR is placed
into service. The 8 percent return on capital investment approximates the return
authorized in the Company's last electric rate case in 1995 and includes a
return on equity.

The Company expects to achieve timely compliance as a result of the project.
Construction of the first SCR at Culley was completed on schedule, and
construction of the Warrick 4 and Brown SCRs is proceeding on schedule.
Installation of SCR technology as planned is expected to reduce the Company's
overall NOx emissions to levels compliant with Indiana's NOx emissions budget
allotted by the USEPA. Therefore, the Company has recorded no accrual for
potential penalties that may result from noncompliance.

Culley Generating Station Litigation
In the late 1990's, the USEPA initiated an investigation under Section 114 of
the Act of SIGECO's coal-fired electric generating units in commercial operation
by 1977 to determine compliance with environmental permitting requirements
related to repairs, maintenance, modifications, and operations changes. The
focus of the investigation was to determine whether new source review permitting
requirements were triggered by such plant modifications, and whether the best
available control technology was, or should have been used. Numerous electric
utilities were, and are currently, being investigated by the USEPA under an
industry-wide review for compliance. In July 1999, SIGECO received a letter from
the Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance of the USEPA discussing the
industry-wide investigation, vaguely referring to an investigation of SIGECO and
inviting SIGECO to participate in a discussion of the issues. No specifics were
noted; furthermore, the letter stated that the communication was not intended to
serve as a notice of violation. Subsequent meetings were conducted in September
and October 1999 with the USEPA and targeted utilities, including SIGECO,
regarding potential remedies to the USEPA's general allegations.

On November 3, 1999, the USEPA filed a lawsuit against seven utilities,
including SIGECO. SIGECO's suit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the
Southern District of Indiana. The USEPA alleged that, beginning in 1992, SIGECO
violated the Act by (1) making modifications to its Culley Generating Station in
Yankeetown, Indiana without obtaining required permits (2) making major
modifications to the Culley Generating Station without installing the best
available emission control technology and (3) failing to notify the USEPA of the
modifications. In addition, the lawsuit alleged that the modifications to the
Culley Generating Station required SIGECO to begin complying with federal new
source performance standards at its Culley Unit 3. The USEPA also issued an
administrative notice of violation to SIGECO making the same allegations, but
alleging that violations began in 1977.

On June 6, 2003, SIGECO, the Department of Justice (DOJ), and the USEPA
announced a proposed agreement that would resolve the lawsuit. The agreement was
embodied in a consent decree filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern
District of Indiana. The mandatory public comment period has expired, and no
comments were received. SIGECO anticipates that the Court will enter the consent
decree.

Under the terms of the proposed agreement, the DOJ and USEPA have agreed to drop
all challenges of past maintenance and repair activities at the Culley
coal-fired units. In reaching the proposed agreement, SIGECO did not admit to
any allegations alleged in the government's complaint, and SIGECO continues to
believe that it acted in accordance with applicable regulations and conducted
only routine maintenance on the units. SIGECO has entered into this proposed
agreement to further its continued commitment to improve air quality and avoid
the cost and uncertainties of litigation.

Under the proposed agreement, SIGECO has committed to:
o either repower Culley Unit 1 (50 MW) with natural gas, which would
significantly reduce air emissions from this unit, and equip it with SCR
control technology for further reduction of nitrogen oxides, or cease
operation of the unit by December of 2006;
o operate the existing SCR control technology recently installed on Culley
Unit 3 (287 MW) year round at a lower emission rate than that currently
required under the NOx SIP Call, resulting in further nitrogen oxide
reductions;
o enhance the efficiency of the existing scrubber at Culley Units 2 and 3 for
additional removal of sulphur dioxide emissions;
o install a baghouse for further particulate matter reductions at Culley Unit
3 by June of 2007;
o conduct a Sulphuric Acid Reduction Demonstration Project as an
environmental mitigation project designed to demonstrate an advance in
pollution control technology for the reduction of sulfate emissions; and
o pay a $600,000 civil penalty.

The Company anticipates that the proposed settlement would result in total
capital expenditures through 2007 in a range between $16 million and $28
million. Other than the $600,000 civil penalty, which was accrued in the second
quarter of 2003, the implementation of the proposed settlement, including these
capital expenditures and related operating expenses, are expected to be
recovered through rates.

Information Request
On January 23, 2001, SIGECO received an information request from the USEPA under
Section 114 of the Act for historical operational information on the Warrick and
A.B. Brown generating stations. SIGECO has provided all information requested,
and no further action has occurred.

Manufactured Gas Plants

In the past, Indiana Gas and others operated facilities for the manufacture of
gas. Given the availability of natural gas transported by pipelines, these
facilities have not been operated for many years. Under currently applicable
environmental laws and regulations, Indiana Gas and others may now be required
to take remedial action if certain byproducts are found above the regulatory
thresholds at these sites.

Indiana Gas has identified the existence, location, and certain general
characteristics of 26 gas manufacturing and storage sites for which it may have
some remedial responsibility. Indiana Gas has completed a remedial
investigation/feasibility study (RI/FS) at one of the sites under an agreed
order between Indiana Gas and the IDEM, and a Record of Decision was issued by
the IDEM in January 2000. Although Indiana Gas has not begun an RI/FS at
additional sites, Indiana Gas has submitted several of the sites to the IDEM's
Voluntary Remediation Program and is currently conducting some level of remedial
activities including groundwater monitoring at certain sites where deemed
appropriate and will continue remedial activities at the sites as appropriate
and necessary.

In conjunction with data compiled by environmental consultants, Indiana Gas has
accrued the estimated costs for further investigation, remediation, groundwater
monitoring, and related costs for the sites. While the total costs that may be
incurred in connection with addressing these sites cannot be determined at this
time, Indiana Gas has recorded costs that it reasonably expects to incur
totaling approximately $20.4 million.

The estimated accrued costs are limited to Indiana Gas' proportionate share of
the remediation efforts. Indiana Gas has arrangements in place for 19 of the 26
sites with other potentially responsible parties (PRP), which serve to limit
Indiana Gas' share of response costs at these 19 sites to between 20% and 50%.

With respect to insurance coverage, Indiana Gas has received and recorded
settlements from all known insurance carriers in an aggregate amount
approximating $20.4 million.

Environmental matters related to manufactured gas plants have had no material
impact on earnings since costs recorded to date approximate PRP and insurance
settlement recoveries. While Indiana Gas has recorded all costs which it
presently expects to incur in connection with activities at these sites, it is
possible that future events may require some level of additional remedial
activities which are not presently foreseen.

In October 2002, the Company received a formal information request letter from
the IDEM regarding five manufactured gas plants owned and/or operated by SIGECO
and not currently enrolled in the IDEM's Voluntary Remediation Program. In
response SIGECO submitted to the IDEM the results of preliminary site
investigations conducted in the mid-1990's. These site investigations confirmed
that based upon the conditions known at the time, the sites posed no risk to
human health or the environment. Follow-up reviews have recently been initiated
by the Company to confirm that the sites continue to pose no such risk.

Rate and Regulatory Matters

The following is an update on two regulatory matters in Ohio. Each of the
discussed matters is currently pending before the PUCO.

The first matter relates to an application made to the PUCO by VEDO, together
with other regulated Ohio gas utilities, for authority to establish a tariff
mechanism to recover expenses related to uncollectible accounts pursuant to an
automatic adjustment procedure. The application is pending before the PUCO and,
if granted, will enable VEDO to better match revenues with costs associated with
fulfilling its obligation to serve customers who are unable to pay their bills.
Presently, the amount provided for in VEDO's base rates is not adequate to cover
the total expenses relating to uncollectible accounts. The actual positive
impact of the tariff mechanism will vary with the as-billed price of natural gas
and the number of customers who are unable to pay their bills. While the Company
believes there is a sound basis for the PUCO to grant the application to recover
actual expenses relating to uncollectible accounts, no assurance can be provided
with respect to the ultimate outcome of this proceeding.

The second matter concerns the requirement in Ohio that gas utilities, including
VEDO, undergo a biannual audit of their gas acquisition practices in connection
with the gas cost recovery (GCR) mechanism. In the case of VEDO, on or about
August 15, 2003, a third-party consulting firm engaged by the Staff of the PUCO,
is scheduled to conclude an audit report to be filed with the PUCO. The audit
report will provide the results of that firm's review of VEDO's gas acquisition
practices for the biannual period commencing November 1, 2000 (the first day of
operations by VEDO) through October 31, 2002. The audit will provide the initial
opportunity, in the context of a PUCO GCR proceeding, for a review of the
portfolio administration arrangement between VEDO and ProLiance Energy, LLC.
Similar arrangements for the Company's other utility subsidiaries, Indiana Gas
and SIGECO, were previously reviewed and approved by the IURC. VEDO's prior gas
acquisition practices may be challenged in the audit report, including VEDO's
relationship with ProLiance, and, as a result, a gas cost disallowance may be
recommended. Should such a challenge be made, then, by the first of September
2003, VEDO would file its response. If a hearing is necessary, the earliest it
could occur would be mid-September 2003. After that hearing, the PUCO would
consider all of the evidence on the matter and make a determination on the
merits. Throughout this process VEDO could, and likely would, endeavor to engage
in efforts with the participants in the proceeding to resolve disputed issues
outside of administrative litigation. The Company believes that VEDO's gas
acquisition practices that are the subject of the audit were reasonable. If a
challenge is made with respect to VEDO's gas acquisition practices during the
audit period and that challenge was adopted by the PUCO, the Company believes
that it would not be reasonably likely to have a material effect on the
Company's results or financial condition. However, the Company can provide no
assurance as to the ultimate outcome of this proceeding.

United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Informal Inquiry

As more fully described in Note 3 to these consolidated condensed financial
statements and in Note 3 to the 2002 consolidated financial statements filed on
Form 10-K/A, the Company restated its consolidated financial statements for
2000, 2001, and quarterly results issued in 2002. The Company is cooperating
with the SEC in an informal inquiry with respect to this previously announced
restatement, has met with the staff of the SEC, and is providing information in
response to their requests.

Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Guidance

SFAS 143

In July 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement
Obligations" (SFAS 143). SFAS 143 requires entities to record the fair value of
a liability for an asset retirement obligation in the period in which it is
incurred. When the liability is initially recorded, the entity capitalizes a
cost by increasing the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. Over
time, the liability is accreted to its present value, and the capitalized cost
is depreciated over the useful life of the related asset. Upon settlement of the
liability, an entity either settles the obligation for its recorded amount or
incurs a gain or loss upon settlement. The Company adopted this statement on
January 1, 2003. The adoption was not material to the Company's results of
operations or financial condition.

SFAS 149

In April 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 149, "Amendment of Statement 133 on
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" (SFAS 149). SFAS 149 amends and
clarifies the accounting guidance on (1) derivative instruments (including
certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts) and (2) hedging
activities that fall within the scope of FASB Statement No. 133 (SFAS 133),
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. SFAS 149 amends
SFAS 133 to reflect decisions that were made (1) as part of the process
undertaken by the Derivatives Implementation Group (DIG), which necessitated
amending SFAS 133; (2) in connection with other projects dealing with financial
instruments; and (3) regarding implementation issues related to the application
of the definition of a derivative. SFAS 149 also amends certain other existing
pronouncements, which will result in more consistent reporting of contracts that
are derivatives in their entirety or that contain embedded derivatives that
warrant separate accounting. SFAS 149 is effective (1) for contracts entered
into or modified after June 30, 2003, with certain exceptions and (2) for
hedging relationships designated after June 30. The guidance is to be applied
prospectively. Although management is still evaluating the impact of SFAS 149 on
its financial position and results of operations, the adoption is not expected
to have a material effect.

SFAS 150

In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, "Accounting for Certain Financial
Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity" (SFAS 150).
SFAS 150 requires issuers to classify as liabilities the following three types
of freestanding financial instruments: mandatorily redeemable financial
instruments; obligations to repurchase the issuer's equity shares by
transferring assets; and certain obligations to issue a variable number of
shares. SFAS 150 is effective immediately for all financial instruments entered
into or modified after May 31, 2003. For all other instruments, SFAS 150 applies
to the Company's third quarter of 2003. The Company has approximately $200,000
of outstanding preferred stock of a subsidiary that is redeemable on terms
outside the Company's control. However, the preferred stock is not redeemable on
a specified or determinable date or upon an event that is certain to occur.
Therefore, SFAS 150's adoption will not affect the Company's results of
operations or financial condition.

FASB Interpretation (FIN) 45

In November 2002, the FASB issued Interpretation 45, "Guarantor's Accounting and
Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of
Indebtedness of Others" (FIN 45). FIN 45 clarifies the requirements for a
guarantor's accounting for and disclosure of certain guarantees issued and
outstanding and that a guarantor is required to recognize, at the inception of a
guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligations it has undertaken.
The initial recognition and measurement provisions are applicable on a
prospective basis to guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002.
Since that date, the adoption has not had a material effect on the Company's
results of operations or financial condition.

FIN 46

In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation 46, "Consolidation of Variable
Interest Entities" (FIN 46). FIN 46 addresses consolidation by business
enterprises of variable interest entities and significantly changes the
consolidation requirements for those entities. FIN 46 is intended to achieve
more consistent application of consolidation policies to variable interest
entities and, thus improves comparability between enterprises engaged in similar
activities when those activities are conducted through variable interest
entities. FIN 46 applies to variable interest entities created after January 31,
2003 and to variable interest entities in which an enterprise obtains an
interest after that date. FIN 46 applies to the Company's third quarter of 2003
for variable interest entities in which the Company holds a variable interest
acquired before February 1, 2003. Although management is still evaluating the
impact of FIN 46 on its financial position and results of operations, the
adoption is not expected to have a material effect.

Financial Condition

Within Vectren's consolidated group, VUHI funds short-term and long-term
financing needs of the utility group operations. Vectren does not guarantee
VUHI's debt. VUHI's currently outstanding long-term and short-term borrowing
arrangements are jointly and severally guaranteed by Indiana Gas, SIGECO, and
VEDO. The guarantees are full and unconditional and joint and several, and VUHI
has no subsidiaries other than the subsidiary guarantors. Information about the
subsidiary guarantors as a group is included in Note 5 to the condensed
consolidated financial statements. VUHI's long-term and short-term obligations
outstanding at June 30, 2003 totaled $350.0 million and $318.6 million,
respectively. Additionally, prior to VUHI's formation, Indiana Gas and SIGECO
funded their operations separately, and therefore, have long-term debt
outstanding funded solely by their operations. VUHI's operations have
historically funded Vectren's common stock dividends.

VUHI's and Indiana Gas' credit ratings on outstanding senior unsecured debt at
June 30, 2003 are A-/Baa1 as rated by Standard and Poor's Ratings Services
(Standard and Poor's) and Moody's Investors Service (Moody's), respectively.
SIGECO's credit ratings on outstanding senior unsecured debt at June 30, 2003
are BBB+/Baa1. SIGECO's credit ratings on outstanding secured debt at June 30,
2003 are A-/A3. VUHI's commercial paper has a credit rating of A-2/P-2. Moody's
current outlook is stable while Standard and Poor's current outlook is negative.
The ratings of Moody's and Standard and Poor's are categorized as investment
grade and are unchanged from December 31, 2002. In July 2003, Standard and
Poor's reaffirmed its ratings, and Moody's reaffirmed its ratings on VUHI's
senior unsecured debt. A security rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell,
or hold securities. The rating is subject to revision or withdrawal at any time,
and each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating. Standard
and Poor's and Moody's lowest level investment grade rating is BBB- and Baa3,
respectively.

The Company's consolidated equity capitalization objective is 45-55% of total
capitalization. This objective may have varied, and will vary, depending on
particular business opportunities, capital spending requirements, and seasonal
factors that affect the Company's operation. The Company's equity component was
47% and 46% of total capitalization, including current maturities of long-term
debt and long-term debt subject to tender, at June30, 2003 and December 31,
2002, respectively.

The Company expects the majority of its capital expenditures, investments, and
debt security redemptions to be provided by internally generated funds. However,
additional permanent financing will be required due to significant capital
expenditures for NOx compliance equipment at SIGECO and plans to further
strengthen the Company's capital structure and the capital structures of the
Company's utility subsidiaries. These plans include the issuance of new equity
to Vectren, the issuance of additional long-term debt and the calling of certain
long-term debt at SIGECO and Indiana Gas. In April 2003, the Company filed with
the SEC a registration statement, as amended, to issue a maximum of $200 million
in debt securities. The registration statement was declared effective on June
27, 2003. Subsequent to June 30, 2003, the Company initiated these transactions
as more fully described below.

Sources & Uses of Liquidity

Operating Cash Flow

The Company's primary and historical source of liquidity to fund working capital
requirements has been cash generated from operations, which for the six months
ended June, 2003 and 2002 was $186.6 million and $251.9 million, respectively.
The decrease of $65.3 million is primarily the result of more favorable changes
in working capital accounts occurring in 2002 due to a return to lower gas
prices in that year, offset by increased earnings before non-cash charges in
2003.

Financing Cash Flow

Although working capital requirements are generally funded by cash flow from
operations, the Company uses short-term borrowings to supplement working capital
needs when accounts receivable balances are at their highest and gas storage is
refilled. Additionally short-term borrowings are required for capital projects
and investments until they are permanently financed.

Cash flow required for financing activities of $83.6 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2003 includes $47.3 million in payments to decrease borrowings
outstanding and increased common stock dividends compared to 2002. In 2002,
higher operating cash flow was used to repay $144.3 million in borrowings.

Financing Transactions
In January, 2003, the Company called the remaining $23.8 million of Indiana Gas'
9.375% private placement notes originally due in 2021. The total amount paid on
redemption was $24.9 million. Pursuant to regulatory authority the premium paid
was deferred as a regulatory asset. Also in January, 2003, other debt of Indiana
Gas totaling $15.0 million and of SIGECO totaling $1.0 million was paid as
scheduled.

At December 31, 2002, the Company had $26.6 million of adjustable rate senior
unsecured bonds which could, at the election of the bondholder, be tendered to
the Company when interest rates are reset. Such bonds were classified as
long-term debt subject to tender. During the second quarter, the Company
re-marketed those bonds on a long-term basis and has therefore reclassified them
as long-term debt at June 30, 2003.

Financing Activity Subsequent to June 30, 2003
With respect to the permanent financing strategy discussed above, the Company
initiated the following transactions subsequent to June 30, 2003.

Debt Issuance
Subsequent to June 30, 2003, VUHI issued senior unsecured notes with an
aggregate principal amount of $200 million in two $100 million tranches. The
first tranche are 10-year notes due August 2013, with an interest rate of 5.25%
priced at 99.746% to yield 5.28% to maturity (2013 Notes). The second tranche
are 15-year notes due August 2018 with an interest rate of 5.75% priced at
99.177% to yield 5.80% to maturity (2018 Notes).

The notes are jointly and severally guaranteed by the Company's three public
utilities. In addition, they have no sinking fund requirements, and interest
payments are due semi-annually. The notes may be called by the Company, in whole
or in part, at any time for an amount equal to accrued and unpaid interest, plus
the greater of 100% of the principal amount or the sum of the present values of
the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest, discounted to the
redemption date on a semi-annual basis at the Treasury Rate, as defined in the
indenture, plus 20 basis points for the 2013 Notes and 25 basis points for the
2018 Notes.

Shortly before these issues, the Company entered into several treasury locks
with a total notional amount of $150.0 million. Upon issuance of the debt, the
treasury locks were settled resulting in the Company receiving $5.7 million. The
value received will be amortized as a reduction of interest expense over the
life of the issues.

The net proceeds from the sale of the senior notes and settlement of related
hedging arrangements approximated $203 million.

Vectren Equity Issuance
In August 2003, Vectren completed a public offering of 6.5 million shares of its
common stock, which was priced at $22.81 per share to yield total gross proceeds
$148.3 million. Vectren also has granted the underwriters a 30-day option to
purchase up to an additional 975,000 shares of its common stock at the public
offering price to cover over-allotments, if any. The public offering of the
shares closed on August 13, 2003 with net proceeds of approximately $143 million
(excluding any over-allotment option). Vectren intends to contribute the net
proceeds to VUHI.

SIGECO and Indiana Gas Debt Call
In August 2003, the Company initiated steps to call two first mortgage bonds
outstanding at SIGECO and a senior unsecured note outstanding at Indiana Gas.
The first SIGECO bond has a principal amount of $45.0 million, an interest rate
of 7.60%, was originally due in 2023, and may be redeemed at 103.745% of its
stated principal amount. The second SIGECO bond has a principal amount of $20.0
million, an interest rate of 7.625%, was originally due in 2025, and may be
redeemed at 103.763% of the stated principal amount. The Indiana Gas note has a
principal amount of $13.5 million, an interest rate of 6.75%, was originally due
in 2028, and may be redeemed at the principal amount. These transactions are
expected to take place in September 2003. Pursuant to regulatory authority, the
premium paid to retire the net carrying value of these notes will be deferred as
a regulatory asset.

Investing Cash Flow

Cash required for investing activities of $104.2 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2003 includes $103.2 million of requirements for capital
expenditures. Investing activities for 2002 were $72.0 million. The increase
occurring in 2003 is principally the result of additional capital expenditures,
principally for the NOx project and implementation of choice programs in Ohio,
and payments to other Vectren subsidiaries for the transfer of assets. In
addition, in 2002 proceeds were received from the sale of assets and from the
collection of notes receivable from other Vectren companies.

Available Sources of Liquidity

At June 30, 2003, the Company has $371 million of short-term borrowing capacity,
of which approximately $51 million is available.

Planned Capital Expenditures & Investments

Capital expenditures for the remainder to 2003 are estimated to be approximately
$150 million.

Forward-Looking Information

A "safe harbor" for forward-looking statements is provided by the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (Reform Act of 1995). The Reform Act of
1995 was adopted to encourage such forward-looking statements without the threat
of litigation, provided those statements are identified as forward-looking and
are accompanied by meaningful cautionary statements identifying important
factors that could cause the actual results to differ materially from those
projected in the statement. Certain matters described in Management's Discussion
and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition are
forward-looking statements. Such statements are based on management's beliefs,
as well as assumptions made by and information currently available to
management. When used in this filing, the words "believe," "anticipate,"
"endeavor," "estimate," "expect," "objective," "projection," "forecast," "goal,"
and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. In
addition to any assumptions and other factors referred to specifically in
connection with such forward-looking statements, factors that could cause the
Company's actual results to differ materially from those contemplated in any
forward-looking statements include, among others, the following:

o Factors affecting utility operations such as unusual weather conditions;
catastrophic weather-related damage; unusual maintenance or repairs;
unanticipated changes to fossil fuel costs; unanticipated changes to gas
supply costs, or availability due to higher demand, shortages,
transportation problems or other developments; environmental or pipeline
incidents; transmission or distribution incidents; unanticipated changes to
electric energy supply costs, or availability due to demand, shortages,
transmission problems or other developments; or electric transmission or
gas pipeline system constraints.

o Increased competition in the energy environment including effects of
industry restructuring and unbundling.

o Regulatory factors such as unanticipated changes in rate-setting policies
or procedures, recovery of investments and costs made under traditional
regulation, and the frequency and timing of rate increases.

o Financial or regulatory accounting principles or policies imposed by the
Financial Accounting Standards Board; the Securities and Exchange
Commission; the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission; state public utility
commissions; state entities which regulate electric and natural gas
transmission and distribution, natural gas gathering and processing,
electric power supply; and similar entities with regulatory oversight.

o Economic conditions including the effects of an economic downturn,
inflation rates, and monetary fluctuations.

o Changing market conditions and a variety of other factors associated with
physical energy and financial trading activities including, but not limited
to, price, basis, credit, liquidity, volatility, capacity, interest rate,
and warranty risks.

o Direct or indirect effects on our business, financial condition or
liquidity resulting from a change in credit ratings, changes in interest
rates, and/or changes in market perceptions of the utility industry and
other energy-related industries.

o Employee or contractor workforce factors including changes in key
executives, collective bargaining agreements with union employees, or work
stoppages.

o Legal and regulatory delays and other obstacles associated with mergers,
acquisitions, and investments in joint ventures.

o Costs and other effects of legal and administrative proceedings,
settlements, investigations, claims, and other matters, including, but not
limited to, those described in Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Results of Operations and Financial Condition.

o Changes in federal, state or local legislature requirements, such as
changes in tax laws or rates, environmental laws and regulations.

The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any
forward-looking statements, whether as a result of changes in actual results,
changes in assumptions, or other factors affecting such statements.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The Company is exposed to various business risks associated with commodity
prices, interest rates, and counter-party credit. These financial exposures are
monitored and managed by the Company as an integral part of its overall risk
management program. The Company's risk management program includes, among other
things, the use of derivatives to mitigate risk.

The Company also executes derivative contracts in the normal course of
operations while buying and selling commodities and other fungible goods to be
used in operations and while optimizing generation assets. The Company does not
execute derivative contracts it designates as trading.

These risks are not significantly different from the information set forth in
Item 7A Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk included in
the VUHI 2002 Form 10-K/A and is therefore not presented herein.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of June 30, 2003, the Company carried out an evaluation under the supervision
and with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the effectiveness and the design and operation of the Company's
disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, the Chief
Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the
Company's disclosure controls and procedures provide reasonable assurance that
material information relating to the Company required to be disclosed by the
Company in its filings under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act)
is brought to their attention on a timely basis.

Disclosure controls and procedures, as defined by the Exchange Act in Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e), are controls and other procedures of the Company that
are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company
in the reports filed or submitted by it under the Exchange Act is recorded,
processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the
SEC's rules and forms. "Disclosure controls and procedures" include, without
limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required
to be disclosed by the Company in its Exchange Act reports is accumulated and
communicated to the Company's management, including its principal executive and
financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

During the quarter ended June 30, 2003, there have been no significant changes
to the Company's internal control over financial reporting that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal
control over financial reporting.

Internal control over financial reporting is defined by the SEC in Final Rule:
Management's Reports on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and
Certification of Disclosure in Exchange Act Periodic Reports. The final rule
defines internal control over financial reporting as a process designed by, or
under the supervision of, the registrant's principal executive and principal
financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the
registrant's board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and
procedures that: (1) Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable
detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the
assets of the registrant; (2) Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are
recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and
expenditures of the registrant are being made only in accordance with
authorizations of management and directors of the registrant; and (3) Provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use or disposition of the registrant's assets that could have a
material effect on the financial statements.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The Company is party to various legal proceedings arising in the normal course
of business. In the opinion of management, there are no legal proceedings
pending against the Company that are likely to have a material adverse effect on
its financial position or results of operations. See Note 8 of its unaudited
consolidated condensed financial statements included in Part 1 Item 1 Financial
Statements regarding the Clean Air Act and related legal proceedings.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

Certifications
31.1 Certification Pursuant To Section 302 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002-
Chief Executive Officer

31.2 Certification Pursuant To Section 302 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002-
Chief Financial Officer

32 Certification Pursuant To Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

Other Exhibits
None

(b) Reports On Form 8-K During The Last Calendar Quarter
On April 25, 2003, VUHI filed a Current Report on Form 8-K with respect to the
release of Vectren Corporation's financial information to the investment
community regarding its results of operations, for the three and twelve month
periods ended March 31, 2003. The financial information was released to the
public through this filing.
Item 12. Results of Operations and Financial Condition
Item 7. Exhibits
99.1 - Press Release - Vectren Corporation Reports 1st Quarter
2003 Increase
99.2 - Cautionary Statement for Purposes of the "Safe Harbor"
Provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
of 1995

On June 9, 2003, VUHI filed a Current Report on Form 8-K with respect a proposed
agreement between Southern Indiana Gas and Electric Company, a wholly-owned
subsidiary, the U.S. Department of Justice, and the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency that would lead to further improvements in air quality and
resolve the government's pending Clean Air Act claims against SIGECO.
Item 9. Regulation FD Disclosure
Item 7. Exhibits
99.1 - Press Release - Vectren subsidiary reaches agreement with
Department of Justice, EPA
99.2 - Cautionary Statement for Purposes of the "Safe Harbor"
Provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
of 1995

On June 30, 2003, VUHI filed a Current Report on Form 8-K to announce 1) on June
26, 2003, its revolving credit facility was renewed and 2) on June 27, 2003, a
registration statement, originally filed on March 31, 2003, was declared
effective.
Item 9. Regulation FD Disclosure
Item 7. Exhibits
99.1 - Press Release - Vectren Renews Credit Facility and
Announces Effectiveness of Registration Statement
99.2 - Cautionary Statement for Purposes of the "Safe Harbor"
Provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
of 1995







SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


VECTREN UTILITY HOLDINGS, INC.
------------------------------
Registrant




August 14, 2003 /s/Jerome A. Benkert, Jr.
-------------------------
Jerome A. Benkert, Jr.
Executive Vice President &
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)



/s/M. Susan Hardwick
--------------------------
M. Susan Hardwick
Vice President & Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)