UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
FORM 10-Q
[ |
X |
] |
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002
or
[ |
|
] |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from __________ to __________
Commission File Number 1-985
INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY LIMITED
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Bermuda |
|
N/A |
Clarendon House |
(441) 295-2838
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No .
The number of Class A common shares outstanding as of July 31, 2002 was 169,171,114.
INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY LIMITED
PART I. |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION Condensed Consolidated Income Statement for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001 Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at June 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001 Item 2 - Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Item 3 - Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
|
|
PART II. |
OTHER INFORMATION Item 6 - Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K |
|
|
SIGNATURES |
|
INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY LIMITED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT
(in millions except per share amounts)
|
|
|||||||||
2002 |
2001 |
2002 |
2001 |
|||||||
Net sales |
$2,587.4 |
$2,459.3 |
$4,893.3 |
$4,750.6 |
||||||
Cost of goods sold |
1,994.9 |
1,933.3 |
3,769.2 |
3,720.6 |
||||||
Selling and administrative expenses |
378.8 |
355.4 |
727.0 |
697.5 |
||||||
Restructuring charges |
7.3 |
8.3 |
19.1 |
31.6 |
||||||
Operating income |
206.4 |
162.3 |
378.0 |
300.9 |
||||||
Interest expense |
( 59.5 |
) |
( 61.1 |
) |
( 119.0 |
) |
( 125.6 |
) |
||
Other income (expense), net |
( 11.3 |
) |
( 2.1 |
) |
( 21.5 |
) |
5.4 |
|||
Minority interests |
( 3.8 |
) |
( 5.6 |
) |
( 7.2 |
) |
( 14.1 |
) |
||
Earnings before income taxes |
131.8 |
93.5 |
230.3 |
166.6 |
||||||
Provision for income taxes |
24.4 |
30.6 |
42.0 |
54.4 |
||||||
Net earnings before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
|
|
|
|
||||||
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net earnings (loss) |
$ 107.4 |
$ 62.9 |
$( 446.2 |
) |
$ 112.2 |
|||||
Basic earnings (loss) per common share: |
||||||||||
Net earnings before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
|
|
|
|
||||||
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net earnings (loss) |
$ 0.64 |
$ 0.38 |
$ ( 2.64 |
) |
$ 0.69 |
|||||
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share: |
||||||||||
Net earnings before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
|
|
|
|
||||||
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net earnings (loss) |
$ 0.63 |
$ 0.38 |
$ ( 2.62 |
) |
$ 0.69 |
|||||
Dividends per share |
$ 0.17 |
$ 0.17 |
$ 0.34 |
$ 0.34 |
||||||
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements. |
INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY LIMITED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
(in millions)
June 30, 2002 |
December 31, 2001 |
|||||
|
||||||
Current assets: |
||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ 123.9 |
$ 114.0 |
||||
Marketable securities |
8.8 |
7.4 |
||||
Accounts and notes receivable, net |
1,561.2 |
1,482.9 |
||||
Inventories, net |
1,386.8 |
1,295.3 |
||||
Prepaid expenses and deferred income taxes |
334.2 |
288.2 |
||||
Total current assets |
3,414.9 |
3,187.8 |
||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
1,632.0 |
1,633.0 |
||||
Goodwill |
3,968.2 |
4,811.7 |
||||
Intangible assets, net |
890.9 |
849.1 |
||||
Other assets |
865.5 |
582.1 |
||||
Total assets |
$10,771.5 |
$11,063.7 |
||||
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||
Accounts payable |
$ 734.1 |
$ 761.0 |
||||
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
1,493.5 |
1,526.3 |
||||
Loans payable |
1,436.6 |
563.7 |
||||
Total current liabilities |
3,664.2 |
2,851.0 |
||||
Long-term debt |
2,167.3 |
2,900.7 |
||||
Postemployment liabilities |
920.1 |
920.4 |
||||
Other noncurrent liabilities |
489.1 |
475.0 |
||||
7,240.7 |
7,147.1 |
|||||
Shareholders' equity: |
||||||
Common shares |
169.2 |
168.0 |
||||
Other shareholders' equity |
3,605.2 |
4,070.0 |
||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
( 243.6 |
) |
( 321.4 |
) |
||
Total shareholders' equity |
3,530.8 |
3,916.6 |
||||
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity |
$10,771.5 |
$11,063.7 |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY LIMITED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(in millions)
Six months |
|||||
2002 |
2001 |
||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|||||
Net earnings before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
|
|
|||
Adjustments to arrive at net cash provided |
|||||
Restructure of operations |
19.1 |
31.6 |
|||
Depreciation and amortization |
129.4 |
187.1 |
|||
Changes in other asset and liabilities, net |
( 290.0 |
) |
(418.8 |
) |
|
Other, net |
( 3.9 |
) |
8.9 |
||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
42.9 |
( 79.0 |
) |
||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|||||
Capital expenditures |
( 77.5 |
) |
( 86.3 |
) |
|
Investments and acquisitions, net of cash |
( 85.2 |
) |
( 103.5 |
) |
|
Proceeds from business dispositions |
- |
17.5 |
|||
(Increase) decrease in marketable securities |
( 1.4 |
) |
92.7 |
||
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment |
19.7 |
17.3 |
|||
Other, net |
( 4.6 |
) |
2.9 |
||
Net cash used in investing activities |
( 149.0 |
) |
( 59.4 |
) |
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|||||
Net change in debt |
133.0 |
275.9 |
|||
Purchase of treasury stock |
- |
( 58.1 |
) |
||
Dividends paid |
( 57.3 |
) |
( 55.9 |
) |
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
35.6 |
8.5 |
|||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
111.3 |
170.4 |
|||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash |
|||||
equivalents |
4.7 |
( 3.0 |
) |
||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
9.9 |
29.0 |
|||
Cash and cash equivalents - beginning of period |
114.0 |
97.0 |
|||
Cash and cash equivalents - end of period |
$123.9 |
$126.0 |
|||
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements. |
INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY LIMITED
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1 - In the opinion of management, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments (including normal recurring accruals) necessary to present fairly the consolidated unaudited financial position and results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001.
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.
Note 2 - During the third quarter of 2000, the Company commenced a $325 million restructuring program, which included such actions as plant rationalizations, organizational realignments consistent with the Company's new market-based structure and the consolidation of back-office processes. During the fourth quarter of 2001, the Company commenced a second restructuring program for an additional $150 million to further reduce the general and administrative expenses across the Company. These programs include certain costs that are identified in Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 100 "Restructuring and Impairment Charges" and Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) 94-3 "Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit and Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring)" as restructuring, as well as other related costs that do not meet the criteria to be classified as restructuring. Nonrecurring costs associated with these activities not qual ifying as restructuring are referred to as "productivity investments" and have been charged to "Cost of goods sold" and "Selling and administrative expenses." Substantially all income statement activity and cash payments under both programs is expected to be completed by December 31, 2002. Remaining amounts relate primarily to ongoing lease commitments and pension liabilities. The Company expects lower costs and improved customer service in all segments as a result of these actions. The Company manages the 2000 and 2001 programs as a single restructuring program totaling $475 million. Therefore, all comments regarding restructure activity refer to both programs combined.
The total employee terminations related to the restructuring program is expected to be approximately 6,000 (excluding Hussmann International, Inc.) by December 31, 2002. See Note 3 for restructuring activities of Hussmann International, Inc. (Hussmann), which were recorded as part of purchase accounting for the acquisition. These terminations impacted both the salaried and hourly employee groups. The total number of manufacturing facilities to be closed by December 31, 2002 is 21 (excluding Hussmann). Payments for the terminations of employees and facility closures have been made since the inception of the program and will be substantially complete by December 31, 2002.
Management teams that were directly involved with the required actions developed the projected costs for each project within each segment and the Corporate Center. The costs incurred relating to the restructuring and productivity investments included involuntary employee termination benefits and relocation costs, lease exit costs, equipment write-offs, moving costs, and new site set up costs.
A reconciliation of the consolidated restructuring reserve for the 2000 and 2001 programs is as follows:
|
Employee |
|
|
|||
Balance at December 31, 2001 |
$ 34.5 |
$ 7.1 |
$ 41.6 |
|||
Provision |
17.3 |
1.8 |
19.1 |
|||
Cash payments |
( 23.8 |
) |
( 6.8 |
) |
( 30.6 |
) |
Non-cash write-offs |
- |
( 1.5 |
) |
( 1.5 |
) |
|
Balance at June 30, 2002 |
$ 28.0 |
$ 0.6 |
$ 28.6 |
Climate Control
This segment has undergone significant restructuring due to the acquisition of Hussmann in 2000. During 2000, Thermo King experienced a reduction in volumes due to a severe recession in the North America truck and trailer markets. Manufacturing facilities became a focus to improve production efficiencies and decrease manufacturing operating costs. In conjunction with the Hussmann acquisition, it was necessary to address these issues to achieve the synergies identified. The approved actions were as follows:
As of June 30, 2002, all five specified manufacturing locations have been closed, the outsourcing of certain product manufacturing was completed, and 1,329 employees have been terminated. An additional 45 employees will be terminated by December 31, 2002.
A reconciliation of the restructuring reserve for the 2000 and 2001 programs is as follows:
Employee termination costs |
Costs |
|
|||||||||||||||
In millions |
Phase I |
Phase II |
Phase I |
Phase II |
Phase I |
Phase II |
|||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2001 |
$ 1.6 |
$ 6.9 |
$ - |
$ - |
$ 1.6 |
$ 6.9 |
|||||||||||
Provision |
2.3 |
0.9 |
- |
1.5 |
2.3 |
2.4 |
|||||||||||
Cash payments |
( 1.8 |
) |
( 3.8 |
) |
- |
- |
( 1.8 |
) |
( 3.8 |
) |
|||||||
Non-cash write-offs |
- |
- |
- |
( 1.0 |
) |
- |
( 1.0 |
) |
|||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2002 |
$ 2.1 |
$ 4.0 |
$ - |
$ 0.5 |
$ 2.1 |
$ 4.5 |
Air & Productivity Solutions
Management examined the segment's operations and determined that the consolidation of manufacturing locations and the reduction of selling and administrative expenses were essential to meet its strategic objectives. To achieve a lower cost structure, an Eastern European
manufacturing plant was opened enabling the business to compete on a global scale. The severe recession in the worldwide industrial markets necessitated employee terminations to align the cost structure with the volume levels. The approved actions were as follows:
As of June 30, 2002, seven of the specified manufacturing locations have been closed with the final closure to occur by December 31, 2002. Employees terminated as of June 30, 2002 were 1,274 with an additional 38 employees to be terminated by December 31, 2002.
A reconciliation of the restructuring reserve for the 2000 and 2001 programs is as follows:
Employee termination Costs |
Facility exit costs |
|
|||||||||||||||
In millions |
Phase I |
Phase II |
Phase I |
Phase II |
Phase I |
Phase II |
|||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2001 |
$ 3.1 |
$ 3.7 |
$ 2.7 |
$ - |
$ 5.8 |
$ 3.7 |
|||||||||||
Provision |
( 3.1 |
) |
0.7 |
- |
- |
( 3.1 |
) |
0.7 |
|||||||||
Cash payments |
- |
( 3.3 |
) |
( 2.7 |
) |
- |
( 2.7 |
) |
( 3.3 |
) |
|||||||
Balance at June 30, 2002 |
$ - |
$ 1.1 |
$ - |
$ - |
$ - |
$ 1.1 |
During the third quarter of 2001, an accrual of $6.2 million was recorded by Air Solutions related to the announcement of a U.K. facility closing. This location manufactured products for two business units, Air Solutions (Air & Productivity Solutions segment) and Portable Power
(Infrastructure segment). During the first quarter of 2002, management determined that $3.1 million, of the original $6.2 million, was related to the Portable Power business and an entry was recorded to properly reflect the activity in each business. This resulted in a credit to the Air & Productivity Solutions segment, which was offset by a debit to the Infrastructure segment. Therefore, there was no change in the total reserve recorded.
Engineered Solutions
Management examined the Engineered Solutions' operations and determined that the geographical realignment of the manufacturing footprint was critical to achieve its strategic objectives. To enable the business to compete on a global scale, an Eastern European manufacturing plant was opened. Manufacturing facilities became a focus to improve production efficiencies and decrease manufacturing operating costs. The approved actions were as follows:
As of June 30, 2002, the specified manufacturing location was closed, and 1,138 employees were terminated, with an additional 255 expected by December 31, 2002.
A reconciliation of the restructuring reserve for the 2000 and 2001 programs is as follows:
Employee termination costs |
Facility exit costs |
|
||||||||||
In millions |
Phase I |
Phase II |
Phase I |
Phase II |
Phase I |
Phase II |
||||||
Balance at December 31, 2001 |
$ 1.1 |
$ 2.7 |
$ - |
$ - |
$ 1.1 |
$ 2.7 |
||||||
Provision |
0.7 |
1.2 |
- |
- |
0.7 |
1.2 |
||||||
Cash payments |
- |
( 3.9 |
) |
- |
- |
- |
( 3.9 |
) |
||||
Balance at June 30, 2002 |
$ 1.8 |
$ - |
$ - |
$ - |
$ 1.8 |
$ - |
Dresser-Rand
Management examined the segment's operations and selling and administrative (S&A) expense structure, and determined that the reduction of S&A expenses, as well as the consolidation of its sales regions was essential to meet its strategic objectives. The approved actions were as follows:
As of June 30, 2002, the organizational realignment was complete, all 318 identified employees were terminated, and the closure of the non-manufacturing locations was complete.
A reconciliation of the restructuring reserve for the 2000 and 2001 programs is as follows:
Employee termination costs |
Facility exit costs |
|
||||||||||
In millions |
Phase I |
Phase II |
Phase I |
Phase II |
Phase I |
Phase II |
||||||
Balance at December 31, 2001 |
$ - |
$ - |
$ - |
$ - |
$ - |
$ - |
||||||
Provision |
1.5 |
- |
- |
- |
1.5 |
- |
||||||
Cash payments |
( 1.5 |
) |
- |
- |
- |
( 1.5 |
) |
- |
||||
Balance at June 30, 2002 |
$ - |
$ - |
$ - |
$ - |
$ - |
$ - |
Infrastructure
Manufacturing facilities became a focus to improve production efficiencies and decrease manufacturing operating costs. The consolidation of the manufacturing locations will enable the business to leverage its capacity when the volumes return. Additional significant management realignments were essential to the success of the market strategy and to leverage the distribution channels. The approved actions were as follows:
As of June 30, 2002, the two specified manufacturing location were closed, and 696 employees were terminated. An additional 19 employee terminations are expected by December 31, 2002.
A reconciliation of the restructuring reserve for the 2000 and 2001 programs is as follows:
Employee termination costs |
Facility exit costs |
|
||||||||||
In millions |
Phase I |
Phase II |
Phase I |
Phase II |
Phase I |
Phase II |
||||||
Balance at December 31, 2001 |
$ 1.6 |
$ 0.5 |
$ 0.3 |
$ - |
$ 1.9 |
$ 0.5 |
||||||
Provision |
3.7 |
1.6 |
- |
- |
3.7 |
1.6 |
||||||
Cash payments |
( 2.0 |
) |
( 2.0 |
) |
- |
- |
( 2.0 |
) |
( 2.0 |
) |
||
Non-cash write-offs |
- |
- |
( 0.3 |
) |
- |
( 0.3 |
) |
- |
||||
Balance at June 30, 2002 |
$ 3.3 |
$ 0.1 |
$ - |
$ - |
$ 3.3 |
$ 0.1 |
Security & Safety
Manufacturing facilities became a focus to improve production efficiencies and decrease manufacturing operating costs. Management also reviewed the current S&A expense structure and determined that significant actions were required to align the cost structure with the current volume levels. The approved actions were as follows:
As of June 30, 2002, four of the specified manufacturing locations were closed and 395 of the 472 employees had been terminated. The final facility closure and employee terminations will occur prior to December 31, 2002.
A reconciliation of the restructuring reserve for the 2000 and 2001 programs is as follows:
Employee termination costs |
Facility exit costs |
|
||||||||||
In millions |
Phase I |
Phase II |
Phase I |
Phase II |
Phase I |
Phase II |
||||||
Balance at December 31, 2001 |
$ 2.4 |
$ - |
$ 4.1 |
$ - |
$ 6.5 |
$ - |
||||||
Provision |
0.3 |
- |
0.3 |
- |
0.6 |
- |
||||||
Cash payments |
( 2.2 |
) |
- |
( 4.1 |
) |
- |
( 6.3 |
) |
- |
|||
Non-cash write-offs |
- |
- |
( 0.2 |
) |
- |
( 0.2 |
) |
- |
||||
Balance at June 30, 2002 |
$ 0.5 |
$ - |
$ 0.1 |
$ - |
$ 0.6 |
$ - |
Corporate Center Restructuring
Management determined that previously decentralized back office functions (such as accounts payable, accounts receivable, benefits administration and payroll) proved to be an inefficient way of managing costs of high volume transactions. The creation of Global Business Services (a shared service center) enabled the Company to consolidate high volume transactions at a lower cost by reducing the number of employees in business units' back office operations. These actions resulted in employee terminations of 153 as of June 30, 2002, and an additional 243 reduction in staff is expected by December 31, 2002. The restructuring costs associated with corporate are primarily related to the involuntary employee terminations.
A reconciliation of the restructuring reserve for the 2000 and 2001 programs is as follows:
Employee termination costs |
Facility exit costs |
|
||||||||||
In millions |
Phase I |
Phase II |
Phase I |
Phase II |
Phase I |
Phase II |
||||||
Balance at December 31, 2001 |
$ 8.6 |
$ 2.3 |
$ - |
$ - |
$ 8.6 |
$ 2.3 |
||||||
Provision |
- |
7.5 |
- |
- |
- |
7.5 |
||||||
Cash payments |
( 0.8 |
) |
( 2.5 |
) |
- |
- |
( 0.8 |
) |
( 2.5 |
) |
||
Balance at June 30, 2002 |
$ 7.8 |
$ 7.3 |
$ - |
$ - |
$ 7.8 |
$ 7.3 |
Note 3 - In June 2000, the Company acquired Hussmann for approximately $1.7 billion in cash, after consideration of amounts paid for outstanding stock options, debt retirement, employee contracts and transaction costs. Hussmann's business is the design, production, installation and service of merchandising and refrigeration systems for the global food industry.
As part of the acquisition process, the Company determined that significant synergies could be achieved through the consolidation of manufacturing facilities and the reduction of excess manufacturing and selling and administrative employees. The Company expects lower costs and improved customer service as a result of these actions. The following initiatives were identified to achieve these synergies:
U.S. & Canada
Four facilities were consolidated into other U.S. plants, which manufacture similar products. One closure was completed in December 2000 and the other closures were completed in the first half of 2002.
International Operations
The international plant closures began in October 2000 and were completed by December 31, 2001.
The costs incurred relating to each of the above restructurings included involuntary employee termination benefits and relocation costs, lease exit costs, and equipment write-offs.
The total number of employees terminated as part of the above restructuring plans was approximately 1,500. These terminations affected both the salaried and hourly employee groups.
The restructuring has been substantially completed as of the second quarter 2002, and the reserves have been utilized, except those relating to ongoing lease commitments and pension liabilities not yet settled. The remaining exit cost liabilities relating to employee termination costs will be paid by June 30, 2003. All facility exit costs, except for ongoing lease commitments, are expected to be paid by December 31, 2002. Ongoing lease commitment payments of approximately $0.3 million are expected to be paid annually from 2003 through 2016, unless subleased.
During the first half of 2001, Hussmann recorded $43 million of additional restructuring liabilities to goodwill. These additional amounts were recorded due to the finalization of exit plans of the remaining facilities identified at acquisition in accordance with the integration plan. Additionally, in accordance with EITF 95-3, "Recognition of Liabilities in Connection with a Purchase Business Combination", costs exceeding the amounts originally recorded as liabilities required an adjustment to increase the liability and were identified within one year of the acquisition date, and therefore recorded as part of the acquisition price.
A reconciliation of the restructuring reserve is as follows:
|
Employee |
|
|
|||
Balance at December 31, 2001 |
$12.1 |
$ 23.1 |
$ 35.2 |
|||
Cash payments |
( 10.5 |
) |
( 8.0 |
) |
( 18.5 |
) |
Balance at June 30, 2002 |
$ 1.6 |
$ 15.1 |
$ 16.7 |
In June 2002, the Company acquired Electronic Technologies Corporation (ETC), based in Dover Plains, New York, for approximately $22 million. ETC provides specialty security systems integration, serving as a single source for integrating a facility's access control, closed circuit television and fire/life safety systems. The final purchase price may be increased by approximately $15 million based upon certain future operating goals as specified in the contract.
In May 2002, the Company acquired a 51 percent interest in Superay, a manufacturer of tools and related products based in Jin Tan, China, for approximately $3 million.
In the first quarter, the Company acquired a 30% interest in CISA S.p.A. (CISA), a European manufacturer of mechanical and electronic security products, for approximately $60 million. CISA operates worldwide and will enable the Company to provide customers with a complete portfolio of security products in the Americas and the European and Asia Pacific markets.
Note 4 - Inventories are stated at cost, which is not in excess of market. Most U.S. manufactured inventories, excluding the Climate Control and Dresser-Rand segments, are valued on the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method. All other inventories are valued using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. The composition of inventories was as follows (in millions):
|
|
||||
Raw materials and supplies |
$ 329.6 |
$ 307.9 |
|||
Work-in-process |
398.5 |
395.5 |
|||
Finished goods |
800.5 |
733.1 |
|||
1,528.6 |
1,436.5 |
||||
Less-LIFO reserve |
141.8 |
141.2 |
|||
Total |
$1,386.8 |
$1,295.3 |
Note 5 - Effective January 1, 2002, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 142 "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets". Under the provisions of this standard, goodwill and intangible assets deemed to have indefinite lives are no longer subject to amortization, but rather are tested for impairment at least annually. All other intangible assets are to be amortized over their estimated useful lives.
Step one of the impairment testing required under SFAS No. 142 was completed by June 30, 2002. Under step one of the impairment test, all reporting units were identified in accordance with the guidance of SFAS No. 142 and SFAS No. 131 "Disclosures About Segments of an
Enterprise and Related Information". The January 1, 2002 carrying value of the reporting units was then compared to the fair value of the reporting units. Fair value was computed by utilizing a discounted cash flow model. Upon completion of the comparison of the values of the reporting units, it was determined that the carrying value of the Thermo King reporting unit of the Climate Control segment was in excess of its fair value.
Step two of the impairment test, which compares the implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill with carrying amount of that goodwill, was then completed. The implied fair value of goodwill was determined by allocating the fair value of the reporting unit to all the assets and liabilities (including unrecognized intangible assets) as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination and the fair value of the reporting unit was the price paid to acquire the reporting unit. This resulted in a goodwill impairment charge of $864.4 million being recorded. As required by SFAS No. 142, this charge, $634.5 million, net of tax, was recognized as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle retroactive to January 1, 2002.
The following is a reconciliation of previously reported financial information to adjusted amounts excluding amortization expense relating to goodwill and other intangible assets deemed to have indefinite lives, which are no longer being amortized (in millions, except per share amounts):
For the three months ended June 30, 2001 |
For the six months ended June 30, 2001 |
||||||||
Basic |
Diluted |
Basic |
Diluted |
||||||
Earnings |
earnings |
earnings |
Earnings |
||||||
Earnings |
per share |
per share |
Earnings |
per share |
per share |
||||
Net earnings as reported |
$ 62.9 |
$0.38 |
$0.38 |
$112.2 |
$0.69 |
$0.69 |
|||
Goodwill amortization expense, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Other intangible asset amortization expense, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Adjusted net earnings |
$ 91.9 |
$ 0.56 |
$ 0.55 |
$172.6 |
$1.06 |
$1.05 |
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the six months ended June 30, 2002 are as
follows (in millions):
|
Reclassifications to intangible |
Additions and |
|
Impairment |
|
||||||
Climate Control |
$ 3,336.1 |
$ ( 22.7 |
) |
$ 10.5 |
$ 5.8 |
$( 864.4 |
) |
$2,465.3 |
|||
Industrial Solutions: |
|||||||||||
Air & Productivity |
|||||||||||
Solutions |
102.0 |
- |
2.1 |
2.8 |
- |
106.9 |
|||||
Dresser-Rand |
24.4 |
- |
- |
( 0.1 |
) |
- |
24.3 |
||||
Engineered Solutions |
4.2 |
- |
0.3 |
0.5 |
- |
5.0 |
|||||
Infrastructure |
885.1 |
- |
3.0 |
4.3 |
- |
892.4 |
|||||
Security & Safety |
459.9 |
( 8.6 |
) |
- |
23.0 |
- |
474.3 |
||||
Total |
$ 4,811.7 |
$ ( 31.3 |
) |
$15.9 |
$36.3 |
$( 864.4 |
) |
$3,968.2 |
* Upon acquisition of a new business, the Company records the excess purchase price to goodwill until final valuations are completed to further disaggregate the amount.
** Represents goodwill related to current year acquisitions or adjustments as a result of final allocations of purchase price.
The following table sets forth the gross amount and accumulated amortization of the Company's intangible assets (in millions):
June 30, 2002 |
December 31, 2001 |
|||||||
Gross |
Accumulated |
Gross |
Accumulated |
|||||
Customer relationships |
$380.0 |
$ 19.4 |
$380.0 |
$ 14.6 |
||||
Installed service base |
235.8 |
13.8 |
235.8 |
10.9 |
||||
Software |
96.2 |
9.5 |
82.4 |
3.6 |
||||
Trademarks |
7.1 |
5.8 |
152.7 |
4.9 |
||||
Other |
57.1 |
26.1 |
59.6 |
27.4 |
||||
Total amortizable intangible assets |
776.2 |
74.6 |
910.5 |
61.4 |
||||
Total indefinite lived intangible assets - trademarks |
189.3 |
- |
- |
- |
||||
Total |
$965.5 |
$ 74.6 |
$910.5 |
$ 61.4 |
During the first six months of 2002, the Company acquired software in the amount of $12.5 million with a weighted average amortization period of 4.3 years.
Intangible asset amortization expense for the second quarter and six months ended of 2002 was $7.1 million and $15.8 million, respectively.
Estimated intangible asset amortization expense for each of the next five fiscal years is expected to be $34.9 million in 2002, $37.8 million in 2003, $37.8 million in 2004, $36.6 million in 2005, and $36.6 million in 2006.
Note 6 - Information on basic and diluted shares is as follows (in millions):
|
|
|||||||
2002 |
2001 |
2002 |
2001 |
|||||
Average number of basic shares |
169.0 |
164.1 |
168.7 |
162.5 |
||||
Shares issuable under incentive stock plans |
2.2 |
1.5 |
1.8 |
1.3 |
||||
Average number of diluted shares |
171.2 |
165.6 |
170.5 |
163.8 |
Diluted earnings per share computations for the three months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001 excluded the weighted average effect of the assumed exercise of approximately 4.7 million and 5.1 million shares issuable under stock benefit plans, respectively. Excluded for each of the six-month periods ended June 30, 2002 and 2001 were 5.1 million shares. These shares were excluded because the effect would be anti-dilutive.
Note 7 - The components of comprehensive income are as follows (in millions):
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
2002 |
2001 |
2002 |
2001 |
|||||||||||||||
Net earnings |
$107.4 |
$ 62.9 |
$(446.2 |
) |
$112.2 |
|||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
103.5 |
( 21.8 |
) |
77.3 |
( 54.5 |
) |
||||||||||||
Change in fair value of derivatives |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
Reclassification to realized on marketable |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss) |
$211.4 |
$ 43.6 |
$( 368.4 |
) |
$ 41.8 |
Included in accumulated other comprehensive income at June 30, 2002, is $2.0 million related to the fair value of derivatives qualifying as cash flow hedges, of which $1.1 million is expected to be reclassified to earnings over the twelve month period ending June 30, 2003. The actual amounts that will be reclassified to earnings over the next twelve months will vary from this amount as a result of changes in market conditions. No amounts were reclassified to earnings during the quarter in connection with forecasted transactions that were no longer considered probable of occurring.
At June 30, 2002, the maximum term of derivative instruments that hedge forecasted transactions, for foreign currency hedges, was 10 months. At June 30, 2002, the maximum term of derivative instruments that hedge forecasted transactions, for commodity hedges, was 18 months.
Note 8 - A summary of operations by reportable segment is as follows (in millions):
Three months ended June 30, |
Six months ended June 30, |
||||||||||||||||
2002 |
2001 |
2002 |
2001 |
||||||||||||||
Net Sales |
|||||||||||||||||
Climate Control |
$ 615.2 |
$ 607.3 |
$1,129.7 |
$1,118.8 |
|||||||||||||
Industrial Solutions: |
|||||||||||||||||
Air & Productivity Solutions |
323.1 |
335.1 |
633.2 |
665.2 |
|||||||||||||
Dresser-Rand |
234.7 |
181.7 |
446.5 |
362.8 |
|||||||||||||
Engineered Solutions |
321.1 |
270.0 |
610.0 |
542.3 |
|||||||||||||
878.9 |
786.8 |
1,689.7 |
1,570.3 |
||||||||||||||
Infrastructure |
729.3 |
719.8 |
1,364.4 |
1,381.1 |
|||||||||||||
Security & Safety |
364.0 |
345.4 |
709.5 |
680.4 |
|||||||||||||
Total |
$2,587.4 |
$2,459.3 |
$4,893.3 |
$4,750.6 |
|||||||||||||
Operating Income (Loss) |
|||||||||||||||||
Climate Control |
$ 37.3 |
$ 11.5 |
$ 60.5 |
$ 1.1 |
|||||||||||||
Industrial Solutions: |
|||||||||||||||||
Air & Productivity Solutions |
13.9 |
14.7 |
39.5 |
49.5 |
|||||||||||||
Dresser-Rand |
0.2 |
( 5.5 |
) |
( 0.2 |
) |
( 12.9 |
) |
||||||||||
Engineered Solutions |
20.9 |
20.4 |
37.0 |
35.7 |
|||||||||||||
35.0 |
29.6 |
76.3 |
72.3 |
||||||||||||||
Infrastructure |
89.7 |
84.9 |
152.4 |
155.8 |
|||||||||||||
Security & Safety |
64.3 |
56.3 |
130.4 |
110.6 |
|||||||||||||
Unallocated corporate expenses |
( 19.9 |
) |
( 20.0 |
) |
( 41.6 |
) |
( 38.9 |
) |
|||||||||
Total |
$ 206.4 |
$ 162.3 |
$ 378.0 |
$ 300.9 |
|||||||||||||
No significant changes in assets by geographic area have occurred since December 31, 2001. |
Note 9 - As part of the reorganization, Ingersoll-Rand Company Limited (IR-Limited or the company) guaranteed all of the issued public debt securities of Ingersoll-Rand Company (IR-New Jersey). The subsidiary issuer, IR-New Jersey, is 100% owned by the parent, IR-Limited, the guarantees are full and unconditional, and no other subsidiary of the Company guarantees the securities. The following condensed consolidated financial information for IR-Limited, IR-New Jersey, and all their other subsidiaries is included so that separate financial statements of IR-New Jersey are not required to be filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The condensed consolidating financial statements present the Parent and Issuer investments in their subsidiaries using the equity method of accounting. Intercompany investments in the nonvoting Class B common shares are accounted for on the cost method.
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet |
||||||||||
|
|
|
Other |
Consolidating |
IR-Limited Consolidated |
|||||
Current assets: |
||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ - |
$ 66.7 |
$ 57.2 |
$ - |
$ 123.9 |
|||||
Marketable securities |
- |
- |
8.8 |
- |
8.8 |
|||||
Accounts and notes receivable, net |
0.1 |
162.8 |
1,398.3 |
- |
1,561.2 |
|||||
Inventories, net |
- |
171.4 |
1,215.4 |
- |
1,386.8 |
|||||
Prepaid expenses and deferred income |
|
|
|
- |
|
|||||
Accounts, notes and interest receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Total current assets |
2.2 |
446.2 |
12,299.8 |
( 9,333.3 |
) |
3,414.9 |
||||
Investment in affiliates |
8,953.7 |
12,363.3 |
11,848.0 |
( 33,165.0 |
) |
- |
||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
- |
265.6 |
1,366.4 |
- |
1,632.0 |
|||||
Intangible assets, net |
- |
175.8 |
4,683.3 |
- |
4,859.1 |
|||||
Note receivable affiliate |
- |
- |
3,647.4 |
( 3,647.4 |
) |
- |
||||
Other assets |
- |
144.1 |
721.4 |
- |
865.5 |
|||||
Total assets |
$ 8,955.9 |
$13,395.0 |
$34,566.3 |
$ ( 46,145.7 |
) |
$10,771.5 |
||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||||
Accounts payable and accruals |
$ - |
$ 292.4 |
$ 1,935.2 |
- |
$2,227.6 |
|||||
Loans payable |
- |
1,263.4 |
173.2 |
- |
1,436.6 |
|||||
Accounts, notes and interest payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Total current liabilities |
192.6 |
4,423.1 |
8,381.8 |
(9,333.3 |
) |
3,664.2 |
||||
Long-term debt |
- |
1,950.6 |
216.7 |
- |
2,167.3 |
|||||
Note payable affiliate |
- |
3,647.4 |
- |
( 3,647.4 |
) |
- |
||||
Other noncurrent liabilities |
- |
116.5 |
1,292.7 |
- |
1,409.2 |
|||||
192.6 |
10,137.6 |
9,891.2 |
( 12,980.7 |
) |
7,240.7 |
|||||
Shareholders' equity: |
||||||||||
Class A common shares |
169.2 |
- |
- |
- |
169.2 |
|||||
Class B common shares |
135.3 |
- |
- |
( 135.3 |
) |
- |
||||
Common shares |
- |
- |
2,362.8 |
( 2,362.8 |
) |
- |
||||
Other shareholders' equity |
8,381.0 |
3,368.2 |
22,509.4 |
( 30,653.4 |
) |
3,605.2 |
||||
Accumulated other comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
|
) |
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders' equity |
8,763.3 |
3,257.4 |
24,675.1 |
( 33,165.0 |
) |
3,530.8 |
||||
Total liabilities and shareholders' |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Note: Before reduction of $5.3 billion of assets and shareholders' equity related to the Class B common shares issued pursuant to the reorganization on December 31, 2001.
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet |
|||||||||
|
|
|
Other |
Consolidating |
IR-Limited |
||||
Current assets: |
|||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ - |
$ 23.4 |
$ 90.6 |
$ - |
$ 114.0 |
||||
Marketable securities |
- |
- |
7.4 |
- |
7.4 |
||||
Accounts and notes receivable, net |
- |
128.3 |
1,354.6 |
- |
1,482.9 |
||||
Inventories, net |
- |
134.8 |
1,160.5 |
- |
1,295.3 |
||||
Prepaid expenses and deferred income |
|
|
230.4 |
- |
|
||||
Accounts and notes receivable affiliates |
- |
- |
2,957.9 |
( 2,957.9 |
) |
- |
|||
Total current assets |
- |
344.3 |
5,801.4 |
( 2,957.9 |
) |
3,187.8 |
|||
Investment in affiliates |
5,547.5 |
12,825.5 |
8,708.2 |
( 27,081.2 |
) |
- |
|||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
- |
238.9 |
1,394.1 |
- |
1,633.0 |
||||
Intangible assets, net |
- |
123.4 |
5,537.4 |
- |
5,660.8 |
||||
Note receivable affiliate |
3,647.4 |
- |
- |
( 3,647.4 |
) |
- |
|||
Other assets |
- |
218.1 |
364.0 |
- |
582.1 |
||||
Total assets |
$9,194.9 |
$13,750.2 |
$21,805.1 |
$ ( 33,686.5 |
) |
$11,063.7 |
|||
Current liabilities: |
|||||||||
Accounts payable and accruals |
$ - |
$ 319.3 |
$ 1,968.0 |
$ - |
$ 2,287.33 |
||||
Loans payable |
- |
449.7 |
114.0 |
- |
563.7 |
||||
Accounts and note payable affiliates |
- |
2,650.0 |
307.9 |
( 2,957.9 |
) |
- |
|||
Total current liabilities |
- |
3,419.0 |
2,389.9 |
( 2,957.9 |
) |
2,851.0 |
|||
Long-term debt |
- |
2,650.6 |
250.1 |
- |
2,900.7 |
||||
Note payable affiliate |
- |
3,647.4 |
- |
( 3,647.4 |
) |
- |
|||
Other noncurrent liabilities |
- |
116.6 |
1,278.8 |
- |
1,395.4 |
||||
- |
9,833.6 |
3,918.8 |
( 6,605.3 |
) |
7,147.1 |
||||
Shareholders' equity: |
|||||||||
Class A common shares |
168.0 |
- |
- |
- |
168.0 |
||||
Class B common shares |
135.3 |
- |
- |
( 135.3 |
) |
- |
|||
Common shares |
- |
- |
2,362.8 |
( 2,362.8 |
) |
- |
|||
Other shareholders' equity |
8,891.6 |
4,039.4 |
15,787.8 |
( 24,648.8 |
) |
4,070.0 |
|||
Accumulated other comprehensive |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders' equity |
9,194.9 |
3,916.6 |
17,886.3 |
( 27,081.2 |
) |
3,916.6 |
|||
Total liabilities and shareholders' |
$9,194.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
* Note: Before reduction of $5.3 billion of assets and shareholders' equity related to the Class B common shares issued pursuant to the reorganization on December 31, 2001.
Condensed Consolidating Income Statement For the three months ended June 30, 2002 |
||||||||||
|
|
|
Other Subsidiaries |
|
IR-Limited Consolidated |
|||||
Net sales |
$ - |
$ 344.5 |
$2,242.9 |
$ - |
$2,587.4 |
|||||
Cost of goods sold |
- |
255.3 |
1,739.6 |
- |
1,994.9 |
|||||
Selling and administrative expenses |
- |
75.4 |
303.4 |
- |
378.8 |
|||||
Restructuring charges |
- |
3.6 |
3.7 |
- |
7.3 |
|||||
Operating income |
- |
10.2 |
196.2 |
- |
206.4 |
|||||
Equity earnings in affiliates (net of tax) |
107.6 |
63.7 |
( 40.5 |
) |
( 130.8 |
) |
- |
|||
Interest expense |
- |
( 45.9 |
) |
( 13.6 |
) |
- |
( 59.5 |
) |
||
Intercompany interest, dividends and fees |
( 0.2 |
) |
( 95.9 |
) |
96.1 |
- |
- |
|||
Other income (expense), net |
- |
( 11.2 |
) |
( 0.1 |
) |
- |
( 11.3 |
) |
||
Minority interests |
- |
- |
( 3.8 |
) |
- |
( 3.8 |
) |
|||
Earnings before income taxes |
107.4 |
( 79.1 |
) |
234.3 |
( 130.8 |
) |
131.8 |
|||
(Benefit)/provision for income taxes |
- |
( 49.5 |
) |
73.9 |
- |
24.4 |
||||
Net earnings |
$ 107.4 |
$ ( 29.6 |
) |
$160.4 |
$( 130.8 |
) |
$ 107.4 |
Condensed Consolidating Income Statement For the three months ended June 30, 2001 |
|||||||||
|
|
|
Other Subsidiaries |
Consolidating |
|
||||
Net sales |
$ - |
$324.2 |
$2,135.1 |
$ - |
$2,459.3 |
||||
Cost of goods sold |
- |
232.6 |
1,700.7 |
- |
1,933.3 |
||||
Selling and administrative expenses |
- |
69.9 |
285.5 |
- |
355.4 |
||||
Restructuring charges |
- |
- |
8.3 |
- |
8.3 |
||||
Operating income |
- |
21.7 |
140.6 |
- |
162.3 |
||||
Equity earnings in affiliates (net of tax) |
- |
96.4 |
- |
( 96.4 |
) |
- |
|||
Interest expense |
- |
( 50.1 |
) |
( 11.0 |
) |
- |
( 61.1 |
) |
|
Intercompany interest and fees |
- |
0.7 |
( 0.7 |
) |
- |
- |
|||
Other income (expense), net |
- |
( 15.6 |
) |
13.5 |
- |
( 2.1 |
) |
||
Minority interests |
- |
- |
( 5.6 |
) |
- |
( 5.6 |
) |
||
Earnings before income taxes |
- |
53.1 |
136.8 |
( 96.4 |
) |
93.5 |
|||
(Benefit)/provision for income taxes |
- |
( 9.7 |
) |
40.3 |
- |
30.6 |
|||
Net earnings |
$ - |
$ 62.8 |
$ 96.5 |
$ ( 96.4 |
) |
$ 62.9 |
Condensed Consolidating Income Statement For the six months ended June 30, 2002 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Other Subsidiaries |
Consolidating |
IR-Limited Consolidated |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ - |
$ 621.2 |
$ 4,272.1 |
$ - |
$4,893.3 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of goods sold |
- |
459.9 |
3,309.3 |
- |
3,769.2 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Selling and administrative expenses |
- |
140.5 |
586.5 |
- |
727.0 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Restructuring charges |
- |
9.4 |
9.7 |
- |
19.1 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating income |
- |
11.4 |
366.6 |
- |
378.0 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity earnings in affiliates (net of tax) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
- |
( 93.8 |
) |
( 25.2 |
) |
- |
( 119.0 |
) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Intercompany interest and fees |
100.0 |
( 191.3 |
) |
91.3 |
- |
- |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Other income (expense), net |
- |
( 17.4 |
) |
( 4.1 |
) |
- |
( 21.5 |
) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Minority interests |
- |
- |
( 7.2 |
) |
- |
( 7.2 |
) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Earnings before income taxes |
188.3 |
( 145.6 |
) |
380.9 |
( 193.3 |
) |
230.3 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
(Benefit)/provision for income taxes |
- |
( 105.1 |
) |
147.1 |
- |
42.0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Net earnings before cumulative effect of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Cumulative effect of change in accounting |
|
|
|
|
|
634.5 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Net earnings (loss) |
$ ( 446.2 |
) |
$ ( 40.5 |
) |
$( 400.7 |
) |
$ 441.2 |
$( 446.2 |
) |
Condensed Consolidating Income Statement For the six months ended June 30, 2001 |
|||||||||
|
|
|
Other Subsidiaries |
Consolidating |
|
||||
Net sales |
$ - |
$637.3 |
$4,113.3 |
$ - |
$4,750.6 |
||||
Cost of goods sold |
- |
455.6 |
3,265.0 |
- |
3,720.6 |
||||
Selling and administrative expenses |
- |
133.5 |
564.0 |
- |
697.5 |
||||
Restructuring charges |
- |
- |
31.6 |
- |
31.6 |
||||
Operating income |
- |
48.2 |
252.7 |
- |
300.9 |
||||
Equity earnings in affiliates (net of tax) |
- |
154.0 |
- |
( 154.0 |
) |
- |
|||
Interest expense |
- |
( 101.5 |
) |
( 24.1 |
) |
- |
( 125.6 |
) |
|
Intercompany interest and fees |
- |
7.2 |
( 7.2 |
) |
- |
- |
|||
Other income (expense), net |
- |
( 12.6 |
) |
18.0 |
- |
5.4 |
|||
Minority interests |
- |
- |
( 14.1 |
) |
- |
( 14.1 |
) |
||
Earnings before income taxes |
- |
95.3 |
225.3 |
( 154.0 |
) |
166.6 |
|||
(Benefit)/provision for income taxes |
- |
( 16.9 |
) |
71.3 |
- |
54.4 |
|||
Net earnings |
$ - |
$ 112.2 |
$ 154.0 |
$ ( 154.0 |
) |
$ 112.2 |
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows |
||||||||||
(In millions) |
|
IR-New Jersey |
Other |
Consolidating |
IR-Limited |
|||||
Net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities |
$ 67.7 |
$( 68.0 |
) |
$ 43.2 |
$ - |
$ 42.9 |
||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||||
Capital expenditures |
- |
( 8.0 |
) |
( 69.5 |
) |
- |
( 77.5 |
) |
||
Investments and acquisitions, net of cash |
- |
- |
( 85.2 |
) |
- |
( 85.2 |
) |
|||
Decrease in marketable securities |
- |
- |
( 1.4 |
) |
- |
( 1.4 |
) |
|||
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Other, net |
- |
- |
( 4.6 |
) |
- |
( 4.6 |
) |
|||
Net cash used in investing activities |
- |
( 6.1 |
) |
( 142.9 |
) |
- |
( 149.0 |
) |
||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||||
Net change in debt |
- |
113.6 |
19.4 |
- |
133.0 |
|||||
Dividends paid |
(103.3 |
) |
3.8 |
42.2 |
- |
( 57.3 |
) |
|||
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options |
35.6 |
- |
- |
- |
35.6 |
|||||
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
( 67.7 |
) |
117.4 |
61.6 |
- |
111.3 |
||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|||
Net increase/ (decrease) in cash and cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Cash and cash equivalents - beginning of |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash and cash equivalents - end of period |
$ - |
$ 66.7 |
$ 57.2 |
$ - |
$123.9 |
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows |
|||||||||
(In millions) |
|
IR-New Jersey |
Other |
Consolidating |
|
||||
Net cash (used in)/provided by operating activities |
$ - |
$ ( 304.0 |
) |
$225.0 |
$ - |
$ (79.0 |
) |
||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|||||||||
Capital expenditures |
- |
( 11.3 |
) |
( 75.0 |
) |
- |
( 86.3 |
) |
|
Investments and acquisitions, net of cash |
- |
( 3.1 |
) |
( 100.4 |
) |
- |
( 103.5 |
) |
|
Proceeds from business dispositions |
- |
- |
17.5 |
- |
17.5 |
||||
Decrease in marketable securities |
- |
95.1 |
( 2.4 |
) |
- |
92.7 |
|||
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and |
|
- |
|
|
17.3 |
||||
Other, net |
- |
- |
2.9 |
- |
2.9 |
||||
Net cash provided by/(used in) investing |
- |
|
|
) |
- |
|
|
||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|||||||||
Net change in debt |
- |
379.9 |
( 104.0 |
) |
- |
275.9 |
|||
Purchase of treasury stock |
- |
( 58.1 |
) |
- |
- |
( 58.1 |
) |
||
Dividends paid |
- |
( 55.9 |
) |
- |
- |
( 55.9 |
) |
||
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options |
- |
8.5 |
- |
- |
8.5 |
||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
- |
274.4 |
( 104.0 |
) |
- |
170.4 |
|||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and |
- |
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
- |
51.1 |
( 22.1 |
) |
- |
29.0 |
|||
Cash and cash equivalents - beginning of |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Cash and cash equivalents - end of period |
$ - |
$ 51.1 |
$ 74.9 |
$ - |
$ 126.0 |
INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY LIMITED
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Results of Operations - Three Months Ended June 30, 2002 and 2001
Net earnings for the second quarter of 2002 were $107.4 million, or diluted earnings per share of $0.63 as compared to $62.9 million and $0.38 per share in the comparable quarter of 2001. All dollar amounts are in millions.
Three months ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
2002 |
2001 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Restructure and Other |
|
|
Restructure and Other |
SFAS |
|
|||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$2,587.4 |
$ - |
$2,587.4 |
$2,459.3 |
$ - |
$ - |
$2,459.3 |
||||||||||||||||
Cost of goods sold |
1,994.9 |
12.5 |
1,982.4 |
1,933.3 |
27.3 |
31.5 |
1,874.5 |
||||||||||||||||
Selling and administrative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Restructuring charges |
7.3 |
7.3 |
- |
8.3 |
8.3 |
- |
- |
||||||||||||||||
Operating income |
$ 206.4 |
$ ( 21.9 |
) |
$ 228.3 |
$ 162.3 |
$ ( 42.0 |
) |
$( 33.5 |
) |
$ 237.8 |
|||||||||||||
Operating margin |
8.0% |
8.8% |
6.6%0 |
9.7% |
Cost of goods sold, and selling and administrative expenses include charges for productivity investments. Productivity investments consist of costs for equipment moving, facility redesign, employee relocation and retraining, and systems enhancements. Charges for productivity investments are expensed as incurred. See "Restructuring" for further discussion. In addition, 2001 reported results include amortization of goodwill. As a result of the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142 "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets", goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets are no longer subject to amortization. Results are shown on a "reported" basis, as well as before restructure, productivity investments, and goodwill amortization (SFAS No. 142 amortization).
Net Sales
Revenues for the second quarter of 2002 increased by approximately 5% over the comparable quarter of 2001 due to higher Dresser-Rand revenues and the results of acquisitions. Excluding acquisitions, revenues increased by approximately 3%, due mainly to increased volumes at Dresser-Rand and Engineered Solutions. Dresser-Rand revenues in the second quarter were impacted by certain large components that are purchased by Dresser-Rand on behalf of customers and passed through at low margins. The Company continues to make progress in increasing recurring revenues, which include revenues derived from installation, parts and service. Total recurring revenues grew by 14% in the second quarter of 2002 compared to the second quarter of 2001.
Cost of Goods Sold
Cost of goods sold in the second quarter of 2002 was 77.1% of sales as compared to 78.6% in 2001. Excluding productivity investments and SFAS No. 142 amortization, the ratio of cost of goods sold to sales was 76.6% in the second quarter of 2002 and 76.2% in the comparable prior period. The increase was mainly attributable to unfavorable product mix and pricing pressure, which was partially offset by the benefits associated with the restructuring programs and improved productivity.
Selling and Administrative Expenses
Selling and administrative expenses in the second quarter of 2002 were 14.6% of sales as compared to 14.5% in 2001. Excluding productivity investments and SFAS No. 142 amortization, the ratio of selling and administrative expenses to sales was 14.6% in the second quarter of 2002 and 14.1% in the comparable prior period. The increase in the ratio is largely attributable to the acquisition of service oriented businesses that have higher S&A ratios than the company's historical mix of businesses.
Restructuring Charges
Restructure expense, primarily related to severance, was $7.3 million in the second quarter of 2002 as compared to $8.3 million in the comparable second quarter of 2001.
Operating Income
Operating income for the second quarter of 2002 increased by approximately 27%. Excluding restructure expense, productivity investments and SFAS No. 142 amortization, operating income decreased by approximately 4%.
Interest Expense
Interest expense decreased by $1.6 million from $61.1 million in the second quarter of 2001, to $59.5 million in 2002. The decrease is attributable to lower year-over-year debt levels and a decline in interest rates.
Other Income (Expense)
Other income (expense), net, includes foreign exchange activities, equity in earnings of partially owned affiliates, and other miscellaneous income and expense items. Other income (expense), net, aggregated $11.3 million of net expense in the second quarter of 2002 as compared with $2.1 million of net expense in 2001. The difference between the comparable quarters is mainly due to approximately $4.0 million of foreign exchange losses in 2002 and approximately $6.0 million of foreign exchange gains in 2001.
Minority Interests
Charges for minority interests in the second quarter of 2002 were $3.8 million, a decrease of $1.8 million compared to 2001. The second quarter of 2001 included $2.4 million of charges associated with the Company's equity-linked securities, which were converted into approximately 8.3 million common shares in May 2001.
Provision for Income Taxes
The Company's second quarter 2002 provision for income taxes was $24.4 million, as compared to $30.6 million in 2001. The Company's effective tax rate for the second quarter 2002 was 18%, down significantly from the prior year's 33%, as a result of transactions enabled by the Company's reincorporation effective December 31, 2001. The Company is carefully monitoring the current legislative activity concerning inversions and is confident it will be able to achieve an effective tax rate of 18% for 2002. See "Reorganization as a Bermuda Company and Related Risk Factors".
Backlog
Incoming orders for the second quarter of 2002 totaled $2.6 billion, compared to $2.5 billion in the second quarter of 2001. The Company's backlog of orders at June 30, 2002, believed to be firm, was $1.9 billion, which was an increase of approximately $100 million from December 31, 2001.
Results of Operations - Six Months Ended June 30, 2002 and 2001
Net earnings before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle for the first six months of 2002 were $188.3 million, or diluted earnings per share of $1.10 as compared to $112.2 million and $0.69 per share in the comparable period of 2001. All dollar amounts are in millions.
Six months ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
2002 |
2001 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Restructure and Other |
|
|
Restructure and Other |
SFAS |
|
|||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$4,893.3 |
$ - |
$4,893.3 |
$4,750.6 |
$ - |
$ - |
$4,750.6 |
||||||||||||||||
Cost of goods sold |
3,769.2 |
22.3 |
3,746.9 |
3,720.6 |
41.4 |
65.4 |
3,613.8 |
||||||||||||||||
Selling and administrative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Restructuring charges |
19.1 |
19.1 |
- |
31.6 |
31.6 |
- |
- |
||||||||||||||||
Operating income |
$ 378.0 |
$ ( 45.8 |
) |
$ 423.8 |
$ 300.9 |
$ ( 90.9 |
) |
$( 69.8 |
) |
$ 461.6 |
|||||||||||||
Operating margin |
7.7% |
8.7% |
6.3%0 |
9.7% |
Cost of goods sold, and selling and administrative expenses include charges for productivity investments. Productivity investments consist of costs for equipment moving, facility redesign, employee relocation and retraining, and systems enhancements. Charges for productivity investments are expensed as incurred. See "Restructuring" for further discussion. In addition, 2001 reported results include amortization of goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets. As a result of the adoption of SFAS No. 142 "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets", goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets are no longer subject to amortization. Results are shown on a "reported" basis, as well as before restructure, productivity investments, and goodwill and indefinite lived intangible asset amortization (SFAS No. 142 amortization).
Net Sales
Revenues for the first six months of 2002 increased by approximately 3% over the comparable period of 2001 due primarily to the results of acquisitions. Excluding acquisitions, revenues remained constant.
Cost of Goods Sold
Cost of goods sold for the first six months of 2002 was 77.0% of sales as compared to 78.3% in 2001. Excluding productivity investments and SFAS No. 142 amortization, the ratio of cost of goods sold to sales was 76.6% in the first half of 2002 and 76.1% in the comparable prior period. The increase was mainly attributable to unfavorable product mix and pricing pressure, which was
partially offset by the benefits associated with the restructuring programs and improved productivity.
Selling and Administrative Expenses
Selling and administrative expenses in the first six months of 2002 was 14.9% of sales as compared to 14.7% in 2001. Excluding productivity investments and SFAS No. 142 amortization, the ratio of selling and administrative expenses to sales was 14.8% in the first half of 2002 and 14.2% in the comparable prior period. The increase in the ratio is largely attributable to the acquisition of service oriented businesses that have higher S&A ratios than the company's historical mix of businesses.
Restructuring Charges
Restructure expense, primarily related to severance, was $19.1 million in the second quarter of
2002 as compared to $31.6 million in the comparable second quarter of 2001.
Operating Income
Operating income for the first six months of 2002 increased by approximately 26%. Excluding restructure, productivity investments and SFAS No. 142 amortization, operating income decreased by approximately 8%.
Interest Expense
Interest expense decreased by $6.6 million from $125.6 million in the first six months of 2001, to $119.0 million in 2002. The decrease is attributable to lower year-over-year debt levels and a decline in interest rates.
Other Income (Expense)
Other income (expense), net, includes foreign exchange activities, equity in earnings of partially owned affiliates, and other miscellaneous income and expense items. Other income (expense), net, aggregated $21.5 million of net expense in the first six months of 2002 as compared with $5.4 million of net income in 2001. The difference between the comparable periods is mainly due to approximately $3.6 million of foreign exchange losses in 2002 versus approximately $6.0 million of foreign exchange gains in 2001. In addition, 2001 includes a gain of $8.8 million on the sale of stock received in connection with the sale of Dresser-Rand's compression services business.
Minority Interests
Charges for minority interests in the first six months of 2002 were $7.2 million, a decrease of $6.9 million compared to 2001. The first six months of 2001 included $8.6 million of charges associated with the Company's equity-linked securities, which were converted into approximately 8.3 million common shares in May 2001.
Provision for Income Taxes
The Company's provision for income taxes for the first six months of 2002 was $42.0 million, as compared to $54.4 million in 2001. The Company's effective tax rate for the first six months of
2002 was 18%, down significantly from the prior year's 33%, as a result of transactions enabled by the Company's reincorporation effective December 31, 2001. The Company is carefully monitoring the current legislative activity concerning inversions and is confident it will be able to achieve an effective tax rate of 18% for 2002. See "Reorganization as a Bermuda Company and Related Risk Factors".
Restructuring
During the third quarter of 2000, the Company commenced a $325 million restructuring program, which included such actions as plant rationalizations, organizational realignments consistent with the Company's new market-based structure and the consolidation of back-office processes. During the fourth quarter of 2001, the Company commenced a second restructuring program for an additional $150 million to further reduce the general and administrative expenses across the Company. These programs include certain costs that are identified in SAB 100 and EITF 94-3 as restructuring, as well as other related costs that do not meet the criteria to be classified as restructuring. Nonrecurring costs associated with these activities not qualifying as restructuring are referred to as "productivity investments" and have been charged to "Cost of sales" and "Selling and administrative expenses." Productivity investments for the six months ended June 30, 2002 include costs for equipment moving ($3.1 millio n), facility redesign ($10.3 million), employee relocation and retraining ($8.6 million), and systems enhancements and other ($4.7 million). Substantially all income statement activity and cash payments under both programs is expected to be completed by December 31, 2002. Remaining amounts related primarily to ongoing lease commitments and pension liabilities. The Company expects lower costs and improved customer service in all segments as a result of these actions. The Company manages the 2000 and 2001 programs as a single restructuring program totaling $475 million. Therefore, all comments regarding restructure activity refer to both programs combined.
The total employee terminations related to the restructuring program is expected to be approximately 6,000 (excluding Hussmann International, Inc. (Hussmann); See Note 3 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements) by December 31, 2002. These terminations impacted both the salaried and hourly employee groups. The total number of manufacturing facilities to be closed by December 31, 2002 is 21 (excluding Hussmann). Payments for the terminations of employees and facility closures have been made since the inception of the program and will be substantially complete by December 31, 2002.
The planned benefit of the program is estimated to be approximately $225 million on an annual basis once fully implemented. Approximately $10 million of benefits from the above-mentioned actions were realized in the second half of 2000. During 2001, the Company realized approximately $125 million of incremental benefits from the program. Due to the timing of completion of facility related projects, the first year of full realization of the benefits is expected to be 2003.
Management teams that were directly involved with the required actions developed the
projected costs for each project within each segment and the Corporate Center. The costs incurred relating to the restructuring and productivity investments included involuntary employee termination benefits and relocation costs, lease exit costs, equipment write-offs, moving costs, and new site set up costs.
The projected savings identified at the project level were developed by the management teams at the various locations and were based on the historical data that pertained to the specific actions (payroll, benefits, and variable overhead).
A reconciliation of the consolidated restructuring reserve for the 2000 and 2001 programs is as follows:
|
Employee |
|
|
|||
Balance at December 31, 2001 |
$ 34.5 |
$ 7.1 |
$ 41.6 |
|||
Provision |
17.3 |
1.8 |
19.1 |
|||
Cash payments |
( 23.8 |
) |
( 6.8 |
) |
( 30.6 |
) |
Non-cash write-offs |
- |
( 1.5 |
) |
( 1.5 |
) |
|
Balance at June 30, 2002 |
$ 28.0 |
$ 0.6 |
$ 28.6 |
Climate Control
This segment has undergone significant restructuring due to the acquisition of Hussmann in 2000. See Note 3 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. During 2000, Thermo King experienced a reduction in volumes due to a severe recession in the North America truck and trailer markets. Manufacturing facilities became a focus to improve production efficiencies and decrease manufacturing operating costs. In conjunction with the Hussmann acquisition, it was necessary to address these issues to achieve the synergies identified. The approved actions were as follows:
As of June 30, 2002, all five specified manufacturing locations have been closed, the outsourcing of certain product manufacturing was completed, and 1,329 employees have been terminated. An additional 45 employees will be terminated by December 31, 2002.
The expected annual savings is approximately $35 million. For the six months ended June 30, 2002, this segment has realized approximately $10 million of savings.
A reconciliation of the restructuring reserve for the 2000 and 2001 programs is as follows:
Employee termination costs |
Facility exit costs |
|
||||||||||
In millions |
Phase I |
Phase II |
Phase I |
Phase II |
Phase I |
Phase II |
||||||
Balance at December 31, 2001 |
$ 1.6 |
$ 6.9 |
$ - |
$ - |
$ 1.6 |
$ 6.9 |
||||||
Provision |
2.3 |
0.9 |
- |
1.5 |
2.3 |
2.4 |
||||||
Cash payments |
( 1.8 |
) |
( 3.8 |
) |
- |
- |
( 1.8 |
) |
( 3.8 |
) |
||
Non-cash write-offs |
- |
- |
- |
( 1.0 |
) |
- |
( 1.0 |
) |
||||
Balance at June 30, 2002 |
$ 2.1 |
$ 4.0 |
$ - |
$ 0.5 |
$ 2.1 |
$ 4.5 |
Air & Productivity Solutions
Management examined the segment's operations and determined that the consolidation of manufacturing locations and the reduction of selling and administrative expenses were essential to meet its strategic objectives. To achieve a lower cost structure, an Eastern European manufacturing plant was opened enabling the business to compete on a global scale. The severe recession in the worldwide industrial markets necessitated employee terminations to align the cost structure with the volume levels. The approved actions were as follows:
As of June 30, 2002, seven of the specified manufacturing locations have been closed with the final closure to occur by December 31, 2002. Employees terminated as of June 30, 2002 were 1,274 with an additional 38 employees to be terminated by December 31, 2002.
The expected annual savings is approximately $60 million. For the six months ended June 30, 2002, this segment has realized approximately $15 million of savings.
A reconciliation of the restructuring reserve for the 2000 and 2001 programs is as follows:
Employee termination costs |
Facility exit costs |
|
||||||||||
In millions |
Phase I |
Phase II |
Phase I |
Phase II |
Phase I |
Phase II |
||||||
Balance at December 31, 2001 |
$ 3.1 |
$ 3.7 |
$ 2.7 |
$ - |
$ 5.8 |
$ 3.7 |
||||||
Provision |
( 3.1 |
) |
0.7 |
- |
- |
( 3.1 |
) |
0.7 |
||||
Cash payments |
- |
( 3.3 |
) |
( 2.7 |
) |
- |
( 2.7 |
) |
(3.3 |
) |
||
Balance at June 30, 2002 |
$ - |
$ 1.1 |
$ - |
$ - |
$ - |
$ 1.1 |
Engineered Solutions
Management examined the Engineered Solutions' operations and determined that the geographical realignment of the manufacturing footprint was critical to achieve its strategic objectives. To enable the business to compete on a global scale, an Eastern European manufacturing plant was opened. Manufacturing facilities became a focus to improve production efficiencies and decrease manufacturing operating costs. The approved actions were as follows:
As of June 30, 2002, the specified manufacturing location was closed, and 1,138 employees were terminated, with an additional 255 expected by December 31, 2002.
The expected annual savings is approximately $55 million. For the six months ended June 30, 2002, this segment has realized approximately $15 million of savings.
A reconciliation of the restructuring reserve for the 2000 and 2001 programs is as follows:
Employee termination costs |
Facility exit costs |
|
||||||||||
In millions |
Phase I |
Phase II |
Phase I |
Phase II |
Phase I |
Phase II |
||||||
Balance at December 31, 2001 |
$ 1.1 |
$ 2.7 |
$ - |
$ - |
$ 1.1 |
$ 2.7 |
||||||
Provision |
0.7 |
1.2 |
- |
- |
0.7 |
1.2 |
||||||
Cash payments |
- |
( 3.9 |
) |
- |
- |
- |
( 3.9 |
) |
||||
Balance at June 30, 2002 |
$ 1.8 |
$ - |
$ - |
$ - |
$ 1.8 |
$ - |
Dresser-Rand
Management examined the segment's operations and selling and administrative (S&A) expense structure, and determined that the reduction of S&A expenses, as well as the consolidation of its sales regions was essential to meet its strategic objectives. The approved actions were as follows:
As of June 30, 2002, the organizational realignment was complete, all 318 identified employees were terminated, and the closure of the non-manufacturing locations was complete.
As of December 31, 2001, this segment has realized approximately $10 million of savings, which it expects to be the annual savings in future years.
A reconciliation of the restructuring reserve for the 2000 and 2001 programs is as follows:
Employee termination costs |
Facility exit costs |
|
||||||||||
In millions |
Phase I |
Phase II |
Phase I |
Phase II |
Phase I |
Phase II |
||||||
Balance at December 31, 2001 |
$ - |
$ - |
$ - |
$ - |
$ - |
$ - |
||||||
Provision |
1.5 |
- |
- |
- |
1.5 |
- |
||||||
Cash payments |
( 1.5 |
) |
- |
- |
- |
( 1.5 |
) |
- |
||||
Balance at June 30, 2002 |
$ - |
$ - |
$ - |
$ - |
$ - |
$ - |
Infrastructure
Manufacturing facilities became a focus to improve production efficiencies and decrease manufacturing operating costs. The consolidation of the manufacturing locations will enable the business to leverage its capacity when the volumes return. Additional significant management
realignments were essential to the success of the market strategy and to leverage the distribution channels. The approved actions were as follows:
As of June 30, 2002, the two specified manufacturing location were closed, and 696 employees were terminated. An additional 19 employee terminations are expected by December 31, 2002.
The expected annual savings is approximately $29 million. For the six months ended June 30, 2002, this segment has realized approximately $5 million of savings.
A reconciliation of the restructuring reserve for the 2000 and 2001 programs is as follows:
Employee termination costs |
Facility exit costs |
|
||||||||||
In millions |
Phase I |
Phase II |
Phase I |
Phase II |
Phase I |
Phase II |
||||||
Balance at December 31, 2001 |
$ 1.6 |
$ 0.5 |
$ 0.3 |
$ - |
$ 1.9 |
$ 0.5 |
||||||
Provision |
3.7 |
1.6 |
- |
- |
3.7 |
1.6 |
||||||
Cash payments |
( 2.0 |
) |
( 2.0 |
) |
- |
- |
( 2.0 |
) |
( 2.0 |
) |
||
Non-cash write-offs |
- |
- |
( 0.3 |
) |
- |
( 0.3 |
) |
- |
||||
Balance at June 30, 2002 |
$ 3.3 |
$ 0.1 |
$ - |
$ - |
$ 3.3 |
$ 0.1 |
Security & Safety
Manufacturing facilities became a focus to improve production efficiencies and decrease manufacturing operating costs. Management also reviewed the current selling and administrative expense structure and determined that significant actions were required to align the cost structure with the current volume levels. The approved actions were as follows:
As of June 30, 2002, four of the specified manufacturing location were closed and 395 of the 472 employees had been terminated. The final facility closure and employee terminations will occur prior to December 31, 2002.
The expected annual savings is approximately $39 million. For the six months ended June 30, 2002, this segment has realized approximately $10 million of savings.
A reconciliation of the restructuring reserve for the 2000 and 2001 programs is as follows:
Employee termination costs |
Facility exit costs |
|
||||||||||
In millions |
Phase I |
Phase II |
Phase I |
Phase II |
Phase I |
Phase II |
||||||
Balance at December 31, 2001 |
$ 2.4 |
$ - |
$ 4.1 |
$ - |
$ 6.5 |
$ - |
||||||
Provision |
0.3 |
- |
0.3 |
- |
0.6 |
- |
||||||
Cash payments |
( 2.2 |
) |
- |
( 4.1 |
) |
- |
( 6.3 |
) |
- |
|||
Non-cash write-offs |
- |
- |
( 0.2 |
) |
- |
( 0.2 |
) |
- |
||||
Balance at June 30, 2002 |
$ 0.5 |
$ - |
$ 0.1 |
$ - |
$ 0.6 |
$ - |
Corporate Center Restructuring
Management determined that previously decentralized back office functions (such as accounts payable, accounts receivable, benefits administration and payroll) proved to be an inefficient way of managing costs of high volume transactions. The creation of Global Business Services (a shared service center) enabled the Company to consolidate high volume transactions at a lower cost. These actions resulted in employee terminations of 153 as of June 30, 2002, and an additional 243 reduction in staff is expected by December 31, 2002. The restructuring costs associated with corporate are primarily related to the involuntary employee terminations. The savings associated with the corporate restructuring activities are realized in the segments due to the reduction of employees in business units' back office operations.
A reconciliation of the restructuring reserve for the 2000 and 2001 programs is as follows:
Employee termination costs |
Facility exit costs |
|
||||||||||
In millions |
Phase I |
Phase II |
Phase I |
Phase II |
Phase I |
Phase II |
||||||
Balance at December 31, 2001 |
$ 8.6 |
$ 2.3 |
$ - |
$ - |
$ 8.6 |
$ 2.3 |
||||||
Provision |
- |
7.5 |
- |
- |
- |
7.5 |
||||||
Cash payments |
( 0.8 |
) |
( 2.5 |
) |
- |
- |
( 0.8 |
) |
( 2.5 |
) |
||
Balance at June 30, 2002 |
$ 7.8 |
$ 7.3 |
$ - |
$ - |
$ 7.8 |
$ 7.3 |
Review of Business Segments
Reported results for 2001 include amortization of goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets. As a result of the adoption of SFAS No. 142 "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets", goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets are no longer subject to amortization. Segment results are shown on a "reported" basis, as well as before restructure, productivity investments and SFAS No. 142 amortization. All amounts are in millions.
The following table summarizes costs for restructure, productivity investments and SFAS No. 142 amortization by segment, for the three months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001:
2002 |
2001 |
|||||||
|
Productivity |
|
Productivity |
SFAS No. 142 |
||||
Climate Control |
$2.3 |
$ 2.4 |
$ - |
$11.6 |
$21.0 |
|||
Industrial Solutions: |
||||||||
Air & Productivity Solutions |
0.7 |
2.4 |
1.3 |
6.9 |
0.3 |
|||
Dresser-Rand |
0.7 |
- |
- |
2.3 |
2.1 |
|||
Engineered Solutions |
0.7 |
5.3 |
3.4 |
3.5 |
- |
|||
Infrastructure |
- |
1.9 |
0.1 |
3.9 |
6.5 |
|||
Security & Safety |
0.2 |
2.2 |
0.5 |
5.5 |
3.6 |
|||
Corporate |
2.7 |
0.4 |
3.0 |
- |
- |
|||
Total |
$7.3 |
$14.6 |
$8.3 |
$33.7 |
$33.5 |
The following table summarizes costs for restructure, productivity investments and SFAS No. 142 amortization by segment, for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001:
2002 |
2001 |
|||||||
|
Productivity |
|
Productivity |
SFAS No. 142 |
||||
Climate Control |
$ 4.7 |
$ 5.3 |
$10.9 |
$16.1 |
$43.9 |
|||
Industrial Solutions: |
||||||||
Air & Productivity Solutions |
( 2.4 |
) |
4.2 |
1.3 |
9.7 |
1.3 |
||
Dresser-Rand |
1.5 |
- |
1.6 |
5.8 |
4.3 |
|||
Engineered Solutions |
1.9 |
8.2 |
10.5 |
5.2 |
- |
|||
Infrastructure |
5.3 |
4.5 |
3.0 |
8.0 |
13.1 |
|||
Security & Safety |
0.6 |
3.9 |
1.3 |
11.9 |
7.2 |
|||
Corporate |
7.5 |
0.6 |
3.0 |
2.6 |
- |
|||
Total |
$19.1 |
$26.7 |
$31.6 |
$59.3 |
$69.8 |
Climate Control
Climate Control is engaged in the design, manufacture, sale and service of transport temperature control units, HVAC systems, refrigerated display merchandisers, beverage coolers, and walk-in storage coolers and freezers. It includes the market leading brands of Thermo King and Hussmann. All dollar amounts are in millions.
Three months ended June 30, |
Six months ended June 30, |
||||||||||
2002 |
2001 |
2002 |
2001 |
||||||||
Sales |
$615.2 |
$607.3 |
$1,129.7 |
$1,118.8 |
|||||||
Operating income, reported |
37.3 |
11.5 |
60.5 |
1.1 |
|||||||
Operating margin, reported |
6.1 |
% |
1.9 |
% |
5.4 |
% |
0.1 |
% |
|||
Operating income, before restructure, productivity |
|||||||||||
investments and SFAS No. 142 amortization |
42.0 |
44.1 |
70.5 |
72.0 |
|||||||
Operating margin, before restructure, productivity |
|||||||||||
investments and SFAS No. 142 amortization |
6.8 |
% |
7.3 |
% |
6.2 |
% |
6.4 |
% |
Climate Control revenues for the second quarter 2002 increased by approximately 1% compared to the second quarter of 2001. The results of acquisitions accounted for approximately 4% of the increase in revenues, while lower volumes decreased revenues by approximately 3%. On a comparable basis, operating income decreased by $2.1 million while operating margins declined from 7.3% in 2001 to 6.8% in 2002. The benefits associated with the restructuring programs and improved productivity increased operating income by approximately 22%, while favorable pricing over the comparable prior period increased operating income by approximately 10%. These increases were more than offset by lower volumes and unfavorable product mix, which decreased operating income by approximately 16% and other decreases such as increased warranty expenses and increased investment due to the startup of the Retail Solutions initiative, which decreased operating income by approximately 18%.
Climate Control revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2002 increased by approximately 1% compared to the six months ended June 30, 2001. The results of acquisitions accounted for approximately 6% of the increase in revenues, while lower volumes decreased revenues by approximately 5%. On a comparable basis, operating income decreased by $1.5 million while operating margins declined from 6.4% in 2001 to 6.2% in 2002. The benefits associated with the restructuring programs and improved productivity increased operating income by approximately 30%, while favorable pricing over the comparable prior period increased operating income by approximately 8%. These increases were more than offset by lower volumes and unfavorable product mix, which decreased operating income by approximately 33% and other decreases such as increased warranty expenses and increased investment due to the startup of the Retail Solutions initiative, which decreased operating income by approximately 6%.
Industrial Solutions
Industrial Solutions is composed of a diverse group of businesses focused on providing solutions to enhance customers' industrial efficiency. Industrial Solutions consists of the following three segments: Air and Productivity Solutions, Dresser-Rand and Engineered Solutions.
Air & Productivity Solutions
Air & Productivity Solutions is engaged in the design, manufacture, sale and service of air compressors, fluid products, microturbines and industrial tools. All dollar amounts are in millions.
Three months ended June 30, |
Six months ended June 30, |
|||||||
2002 |
2001 |
2002 |
2001 |
|||||
Sales |
$323.1 |
$335.1 |
$633.2 |
$665.2 |
||||
Operating income, reported |
13.9 |
14.7 |
39.5 |
49.5 |
||||
Operating margin, reported |
4.3 |
% |
4.4 |
% |
6.2 |
% |
7.4 |
% |
Operating income, before restructure, productivity |
||||||||
investments and SFAS No. 142 amortization |
17.0 |
23.2 |
41.3 |
61.8 |
||||
Operating margin, before restructure, productivity |
||||||||
investments and SFAS No. 142 amortization |
5.3 |
% |
6.9 |
% |
6.5 |
% |
9.3 |
% |
Air & Productivity Solutions' revenues for the second quarter 2002 decreased by approximately 4% compared to the second quarter of 2001, due mainly to lower volumes. On a comparable basis, operating income decreased by $6.2 million while operating margins declined from 6.9% in 2001 to 5.3% in 2002. The benefits associated with the restructuring programs and improved productivity increased operating income by approximately 48%. This increase was more than offset by lower volumes and unfavorable product mix, which decreased operating income by approximately 44%, and higher benefit and insurance costs, which decreased operating income by approximately 16%. In addition, increased investment in developing the PowerWorks microturbine business also had a negative impact.
Air & Productivity Solutions' revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2002 decreased by approximately 5% compared to the six months ended June 30, 2001, due mainly to lower volumes. On a comparable basis, operating income decreased by $20.5 million while operating
margins declined from 9.3% in 2001 to 6.5% in 2002. The benefits associated with the restructuring programs and improved productivity increased operating income by approximately 34%. This increases was more than offset by lower volumes and unfavorable product mix, which decreased operating income by approximately 35%, and higher benefit and insurance costs, which decreased operating income by approximately 14%. In addition, increased investment in developing the PowerWorks microturbine business also had a negative impact.
Dresser-Rand
Dresser-Rand is engaged in the design, manufacture, sale and service of gas compressors, gas and steam turbines, and generators. All dollar amounts are in millions.
Three months ended June 30, |
Six months ended June 30, |
||||||||||||
2002 |
2001 |
2002 |
2001 |
||||||||||
Sales |
$234.7 |
$181.7 |
$446.5 |
$362.8 |
|||||||||
Operating income (expense), reported |
0.2 |
( 5.5 |
) |
( 0.2 |
) |
( 12.9 |
) |
||||||
Operating margin, reported |
0.1 |
% |
( 3.0 |
)% |
0.0 |
% |
( 3.6 |
)% |
|||||
Operating income (expense), before restructure, productivity investments and SFAS No. 142 amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Operating margin, before restructure, productivity |
|||||||||||||
investments and SFAS No. 142 amortization |
0.4 |
% |
( 0.6 |
)% |
0.3 |
% |
( 0.3 |
)% |
Dresser-Rand revenues for the second quarter 2002 increased by approximately 29% compared to the second quarter of 2001, while operating income and margins also increased. The improved results reflect volume increases and ongoing cost reductions. In addition, both revenues and margins were impacted by certain large components that are purchased by Dresser-Rand on behalf of customers and passed through at low margins.
Dresser-Rand revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2002 increased by approximately 23% compared to six months ended June 30, 2001, while operating margins also increased. The improved results reflect volume increases and ongoing cost reductions. In addition, both revenues and margins were impacted by certain large components that are purchased by Dresser-Rand on behalf of customers and passed through at low margins.
Engineered Solutions
Engineered Solutions is engaged in the design, manufacture, sale and service of precision bearing products and motion control components and assemblies. It provides motion control applications to both the automotive OEM and industrial aftermarkets. All dollar amounts are in millions.
Three months ended June 30, |
Six months ended June 30, |
|||||||
2002 |
2001 |
2002 |
2001 |
|||||
Sales |
$321.1 |
$270.0 |
$610.0 |
$542.3 |
||||
Operating income, reported |
20.9 |
20.4 |
37.0 |
35.7 |
||||
Operating margin, reported |
6.5 |
% |
7.6 |
% |
6.1 |
% |
6.6 |
% |
Operating income, before restructure, productivity |
||||||||
investments and SFAS No. 142 amortization |
26.9 |
27.3 |
47.1 |
51.4 |
||||
Operating margin, before restructure, productivity |
||||||||
investments and SFAS No. 142 amortization |
8.4 |
% |
10.1 |
% |
7.7 |
% |
9.5 |
% |
Engineered Solutions' revenues for the second quarter 2002 increased by approximately 19% compared to the second quarter of 2001. The results of the acquisition of Nadella and higher volumes accounted for an increase in revenues of approximately 12% and 8%, respectively. The partial offset in revenues was due to unfavorable pricing over the comparable prior period. On a comparable basis, operating income decreased by $0.4 million while operating margins declined from 10.1% in 2001 to 8.4% in 2002. The benefits associated with the restructuring programs and improved productivity increased operating income by approximately 26%, while higher volumes and favorable product mix increased operating income by approximately 33%. These increases were more than offset by unfavorable pricing over the comparable prior period, which decreased operating income by approximately 29%, and higher benefit and insurance costs, which decreased operating income by approximately 31%.
Engineered Solutions' revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2002 increased by approximately 12% compared to the six months ended June 30, 2001. The results of the acquisition of Nadella and higher volumes accounted for an increase in revenues of approximately 12% and 2%, respectively. The partial offset in revenues was due to unfavorable pricing over the comparable prior period. On a comparable basis, operating income decreased by $4.3 million while operating margins declined from 9.5% in 2001 to 7.7% in 2002. The benefits
associated with the restructuring programs and improved productivity increased operating income by approximately 37%. This increase was more than offset by unfavorable pricing over the comparable prior period, which decreased operating income by approximately 16%, and higher benefit and insurance costs, which decreased operating income by approximately 31%.
Infrastructure
Infrastructure is engaged in the design, manufacture, sale and service of skid-steer loaders, mini-excavators, electric and gasoline powered golf and utility vehicles, portable compressors and light towers, road construction and repair equipment, and a broad line of drills and drill accessories. All dollar amounts are in millions.
Three months ended June 30, |
Six months ended June 30, |
||||||||||
2002 |
2001 |
2002 |
2001 |
||||||||
Sales |
$729.3 |
$719.8 |
$1,364.4 |
$1,381.1 |
|||||||
Operating income, reported |
89.7 |
84.9 |
152.4 |
155.8 |
|||||||
Operating margin, reported |
12.3 |
% |
11.8 |
% |
11.2 |
% |
11.3 |
% |
|||
Operating income, before restructure, productivity |
|||||||||||
investments and SFAS No. 142 amortization |
91.6 |
95.4 |
162.2 |
179.9 |
|||||||
Operating margin, before restructure, productivity |
|||||||||||
investments and SFAS No. 142 amortization |
12.6 |
% |
13.3 |
% |
11.9 |
% |
13.0 |
% |
Infrastructure revenues for the second quarter 2002 increased by approximately 1% compared to the second quarter of 2001. The increase was mainly attributable to higher volumes from new product introductions and higher market shares at Bobcat and Club Car, which resulted in an increase of approximately 1%, while the positive results of acquisitions were offset by unfavorable pricing over the comparable prior period. On a comparable basis, operating income
decreased by $3.8 million while operating margins declined from 13.3% in 2001 to 12.6% in 2002. The benefits associated with the restructuring programs and improved productivity increased operating income by approximately 6%, while higher volumes and favorable product mix increased operating income by approximately 3%. These increases were more than offset by unfavorable pricing over the comparable prior period, which decreased operating income by approximately 4% and other decreases, such as increased warranty expenses, which decreased operating income by approximately 9%.
Infrastructure revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2002 decreased by approximately 1% compared to the six months ended June 30, 2001. The decrease was mainly attributable to lower volumes. On a comparable basis, operating income decreased by $17.7 million while operating margins declined from 13.0% in 2001 to 11.9% in 2002. The benefits associated with the restructuring programs and improved productivity increased operating income by approximately 4%. This increase was more than offset by unfavorable pricing over the comparable prior period, which decreased operating income by approximately 2%, lower volumes and unfavorable product mix, which decreased operating income by approximately 5%, and other decreases, such as increased warranty expenses, which decreased operating income by approximately 6%.
Security & Safety
Security & Safety is engaged in the design, manufacture, sale and service of locks, door closers, exit devices, door control hardware, doors and frames, portable security products, decorative hardware, and electronic and biometric access control systems. All dollar amounts are in millions.
Three months ended June 30, |
Six months ended June 30, |
|||||||
2002 |
2001 |
2002 |
2001 |
|||||
Sales |
$364.0 |
$345.4 |
$709.5 |
$680.4 |
||||
Operating income, reported |
64.3 |
56.3 |
130.4 |
110.6 |
||||
Operating margin, reported |
17.7 |
% |
16.3 |
% |
18.4 |
% |
16.3 |
% |
Operating income, before restructure, productivity |
||||||||
investments and SFAS No. 142 amortization |
66.7 |
65.9 |
134.9 |
131.0 |
||||
Operating margin, before restructure, productivity |
||||||||
investments and SFAS No. 142 amortization |
18.3 |
% |
19.1 |
% |
19.0 |
% |
19.3 |
% |
Security & Safety revenues for the second quarter 2002 increased by approximately 5% compared to the second quarter of 2001. The results of acquisitions accounted for an approximate 2% increase in revenues, with the remaining increase mainly attributable to higher volumes. On a comparable basis, operating income increased by $0.8 million while operating margins declined from 19.1% in 2001 to 18.3% in 2002. The benefits associated with the restructuring programs and improved productivity increased operating income by approximately 7%. This increase was more than offset by higher benefit and insurance costs, which decreased operating income by approximately 4%, and continued investment in security and safety growth initiatives, which decreased operating income by approximately 5%.
Security & Safety revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2002 increased by approximately 4% compared to the six months ended June 30, 2001. The results of acquisitions accounted for an approximate 2% increase in revenues, with the remaining increase mainly attributable to higher volumes. On a comparable basis, operating income increased by $3.9 million while
operating margins declined from 19.3% in 2001 to 19.0% in 2002. The benefits associated with the restructuring programs and improved productivity increased operating income by approximately 7%, while the favorable results of acquisitions increased operating income by approximately 5%. These increases were more than offset by higher benefit and insurance costs, which decreased operating income by approximately 4%, and continued investment in security and safety growth initiatives, which decreased operating income by approximately 5%.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company's debt-to-total capital ratio at June 30, 2002, was approximately 50%, compared with 46% reported at December 31, 2001. The impairment charge taken in connection with the adoption of SFAS No. 142 had a negative impact on the company's debt-to-total capital ratio. However, the impairment charge will not impact the company's liquidity or access to capital markets. The company's public debt has no financial covenants and its $2.5 billion revolving credit line has a debt-to-total capital covenant of 65%, which is calculated excluding the impairment charge relating to SFAS No. 142.
The Company's working capital was a negative $249.3 million at June 30, 2002, compared to $336.8 million at December 31, 2001. The decrease is primarily related to the reclassification of approximately $700 million of debt, which matures in February 2003, from long-term to short-
term. The Company anticipates meeting its short-term debt obligations by utilizing operating cash flow or various means of refinancing available if necessary.
During the first six months of 2002, foreign currency translation adjustments resulted in a net increase of $77.3 million in shareowners' equity. Currency fluctuations in the euro accounted for the majority of the change.
Environmental Matters
The Company is party to environmental lawsuits and claims, and has received notices of potential violations of environmental laws and regulations from the Environmental Protection Agency and similar state authorities. It is identified as a potentially responsible party (PRP) for cleanup costs associated with off-site waste disposal at federal Superfund and state remediation sites. At some of these sites, the Company's records disclose no involvement or
the Company's liability has been fully determined. For all sites there are other PRPs and in most instances, the Company's site involvement is minimal.
In estimating its liability, the Company has not assumed it will bear the entire cost of remediation of any site to the exclusion of other PRPs who may be jointly and severally liable. The ability of other PRPs to participate has been taken into account, based generally on the parties' financial condition and probable contributions on a per site basis. Additional lawsuits and claims involving environmental matters are likely to arise from time to time in the future.
Although uncertainties regarding environmental technology, U.S. federal and state laws and regulations and individual site information make estimating the liability difficult, management believes that the total liability for the cost of remediation and environmental lawsuits and claims will not have a material effect on the financial condition, results of operations, liquidity or cash flows of the Company for any year. It should be noted that when the Company estimates its liability for environmental matters, such estimates are based on current technologies, and the Company does not discount its liability or assume any insurance recoveries.
Acquisitions
In June 2002, the Company acquired Electronic Technologies Corporation (ETC), based in Dover Plains, New York, for approximately $22 million. ETC provides specialty security systems integration, serving as a single source for integrating a facility's access control, closed circuit television and fire/life safety systems. The final purchase price may be increased by approximately $15 million based upon certain future operating goals as specified in the contract.
In May 2002, the Company acquired a 51 percent interest in Superay, a manufacturer of tools and related products based in Jin Tan, China, for approximately $3 million.
In the first quarter, the Company acquired a 30% interest in CISA S.p.A. (CISA), a European manufacturer of mechanical and electronic security products, for approximately $60 million.
CISA operates worldwide and will enable the Company to provide customers with a complete portfolio of security products in the Americas and the European and Asia Pacific markets.
New Accounting Standards
In June 2002, SFAS No. 146 "Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities" was issued. The standard requires that a liability for a cost that is associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized when the liability is incurred. It nullifies the guidance of EITF No. 94-3, which recognized a liability for an exit cost on the date an entity committed itself to an exit plan. The standard will be effective for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002. The company is currently reviewing the provisions of SFAS No. 146 to determine its impact upon adoption.
In June 2001, SFAS No. 143, "Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations" was issued. The standard requires that legal obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets be recorded at fair value when incurred and is effective for the Company on January 1, 2003. The Company is currently reviewing the provisions of SFAS No. 143 to determine the standards impact upon adoption.
Safe Harbor Statement
Information provided by the Company in reports such as this report on Form 10-Q, in press releases and in statements made by employees in oral discussions, to the extent the information is not historical fact, constitutes "forward looking statements" within the meaning of the Securities Exchange Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Forward looking statements by their nature involve risk and uncertainty.
The Company cautions that a variety of factors, including but not limited to the following, could cause business conditions and results to differ from those expected by the Company: changes in the rate of economic growth in the United States and in other major international economies; significant changes in trade, monetary and fiscal policies worldwide; tax legislation; currency fluctuations among the U.S. dollar and other currencies; demand for company products and services; distributor inventory levels; failure to achieve the Company's productivity targets; and competitor actions including unanticipated pricing actions or new product introductions.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
The Company is exposed to fluctuations in the price of major raw materials used in the manufacturing process, foreign currency fluctuations and interest rate changes. From time to time the Company enters into agreements to reduce its raw material, foreign currency and interest rate risks. Such agreements hedge only specific transactions or commitments. To minimize the risk of counterparty nonperformance, such agreements are made only through major financial institutions with significant experience in such financial instruments.
The Company generates foreign currency exposures in the normal course of business. To mitigate the risk from foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, the Company will generally enter into forward currency exchange contracts or options for the purchase or sale of a currency in accordance with the Company's policies and procedures. The Company applies sensitivity analysis and value at risk (VAR) techniques when measuring the Company's exposure to currency fluctuations. VAR is a measurement of the estimated loss in fair value until currency positions can be neutralized, recessed or liquidated and assumes a 95% confidence level with normal market conditions.
The Company maintains significant operations in countries other than the U.S.; therefore, the movement of the U.S. dollar against foreign currencies has an impact on the Company's financial position. Generally, the functional currency of the Company's non-U.S. subsidiaries is their local currency. The Company manages exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates through its normal operations and financing activities, as well as through the use of forward exchange contracts and options. The Company attempts, through its hedging activities, to mitigate the impact on income of changes in foreign exchange rates.
Reorganization as a Bermuda Company and Related Risk Factors
On December 31, 2001, Ingersoll-Rand Company (IR-New Jersey) was effectively reorganized as Ingersoll-Rand Company Limited, a Bermuda company (the Reorganization). The Company believes that its Reorganization as a Bermuda company will enable it to realize a variety of potential, financial and strategic benefits, including to:
To consummate the Reorganization, IR Merger Corporation, a New Jersey corporation, merged into IR-New Jersey, with IR-New Jersey as the surviving company. Upon the merger, IR-New Jersey became a wholly owned, indirect subsidiary of the Company, and the outstanding shares of IR-New Jersey common stock were automatically cancelled in exchange for the issue of the Company's Class A common shares. In addition, as part of the Reorganization, IR-New Jersey and certain of its subsidiaries transferred shares of certain existing subsidiaries and issued certain debt to the Company in exchange for 135,250,003 shares of the Company's Class B common shares, such amount of shares being subject to adjustment based on the results of final valuation of the transferred subsidiaries. The number of Class B common shares issued had an aggregate value equal to the fair market value of the shares of the subsidiaries transferred (the transferred shares) and the amount of debt issued to the Company based on the ma
rket value of IR-New Jersey common stock at the effective time of the merger. Prior to the Reorganization, neither the
Company nor IR-Merger Corporation had any significant assets or capitalization or engaged in any business or other activities other than in connection with formation and the merger and related reorganization transactions.
The Reorganization will expose the Company to the risks described below. In addition, the Company cannot be assured that the anticipated benefits of the Reorganization will be realized.
The Reorganization and related transfers of assets could result in a taxable gain.
There is a possibility of U.S. withholding tax if the Internal Revenue Service successfully disputes the value of the transferred shares. Therefore, while the Company believes that neither IR-New Jersey nor the Company will incur significant U.S. federal income or withholding taxes as a result of the transfer of the transferred shares, its projections will not be binding on the Internal Revenue Service. The Company cannot be assured that its anticipated tax costs with respect to the transferred shares will be borne out, that the Internal Revenue Service will not contest its determination, or that the Internal Revenue Service will not succeed in any such contest.
Certain of the Company's shareholders may be subject to additional tax if the Company or any of its non-U.S. subsidiaries are considered a "controlled foreign corporation" or "CFC" under current U.S. tax laws.
A non-U.S. corporation (a foreign corporation), such as the Company, will constitute a "controlled foreign corporation" or "CFC" for U.S. federal income tax purposes if U.S. shareholders owning (directly, indirectly, or constructively) 10% or more of the foreign corporation's total combined voting power collectively own (directly, indirectly, or constructively) more than 50% of the total combined voting power or total value of the foreign corporation's shares. Following the merger and as of December 31, 2001, IR-New Jersey,
through its ownership of the non-voting Class B common shares, owned approximately 45% of the total value of the Company's shares. As a consequence, any Class A common shareholder who is considered to own 10% of the voting power in the Company could cause the Company's foreign subsidiaries or (if the Internal Revenue Service successfully takes the position that the Class B common shares held by IR-New Jersey in the Company are voting shares) the Company itself to be treated as a CFC.
If the Company or any of its foreign subsidiaries are treated as a CFC, this status should have no adverse effect on any of the Company's shareholders who do not own (directly, indirectly, or constructively) 10% or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of the Company's shares or the shares of any of its foreign subsidiaries. If, however, the Company or any of its foreign subsidiaries are treated as a CFC for an uninterrupted period of 30 days or more during any taxable year, any U.S. shareholder who owns (directly, indirectly, or constructively) 10% or more of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the company or the subsidiary on any day during the taxable year and who directly or indirectly owns any stock in the corporation the last day of such year in which it is a CFC will have to include in its gross income for U.S. federal income tax purposes its pro rata share of the corporation's "subpart F income" relating to the period during which the corpora tion is a CFC.
In addition, the gain on the sale of the Company's shares, if treated as a CFC, realized by such a shareholder would be treated as ordinary income to the extent of the shareholder's proportionate share of the Company's and its CFC subsidiaries' undistributed earnings and profits accumulated during the shareholder's holding period of the shares while the Company is a CFC.
If the U.S. shareholder is a corporation, however, it may be eligible to credit against its U.S. tax liability with respect to these potential inclusions foreign taxes paid on the earnings and profits associated with the included income. A disposition of shares by a U.S. shareholder may result in termination of the Company's CFC status or the CFC status of its foreign subsidiaries.
The Internal Revenue Service and non-U.S. taxing authorities may not agree with the Company's tax treatment of various items relating to the Reorganization.
The Company believes that the Reorganization will help enhance its business growth and cash flow and reduce its worldwide effective tax rate. However, the Company cannot give any assurance as to the amount of taxes it will pay as a result of or after the Reorganization. The amount of taxes it will pay will depend in part on the treatment given the Company by the taxing authorities in the jurisdictions in which it operates.
The Company may become subject to U.S. corporate income tax, which would reduce its net income.
Prior to the Reorganization, IR-New Jersey was subject to U.S. corporate income tax on its worldwide income. After the Reorganization, the earnings of IR-New Jersey and its U.S. subsidiaries continue to be subject to U.S. corporate income tax. The Company believes that after the Reorganization its non-U.S. operations will generally not be subject to U.S. tax other
than withholding taxes. However, if the Internal Revenue Service successfully contends that the Company or any of its non-U.S. affiliates are engaged in a trade or business in the U.S., the Company or that non-U.S. affiliate would, subject to possible income tax treaty exemptions, be required to pay U.S. corporate income tax and/or branch profits tax on income that is effectively connected with such trade or business.
Changes in laws or regulations could adversely affect the Company and its subsidiaries.
Changes in tax laws, treaties or regulations or the interpretation or enforcement thereof could adversely affect the tax consequences of the Reorganization to the Company and its subsidiaries. In this connection, bills have been introduced in the United States Congress which, if enacted, could substantially reduce or eliminate the tax benefits resulting from the Reorganization.
There are also proposed U.S. legislative and regulatory actions which could reduce or eliminate the ability of the Company or its subsidiaries to enter into contracts with governmental authorities.
Anti-takeover provisions in the Company's bye-laws and its shareholder rights plan mirror certain anti-takeover provisions that were in effect with respect to IR-New Jersey prior to the Reorganization.
Provisions in the Company's bye-laws and shareholder rights plan, which mirror certain provisions that were in IR-New Jersey's certificate of incorporation, by-laws and shareholder rights plan and certain provisions of the New Jersey Business Corporation Act (the NJBCA), could discourage unsolicited takeover bids from third parties or the removal of incumbent management. As a result, it may be less likely that a shareholder will receive premium prices for their shares in an unsolicited takeover by another party. These provisions include:
Similar to the authority of IR-New Jersey's board of directors prior to the Reorganization, the Company's board of directors also may issue preference shares and determine their rights and qualifications. The issuance of preference shares may delay, defer or prevent a merger (referred to under Bermuda law as an "amalgamation"), tender offer or proxy contest involving the Company. This may cause the market price of the Company's Class A common shares to significantly decrease.
The enforcement of judgments in shareholder suits against the Company may be more difficult than it would have been to enforce shareholder suits against IR-New Jersey.
The Company has been advised that a judgment for the payment of money rendered by a court in the United States based on civil liability would not be automatically enforceable in Bermuda. It has also been advised that with respect to a final and conclusive judgment obtained in a court of competent jurisdiction in the United States under which a sum of money is payable (other than a sum of money payable in respect of multiple damages, taxes or other charges of a like nature or in respect of a fine or other penalty), a Bermuda court would be expected to enforce a judgment based thereon, provided that (a) such courts had proper jurisdiction over the parties subject to such judgment, (b) such courts did not contravene the rules of natural justice of Bermuda, (c) such judgment was not obtained by fraud, (d) the enforcement of the judgment would not be contrary to the public policy of Bermuda, (e) no new admissible evidence relevant to the action is submitted prior to the rendering of the jud gment by the courts of Bermuda and (f) there is due compliance with the correct procedures under the laws of Bermuda.
As a result, it may be difficult for a holder of the Company's securities to effect service of process within the United States or to enforce judgments obtained against the Company in U.S. courts. The Company has irrevocably agreed that it may be served with process with respect to actions based on offers and sales of securities made in the United States by having Ingersoll-Rand Company, 200 Chestnut Ridge Road, Woodcliff Lake, New Jersey 07677, be its U.S. agent appointed for that purpose.
A Bermuda court may impose civil liability on the Company or its directors or officers in a suit brought in the Supreme Court of Bermuda against the Company or such persons with respect to a violation of U.S. federal securities laws, provided that the facts surrounding such violation would constitute or give rise to a cause of action under Bermuda law.
INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY LIMITED
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 6 - Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
Exhibit No. Description
99.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
99.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
A Current Report on Form 8-K (Item 9) dated July 19, 2002, reporting the filing of Exhibit 99.1 - Press Release issued by Ingersoll-Rand Company Limited, announcing financial results for the second quarter and year to date 2002, and Exhibit 99.2 - Chairman's Comments, second quarter 2002 conference call discussing the second quarter and year to date financial results.
INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY LIMITED
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY LIMITED
(Registrant)
Date August 14, 2002 |
/s/ T.R. McLevish |
|
T.R. McLevish, Senior Vice President & |
|
Principal Financial Officer |
Date August 14, 2002 |
/s/ S.R. Shawley |
|
S.R. Shawley, Vice President & Controller |
|
Principal Accounting Officer |
|
|
|
|