UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
ý Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005.
Or
o Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the transition period from to
Commission File Number 000-50266
TRINITY CAPITAL CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
New Mexico |
|
85-0242376 |
(State of incorporation) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
1200 Trinity Drive, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87544 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
(505) 662-5171 |
Telephone number |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Yes ý No o
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 6,603,873 shares of common stock, no par value, outstanding as of May 6, 2005.
TRINITY CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CERTIFICATIONS |
1
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
TRINITY CAPITAL CORPORATION & SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004
(Amounts in thousands, except share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
38,047 |
|
$ |
23,678 |
|
Interest bearing deposits with banks |
|
23,208 |
|
96 |
|
||
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resell agreements |
|
301 |
|
40 |
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
61,556 |
|
23,814 |
|
||
Investment securities available for sale |
|
41,786 |
|
44,105 |
|
||
Investment securities held to maturity, at amortized cost (fair value of $52,384 at March 31, 2005 and $61,883 at December 31, 2004) |
|
52,377 |
|
61,658 |
|
||
Other investments |
|
7,321 |
|
7,480 |
|
||
Loans (net of allowance for loan losses of $8,689 at March 31, 2005 and $8,367 at December 31, 2004) |
|
925,038 |
|
885,954 |
|
||
Loans held for sale |
|
8,319 |
|
8,634 |
|
||
Premises and equipment, net |
|
24,774 |
|
25,450 |
|
||
Accrued interest receivable |
|
6,547 |
|
5,941 |
|
||
Mortgage servicing rights, net |
|
8,628 |
|
8,371 |
|
||
Other real estate owned |
|
3,523 |
|
6,438 |
|
||
Other assets |
|
3,019 |
|
2,548 |
|
||
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,142,888 |
|
$ |
1,080,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Noninterest bearing |
|
$ |
72,929 |
|
$ |
63,070 |
|
Interest bearing |
|
889,160 |
|
817,511 |
|
||
Total deposits |
|
962,089 |
|
880,581 |
|
||
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
|
34,400 |
|
||
Long-term borrowings |
|
78,111 |
|
60,006 |
|
||
Junior subordinated debt owed to unconsolidated trusts |
|
22,682 |
|
22,682 |
|
||
Borrowings made by Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) to outside parties |
|
1,214 |
|
1,686 |
|
||
Accrued interest payable |
|
2,834 |
|
2,768 |
|
||
Other liabilities |
|
4,138 |
|
5,314 |
|
||
Total liabilities |
|
1,071,068 |
|
1,007,437 |
|
||
Stock owned by Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) participants; 636,896 shares and 636,915 shares at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively, at fair value; net of unearned ESOP shares of 73,347 shares and 98,318 shares at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively, at historical cost |
|
16,981 |
|
18,078 |
|
||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 8) |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Common stock, no par, authorized 20,000,000 shares; issued 6,856,800 shares, shares outstanding 6,603,873 and 6,732,748 at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively |
|
6,836 |
|
6,836 |
|
||
Additional paid-in capital |
|
1,172 |
|
997 |
|
||
Retained earnings |
|
51,746 |
|
47,849 |
|
||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
(311 |
) |
(200 |
) |
||
Total stockholders equity before treasury stock |
|
59,443 |
|
55,482 |
|
||
Treasury stock, at cost, 179,580 shares and 25,734 shares at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively |
|
(4,604 |
) |
(604 |
) |
||
Total stockholders equity |
|
54,839 |
|
54,878 |
|
||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,142,888 |
|
$ |
1,080,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
2
TRINITY CAPITAL CORPORATION & SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 and 2004
(Amounts in thousands except share and per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
March 31, 2005 |
|
March 31, 2004 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest income: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Loans, including fees |
|
$ |
14,222 |
|
$ |
11,938 |
|
Investment securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Taxable |
|
656 |
|
973 |
|
||
Nontaxable |
|
180 |
|
158 |
|
||
Federal funds sold and repurchase agreements |
|
4 |
|
|
|
||
Other interest bearing deposits |
|
20 |
|
6 |
|
||
Investment in unconsolidated trusts |
|
16 |
|
13 |
|
||
Total interest income |
|
15,098 |
|
13,088 |
|
||
Interest expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Deposits |
|
3,981 |
|
2,968 |
|
||
Short-term borrowings |
|
102 |
|
67 |
|
||
Long-term borrowings |
|
577 |
|
607 |
|
||
Junior subordinated debt owed to unconsolidated trusts |
|
519 |
|
439 |
|
||
Total interest expense |
|
5,179 |
|
4,081 |
|
||
Net interest income |
|
9,919 |
|
9,007 |
|
||
Provision for loan losses |
|
525 |
|
600 |
|
||
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
|
9,394 |
|
8,407 |
|
||
Other income: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Mortgage loan servicing fees |
|
602 |
|
574 |
|
||
Loan and other fees |
|
588 |
|
557 |
|
||
Service charges on deposits |
|
331 |
|
331 |
|
||
Gain on sale of loans |
|
463 |
|
1,016 |
|
||
Gain on sale of securities |
|
|
|
272 |
|
||
Other operating income |
|
76 |
|
267 |
|
||
|
|
2,060 |
|
3,017 |
|
||
Other expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
4,058 |
|
3,853 |
|
||
Occupancy |
|
799 |
|
494 |
|
||
Data processing |
|
490 |
|
435 |
|
||
Marketing |
|
324 |
|
226 |
|
||
Amortization and valuation of mortgage servicing rights |
|
130 |
|
987 |
|
||
Supplies |
|
209 |
|
172 |
|
||
Other |
|
1,648 |
|
1,362 |
|
||
|
|
7,658 |
|
7,529 |
|
||
Income before income taxes |
|
3,796 |
|
3,895 |
|
||
Income taxes |
|
1,428 |
|
1,445 |
|
||
Net income |
|
$ |
2,368 |
|
$ |
2,450 |
|
Basic earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
Diluted earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
3
TRINITY CAPITAL CORPORATION & SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 and 2004
(Amounts in thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
March 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash Flows From Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income |
|
$ |
2,368 |
|
$ |
2,450 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
631 |
|
527 |
|
||
Net amortization of: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
694 |
|
624 |
|
||
Premiums and discounts on investment securities |
|
293 |
|
387 |
|
||
Junior subordinated debt owed to unconsolidated trusts issuance costs |
|
5 |
|
4 |
|
||
Provision for loan losses |
|
525 |
|
600 |
|
||
Change in mortgage servicing rights valuation allowance |
|
(564 |
) |
364 |
|
||
Loss on sale or disposal of premises and equipment |
|
143 |
|
|
|
||
Gain on sale of available for sale securities |
|
|
|
(272 |
) |
||
Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) stock dividends received |
|
(41 |
) |
(20 |
) |
||
Gain on sale of loans |
|
(463 |
) |
(1,016 |
) |
||
Loss on disposal of other real estate owned |
|
211 |
|
159 |
|
||
Write-down of value of other real estate owned |
|
307 |
|
|
|
||
(Increase) decrease in other assets |
|
(1,082 |
) |
1,600 |
|
||
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities |
|
1,005 |
|
(2,008 |
) |
||
Release of Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) shares |
|
606 |
|
587 |
|
||
Net cash provided by operating activities before originations and gross sales of loans |
|
4,638 |
|
3,986 |
|
||
Gross sales of loans held for sale |
|
38,581 |
|
61,980 |
|
||
Origination of loans held for sale |
|
(38,190 |
) |
(68,480 |
) |
||
Net cash provided by (used in) provided by operating activities |
|
5,029 |
|
(2,514 |
) |
||
Cash Flows From Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Proceeds from maturities and paydowns of investment securities available for sale |
|
2,025 |
|
19,585 |
|
||
Proceeds from maturities and paydowns of investment securities held to maturity |
|
9,106 |
|
26 |
|
||
Proceeds from maturities and paydowns of investment securities, other |
|
325 |
|
|
|
||
Proceeds from sale of investment securities, available for sale |
|
|
|
28,388 |
|
||
Purchase of investment securities available for sale |
|
|
|
(1,620 |
) |
||
Purchase of investment securities held to maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Purchase of investment securities, other |
|
(125 |
) |
|
|
||
Proceeds from sale of other real estate owned |
|
2,872 |
|
1,505 |
|
||
Loans funded, net of repayments |
|
(40,084 |
) |
(30,038 |
) |
||
Purchases of premises and equipment |
|
(198 |
) |
(2,528 |
) |
||
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment |
|
100 |
|
|
|
||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
(25,979 |
) |
15,318 |
|
||
Cash Flows From Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net increase in demand deposits, NOW accounts and savings accounts |
|
33,558 |
|
9,673 |
|
||
Net increase (decrease) in time deposits |
|
47,950 |
|
(3,153 |
) |
||
Proceeds from issuances of borrowings |
|
20,000 |
|
83,600 |
|
||
Repayment of borrowings |
|
(36,295 |
) |
(89,818 |
) |
||
Repayment of ESOP debt |
|
(472 |
) |
(471 |
) |
||
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
(4,000 |
) |
|
|
||
Dividend payments |
|
(2,049 |
) |
(2,048 |
) |
||
Net cash provided by (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
58,692 |
|
(2,217 |
) |
||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
37,742 |
|
$ |
10,587 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Beginning of year |
|
23,814 |
|
43,111 |
|
||
End of period |
|
$ |
61,556 |
|
$ |
53,698 |
|
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash payments (receipts) for: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest |
|
$ |
5,113 |
|
$ |
4,419 |
|
Income taxes |
|
404 |
|
(230 |
) |
||
Non-cash investing and financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Transfers from loans to other real estate owned |
|
475 |
|
1,124 |
|
||
Change in unrealized (loss) gain on investment securities, net of taxes |
|
(111 |
) |
12 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
4
TRINITY CAPITAL CORPORATION & SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include the consolidated balances and results of operations of Trinity Capital Corporation (Trinity or the Company) and its wholly owned subsidiaries: Los Alamos National Bank (the Bank) and Title Guaranty & Insurance Company (Title Guaranty), collectively referred to as the Company. Trinity Capital Trust I (Trust I), Trinity Capital Trust II (Trust II) and Trinity Capital Trust III (Trust III), collectively referred to as the Trusts, which are also wholly owned subsidiaries of Trinity, are not consolidated in these financial statements (see Consolidation accounting policy below.) The business activities of the Company consist solely of the operations of its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods have been made. The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire fiscal year.
The unaudited interim financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and industry practice. Certain information in footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and industry practice has been condensed or omitted pursuant to rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Companys December 31, 2004 audited financial statements filed on Form 10-K.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principals generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions which affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reported periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Note 2. Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income includes net income, as well as the change in net unrealized (loss) gain on investment securities available for sale, net of tax. Comprehensive income was $2.3 million and $2.5 million for the three month periods ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Note 3. Earnings Per Share Data
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the periods indicated:
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
|
|
(Unaudited; In thousands except |
|
||||
Net income |
|
$ |
2,368 |
|
$ |
2,450 |
|
Weighted average common shares issued |
|
6,856,800 |
|
6,856,800 |
|
||
LESS: Weighted average treasury stock shares |
|
(99,238 |
) |
(29,128 |
) |
||
LESS: Weighted average unearned Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) stock shares |
|
(78,619 |
) |
(105,270 |
) |
||
Weighted average common shares outstanding, net |
|
6,678,943 |
|
6,722,402 |
|
||
Basic earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
Weighted average dilutive shares from stock option plan |
|
98,879 |
|
117,782 |
|
||
Weighted average common shares outstanding including dilutive shares |
|
6,777,822 |
|
6,840,184 |
|
||
Diluted earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
5
Note 4. Recent Accounting Pronouncements and Regulatory Developments
In September 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 03-1-1 delaying the effective date of paragraphs 10-20 of EITF 03-1, The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments, which provides guidance for determining the meaning of other-than-temporarily impaired and its application to certain debt and equity securities within the scope of SFAS No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, and investments accounted for under the cost method. The guidance requires that investments which have declined in value due to credit concerns or solely due to changes in interest rates must be recorded as other-than-temporarily impaired unless the Company can assert and demonstrate its intention to hold the security for a period of time sufficient to allow for a recovery of fair value up to or beyond the cost of the investment which might mean maturity. The delay of the effective date of EITF 03-1 will be superseded concurrent with the final issuance of proposed FSP Issue 03-1-a. Proposed FSP Issue 03-1-a is intended to provide implementation guidance with respect to all securities analyzed for impairment under paragraphs 10-20 of EITF 03-1. Management continues to closely monitor and evaluate how the provisions of EITF 03-1 and proposed FSP Issue 03-1-a will affect the Company.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment, which is an Amendment of FASB Statement Nos. 123 and 95. SFAS No. 123R changes, among other things, the manner in which share-based compensation, such as stock options, will be accounted for by both public and non-public companies. For public companies, the cost of employee services received in exchange for equity instruments including options and restricted stock awards generally will be measured at fair value at the grant date. The grant date fair value will be estimated using option-pricing models adjusted for the unique characteristics of those options and instruments, unless observable market prices for the same or similar options are available. The cost will be recognized over the requisite service period, often the vesting period, and will be remeasured at each reporting date through settlement date.
The changes in accounting will replace existing requirements under SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and will eliminate the ability to account for share-based compensation transactions using APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, which does not require companies to expense options if the exercise price is equal to the trading price at the date of grant. The accounting for similar transactions involving parties other than employees or the accounting for employee stock ownership plans that are subject to AICPA Statement of Position 93-6, Employers Accounting for Employee Stock Ownership Plans, would remain unchanged.
On April 14, 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced the adoption of a new rule that amends the compliance dates for SFAS No. 123R. Under SFAS No. 123R, the Company would have been required to implement the standard as of the beginning of the first interim period that begins after June 15, 2005. The SECs new rule allows companies to implement SFAS No. 123R at the beginning of their next fiscal year, instead of the next reporting period, that begins after June 15, 2005. The SECs new rule does not change the accounting required by SFAS No. 123R; it changes only the dates for compliance with the standard.
Note 5. Short Term Borrowings
The Company had no borrowings with maturities of less than one year as of March 31, 2005. As of December 31, 2004, the Company had Federal Home Loan Bank advances with maturities of less than one year of $34.4 million.
Note 6. Long Term Borrowings
The Company had Federal Home Loan Bank advances with maturity dates greater than one year of $78.1 million and $60.0 million as of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively. As of March 31, 2005, the advances have fixed interest rates ranging from 3.22% to 6.34%.
6
Note 7. Junior Subordinated Debt Owed to Unconsolidated Trusts
The following table presents details on the junior subordinated debt owed to unconsolidated trusts as of March 31, 2005:
|
|
Trust I |
|
Trust II |
|
Trust III |
|
|||
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|||||||
Date of issue |
|
March 23, 2000 |
|
November 28, 2001 |
|
May 11, 2004 |
|
|||
Amount of trust preferred securities issued |
|
$ |
10,000 |
|
$ |
6,000 |
|
$ |
6,000 |
|
Rate on trust preferred securities |
|
10.875 |
% |
9.95 |
% |
5.61% (variable) |
|
|||
Maturity |
|
March 8, 2030 |
|
December 8, 2031 |
|
September 8, 2034 |
|
|||
Date of first redemption |
|
March 8, 2010 |
|
December 8, 2006 |
|
September 8, 2009 |
|
|||
Common equity securities issued |
|
$ |
310 |
|
$ |
186 |
|
$ |
186 |
|
Junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures owed |
|
$ |
10,310 |
|
$ |
6,186 |
|
$ |
6,186 |
|
Rate on junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures |
|
10.875 |
% |
9.95 |
% |
5.61% (variable) |
|
On the dates of issue indicated above, the Trusts, being Delaware statutory business trusts, issued trust preferred securities (the trust preferred securities) in the amount and at the rate indicated above. These securities represent preferred beneficial interests in the assets of the Trusts. The trust preferred securities will mature on the dates indicated, and are redeemable in whole or in part at the option of the Company at any time after the date of first redemption indicated above, with the approval of the Federal Reserve Board and in whole at any time upon the occurrence of certain events affecting their tax or regulatory capital treatment. The Trusts also issued common equity securities to Trinity in the amounts indicated above. The Trust s used the proceeds of the offering of the trust preferred securities to purchase junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (the debentures) issued by the Company, which have terms substantially similar to the trust preferred securities. The Company has the right to defer payments of interest on the debentures at any time or from time to time for a period of up to ten consecutive semi-annual periods with respect to each interest payment deferred. Under the terms of the debentures, in the event that under certain circumstances there is an event of default under the debentures or the Company has elected to defer interest on the debentures, the Company may not, with certain exceptions, declare or pay any dividends or distributions on its capital stock or purchase or acquire any of its capital stock. The Company used the majority of the proceeds from the sale of the debentures to add to Tier 1 capital in order to support its growth.
Trinity owns all of the outstanding common stock of the Trusts. The Trusts are considered variable interest entities (VIEs) under Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation (FIN) No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, as revised. Prior to FIN 46, VIEs were generally consolidated by an enterprise when the enterprise had a controlling financial interest through ownership of a majority of voting interest in the entity. Under FIN 46, a VIE should be consolidated by its primary beneficiary. The Company implemented FIN 46 during the fourt h quarter of 2003. Because Trinity is not the primary beneficiary of the Trusts, the financial statements of the Trusts are no longer included in the consolidated financial statements of the Company. The Companys prior financial statements have been reclassified to de-consolidate the Companys investment in the Trusts.
The trust preferred securities are currently included in the Tier 1 capital of Trinity for regulatory capital purposes. However, because the Trusts are no longer a part of the Companys financial statements, the Federal Reserve Board may in the future disallow inclusion of the trust preferred securities in Tier 1 capital for regulatory capital purposes. The most recent rule issued by the Federal Reserve Board indicated that it will continue to recognize these trust preferred securities as Tier 1 capital within certain limitations. Please refer to Note 4, Recent Accounting and Regulatory Developments, for more information. However, there can be no assurance that the Federal Reserve Board will continue to permit institutions to include trust preferred securities in Tier I capital for regulatory capital purposes. As of March 31, 2005, assuming the Company was not permitted to include the $23 million in trust preferred securities issued by the Trusts in its Tier 1 capital, the Company would still exceed the regulatory required minimums for capital adequacy purposes. If the trust preferred securities were no longer permitted to be included in Tier 1 capital, the Company would also be permitted to redeem the capital securities without penalty.
Payments of distributions on the trust preferred securities and payments on redemption of the trust preferred securities are guaranteed by the Company on a limited basis. The Company also entered into an agreement as to expenses and liabilities with the Trusts pursuant to which it agreed, on a subordinated basis, to pay any costs, expenses or liabilities of the Trusts other than those arising under the trust preferred securities. The obligations of the Company under the junior subordinated debentures, the related indenture, the trust agreement establishing the Trusts, the guarantee and the agreement as to expenses and liabilities, in the aggregat e, constitute a full and unconditional guarantee by the Company of the Trusts obligations under the trust preferred securities.
7
Issuance costs of $615 thousand related to the trust preferred securities were deferred and are being amortized over the period until mandatory redemption of the securities in March 2030, December 2031 and September 2034, respectively. During the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, $5 thousand and $4 thousand of these issuance costs were amortized. Unamortized issuance costs were $534 thousand and $476 thousand at March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Distributions accrued and unpaid to securities holders totaled $286 thousand and $265 thousand on March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Note 8. Commitments, Contingencies and Off-Balance Sheet Activities
Credit-related financial instruments: The Company is a party to credit-related commitments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These credit-related commitments include commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit and commercial letters of credit. Such credit-related commitments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated balance sheets.
The Companys exposure to credit loss is represented by the contractual amount of these credit-related commitments. The Company follows the same credit policies in making credit-related commitments as it does for on-balance-sheet instruments.
At March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, the following credit-related commitments were outstanding whose contract amounts represent credit risk:
|
|
Contract Amount |
|
||||
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
||||
Unfunded commitments under lines of credit |
|
$ |
182,984 |
|
$ |
168,794 |
|
Commercial and standby letters of credit |
|
33,928 |
|
33,319 |
|
||
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require a payment of a fee. The commitments for equity lines of credit may expire without being drawn upon. Therefore, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The amount of collateral obtained, if it is deemed necessary by the Company, is based on managements credit evaluation of the customer. Unfunded commitments under commercial lines of credit, revolving credit lines and overdraft protection agreements are commitments for possible future extensions of credit to existing customers. Overdraft protection agreements are uncollateralized, but most other unfunded commitments have collateral. These unfunded lines of credit usually do not contain a specified maturity date and may not necessarily be drawn upon to the total extent to which the Company is committed.
Commercial and standby letters of credit are conditional credit-related commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Those letters of credit are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements. Essentially all letters of credit issued have expiration dates within one year. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is the same as that involved in extending loans to customers. The Company generally holds collateral supporting those credit-related commitments, if deemed necessary. In the event the customer does not perform in accordance with the terms of the agreement with the third party, the Company would be required to fund the credit-related commitment. The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make is represented by the contractual amount shown in the summary above. If the credit-related commitment is funded, the Company would be entitled to seek recovery from the customer. At March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, no amounts have been recorded as liabilities for the Companys potential obligations under these credit-related commitments. The fair value of these credit-related commitments is approximately equal to the fees collected when granting these letters of credit. These fees collected were $132 thousand and $60 thousand as of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively, and are included in other liabilities on the Companys balance sheet.
Concentrations of credit risk: The majority of the loans, commitments to extend credit, and standby letters of credit have been granted to customers in Los Alamos, Santa Fe and surrounding communities. Although the Company has a diversified loan portfolio, a substantial portion of its loans are made to businesses and individuals associated with, or employed by, Los Alamos National Laboratory (the Laboratory). The ability of such borrowers to honor their contracts is predominately dependent upon the continued operation and funding of the Laboratory. Investments in securities issued by states and political subdivisions involve governmental entities within the state of New Mexico. The distribution of commitments to extend credit approximates the distribution of loans outstanding. Standby letters of credit were granted primarily to commercial borrowers.
8
Contingencies: In the normal course of business, the Company is involved in various legal proceedings. In the opinion of management, after consulting with counsel, probable liabilities resulting from such proceedings would not have a material adverse effect on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
Note 9. Pro Forma Impact of Stock-Based Compensation Plans
As allowed under SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,
the Company measures stock-based compensation cost in accordance with the
methods prescribed in Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.
As stock options are granted at fair value, there are no charges to earnings
associated with stock options granted. Accordingly, no compensation cost
has been recognized for grants made to date. Had compensation cost been
determined based on the fair value method prescribed in FASB Statement No. 123,
reported net income and earnings per common share would have been reduced to
the pro forma amounts shown below:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||||
|
|
March 31, |
|
||||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||||
|
|
(In thousands, except |
|
||||||
|
|
per share amounts) |
|
||||||
Net income as reported |
|
$ |
2,368 |
|
$ |
2,450 |
|
||
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects |
|
28 |
|
28 |
|
||||
Pro forma net income |
|
$ |
2,340 |
|
$ |
2,422 |
|
||
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Basic as reported |
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
||
Basic pro forma |
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
||
Diluted as reported |
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
||
Diluted pro forma |
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
||
9
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
This discussion is intended to focus on certain financial information regarding the Company and the Bank and is written to provide the reader with a more thorough understanding of its financial statements. The following discussion and analysis of the Companys financial position and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the information set forth in Item 3, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk and the annual audited consolidated financial statements filed on Form 10-K.
Special Note Concerning Forward-Looking Statements
This Form 10-Q (including information incorporated by reference) contains, and our future oral and written statements may contain, forward-looking statements, within the meaning of such term in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, with respect to our financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance and business. Forward-looking statements, which may be based upon beliefs, expectations and assumptions of our management and on information currently available to management, are generally identifiable by the use of words such as believe, expect, anticipate, plan, intend, estimate, may, will, would, could, should or other similar expressions. Additionally, all statements in this document, including forward-looking statements, speak only as of the date they are made, and we undertake no obligation to update any statement in light of new information or future events.
Our ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Factors which could have a material adverse effect on our operations and future prospects include, but are not limited to, the following:
The strength of the United States economy in general and the strength of the local economies in which we conduct our operations which may be less favorable than expected and may result in, among other things, a deterioration in the credit quality and value of our assets.
The economic impact of any future terrorist threats or attacks, and the response of the United States to any such threats and attacks.
The effects of, and changes in, federal, state and local laws, regulations and policies affecting banking, securities, insurance and monetary and financial matters.
The effects of changes in interest rates (including the effects of changes in the rate of prepayments of our assets) and the policies of the Federal Reserve.
Our ability to compete with other financial institutions as effectively as we currently intend due to increases in competitive pressures in the financial services sector.
Our ability to obtain new customers and to retain existing customers.
The timely development and acceptance of products and services, including products and services offered through alternative delivery channels such as the Internet.
Technological changes implemented by us and by other parties, including third party vendors, which may be more difficult or more expensive than anticipated or which may have unforeseen consequences to us and our customers.
Our ability to develop and maintain secure and reliable electronic systems.
Our ability to retain key executives and employees and the difficulty that we may experience in replacing key executives and employees in an effective manner.
Consumer spending and saving habits which may change in a manner that affects our business adversely.
Business combinations and the integration of acquired businesses which may be more difficult or expensive than expected.
The costs, effects and outcomes of existing or future litigation.
Changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted by state and federal regulatory agencies and the Financial Accounting Standards Board.
10
Our ability to manage the risks associated with the foregoing as well as anticipated.
Changes in the management and national policy regarding the primary employer in Los Alamos County, Los Alamos National Laboratory (the Laboratory), including changes in the level of funding.
These risks and uncertainties should be considered in evaluating forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. Additional information concerning us and our business, including other factors that could materially affect our financial results, will be included in our filings with the SEC.
Critical Accounting Policies
Allowance for Loan Losses: Management believes the allowance for loan losses accounting policy is critical to the portrayal and understanding of our financial condition and results of operations. As such, selection and application of this critical accounting policy involves judgments, estimates, and uncertainties that are susceptible to change. In the event that different assumptions or conditions were to prevail, and depending upon the severity of such changes, the possibility of materially different financial condition or results of operations is a reasonable likelihood.
The allowance for loan losses is maintained at an amount that management believes will be adequate to absorb probable losses on existing loans, based on an evaluation of the collectibility of loans and prior loss experience. Three methods are used to evaluate the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses: (1) historical loss experience, based on loss experience by quality classification in the previous twelve calendar quarters; (2) specific identification, based upon managements assessment of loans and the probability that a charge off will occur in the upcoming quarter; and (3) loan concentrations, based on current or expected economic factors in the geographic and industry sectors where management believes we may eventually experience some loan losses. This evaluation also takes into consideration such factors as changes in the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, the value of underlying collateral, overall portfolio quality, review of specific problem loans, and current economic conditions that may affect the borrowers ability to pay.
While management uses the best information available to make its evaluation, future adjustments to the allowance may be necessary if there are significant changes in economic conditions. In addition, as an integral part of their examination process regulatory agencies periodically review our allowance for loan losses and may require us to make additions to the allowance based on their evaluation of information available at the time of their examinations. Although we believe the allowance for loan losses is sufficient to cover probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio, there can be no assurance that the allowance will prove sufficient to cover actual future loan losses.
Mortgage Servicing Right (MSR) Assets: Servicing residential mortgage loans for third-party investors represents a significant business activity of the Bank. As of March 31, 2005, mortgage loans serviced for others totaled $918.5 million. The MSRs on these loans total $8.6 million as of March 31, 2005. The expected and actual rates of mortgage loan prepayments are the most significant factors driving the value of MSRs. Increases in mortgage loan prepayments reduce estimated future net servicing cash flows because the life of the underlying loan is reduced. In determining the fair value of the MSRs, mortgage interest rates, which are used to determine prepayment rates and disco unt rates are held constant over the estimated life of the portfolio. Fair values of the MSRs are provided by an independent third-party broker of MSRs on a monthly basis. The values given by the broker are based upon current market conditions and assumptions, which incorporate the expected life of the loans, estimated costs to service the loans, servicing fees to be received and other factors. MSRs are carried at the lower of the initial capitalized amount, net of accumulated amortization, or fair value.
The fair value of the MSRs is driven primarily by the effect current mortgage interest rates have on the likelihood borr owers will prepay the underlying mortgages by refinancing at a lower rate. Accordingly, higher interest rates decrease the likelihood of repayment, extending the life of the MSRs and increasing the value of these assets. Lower interest rates increase the likelihood of repayment, contracting the life of the MSRs and decreasing the value of these assets. This can have a significant impact on our income. In the first three months of 2005, we recognized income of $564 thousand due to a decrease in the valuation allowance associated with MSRs; in the first three months of 2004, we incurred an expense of $364 thousand due to a increase in the valuation allowance associated with MSRs. We can have no certainty on the direction and amount of interest rate changes looking forward, and therefore, the amount or direction of the change in valuation.
11
Overview
The first quarter of 2005 was characterized by strong asset growth and flat income growth due to the anticipated drop in the mortgage loan refinance business due to higher rates, which was largely offset by strong growth in net interest income. Net income was $2.4 million, a 3.3% decrease from the prior year first quarter earnings of $2.5 million. Total assets grew $62.5 million from the prior year end, which is an annualized growth rate of 23.1%.
Net interest income (not tax-equivalent), our major source of income, increased $912 thousand (or 10.1%) over the prior year first quarter. This increase was mainly due to our growth in earning assets, while our net interest margin (not tax-equivalent) decreased from 3.92% in the first quarter of 2004 to 3.89% in the first quarter of 2005. This decrease in margin was due to our decision to be more competitive in interest rates paid on deposit products in order to attract new deposits in the new Santa Fe office and to fund increasing loan demand.
Looking forward to the remainder of the year 2005, we expect continued growth in deposits and loans from the newly opened branch in Santa Fe. We also anticipate that Title Guarantys operations in Santa Fe will generate additional income. We believe that we have sufficient capital to support this growth and remain well-capitalized. The additional personnel and other costs associated with the new Santa Fe office as well as the new Title Guaranty office will likely increase other expenses compared to the prior year, since in 2004 the new office was opened only for a partial year. However, we believe the increased growth in business generated by these offices will likely offset a portion or all of these expenses.
Results of Operations-Income Statement Analysis
Net Income-General. Net income for the three months ended March 31, 2005 was $2.4 million, compared to $2.5 million for the same period of 2004. Diluted earnings per share decreased by $0.01 to $0.35 for the three months ended March 31, 2005 from $0.36 for the same period of 2004. This represented a decrease in earnings per share of 2.8%. This decrease was primarily due to a decline in non-interest income of $957 thousand (31.7%), which was largely offset by an increase in net interest income of $912 thousand (10.1%). The effect of these and other items, net of taxes, was a decline in unaudited net income of approximately $82 thousand for the first quarter of 2005 compared to the first quarter of 2004.
The profitability of the Companys operations depends primarily on its net interest income, which is the difference between total interest earned on interest earning assets and total interest paid on interest bearing liabilities. The Companys net income is affected by its provision for loan losses as well as other income and other expenses. The provision for loan losses reflects the amount thought to be adequate to cover probable credit losses in the loan portfolio. Non-interest income or other income consists of mortgage loan servicing fees, loan and other fees, service charges on deposits, gain on sale of loans, gain on sale of securities and other operating income. Other expenses include salaries and employee benefits, occupancy expenses, data processing expenses, marketing, amortization and valuation of mortgage servicing rights, supplies expense and other expenses.
The amount of net interest income is affected by changes in the volume and mix of interest earning assets, the level of interest rates earned on those assets, the volume and mix of interest bearing liabilities, and the level of interest rates paid on those interest bearing liabilities. The provision for loan losses is dependent on changes in the loan portfolio and managements assessment of the collectibility of the loan portfolio, as well as economic and market conditions. Other income and other expenses are impacted by growth of operations and growth in the number of accounts through both acquisitions and core banking business growth. Growth in operations affects other expenses as a result of additional employees, branch facilities and promotional marketing expenses. Growth in the number of accounts affects other income including service fees as well as other expenses such as computer services, supplies, postage, telecommunications and other miscellaneous expenses.
12
Net Interest Income. The following tables present, for the periods indicated, the total dollar amount of interest income from average interest earning assets and the resultant yields, as well as the interest expense on average interest bearing liabilities, and the resultant costs, expressed both in dollars and rates. Borrowings made by the Companys Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) from outside parties are not included in this analysis, as the interest expense on this borrowing is born by the ESOP. Funding for the ESOP is recognized as part of compensation expense:
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
Balance |
|
Interest |
|
Yield/Rate |
|
Balance |
|
Interest |
|
Yield/Rate |
|
||||
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
||||||||||||||
Interest Earning Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Loans(1)(2) |
|
$ |
921,441 |
|
$ |
14,222 |
|
6.26 |
% |
$ |
763,041 |
|
$ |
11,938 |
|
6.29 |
% |
Taxable investment securities |
|
89,509 |
|
656 |
|
2.97 |
|
137,337 |
|
973 |
|
2.85 |
|
||||
Investment securities exempt from federal income taxes(3) |
|
17,288 |
|
281 |
|
6.59 |
|
20,434 |
|
243 |
|
4.78 |
|
||||
Federal funds sold |
|
708 |
|
4 |
|
2.29 |
|
40 |
|
|
|
0.54 |
|
||||
Other interest bearing deposits |
|
3,618 |
|
20 |
|
2.24 |
|
2,607 |
|
6 |
|
0.93 |
|
||||
Investment in unconsolidated trust subsidiaries |
|
682 |
|
16 |
|
9.51 |
|
496 |
|
13 |
|
10.54 |
|
||||
Total interest earning assets |
|
1,033,246 |
|
15,199 |
|
5.97 |
|
923,955 |
|
13,173 |
|
5.73 |
|
||||
Non-interest earning assets |
|
69,706 |
|
|
|
|
|
78,662 |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,102,952 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,002,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest Bearing Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Deposits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
NOW and money market deposits |
|
$ |
124,517 |
|
$ |
326 |
|
1.06 |
% |
$ |
205,885 |
|
$ |
394 |
|
0.77 |
% |
Savings deposits |
|
374,263 |
|
1,045 |
|
1.13 |
|
211,278 |
|
549 |
|
1.05 |
|
||||
Time deposits |
|
378,205 |
|
2,610 |
|
2.80 |
|
334,540 |
|
2,025 |
|
2.43 |
|
||||
Short-term borrowings |
|
16,068 |
|
102 |
|
2.57 |
|
17,839 |
|
67 |
|
1.51 |
|
||||
Long-term borrowings, including ESOP borrowings |
|
62,917 |
|
577 |
|
3.72 |
|
66,346 |
|
607 |
|
3.68 |
|
||||
Junior subordinated debt owed to unconsolidated trusts |
|
22,682 |
|
519 |
|
9.28 |
|
16,496 |
|
439 |
|
10.70 |
|
||||
Total interest bearing liabilities |
|
978,652 |
|
5,179 |
|
2.15 |
|
852,384 |
|
4,081 |
|
1.93 |
|
||||
Demand depositsnon-interest bearing |
|
45,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
57,982 |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Other non-interest bearing liabilities |
|
5,968 |
|
|
|
|
|
24,131 |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Stockholders equity, including stock owned by ESOP |
|
72,377 |
|
|
|
|
|
68,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,102,952 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,002,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net interest income/interest rate Spread(4) |
|
|
|
10,020 |
|
3.82 |
% |
|
|
$ |
9,092 |
|
3.80 |
% |
|||
Net interest margin on a fully tax equivalent basis(5) |
|
|
|
|
|
3.93 |
% |
|
|
|
|
3.96 |
% |
||||
Net interest margin(5) |
|
|
|
|
|
3.89 |
% |
|
|
|
|
3.92 |
% |
(1) Includes non-accrual loans of $5.4 million and $3.2 million for March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
(2) Interest income includes loan origination fees of $682 thousand and $730 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
(3) Non-taxable investment income is presented on a fully tax equivalent basis, adjusting for federal and state exemption of interest income and certain other permanent tax differences.
(4) Interest rate spread represents the difference between the average yield on interest earning assets and the average cost of interest bearing liabilities and is presented on a fully tax equivalent basis.
(5) Net interest margin represents net interest income as a percentage of average interest earning assets.
13
For the first quarter of 2005, net interest income on a fully tax equivalent basis increased $928 thousand to $10.0 million from $9.1 million for the first quarter of 2004. The increase in net interest income resulted from an increase in interest income on a fully tax equivalent basis of $2.0 million (15.4%), while interest expense increased $1.1 million (26.9%). Interest income on a fully tax equivalent basis increased due primarily to an increase in average earning assets of $109.3 million (11.8%). Interest expense increased due to an increase in average interest bearing liabilities of $126.3 million (14.8%), which accounted for $657 thousand of the increase. The cost on interest bearing liabilities increased 22 basis points, which accounted for $441 thousand of the increase in interest expense. The net interest margin expressed in a fully tax equivalent basis decreased 3 basis points to 3.93% for 2005 from 3.96% for 2004.
Based on managements review of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, provision for loan losses of $525 thousand was recorded for the three-month period ended March 31, 2005 versus provision of $600 thousand recorded during the same period of 2004. The decrease in the provision for loan losses for the period ended March 31, 2005 reflected a number of factors, including the level of charge-offs, managements overall view on current credit quality, the amount and status of impaired loans and the amount and status of past due accruing loans (90 days or more), as discussed in more detail below in the analysis relating to the Companys financial condition.
Volume, Mix and Rate Analysis of Net Interest Income. The following tables present the extent to which changes in volume, changes in interest rates, and changes in the interest rates times the changes in volume of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities have affected our interest income and interest expense during the periods indicated. Information is provided on changes in each category due to: (i) changes attributable to changes in volume (change in volume times the prior period interest rate); (ii) changes attributable to changes in interest rate (changes in rate times the prior period volume); and (iii) changes attributable to changes in rate/volume (changes in interest rate times changes in volume). Changes attributable to the combined impact of volume and rate have been allocated proportionally to the changes due to volume and the changes due to rate:
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|||||||
|
|
2005 Compared to 2004 |
|
|||||||
|
|
Change Due |
|
Change Due |
|
Total |
|
|||
|
|
to Volume |
|
to Rate |
|
Change |
|
|||
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|||||||
Interest Earning Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Loans |
|
$ |
2,447 |
|
$ |
(163 |
) |
$ |
2,284 |
|
Taxable investment securities |
|
(348 |
) |
31 |
|
(317 |
) |
|||
Investment securities exempt from federal income taxes(1) |
|
(41 |
) |
79 |
|
38 |
|
|||
Federal funds sold |
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|||
Other interest bearing deposits |
|
3 |
|
11 |
|
14 |
|
|||
Investment in unconsolidated trust subsidiaries |
|
5 |
|
(2 |
) |
3 |
|
|||
Total increase (decrease) in interest income |
|
2,070 |
|
(44 |
) |
2,026 |
|
|||
Interest Bearing Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
NOW and money market deposit accounts |
|
(186 |
) |
118 |
|
(68 |
) |
|||
Savings deposits |
|
452 |
|
44 |
|
496 |
|
|||
Time deposits |
|
282 |
|
303 |
|
585 |
|
|||
Short-term borrowings |
|
(8 |
) |
43 |
|
35 |
|
|||
Long-term borrowings |
|
(31 |
) |
1 |
|
(30 |
) |
|||
Junior subordinated debt owed to unconsolidated trusts |
|
148 |
|
(68 |
) |
80 |
|
|||
Total increase (decrease) in interest expense |
|
657 |
|
441 |
|
1,098 |
|
|||
Increase (decrease) in net interest income |
|
$ |
1,413 |
|
$ |
(485 |
) |
$ |
928 |
|
(1) Non-taxable investment income is presented on a fully tax equivalent basis, adjusting for federal and state exemption of interest income and certain other permanent tax differences.
14
Other Income. Changes in other income between the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 are as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
March 31, 2005 |
|
March 31, 2004 |
|
Net difference |
|
|||
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|||||||
Other income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Mortgage loan servicing fees |
|
$ |
602 |
|
$ |
574 |
|
$ |
28 |
|
Loan and other fees |
|
588 |
|
557 |
|
31 |
|
|||
Service charges on deposits |
|
331 |
|
331 |
|
|
|
|||
Gain on sale of loans |
|
463 |
|
1,016 |
|
(553 |
) |
|||
Gain on sale of securities |
|
|
|
272 |
|
(272 |
) |
|||
Other operating income |
|
76 |
|
267 |
|
(191 |
) |
|||
|
|
$ |
2,060 |
|
$ |
3,017 |
|
$ |
(957 |
) |
In the first quarter of 2005, other income decreased by $957 thousand (31.7%) to $2.1 million from $3.0 million for the first quarter of 2004. Gain on sale of loans decreased $553 thousand due to a continued drop in mortgage loan refinance activity due to increasing interest rates. This drop in refinancing was expected and was experienced generally in the financial services industry. In the first quarter of 2004, other income also included a gain of $272 thousand on the sale of securities, while there was no gain on the sale of securities in the first quarter of 2005.
Other Expenses. Changes in other expenses between the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 are as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
March 31, 2005 |
|
March 31, 2004 |
|
Net difference |
|
|||
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|||||||
Other expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Salaries and employee benefits |
|
$ |
4,058 |
|
$ |
3,853 |
|
$ |
205 |
|
Occupancy |
|
799 |
|
494 |
|
305 |
|
|||
Data processing |
|
490 |
|
435 |
|
55 |
|
|||
Marketing |
|
324 |
|
226 |
|
98 |
|
|||
Amortization and valuation of mortgage servicing rights |
|
130 |
|
987 |
|
(857 |
) |
|||
Supplies |
|
209 |
|
172 |
|
37 |
|
|||
Other |
|
1,648 |
|
1,362 |
|
286 |
|
|||
|
|
$ |
7,658 |
|
$ |
7,529 |
|
$ |
129 |
|
For the first quarter of 2005, other expenses increased $129 thousand (1.7%) to $7.7 million in 2005 from $7.5 million in the first quarter of 2004. The largest change was in the amortization and valuation of mortgage servicing rights, which declined $857 thousand from the first quarter of 2004 to the first quarter of 2005. This was due to a decrease in the valuation allowance of $564 thousand in the first quarter of 2005, compared to an increase in the valuation allowance of $364 thousand in the first quarter of 2004, for a net decline in expense of $928 thousand. This was partially offset by an increase in the amortization expense of the mortgage servicing rights of $71 thousand. Occupancy expenses increased $305 thousand (61.7%), mainly due to the operation of the Santa Fe Downtown office, which was opened in August 2004. Salaries and employee benefits increased by $205 thousand (5.3%), mainly due to an increase in $231 thousand (8.4%) in salary expenses, which was partially offset by a decline in personnel benefits expenses. This increase in salary expenses was mainly due to changes in staffing to open the new Santa Fe Downtown office.
Income Taxes. In the first quarter of 2005, income tax expense was virtually unchanged, decreasing $17 thousand (1.2%) from the first quarter of 2004 for a total of $1.4 million in both years. The effective tax rate increased slightly to 37.6% in the first quarter of 2005, compared to 37.1% in the first quarter of 2004. A lower balance of tax-exempt municipal securities accounted for this slight increase.
15
Financial Condition-Balance Sheet Analysis
General. Total assets at March 31, 2005 remained at $1.1 billion, following an increase of $62.5 million (5.8%) from December 31, 2004. During the same period, total liabilities increased $63.6 million (6.3%) to a total of $1.1 billion on March 31, 2005 from $1.0 billion on December 31, 2004. The increase in total liabilities was primarily due to an increase in deposits of $81.5 million (9.3%), which was partially offset by a decrease in short-and long-term borrowings of $16.3 million (17.3%). Stockholders equity (including stock owned by the Employee Stock Ownership Plan) decreased $1.1 million (1.6%) to $71.8 million on March 31, 2005 compared to $73.0 million on December 31, 2004. This was primarily due to a large purchase of treasury stock in the first quarter of 2005 of $4.0 million, which was largely offset by an increase in retained earnings from current year operations of $2.4 million.
Investment Securities. The primary purposes of the investment portfolio are to provide a source of earnings, for liquidity management, to provide collateral to pledge against public deposits and to control interest rate risk. In managing the portfolio, the Company seeks to obtain the objectives of safety of principal, liquidity, diversification and maximized return on funds. For an additional discussion with respect to these matters, see Liquidity and Sources of Capital under Item 2 and Asset Liability Management under Item 3 below.
The following tables set forth the amortized cost and fair value of securities by accounting classification category and by type of security as indicated:
|
|
At March 31, 2005 |
|
At December 31, 2004 |
|
At March 31, 2004 |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Cost |
|
Fair Value |
|
Cost |
|
Fair Value |
|
Cost |
|
Fair Value |
|
||||||
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
||||||||||||||||
Securities Available for Sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
U.S. Government agencies |
|
$ |
40,088 |
|
$ |
39,616 |
|
$ |
42,218 |
|
$ |
41,907 |
|
$ |
47,956 |
|
$ |
48,187 |
|
States and political subdivisions |
|
2,198 |
|
2,165 |
|
2,210 |
|
2,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Equity securities |
|
1 |
|
5 |
|
1 |
|
7 |
|
1 |
|
7 |
|
||||||
Total securities available for sale |
|
$ |
42,287 |
|
$ |
41,786 |
|
$ |
44,429 |
|
$ |
44,105 |
|
$ |
47,957 |
|
$ |
48,194 |
|
Securities Held to Maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
U.S. Government agencies |
|
$ |
37,324 |
|
$ |
37,305 |
|
$ |
46,547 |
|
$ |
46,705 |
|
$ |
53,072 |
|
$ |
54,438 |
|
States and political subdivisions |
|
15,053 |
|
15,079 |
|
15,111 |
|
15,178 |
|
20,442 |
|
20,638 |
|
||||||
Total securities held to maturity |
|
$ |
52,377 |
|
$ |
52,384 |
|
$ |
61,658 |
|
$ |
61,883 |
|
$ |
73,514 |
|
$ |
75,076 |
|
Other securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Non-marketable equity securities (including FRB and FHLB stock) |
|
$ |
6,639 |
|
$ |
6,639 |
|
$ |
6,798 |
|
$ |
6,798 |
|
$ |
6,305 |
|
$ |
6,305 |
|
Investment in unconsolidated trusts |
|
682 |
|
682 |
|
682 |
|
682 |
|
496 |
|
496 |
|
||||||
Total other securities |
|
$ |
7,321 |
|
$ |
7,321 |
|
$ |
7,480 |
|
$ |
7,480 |
|
$ |
6,801 |
|
$ |
6,801 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan Portfolio. The following tables set forth the composition of the loan portfolio:
|
|
At March 31, 2005 |
|
At December 31, 2004 |
|
At March 31, 2004 |
|
||||||||||
|
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
|
||||
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
||||||||||||||
Commercial |
|
$ |
93,549 |
|
9.99 |
% |
$ |
92,736 |
|
10.35 |
% |
$ |
75,548 |
|
9.80 |
% |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
365,805 |
|
39.09 |
|
346,454 |
|
38.65 |
|
294,266 |
|
38.18 |
|
||||
Residential real estate |
|
288,515 |
|
30.82 |
|
282,380 |
|
31.50 |
|
232,995 |
|
30.22 |
|
||||
Construction real estate |
|
136,375 |
|
14.57 |
|
121,769 |
|
13.59 |
|
118,679 |
|
15.39 |
|
||||
Installment and other |
|
51,770 |
|
5.53 |
|
52,984 |
|
5.91 |
|
49,416 |
|
6.41 |
|
||||
Total loans |
|
936,014 |
|
100.00 |
|
896,323 |
|
100.00 |
|
770,904 |
|
100.00 |
|
||||
Unearned income |
|
(2,287 |
) |
|
|
(2,002 |
) |
|
|
(1,701 |
) |
|
|
||||
Gross loans |
|
933,727 |
|
|
|
894,321 |
|
|
|
769,203 |
|
|
|
||||
Allowance for loan losses |
|
(8,689 |
) |
|
|
(8,367 |
) |
|
|
(7,734 |
) |
|
|
||||
Net loans |
|
$ |
925,038 |
|
|
|
$ |
885,954 |
|
|
|
$ |
761,469 |
|
|
|
|
16
Net loans increased $163.6 million (21.5%) to $925.0 million at March 31, 2005 from $761.5 million at March 31, 2004. The increase was due primarily to growth in the Companys commercial, commercial real estate and residential real estate loan portfolios. This growth as been due to a combination of a strengthening local economy, more activity generated from our newest Santa Fe office and increased marketing of our loan products.
We project continued growth in our loan portfolio due to a strengthened local economy, a stabilized Laboratory budget of over $2 billion and anticipated increases in interest rates. We anticipate the volume of commercial real estate and construction loans to increase as the industry strengthens and the New Mexico economy continues to improve by attracting new business to the state. Commercial real estate is strengthened due to vacancy rates returning to their historical averages and demand picking up due to new business looking to expand within the state. The housing market for homes below $500 thousand remains strong and we project that market to remain constant. We expect residential real estate for property worth greater than $1.5 million to be as soft as we have experienced during the last several years.
Asset Quality. The following table sets forth the amounts of non-performing loans and non-performing assets at the dates indicated:
|
|
At March 31, 2005 |
|
At |
|
At March 31, 2004 |
|
|||
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|||||||
Non-accruing loans |
|
$ |
5,580 |
|
$ |
5,714 |
|
$ |
3,275 |
|
Loans 90 days or more past due, still accruing interest |
|
4 |
|
8 |
|
11 |
|
|||
Total non-performing loans |
|
5,584 |
|
5,722 |
|
3,286 |
|
|||
Other real estate owned |
|
3,523 |
|
6,438 |
|
6,843 |
|
|||
Other repossessed assets |
|
19 |
|
64 |
|
26 |
|
|||
Total non-performing assets |
|
$ |
9,126 |
|
$ |
12,224 |
|
$ |
10,155 |
|
Total non-performing loans to total loans |
|
0.60 |
% |
0.64 |
% |
0.43 |
% |
|||
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans |
|
155.61 |
% |
146.23 |
% |
235.36 |
% |
|||
Total non-performing assets to total assets |
|
0.80 |
% |
1.13 |
% |
1.01 |
% |
At March 31, 2005, total non-performing assets decreased $1.0 million (10.1%) to $9.1 million from $10.2 million at March 31, 2004 due to decreases in other real estate owned of $3.3 million, which was partially offset by increases in non-performing loans of $2.3 million. The decreases in other real estate owned was primarily due to the sale of two large residential construction loans in other real estate owned totaling $3.0 million. Non-performing loans increased primarily due to a $2.4 million commercial real estate loan that was placed on non-accrual status in 2004.
At March 31, 2005, total non-performing assets decreased $3.1 million (25.3%) to $9.1 million from $12.2 million at December 31, 2004, primarily due to decreases in other real estate owned of $2.9 million. The decreases in other real estate owned was primarily due to the sale of two large residential construction loan in other real estate owned totaling $3.0 million.
Allowance for Loan Losses. Management believes the allowance for loan losses accounting policy is critical to the portrayal and understanding of the Companys financial condition and results of operations. As such, selection and application of this critical accounting policy involves judgments, estimates, and uncertainties that are susceptible to change. In the event that different assumptions or conditions were to prevail, and depending upon the severity of such changes, the possibility of materially different financial condition or results of operations is a reasonable likelihood.
The allowance for loan losses is maintained at an amount that management believes will be adequate to absorb probable losses on existing loans, based on an evaluation of the collectibility of loans and prior loss experience. This evaluation also takes into consideration such factors as changes in the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, the value of underlying collateral, overall portfolio quality, review of specific problem loans, and current economic conditions that may affect the borrowers ability to pay. While management uses the best information available to make its evaluation, future adjustments to the allowance may be necessary if there are significant changes in economic conditions. In addition, as an integral part of their examination process regulatory agencies periodically review the Companys allowance for loan losses and may require the Company to make additions to the allowance based on their evaluation of information available at the time of their examinations.
17
The following table presents an analysis of the allowance for loan losses for the periods presented:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
March 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
||||
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
8,367 |
|
$ |
7,368 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
525 |
|
600 |
|
||
Charge-offs |
|
(238 |
) |
(238 |
) |
||
Recoveries |
|
35 |
|
4 |
|
||
Net charge-offs |
|
(203 |
) |
(234 |
) |
||
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
8,689 |
|
$ |
7,734 |
|
Gross loans at end of period |
|
$ |
933,727 |
|
$ |
769,203 |
|
Ratio of allowance to total loans |
|
0.93 |
% |
1.01 |
% |
||
Ratio of net charge-offs to average loans(1) |
|
0.09 |
% |
0.13 |
% |
(1) Net charge-offs are annualized for the purposes of this calculation.
Net charge-offs for the three months ended March 31, 2005 totaled $203 thousand, a decrease of $31 thousand (13.2%) from $234 thousand from the three months ended March 31, 2004. The majority of the charge-offs were residential real estate and personal loans. The provision for loan losses decreased for the three months ended March 31, 2005 from 2004, due to managements analysis of current non-performing loans and other factors.
The following table sets forth the allocation of the allowance for loan losses for the periods presented and the percentage of loans in each category to total loans. An allocation for a loan classification is only for internal analysis of the adequacy of the allowance and is not an indication of expected or anticipated losses:
|
|
At March 31, 2005 |
|
At December 31, 2004 |
|
At March 31, 2004 |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
|
Amount |
|
Percent |
|
|||||
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
||||||||||||||||
Commercial |
|
$ |
4,398 |
|
9.99 |
% |
$ |
3,502 |
|
10.35 |
% |
$ |
1,968 |
|
9.80 |
% |
||
Commercial and residential real estate |
|
2,508 |
|
69.91 |
|
2,511 |
|
70.15 |
|
3,432 |
|
68.40 |
|
|||||
Construction real estate |
|
995 |
|
14.57 |
|
981 |
|
13.59 |
|
1,338 |
|
15.39 |
|
|||||
Installment and other |
|
754 |
|
5.53 |
|
1,369 |
|
5.91 |
|
949 |
|
6.41 |
|
|||||
Unallocated |
|
34 |
|
N/A |
|
4 |
|
N/A |
|
47 |
|
N/A |
|
|||||
Total |
|
$ |
8,689 |
|
100.00 |
% |
$ |
8,367 |
|
100.00 |
% |
$ |
7,734 |
|
100.00 |
% |
||
N/Anot applicable
The portion of the allocation that was based upon historical loss experience decreased by $162 thousand (6.4%) in 2005, from $2.5 million on March 31, 2004 to $2.4 million on March 31, 2005. This was largely due to a decrease in the allocation for commercial loans which decreased by $755 thousand, which was partially offset by an increase in the allocation for installment and other loans of $290 thousand. Concentration allocation increased from $4.8 million on March 31, 2004 to $5.6 million on March 31, 2005. This was due to an increase in the allocation for commercial loans of $1.3 million, which was partially offset by a lower allocation in real estate loans (a decline of $756 thousand). The allocation for specifically identified loans increased from $345 thousand on March 31, 2004 to $664 thousand on March 31, 2005. A $420 thousand commercial loan accounted for this increase, which was partially offset by decreases in other categories.
Total net charge-offs were substantially less in 2004 than in the previous two years, and this trend has continued in the first quarter of 2005. This was primarily due to a decrease in commercial charge-offs in 2004 and the first quarter of 2005. Management projects losses to remain in this average barring any anomalies.
Additions to the allowance for loan losses, which are charged to earnings through the provision for loan losses, are determined based on a variety of factors, as indicated above. Although we believe the allowance for loan losses is sufficient to cover probable losses
18
inherent in the loan portfolio, there can be no assurance that the allowance will prove sufficient to cover actual future loan losses.
Potential Problem Loans. The Company utilizes an internal asset classification system as a means of reporting problem and potential problem assets. At scheduled Board of Directors meetings every quarter, a list of total adversely classified assets is presented, showing other real estate owned, other repossessed assets, and all loans listed as Substandard, Doubtful and Loss. All non-accrual loans are classed either as Substandard or Doubtful and are thus included in total adversely classified assets. A separate watch list of loans classified as Special Mention is also presented. An asset is classified Substandard if it is inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Substandard assets include those characterized by the distinct possibility that the Company will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. Assets classified as Doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified Substandard with the added characteristic that the weaknesses present make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions and values, highly questionable and improbable. Assets classified as Loss are those considered uncollectible and viewed as non-bankable assets, worthy of charge-off. Assets that do not currently expose the Company to sufficient risk to warrant classification in one of the aforementioned categories, but possess weaknesses that may or may not be within the control of the customer are deemed to be Special Mention.
The Companys determination as to the classification of its assets and the amount of its valuation allowances is subject to review by the Banks primary regulators, which can order the establishment of additional general or specific loss allowances. The Comptroller of the Currency, in conjunction with the other federal banking agencies, has adopted an interagency policy statement on the allowance for loan losses. The policy statement provides guidance for financial institutions on both the responsibilities of management for the assessment and establishment of adequate allowances and guidance for banking agency examiners to use in determining the adequacy of general valuation guidelines. Generally, the policy statement recommends that (i) institutions have effective systems and controls to identify, monitor and address asset quality problems; (ii) management has analyzed all significant factors that affect the collectibility of the portfolio in a reasonable manner; and (iii) management has established acceptable allowance evaluation processes that meet the objectives set forth in the policy statement. Management believes it has established an adequate allowance for probable loan losses. The Company analyzes its process regularly, with modifications made if needed, and reports those results quarterly at Board of Directors meetings. However, there can be no assurance that regulators, in reviewing the Companys loan portfolio, will not request the Company to materially increase its allowance for loan losses at a future time. Although management believes that adequate specific and general loan loss allowances have been established, actual losses are dependent upon future events and, as such, further additions to the level of specific and general loan loss allowances may become necessary.
The following table shows the amounts of adversely classified assets and special mention loans as of the periods indicated:
|
|
At March 31, 2005 |
|
At December 31, 2004 |
|
At March 31, 2004 |
|
|||
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|||||||
Loans classified as: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Substandard |
|
$ |
12,431 |
|
$ |
15,810 |
|
$ |
12,170 |
|
Doubtful |
|
546 |
|
201 |
|
95 |
|
|||
Total adversely classified loans |
|
12,977 |
|
16,011 |
|
12,265 |
|
|||
Other real estate owned |
|
3,523 |
|
6,438 |
|
6,843 |
|
|||
Other repossessed assets |
|
19 |
|
64 |
|
26 |
|
|||
Total adversely classified assets |
|
$ |
16,519 |
|
$ |
22,513 |
|
$ |
19,134 |
|
Special mention loans |
|
$ |
23,713 |
|
$ |
22,834 |
|
$ |
13,577 |
|
Total adversely classified assets decreased $2.6 million (13.6%) from March 31, 2004 to March 31, 2005. The main reason for the decrease was a decrease of $3.3 million in other real estate owned. Special mention loans increased $10.1 million (74.7%) between March 31, 2004 and March 31, 2005, primarily due to two commercial loan relationships totaling $8.7 million and one commercial real estate development loan relationship for $1.6 million being placed on the watch list.
Deposits. Total deposits increased $81.5 million (9.3%) during the first quarter of 2005. This was partially due to a large increase in public funds of $30.9 million due expanded relationships with certain public entities. The remainder of the increase was due to a variety of factors, including activity in the new office in Santa Fe and more competitive deposit rates combined with a strong marketing program of these rates.
19
Sources of Funds
Liquidity and Sources of Capital
The Companys cash flows are comprised of three classifications: cash flows from operating activities, cash flows from investing activities and cash flows from financing activities. Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities was $5.0 million and $(2.5) million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Net cash provided by operating activities increased $7.5 million in the first three months of 2005 compared to the first three months of 2004 largely due to an increase in the sale of loans held for sale, net of originations, by $6.9 million over the first three months of 2004. Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities was $(26.0) million and $15.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The $41.3 million decrease in cash provided by investing activities was largely due to a drop in the sale of investment securities of $28.4, as well as the decrease of cash provided by maturities and paydowns of securities of $8.2 million. Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities was $58.7 million and $(2.2) million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The $60.9 million increase in cash provided by financing activities was mainly due to an increase in new deposit growth of $75.0 million from the first three months of 2005 compared to the first three months of 2004, which was partially offset by a decrease in cash provided by borrowings (net of repayments) of $10.1 million.
The Company expects to have available cash to meet its liquidity needs. Liquidity management is monitored by the Asset/Liability committee of the Bank, which takes into account the marketability of assets, the sources and stability of funding and the level of unfunded commitments. In the event that additional short-term liquidity is needed, the Company has established relationships with several large regional banks to provide short-term borrowings in the form of federal funds purchases. The Company has borrowed, and management believes that the Company could again borrow, up to $84.0 million for a short time from these banks on a collective basis. Additionally, the Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) and has the ability to borrow from the FHLB. The Company may also have up to 25% of its Tier 1 capital in the form of trust preferred securities. As of March 31, 2005, the Company could borrow an additional $2.0 million in trust preferred securities. As a contingency plan for significant funding needs, the Asset/Liability committee may also consider the sale of investment securities, selling securities under agreement to repurchase, sale of certain loans and/or the temporary curtailment of lending activities.
At March 31, 2005, the Companys total risk-based capital ratio was 11.04%, the Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets ratio was 10.11%, and the Tier 1 capital to average assets ratio was 8.53%. The Bank was categorized as well-capitalized under Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation regulations at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004. At December 31, 2004, the Companys total risk-based capital ratio was 11.59%, the Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets ratio was 10.65%, and the Tier 1 capital to average assets ratio was 8.87%.
At March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, the Companys book value per common share was $10.88 and $10.84, respectively.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Asset Liability Management
Our net interest income is subject to interest rate risk to the extent that it can vary based on changes in the general level of interest rates. It is our policy to maintain an acceptable level of interest rate risk over a range of possible changes in interest rates while remaining responsive to market demand for loan and deposit products. The strategy we employ to manage our interest rate risk is to measure our risk using an asset/liability simulation model and adjust the maturity of securities in its investment portfolio to manage that risk.
Interest rate risk can also be measured by analyzing the extent to which the repricing of assets and liabilities are mismatched to create an interest sensitivity gap. An asset or liability is said to be interest rate sensitive within a specific time period if it will mature or reprice within that time period. The interest rate sensitivity gap is defined as the difference between the amount of interest earning assets maturing or repricing within a specific time period and the amount of interest bearing liabilities maturing or repricing within that same time period. A gap is considered positive when the amount of interest rate sensitive assets exceeds the amount of interest rate sensitive liabilities. A gap is considered negative when the amount of interest rate sensitive liabilities exceeds the amount of interest rate sensitive assets. During a period of rising interest rates, therefore, a negative gap would tend to adversely affect net interest income. Conversely, during a period of falling interest rates, a negative gap position would tend to result in an increase in net interest income.
20
The following tables set forth the amounts of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities outstanding at March 31, 2005, which we anticipate, based upon certain assumptions, to reprice or mature in each of the future time periods shown. Except as stated below, the amount of assets and liabilities shown which reprice or mature during a particular period were determined based on the earlier of the term to repricing or the term to repayment of the asset or liability. These tables are intended to provide an approximation of the projected repricing of assets and liabilities at March 31, 2005 on the basis of contractual maturities and scheduled rate adjustments within a three-month period and subsequent selected time intervals. The loan amounts in the table reflect principal balances expected to be reinvested and/or repriced as a result of contractual amortization and rate adjustments on adjustable-rate loans. The contractual maturities and amortization of loans and investment securities reflect modest prepayment assumptions. While NOW, money market and savings deposit accounts have adjustable rates, it is assumed that the interest rates on these accounts will not adjust immediately to changes in other interest rates. Therefore, the table is calculated assuming that these accounts will reprice based upon an historical analysis of rate changes of these particular accounts, with repricing assigned to these accounts from one to thirteen months.
|
|
Time to Maturity or Repricing |
|
||||||||||||||||
As of March 31, 2005: |
|
0-90 Days |
|
91-365 Days |
|
1-5 Years |
|
Over 5 Years |
|
Total |
|
||||||||
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest Earning Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Loans |
|
$ |
429,905 |
|
$ |
417,676 |
|
$ |
60,156 |
|
$ |
25,990 |
|
$ |
933,727 |
|
|||
Loans held for sale |
|
8,319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,319 |
|
||||||||
Investment securities |
|
17,447 |
|
39,991 |
|
36,114 |
|
7,932 |
|
101,484 |
|
||||||||
Securities purchased under agreements to resell |
|
301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
301 |
|
||||||||
Interest bearing deposits with banks |
|
23,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,208 |
|
||||||||
Investment in unconsolidated trusts |
|
186 |
|
|
|
|
|
310 |
|
496 |
|
||||||||
Total interest earning assets |
|
$ |
479,366 |
|
$ |
457,667 |
|
$ |
96,270 |
|
$ |
34,232 |
|
$ |
1,067,535 |
|
|||
Interest Bearing Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
NOW and money market deposit accounts |
|
$ |
131,091 |
|
$ |
105,683 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
236,774 |
|
|||||
Savings deposits |
|
97,695 |
|
160,131 |
|
7,276 |
|
|
|
265,102 |
|
||||||||
Time deposits |
|
92,021 |
|
213,987 |
|
72,641 |
|
8,635 |
|
387,284 |
|
||||||||
Short- and long-term borrowings |
|
1,915 |
|
5,865 |
|
15,038 |
|
55,293 |
|
78,111 |
|
||||||||
Borrowings made by ESOP to outside parties |
|
1,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,214 |
|
||||||||
Junior subordinated debt owed to unconsolidated trusts |
|
6,186 |
|
|
|
|
|
16,496 |
|
22,682 |
|
||||||||
Total interest bearing liabilities |
|
$ |
330,122 |
|
$ |
485,666 |
|
$ |
94,955 |
|
$ |
80,424 |
|
$ |
991,167 |
|
|||
Rate sensitive assets (RSA) |
|
$ |
479,366 |
|
$ |
937,033 |
|
$ |
1,033,303 |
|
$ |
1,067,535 |
|
$ |
1,067,535 |
|
|||
Rate sensitive liabilities (RSL) |
|
330,122 |
|
815,788 |
|
910,743 |
|
991,167 |
|
991,167 |
|
||||||||
Cumulative GAP (GAP=RSA-RSL) |
|
149,244 |
|
121,245 |
|
122,560 |
|
76,368 |
|
76,368 |
|
||||||||
RSA/Total assets |
|
41.94 |
% |
81.99 |
% |
90.41 |
% |
93.41 |
% |
93.41 |
% |
||||||||
RSL/Total assets |
|
28.88 |
% |
71.38 |
% |
79.69 |
% |
86.72 |
% |
86.72 |
% |
||||||||
GAP/Total assets |
|
13.06 |
% |
10.61 |
% |
10.72 |
% |
6.69 |
% |
6.69 |
% |
||||||||
GAP/RSA |
|
31.13 |
% |
12.94 |
% |
11.86 |
% |
7.15 |
% |
7.15 |
% |
||||||||
Certain shortcomings are inherent in the method of analysis presented in the foregoing table. For example, although certain assets and liabilities may have similar maturities or periods to repricing, they may react in different degrees to changes in market interest rates. Also, the interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities may fluctuate in advance of changes in market interest rates, while interest rates on other types of assets may lag behind changes in market rates. Additionally, in the event of a change in interest rates, prepayment and early withdrawal levels would likely deviate significantly from those assumed in calculating the table. Therefore, we do not rely solely on a gap analysis to manage our interest rate risk, but rather we use what we believe to be the more reliable simulation model relating to changes in net interest income.
21
Based on simulation modeling at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, our net interest income would change over a one-year time period due to changes in interest rates as follows:
Change in Net Interest Income Over One Year Horizon
Changes in Levels of |
|
At March 31, 2005 |
|
At December 31, 2004 |
|
||||||
|
Dollar Change |
|
Percentage Change |
|
Dollar Change |
|
Percentage Change |
|
|||
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
||||||||
+ 2.00 |
% |
$ |
(4,948 |
) |
(12.06 |
)% |
$ |
(5,183 |
) |
(13.25 |
)% |
+ 1.00 |
|
(2,310 |
) |
(5.63 |
) |
(2,030 |
) |
(5.19 |
) |
||
(1.00 |
) |
1,005 |
|
2.45 |
|
595 |
|
1.52 |
|
||
(2.00 |
) |
(1,937 |
) |
(4.72 |
) |
78 |
|
0.20 |
|
||
Our simulations used assume the following:
1. Changes in interest rates are immediate.
2. It is our policy that interest rate exposure due to a 2% interest rate rise or fall be limited to 15% of our annual net interest income, as forecasted by the simulation model. As demonstrated by the table above, our interest rate risk exposure was within this policy at March 31, 2005.
Changes in net interest income between the periods above reflect changes in the composition of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities, related interest rates, repricing frequencies, and the fixed or variable characteristics of the interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities. Projections of income given by the model are not actual predictions, but rather show our relative interest rate risk. Actual interest income may vary from model projections.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We have established disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to the officers who certify our financial reports and to other members of senior management and the board of directors. A review and evaluation was performed by our management, including the Companys Chief Executive Officer (the CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (the CFO), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2005 pursuant to Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Based upon and as of the date of that review and evaluation, the CEO and CFO have concluded that our current disclosure controls and procedures, as designed and implemented, were effective in all material respects to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file and submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 are recorded, processed, summarized and reported as and when required. There have been no changes in the Companys disclosure controls or internal controls over financial reporting during the quarter ended March 31, 2005 that have materially affected, or are reasonable likely to materially affect, the Companys disclosure controls or internal controls over financial reporting.
22
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Neither Trinity, the Bank or Title Guaranty are involved in any pending legal proceedings other than routine legal proceedings occurring in the normal course of business, which, in the opinion of management, in the aggregate, are material to our consolidated financial condition.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
On February 17, 2005, the Company repurchased 153,846 shares of stock at $26.00 per share for a total of $4.0 million. These shares were placed in treasury.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None
Item 5. Other Information
None
Item 6. Exhibits
31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
23
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
TRINITY CAPITAL CORPORATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 6, 2005 |
By: |
/s/ WILLIAM C. ENLOE |
|
|
William C. Enloe |
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
Date: May 6, 2005 |
By: |
/s/ DANIEL R. BARTHOLOMEW |
|
|
Daniel R. Bartholomew |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
24