Back to GetFilings.com

Table of Contents

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

FOR ANNUAL AND TRANSITION REPORTS

PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

(Mark One)

For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003

or

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission file number 0-18603

INTEGRAL SYSTEMS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant’s telephone number , including area code: (301) 731-4233

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, par value $.01 per share

(Title of class)

(Title of class)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2) Yes x No ¨

As of the last business day of the Registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, the aggregate market value of the Common Stock of the Registrant (based upon the average bid and asked prices of the Common Stock as reported by the market makers) held by non-affiliates of the Registrant was $193,266,877.

As of November 14, 2003, 9,726,802 shares of the Common Stock of the Registrant were outstanding.

Table of Contents

INDEX

PART 1

i

Table of Contents

INDEX (CONTINUED)

ii

Table of Contents

PART 1

Company Overview

Integral Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) builds satellite ground systems for command and control, integration and test, data processing, and simulation. Since its inception in 1982, the Company has provided ground systems for over 190 different satellite missions for communications, science, meteorology and earth resource applications. The Company has an established domestic and international customer base that includes government and commercial satellite operators, spacecraft and payload manufacturers, and aerospace systems integrators.

The Company has developed innovative software products that reduce the cost and minimize the development risk associated with traditional, custom-built systems. The Company believes that it was the first to offer a comprehensive commercial-off-the-shelf (“COTS”) software product line for command and control. As a systems integrator, the Company leverages these products to provide turnkey satellite control facilities that can operate multiple satellites from any manufacturer. These systems offer significant cost savings for customers that have traditionally purchased a separate custom control center for each of their satellites.

Through its wholly owned subsidiaries, SAT Corporation and Newpoint Technologies Inc., the Company offers complementary ground system components and systems. This includes turnkey systems, hardware, and software for satellite and terrestrial communications signal monitoring, network and ground equipment monitoring and control, and satellite data processing.

Through its wholly owned subsidiary, Real Time Logic, Inc. (“RT Logic”), which was acquired in October 2002, the Company manufactures satellite communications equipment and systems, principally for military applications. This equipment is used in satellite tracking stations, control centers, spacecraft factories, and range facilites. See Footnote 2 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere herein for more information regarding the acquisition of RT Logic.

In July 2003, the Company acquired the intellectual property rights, inventory and certain other assets of the former Jackson & Tull Satellite Ground Systems division. The acquisition is an extension of the satellite ground systems business segment and enables the Company to be a “turn-key” provider of full motion antennas and RF systems used for tracking low earth orbiting satellites and launch vehicles as well as aeronautical telemetry range operations. See Footnote 2 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere herein for more information.

Integral Systems, Inc. is a Maryland corporation, ISO 9000 certified, and was incorporated in 1982.

Industry Background

The space industry can be broken down into the following industry sectors: infrastructure, communications, emerging applications, and support services. Each of these sectors is funded by both government and commercial investments. Space infrastructure encompasses the development, manufacture and procurement of hardware and related systems for both space assets (i.e., satellites and payloads) and ground assets (i.e., satellite ground systems). The Company’s business is focused in the ground system component of the infrastructure sector. The communications sector of the space industry includes revenue generated by satellite systems for commercial telecommunications services and government and military communications. Satellite technology has become critical to supporting many aspects of telecommunications infrastructure, including long-distance telephone, personal communications systems, and private networks. The emerging applications market includes space technologies utilized for new applications such as global positioning systems and remote sensing. Support services for the space industry include technical support, engineering, finance and consulting, which facilitate growth in space-related markets.

1

Table of Contents

The Company estimates that the current worldwide command and control market represents approximately $3 billion in annual revenues. However, the Company also believes that the increasing acceptance of COTS products will lead to substantial price reductions and a subsequent decrease in market volume. The Company believes that its COTS software products leave it well positioned to capitalize on this market trend, resulting in an increase in both its revenues and market share.

The Company Solution

The Company is currently a leading provider of satellite command and control systems, providing systems for a wide variety of satellites. The Company intends to extend its leadership and to expand its market share in world command and control solutions for users of all satellite types.

The Company offers satellite ground systems products, systems, and services that provide low-cost, efficient and flexible satellite operations systems. The principal characteristics of the Company’s approach are as follows:

Advanced Architecture. Unlike the traditional host-based approach, the Company’s ground systems are fully distributed, consisting of a set of workstations all communicating via a local area network (“LAN”) backbone. Any software function can be performed on any workstation, eliminating the host computer bottleneck and allowing the processing and network loading to be fine-tuned by reallocation of logical processes to physical hardware. This approach also provides more reliable operations by eliminating single points of failure.

Depth of Functionality. The Company’s core product line, EPOCH IPS (Integrated Product Suite), supports satellite operations through a suite of integrated software products. This includes products for real-time satellite control and monitoring, off-line data trending, orbit analysis, and database configuration. The Company’s real-time products perform daily and routine satellite operations, including commanding, telemetry processing and fault detection and correction. The trending package supports sustaining engineering functions, including trending and statistical analysis of data archived by the real-time system. The orbit analysis package performs orbit determination and prediction functions to monitor and control the position of a satellite in space. The database package tailors the performance of the other three packages, which are general in scope, to the specific requirements of each satellite mission. That is, the database defines the telemetry and command characteristics and the desired orbital elements and tolerances.

Mixed Fleet Operations. The Company’s products are compatible with all the world’s major manufacturer’s satellite models. This enables the company to provide a single product solution to operators who own fleets of mixed satellite models. Where previously, these operators would have several different types of ground systems for their fleet, a single, expandable system from Integral Systems will operate the entire fleet. This reduces the end user’s costs for procurement, training, support, and spare parts. It also reduces their incremental costs to add a new satellite to the fleet and provides a safer operations environment due to reduced complexity associated with a single solution.

Flexibility/Adaptability. A critical element to achieving initial operator acceptance of a new system and facilitating rapid implementation is the ability of the Company’s software to serve the needs of particular satellite systems. All of the Company’s software is database driven, allowing it to support satellite design changes or different series of satellites, without modifying the underlying software. Similarly, the software also supports a wide range of COTS hardware, including antenna, radio frequency (“RF”) and baseband equipment, allowing the total system to be delivered in the most efficient configuration for each mission. Finally, the software is supported on all the most widely used computer platforms, including Sun Solaris, IBM AIX, and Windows 2000/XP.

Superior Price/Performance. The Company seeks to achieve superior price/performance by providing comprehensive solutions within the budgetary needs of its customers. The Company believes that its COTS software products provide advanced yet cost-effective solutions for satellite operators. These COTS software products eliminate the need for expensive development services, thereby substantially reducing the overall cost of a ground system. The Company’s database driven software allows satellites to be added over time, which permits the initial system acquisition costs to be amortized over years of operations. The Company believes its software products exceed industry expectations in functionality, technical sophistication and ease of use.

2

Table of Contents

Company Strategy

The Company is currently a leading provider of satellite command and control systems, providing systems for a wide variety of satellites. The Company intends to extend its leadership and to expand its market share in world command and control solutions for users of all satellite types. Primary elements of the Company’s strategy include:

Technological Leadership. The Company intends to continue to commit substantial resources to further develop the next generation of its off-the-shelf software products upon which all its delivered systems are built. In addition, because the satellite infrastructure industry is increasingly requiring standards compliance, the Company intends to adhere to existing and future industry standards and participate in the further development of such standards.

Strategic Alliances and Partnerships. In addition to its own development and marketing organization, the Company has and will continue to establish partnerships with select third parties, primarily satellite and hardware manufacturers, to assist the Company in successfully integrating its software products, implementing total solution command and control systems, and developing customer relationships.

Integration with Complementary Products. The Company believes that its ability to offer command and control software products that can integrate seamlessly with all satellite types and ground system components is a key competitive advantage. The Company also intends to integrate its software products with complementary products, including visualization tools, scheduling engines and decision support aids in order to maintain its competitive advantage and provide maximum flexibility for its customers.

Sales, Support, Service and Marketing Organizations. The Company currently sells and supports its software and systems through direct sales to satellite operators and systems integrators in North America, Europe and Asia. From its headquarters in Lanham, MD, the company performs worldwide marketing, sales, and services including its direct marketing efforts with U.S. Government organizations to capitalize on the growing acceptance of COTS solutions in the government sphere. The Company’s Colorado Springs office serves as the focal point for the Company’s support of its services, products and operations provided to the U.S. Air Force. Through its wholly owned European subsidiary, Integral Systems Europe S.A.S., with headquarters in Toulouse, France the company provides sales, marketing, support, and engineering services to the European market.

Professional Services Capabilities. The Company believes that providing comprehensive services and a high level of customer support is critical to its ability to maintain its leading position in command and control systems and to expand into new markets. Therefore, the Company intends to expand its professional services organization in areas such as hardware testing, pre- and post-sale software support, quality assurance, project installation management and training. The Company is ISO 9000 certified.

Products

Most of the Company’s sales involve a combination of COTS software and hardware products together with development services for mission-specific requirements and system integration as summarized below.

Command and Control Software.

EPOCH IPS, the Company’s COTS software products solution for satellite command and control, is designed to operate a variety of satellites with a minimum of personnel. EPOCH IPS’s success has placed the Company at the forefront of replacing antiquated satellite control centers with smaller systems that can operate multiple satellites produced by any manufacturer. EPOCH IPS’s open architecture, in combination with a graphical user interface and automated monitoring and control features, allows operators to monitor and control both their satellites and ground systems.

EPOCH IPS features a modern, distributed architecture consisting of a series of servers and user workstations interconnected via an Ethernet LAN. This approach provides better performance than traditional mini-computer based ground systems at a lower cost. The EPOCH Integrated Product Suite includes the following products:

EPOCH T&C Server and EPOCH Client, the Company’s real-time satellite data processing and control software products, provide satellite command and control capabilities, including telemetry processing and display, commanding and command verification (“CV”), ground station control, alarm/event processing, and data archive. These functions are driven by the EPOCH Database product, allowing the system to support multiple satellites solely through database updates, without modifying the run-time software. This results in lower maintenance and operations costs throughout the lifecycle.

3

Table of Contents

OASYS, the Company’s mission-planning software provides full spectrum support for spacecraft orbit determination and control, including measurement set reductions, orbit determination, ephemeris propagation, maneuver planning and orbit events/reports. OASYS allows the user to manage a single spacecraft or a fleet in any Earth orbit, including low Earth, geosynchronous and Molniya-type orbits.

ABE, the Company’s offline analysis product provides trending and statistical analysis of the information recorded in the real-time EPOCH IPS archives. ABE supports automatic data extraction of key data along with summary-level statistics (i.e., daily and seasonal minimums and maximums), advanced statistical processing techniques (i.e., covariance, convolution and regression) and graphical data visualization.

Archive Manager, the Company’s archive manager product performs archive data product generation, storage, storage management, and retrieval. The Archive Manager is capable of managing on-line storage and retrieval of terabytes of satellite data on RAID and NAS storage units, providing an efficient low cost storage capability. Compression is utilized to provide additional value to the product.

Signal Monitoring.

The Company’s wholly owned subsidiary SAT Corporation (“SAT”) offers a range of software products and turnkey systems for communications signal monitoring, including MONICS, a family of software products for stand-alone and distributed satellite transponder monitoring, and SIGMON, a turnkey system for detecting terrestrial communications interference.

Equipment Monitoring and Control

The Company’s wholly owned subsidiary Newpoint Technologies, Inc. (“Newpoint”), offers an integrated suite of products targeted at commercial users, including communication satellite operators, communication satellite users, and general-purpose telecommunications companies. Newpoint has two flagship products: 1) Compass, which provides distributed monitoring and control of networked communications systems, and 2) Mercury, a rack-mountable smart box that provides monitoring and control of local network nodes and their associated ground equipment. Newpoint also offers a number of add-ons to their core products, including Stratus, which provides carrier management for satellite transponder operations, and Eclipse, a tool for setting up and reconfiguring the communications traffic on satellite transponders.

Telemetry, Command, and Range Processing.

The Company’s wholly owned subsidiary RT Logic offers an entire product family, the Telemetrix line, ranging from single board components to fully-integrated systems. Telemetrix products support telemetry processing, commanding, ranging, and remote site interfaces for a variety of applications, including tracking stations, control centers, spacecraft and payload integration, and launch range operations.

Image Data Reception, Processing and Distribution.

SKYLIGHT, the Company’s first turnkey product for image data processing, provides automatic, un-manned acquisition, processing, and distribution of satellite imagery to the scientific, meteorological, and military communities. The SKYLIGHT bundle of hardware and software automatically tracks satellites of interest, captures their images, performs first order data processing, and distributes the processed images over the internet.

4

Table of Contents

The Company also offers a military version of the Skylight system, consisting of a set of standard Skylight terminals interlinked to a central command via a commercial communication satellite network. This version allows military planners to view and process weather and related imagery data in near-real time across an entire theater of operations.

Explorer Series I and II: As a result of the Asset Purchase Agreement with Jackson & Tull in July 2003, the Company now produces antenna systems, which are 1.0 – 7.0 meter full motion antenna tracking systems for commercial, government, and military applications. The antenna systems are used for TT&C (Telemetry, Tracking, and Control) and image data reception applications. The Explorer systems are used in the company’s Skylight image data processing product. Operational frequencies are within the S, L, and X bands. The antennas systems are ideal for remote station TT&C and image data reception applications with web browser and scheduled operational control available. The Explorer antennas systems are provided completely integrated as turnkey systems that require minimal maintenance.

Services

Development Services and Systems Integration.

The Company provides services to support mission-specific requirements for both government and commercial customers. Most of the Company’s ground system contracts have a service component. Depending on the application, the services may include development of software applications to interface to and augment the COTS software products, integration of third-party hardware and software, and/or custom software development. The Company also provides post-delivery warranty and maintenance service for most of its systems. The Company believes that its expertise and experience in satellite systems and operations, computer software and hardware, engineering/mathematical analysis and end-user applications allow it to provide ground systems that exceed traditional expectations on system performance, cost and implementation schedule. The Company’s experience, together with its innovative COTS software products and software tools, reduce the risks and lead time associated with ground systems development.

Customers

In general, there are three major applications for satellites: communications, remote sensing, and scientific research. The Company has customers in each of these areas. The Company believes that the combination of its proven COTS software products and its strength as a systems integrator has positioned it to serve as an end-to-end provider of total solutions for all of these applications.

Communications.

The Company provides satellite command and control products for a variety of communications satellites. One of the principal advantages that the Company’s products offer in the commercial sector is the ability to operate fleets of satellites from multiple vendors. This capability allows operators to reduce costs by consolidating their control centers and using a single software package to operate their satellites.

The Company’s products are currently flying communications satellites from most of the major satellite manufacturers, including Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Space Systems Loral, Orbital Sciences, EADS, and Alcatel. The Company’s customers include NewSkies, Echostar, GE Americom, Loral Skynet, Shin Satellite, Binariang Satellite Systems, Orbital Sciences, PanAmSat, Cable & Wireless Optus, and ChinaSat. All of these operators have purchased the Company’s products to operate their fleets of geosynchronous Earth orbit (“GEO”) communications satellites.

The Company is also the leading provider of command and control products for U.S. military communications satellites.

5

Table of Contents

Remote Sensing and Meteorology.

The Company builds command and control systems as well as payload and image data processing systems for meteorological satellites. Since its inception, the Company has provided ground systems for the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (“NOAA”), including both their Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite (“GOES”) Program and the Television Infrared Observational Satellite (“TIROS”) programs. The Company’s systems support mission operations, instrument data processing, simulation and flight software validation. The Company also built the complete command and control system for the U.S. Air Force Defense Meteorological Satellite Program (“DMSP”), whose operations were recently transitioned to civilian control under NOAA’s aegis. Since 1982, the Company has also been under contract to provide the DMSP program with satellite simulators used for training, ground system checkout and flight software analysis.

High-performance ground systems are required to support Earth resource satellites that provide military and civilian customers with accurate image data. The Company has provided such command and control subsystems to Space Imaging/EOSAT and other operators.

Scientific Research.

The Company has supported a variety of diverse and complex science missions. The Company has supported more than a dozen missions for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (“NASA”), including the Small Explorer (“SMEX”) missions, International Solar-Terrestrial Physics (“ISTP”) missions, X-ray Timing Explorer (“XTE”) and Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (“TRMM”). Projects range from the development of distributed command and control systems to validation of complex embedded flight software.

The Company was selected by the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory to support the first NASA Discovery Mission, the Near Earth Asteroid Rendezvous Program (“NEAR”). NEAR was the first in a series of low-cost, small-planet exploratory missions designed to gather data about asteroids in the solar system. The Company’s EPOCH IPS products form the core of the mission’s command and control ground system and also supports the spacecraft I&T. The Applied Physics Laboratory is also using the Company’s products for their next series of scientific missions for NASA. These include the Contour, Solar Stereo, and Messenger missions.

The National Space Program Office (“NSPO”) for the Republic of China selected the Company to provide the complete multi-mission command and control system for their ROCSAT series of satellites. The Company also supports small satellite missions in the United States such as Orbital Sciences Corporation’s SeaStar and Microlab programs.

Marketing

The Company relies upon senior corporate management, project managers and senior technical staff to carry out its marketing program, including the development and execution of marketing plans, proposal presentations and the performance of related tasks. These individuals collect information concerning requirements of current and potential customers in the course of contract performance and formal and informal briefings, from published literature and through participation in professional and industry organizations. Senior management evaluates this information, identifies potential business opportunities and coordinates proposal efforts. The primary source of business in the Company’s existing markets is by referral from existing customers. Additionally, the Company advertises periodically in Space News and other industry publications.

The Company seeks business believed to be of long-term benefit based on considerations such as technical sophistication, favorable market positioning and potential product spin-offs. One of the Company’s primary marketing strategies is to anticipate and understand the changing needs of its customers and then to be prepared to meet those needs as they arise in new programs or in new program functions. This approach to marketing is mirrored in the Company’s products that are highly adaptable to growth and change in the requirements of each user.

6

Table of Contents

Contract Revenue

The Company earns revenues from sales of its products and services through contracts that are funded by the U.S. Government as well as commercial and international organizations. The Company may be either a prime contractor directly to the end-user of its products and services or it may act as a subcontractor under a contract with another company.

The percentages of revenues received by the Company from prime contracts and subcontracts for fiscal years 2003, 2002, and 2001 are as follows:

For a given contract, the revenue mix may include the Company’s COTS software products, pass-through of third-party hardware and software, and services provided by the Company or its subcontractors.

The Company generates revenue under three types of contracts: cost plus, fixed price, and time and material (“T&M”) contracts. Under a cost plus contract, the Company is reimbursed for allowable costs within the contractual terms and conditions and is paid a negotiated fee. The fee may be fixed or based on performance incentives. Revenue recognition under a cost plus contract is based upon actual costs incurred and a pro rata amount of the negotiated fee. Under a fixed price contract, the Company is paid a stipulated price for services or products and bears the risk of increased or unexpected costs. Revenue under a fixed price contract is recognized using the percentage of completion method of accounting based on costs incurred in relation to total estimated costs. Under a T&M contract, the Company receives fixed hourly rates intended to cover salary costs attributable to work performed on the contract and related overhead expenses, reimbursement for other direct costs and a profit. Revenue is recognized under a T&M contract at the contractual rates as labor hours and direct expenses are incurred. To date, the vast majority of contracts for the purchase of the Company’s COTS software products have been fixed priced in nature, either firm fixed price contracts or T&M fixed labor rate contracts.

The following table summarizes the percentage of revenues attributable to each contract type for the period indicated:

U.S. Government Contracts

Company revenues from U.S. Government contracts are derived from a combination of contracts with the U.S. Government and subcontracts with other companies that have prime contracts with the U.S. Government. For fiscal years 2003, 2002, and 2001 approximately 76%, 60%, and 54%, respectively, of the Company’s revenues were derived from contracts or subcontracts funded by the U.S. Government.

The U.S. Air Force represented 50%, 22%, and 10% of revenues, respectively, for fiscal years 2003, 2002, and 2001. The Company expects that at least 55% of its revenue for fiscal year 2004 will be derived from Department of the Air Force contracts and subcontracts. The loss of any one of these Air Force contracts could significantly affect the Company’s performance. Similarly, the expiration, or termination for convenience, of any major contract could significantly affect the Company’s performance if not renewed or replaced by contracts of similar value. It is estimated that the single largest Air Force contract will represent approximately 30% of the Company’s fiscal year 2004 revenue. Under this contract, Integral Systems is leading a team of subcontractors to produce a modern, consolidated command and control infrastructure for the military’s fleet of communication satellites, including Milstar, DSCS III, Advanced EHF, and Wideband Gapfiller.

7

Table of Contents

NOAA, another Federal Government agency, represented 19%, 31%, and 38% of revenues, respectively, for fiscal years 2003, 2002, and 2001. The Company expects that at least 13% of its revenue for fiscal year 2004 will be derived from NOAA contracts. The loss of any one of these NOAA contracts could significantly affect the Company’s performance. Similarly, the expiration, or termination for convenience, of any major contract could significantly affect the Company’s performance if not renewed or replaced by contracts of similar value. It is estimated that no single NOAA contract will represent 10% or more of the Company’s fiscal year 2004 revenue.

U.S. Government contracts are awarded by formal advertising or procurement by negotiation. Negotiated procurements may, but do not necessarily, involve the solicitation of competitive proposals. If competitive proposals are solicited, the U.S. Government selects the proposal most advantageous to it and then conducts negotiations with the selected bidder.

Many of the U.S. Government programs in which the Company participates as a contractor or subcontractor extend for several years but are funded only on an annual basis. Accordingly, the Company’s contracts and subcontracts are subject to termination, reduction or modification in the event of changes in the government’s requirements or budgetary constraints. Additionally, when the Company participates in a project as a subcontractor, it is subject to the risk that the prime contractor may fail or be unable to perform the prime contract.

All of the Company’s U.S. Government contracts and subcontracts are also subject to termination for “convenience”, which means termination without cause. Should a contract be so terminated, the Company would be reimbursed for allowable costs to the date of termination and would be paid a proportionate amount of the stipulated profits or fees attributable to the work actually performed.

The Company’s books and records are subject to audit by the Defense Contract Audit Agency (“DCAA”). Such audits can result in adjustments to contract costs and fees. Although the Company thus far has not been required to make any material audit adjustments, the possibility that such adjustments will be required always exists. Management is of the opinion that any such audit adjustments would not have a material adverse effect on the financial position or results of operations of the Company. Integral Systems, Inc. has been audited by DCAA through fiscal year ending September 30, 2001, and RT Logic, Inc. has been audited by DCAA through March 31, 2000.

The Company’s contracts and subcontracts with federal government agencies are subject to competition and awarded on the basis of technical merit, personnel qualifications, experience and price. The Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially affected by changes in procurement policies, a reduction in funds available for the services provided by it and other risks generally associated with federal government contracts. New government contract awards also are subject to protest by competitors at the time of award that can result in the re-opening of the competition or evaluation process, or the award of a contract to a competitor. The Company considers such bid protests to be a customary element in the process of procuring government contracts.

In addition to the right to terminate, U.S. Government contracts are conditioned upon the continuing availability of congressional appropriations and are typically subject to modification or termination in the event of changes in funding. Congress usually appropriates funds on a fiscal year basis even though contract performance may take several years. Consequently, at the outset of a major program, the contract is usually incrementally funded, and additional funds are normally committed to the contract by the procuring agency as appropriations are made by Congress for future fiscal years. In addition, contractors often experience revenue uncertainties during the first quarter of the government’s fiscal year, which begins October 1, until differences between budget requests and appropriations are resolved. To date, Congress has funded all years of the multi-year major program contracts for which the Company has served as prime contractor or a subcontractor, although there can be no assurance that this will be the case in the future.

8

Table of Contents

Non-U.S. Government Contracts

The Company also has contracts with commercial and international organizations. For fiscal years 2003, 2002, and 2001 approximately 24%, 40%, and 46%, respectively, of the Company’s revenues were derived from non-U.S. Government contracts. These contracts are typically with commercial satellite operators, satellite manufacturers, aerospace systems integrators and foreign governments.

Some of the Company’s non-U.S. Government contracts are with international organizations. For fiscal years 2003, 2002, and 2001 approximately 13%, 21%, and 23%, respectively, of the Company’s revenues were derived from international organizations. Revenues from foreign sources are discussed in Footnote Number 1 of the Notes to the Financial Statements included elsewhere herein. Operations in numerous countries outside the United States carry substantial managerial, operational, legal, and political uncertainties. These operations are subject to changes in government regulations and telecommunications standards, tariffs or taxes, and other trade barriers. In addition, the Company’s agreements relating to foreign operations may be enforceable only in foreign jurisdictions so that it may be difficult for the Company to enforce its rights.

The Company currently has three contracts that are subject to currency fluctuations in foreign markets. The value of these contracts is not material. However, to mitigate currency fluctuation, the Company periodically uses foreign currency exchange contracts (see Footnote Number 15 of the Notes to the Financial Statements). The Company may enter additional contracts that are subject to currency fluctuation. However, there can be no assurance that the Company will enter into foreign currency exchange contracts to mitigate currency fluctuation in the future.

In addition, various agencies and departments of the U.S. government regulate the Company’s ability to pursue business opportunities outside the United States. Exports of space-related products, services, and technical information require licenses granted by the U.S. government. For the Company’s products, services or technical information requiring such a license, the Company does not currently have blanket authorization for the export of them and cannot assure that it will be able to obtain the necessary licenses or approvals on a per transaction basis.

Most of the Company’s non-U.S. Government contracts are awarded competitively and are performed on a fixed price basis. Typically, these contracts are for turnkey systems that are delivered by the Company in six to eighteen months. Payment is most often based on delivery milestones established in the Company’s contract. In addition, the contracts may include a system warranty period that lasts one to two years. The Company also offers extended support for the system on a fixed-price or T&M basis.

For certain of the Company’s non-U.S. Government contracts, the Company often has terms in its contracts under which the customer can enforce performance of the Company or seek damages in case the Company does not perform as agreed to in the contract. Contracts may require the Company to post a performance bond, establish an irrevocable letter of credit, or agree to pay liquidated damages in the event of late delivery. In addition, although a significant portion of the Company’s revenues are generated from the sale of its services and products in commercial markets; the Company cannot assure that it will continue to compete successfully in these markets. Many of the Company’s commercial contracts are for a fixed price. This subjects the Company to substantial risks relating to unexpected cost increases and other factors outside of its control. In addition, the Company may fail to anticipate technical problems, estimate costs accurately, or control costs during performance of a fixed-price contract.

Sale of Software Products

Most of the Company’s contracts include the sale of proprietary software products. Sales of the Company’s software products take many forms. The Company sells (i) software only (a “Software-Only Sale”), (ii) software and services together, or (iii) software, services and hardware together. In addition, depending on a customer’s requirements, the Company may or may not provide post-contract customer support (“PCS”).

The Company’s recognition of revenue for sales of Company software products depends on customer requirements and the nature of the contracts involved. In accordance with SOP 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, for a Software-Only Sale, the Company recognizes revenue when all of the following criteria are met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the vendor’s fee is fixed or determinable and collectibility is

9

Table of Contents

probable. In situations where software is sold together with services and/or hardware, the Company recognizes software license revenue on a percentage of completion basis.

With respect to PCS, the Company recognizes PCS revenue on a percentage of completion basis when PCS is part of a broader fixed price contract that includes software and services. Alternatively, when PCS services (i.e., software maintenance and support) are awarded to the Company under a separate maintenance contract, the Company recognizes PCS revenue on a straight-line basis pro rata over the term of the maintenance contract.

During fiscal year 2003, the Company incurred approximately $2.7 million in Research and Development (“R&D”) costs.

Backlog

The Company’s estimated backlog is as follows (000’s omitted):

The increase in backlog between fiscal 2003 and fiscal 2002 relates primarily to backlog at RT Logic. The increase in backlog between fiscal 2002 and fiscal 2001 relates primarily to a contract awards with the Air Force.

Under outstanding commitments, the Company agrees to provide specific services, frequently over an extended period of time, with continued performance of those services contingent upon the customer’s year-to-year decision to fund the contract.

General commitments consist of contract options and sole source business that management believes likely to be exercised or awarded in connection with existing contracts. Contract options are the Company’s contractual agreement to perform specifically defined services only in the event the customer thereafter requests the Company to do so. Sole source business refers to contract work which the Company reasonably expects to be awarded based on its unique expertise in a specific area or because it has previously done all such work in that area for the customer or prime contractor who will award the contract. The Company estimates that 75% of backlog as of September 30, 2003 will be completed during fiscal year 2004. Estimated backlog includes contract options through June 30, 2011 including general commitments.

Many of the Company’s contracts are multi-year contracts and contracts with option years, and portions of these contracts are carried forward from one year to the next as part of the Company’s contract backlog. The Company’s total contract backlog represents management’s estimate of the aggregate unearned revenues expected to be earned by the Company over the life of all of its contracts, including option periods. Because many factors affect the scheduling of projects, there can be no assurance as to when revenues will be realized on projects included in the Company’s backlog. In addition, although contract backlog represents only business which is considered to be firm, there can be no assurance that cancellations or scope adjustments will not occur. The majority of backlog represents contracts under the terms of which cancellation by the customer would entitle the Company to all or a portion of its costs incurred and potential fees to the date of cancellation.

However, the Company also believes that backlog is not necessarily indicative of future revenues. The Company’s backlog typically is subject to large variations from quarter to quarter as existing contracts are renewed or new contracts are awarded. Additionally, all U.S. Government contracts included in backlog may be terminated at the convenience of the government.

10

Table of Contents

Competition

The Company experiences significant competition in all of the areas in which it does business. The Company believes it is one of four companies in the United States that derive the major portion of their revenue from the development of satellite ground systems. The Company competes with numerous companies having similar capabilities, including Lockheed Martin Corporation, Boeing Satellite Systems, Loral Space & Communications Ltd., Raytheon Company, L3, TRW, Orbital Sciences Corporation, Honeywell International Inc., Computer Sciences Corporation, Alcatel Espace, and EADS. Many of these competitors are significantly larger and have greater financial resources than the Company. In addition, some of these competitors are divisions or subsidiaries of large, diversified companies that have access to the financial resources of their parent companies. Some of our competitors are also current or potential customers, teammates, or subcontractors. In addition, several smaller companies have specialized capabilities in command and control image processing. There are also a number of smaller companies which compete with our subsidiaries in the areas of signal monitoring, network monitoring, and telemetry processing.

In general, the markets in which the Company and its subsidiaries compete are not dominated by a single company; instead, a large number of companies offer services that overlap and are competitive with those offered by the Company. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to compete successfully.

Because its command and control business is specialized and the Company is a leader in COTS software products, the market for this business is somewhat less competitive. In the command and control software market, the Company competes against other companies in the space industry. The Company’s products also face competition from certain government off-the-shelf, or “GOTS”, products for satellite command and control. In its other business areas, ground equipment and systems integration, the Company competes against systems integrators and product manufacturers.

The Company believes that the principal competitive factors in the businesses in which it operates are technical understanding, management capability, past contract performance, personnel qualifications, and price.

The Company principally obtains contracts and subcontracts through competitive procurements offered by the U.S. Government or commercial enterprises. Because of its size, the Company often joins with a larger company in pursuing major procurements. It is not unusual for the Company to compete with a company for a contract while simultaneously joining with the same company in pursuit of another contract.

It is not possible to predict how the Company’s competitive position may be affected by changing economic or competitive conditions, customer requirements or technological developments.

Proprietary Rights

The Company regards its products as proprietary trade secrets and confidential information. The Company has made the strategic decision after discussion with intellectual property counsel not to seek patent protection for its software, hardware, or systems. None of the Company’s software, hardware, or systems are patented. The Company relies on a combination of common law copyright and trade secret laws, third-party nondisclosure agreements and other industry standard methods for protecting ownership of its proprietary software, hardware and systems. The Company generally registers its trademarks and the copyrights with respect to new products and new versions of its software as they are developed. There can be no assurance, however, that in spite of these precautions, an unauthorized third party will not obtain and use information that the Company considers proprietary. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect the Company’s proprietary rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States. The Company does not have non-competition agreements with all of its employees. Moreover, the Company does not have confidentiality agreements with any of its employees hired before mid-December 2000. There can be no assurance that the mechanisms used by the Company to protect its software will be adequate or that the Company’s competitors will not independently develop software products that are substantially equivalent or superior to the Company’s products. The Company believes that it has all necessary rights to market its products, although there can be no assurance third parties will not assert infringement claims in the future.

11

Table of Contents

The Company believes that, due to the nature of its products, the skill of personnel, knowledge and experience of management, and familiarity with the operation of the Company’s products are more important in maintaining a leadership position in the industry than the protection of intellectual property rights.

Employees

The Company believes that its employees and their knowledge and capabilities are a major asset. The Company has been successful in attracting and retaining employees skilled in its core business competencies. The Company intends to continue to employ highly skilled personnel, as well as personnel knowledgeable concerning the needs and operations of its major customers.

As of October 30, 2003, the Company had approximately 360 employees, including employees of ISI Europe in Toulouse, France, SAT Corporation in Sunnyvale, California, Newpoint Technologies in Salem, New Hampshire and RT Logic in Colorado Springs and Denver, Colorado. Of the 360 employees, 352 are full-time employees of whom 309 are considered professionals in engineering related disciplines. Of the engineering professionals, 88% have undergraduate degrees in a scientific discipline and 34% of those have advanced degrees in a scientific discipline. Approximately 82% of the engineering staff has at least 7 years relevant experience.

The Company believes that its relations with its employees are good. None of the Company’s employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements.

There is significant competition for employees with the computer, engineering and information technology skills required to perform the services the Company offers. In addition, the Company must often comply with provisions in government contracts that require specified levels of education, work experience, and security clearances for our employees. The Company cannot assure that it will be successful in attracting or retaining a sufficient number of highly skilled and qualified employees in the future. The Company’s success will depend in part upon the Company’s ability to attract, retain, train and motivate highly skilled employees.

Industry Segments

With the acquisition of RT Logic, the Company now operates in four business segments:

Integral Systems, Inc. and ISI Europe build satellite ground systems for command and control, integration and test, data processing, and simulation. The antenna systems division, established as a result of the Asset Purchase Agreement with Jackson & Tull in July 2003, is an extension of the satellite ground systems business segment.

Through its wholly owned subsidiary SAT, the Company offers turnkey systems and software for satellite and terrestrial communications signal monitoring.

The Company provides equipment monitoring and control software to satellite operators and the telecommunications industry through its wholly owned subsidiary Newpoint (acquired January 2002).

Through its wholly owned subsidiary RT Logic (acquired October 2002), the Company manufactures satellite communications equipment and systems, principally for military applications. This equipment is used in satellite tracking stations, control centers, spacecraft factories, and range facilities.

See Footnote Numbers 17 and 18 of the notes to the Financial Statements included elsewhere herein for financial information regarding these segments.

12

Table of Contents

Available Information

The Company’s web site address is www.integ.com.

The Company makes available free of charge on or through its internet web site its annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after the Company electronically files such material, or furnishes it to, the Commission.

The Company’s satellite ground systems segment uses the following properties:

The Company’s headquarters occupy approximately 46,700 square feet at 5000 Philadelphia Way, Lanham, Maryland 20706. The headquarters’ lease expires May 31, 2009.

During April 1999, the Company contracted for 24,224 square feet and during July 2001, the Company contracted under the same headquarters lease for an additional 1,050 square feet at 5200 Philadelphia Way, Lanham, Maryland 20706. That lease expires on May 31, 2009.

The Company maintains an office in Colorado Springs, Colorado comprised of 22,546 square feet at The Science Park II Office Building, 980 Technology Court, Colorado Springs, Colorado 80915. That lease for the Colorado offices expires on May 31, 2007.

The Company maintains an office in France for 157.73 square meters (517 square feet) at High Tech Buro, Bat. C, Voie 3, Labege, France. The lease for the offices in France expires September 14, 2009.

During July 2002, the Company contracted for an additional 83.78 square meters (275 square feet) at the same address in France. The lease for the supplemental offices in France expires on June 30, 2011.

The Company’s satellite and terrestrial CSM segment uses the following property:

The Company’s subsidiary SAT Corporation occupies approximately 9,940 square feet at 1151 Sonora Court, Sunnyvale, California 94086. That lease expires July 30, 2004.

The Company’s equipment monitoring and control segment uses the following property:

During October 2003, the Company’s subsidiary Newpoint Technologies, Inc. contracted for approximately 4,290 square feet at 8B Industrial Way, Salem, New Hampshire 03079. That lease expires September 30, 2004. As part of its negotiation for the new lease, Newpoint Technologies entered into an agreement with the landlord to terminate the existing lease covering approximately 18,000 square feet at 13 Red Roof Lane, Salem, New Hampshire 03079, which was to expire July 14, 2008.

The Company’s space communication systems segment uses the following properties:

The Company’s subsidiary RT Logic, Inc. occupies approximately 20,058 square feet at 1042 Elkton Drive, Colorado Springs, Colorado 80907. That lease expires December 31, 2005.

During April 2003, RT Logic contracted for approximately 11,750 square feet at 8591 Prairie Trail Drive, Suite 500, Englewood, Colorado 80112. That lease expires April 30, 2009.

The Company believes that it has adequate insurance coverage to protect its properties and assets.

The Company is from time to time involved in litigation incidental to the conduct of its business. The Company is not currently a party to any lawsuit or proceeding which, in the opinion of management, would be likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations.

13

Table of Contents

No matters were submitted to our stockholders during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003.

14

Table of Contents

PART II

The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices of the Company’s common stock as reported by The Nasdaq National Market, where the common stock trades under the Symbol “ISYS.”

As of September 30, 2003, there were approximately 2,000 holders of record of the Company’s common stock.

Historically, the Company has not paid any cash dividends. On December 3, 2003, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of three cents per share. The dividend will be paid on or about January 5, 2004 to shareholders on record as of December 15, 2003. The payment of future dividends, if any, will be determined in light of any applicable contractual restrictions limiting the Company’s ability to pay dividends, the Company’s earnings, financial condition, capital requirements and other factors deemed relevant by the Board of Directors. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

The information required by this item regarding equity compensation plans is set forth in Item 12 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The following table presents summary consolidated financial data of the Company for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2003, 2002, 2001, 2000, and 1999. The financial data for the fiscal years ended September 30, 1999, 2000, and 2001 has been derived from the financial statements of the Company, which have been audited, by Rubino & McGeehin, Chartered, independent public accountants. The financial data for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2003 and 2002 has been derived from the financial statements of the Company which have been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, independent auditors, as set forth in the financial statements and notes thereto presented elsewhere herein. The consolidated financial statements of the Company presented herein have been restated for all periods prior to the acquisition of SAT Corporation to include the combined financial results of the Company and SAT Corporation. The following information should be read in conjunction with the Company’s financial statements and notes thereto presented elsewhere herein. See “Financial Statements” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

15

Table of Contents

Critical Accounting Policies

The Company believes the following accounting policies are critical to the understanding of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

Revenue Recognition

The Company provides services under fixed price contracts for which revenue is generally recognized using the percentage of completion method based on the relationship of actual costs incurred to total costs estimated over the duration of the contract. These estimates regarding costs underlie the Company’s determinations as to overall contract profitability and the timing of revenue recognition. If the Company does not accurately estimate the resources required or the scope of the work to be performed, or does not manage its projects properly within the planned periods of time or satisfy its obligations under the contracts, then actual results may differ from projected results and losses on contracts may need to be recognized.

Revenue results are difficult to predict, and any shortfall in revenue or delay in recognizing revenue could cause the Company’s operating results to vary significantly from quarter to quarter.

16

Table of Contents

Provision for Doubtful Accounts

The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of its customers to make required payments. A considerable amount of judgment is required in assessing the ultimate realization of individual accounts receivable balances, including the credit worthiness of each customer and the period in which customers’ financial condition deteriorate and they are no longer able to pay the balances owed to the Company.

To the extent the Company does not recognize deterioration in its customers’ financial condition in the period it occurs, or to the extent the Company overestimates its customers’ ability to pay, the amount of bad debt expense recognized in a given reporting period will be impacted.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

The Company’s acquisitions of other companies have resulted in the acquisition of certain intangible assets and goodwill. These assets are subject to impairment to the extent the Company’s operations experience significant negative results. These negative results can be the result of the Company’s individual operations or negative trends in the Company’s industry or in the general economy, which impact the Company. To the extent the Company’s intangible assets or goodwill are determined to be impaired, then these balances are written down to their estimated fair value on the date of the impairment. Determining when an impairment has occurred involves a significant amount of judgment. Management bases its judgment on a number of factors including viability of the businesses acquired, their integration into the Company’s operations, the market in which those businesses operate and their projected future results, cash flow projections, and numerous other factors. The results reported in any given period could be impacted by management’s determination as to when an impairment has occurred.

Overview

Integral Systems, Inc. builds satellite ground systems for command and control, integration and test, data processing, and simulation. Since its inception in 1982, the Company has provided ground systems for over 190 different satellite missions for communications, science, meteorology, and earth resource applications. The Company has an established domestic and international customer base that includes government and commercial satellite operators, spacecraft and payload manufacturers, and aerospace systems integrators.

The Company has developed innovative software products that reduce the cost and minimize the development risk associated with traditional custom-built systems. The Company believes that it was the first to offer a comprehensive COTS (Commercial Off-the-Shelf) software product line for command and control. As a systems integrator, the Company leverages these products to provide turnkey satellite control facilities that can operate multiple satellites from any manufacturer. These systems offer significant cost savings for customers that have traditionally purchased a separate custom control center for each of their satellites.

Through its wholly owned subsidiary SAT, acquired in August 2000, the Company also offers turnkey systems and software for satellite and terrestrial communications signal monitoring.

In March 2001, the Company formed a wholly owned subsidiary, ISI Europe, with headquarters in Toulouse, France. ISI Europe serves as the focal point for the support of all of Integral’s European business.

On January 30, 2002, the Company acquired Newpoint. Newpoint provides equipment monitoring and control software to satellite operators and the telecommunications industry.

17

Table of Contents

In October 2002, the Company acquired RT Logic. RT Logic manufactures satellite communications equipment and systems, principally for military applications. This equipment is used in satellite tracking stations, control centers, spacecraft factories, and range facilities.

In July 2003, the Company acquired the intellectual property rights, inventory and certain other assets of the former Jackson & Tull Satellite Ground Systems division. The acquisition is an extension of the satellite ground systems business segment and enables the Company to be a “turn-key” provider of full motion antennas and RF systems used for tracking low earth orbiting satellites and launch vehicles as well as aeronautical telemetry range operations.

Results of Operations

The components of the Company’s income statement as a percentage of revenue are depicted in the following table for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2003, 2002 and 2001:

Revenue

The Company earns revenue, both as a prime contractor and a subcontractor, from sales of its products and services through contracts that are funded by the U.S. Government as well as commercial and international organizations.

18

Table of Contents

For the fiscal years ended September 30, 2003, 2002, and 2001, the Company’s revenues were generated from the following sources:

19

Table of Contents

FISCAL YEAR 2003 COMPARED TO FISCAL YEAR 2002

On a consolidated basis, revenue increased 62%, or $31.7 million, to $82.6 million for the fiscal year 2003, from $50.9 million for fiscal year 2002. Revenue for fiscal years 2003 and 2002 for each of the Company’s segments is shown in the following table:

Revenue increases in the Company’s Satellite Ground Systems segment pertain to increased sales volume as a result of the Company’s contract awards with the U.S. Air Force (specifically the CCS-C and SCNC programs) that were made in the Spring of 2002. Revenue levels for SAT and Newpoint were down 9.6% and 5.0% respectively, in fiscal year 2003 compared to fiscal year 2002 and generally relate to a decreased backlog of orders, decreased bookings of new orders and overall poor market conditions in the commercial satellite market. Newpoint revenue for fiscal year 2002 was only for an eight-month period, as the Company did not acquire this entity until January 30, 2002.

RT Logic was acquired subsequent to September 30, 2002, so the Company reported no revenue for the Space Communication Systems segment for fiscal year 2002. The revenue generated by RT Logic for fiscal year 2002 was the highest annual revenue in that subsidiary’s history.

Cost of Revenue/Gross Margin

The Company computes gross margin by subtracting cost of revenue from revenue. Included in cost of revenue are direct labor expenses, overhead charges associated with the Company’s direct labor base and other costs that can be directly related to specific contract cost objectives, such as travel, consultants, equipment, subcontracts and other direct costs.

Gross margins on contract revenues vary depending on the type of product or service provided. Generally, license revenues related to the sale of the Company’s COTS products have the greatest gross margins because of the minimal associated marginal costs to produce. By contrast, gross margins rates for equipment and subcontract pass-throughs seldom exceed 15%. Engineering service gross margins typically range between 20% and 40%. These definitions and ratios generally apply across all segments.

20

Table of Contents

During fiscal year 2003, cost of revenue increased by 47.2%, or $17.7 million, compared to fiscal year 2002, increasing from $37.6 million during fiscal year 2002 to $55.4 million during fiscal year ended 2003. Gross margin increased from $13.3 million to $27.2 million, an increase of $13.9 million, or 105%, during the periods being compared. Cost of revenue and gross margin for fiscal years ended 2003 and 2002 for each of the Company’s segments are shown in the following table:

Cost of Revenue increases were disproportionately greater than the revenue increases for the Company’s Satellite Ground Systems segment during the periods compared, resulting in a lower gross margin percentage for this segment for the current period compared to last fiscal year (21.7% compared to 25.4%). The lower gross margin percentage for the segment is primarily attributable to two factors:

Gross margin as a percentage of revenue at SAT increased to 40.9% from 38.1% while gross margin as a percentage of revenue at Newpoint increased to 24.0% from 17.0% on a year-to-year basis. The increased percentage for both segments is due to the effects of cost cutting and the elimination of overruns experienced during the prior fiscal year.

RT Logic was acquired subsequent to September 30, 2002, so the Company reported no cost of revenue or gross margin for the Space Communication Systems segment for fiscal year 2002. RT Logic’s gross margin for fiscal year 2003 is the highest in that subsidiary’s history.

21

Table of Contents

Operating Expenses

Operating Expenses for fiscal year 2003 and 2002 for each of the Company’s segments are shown in the following table:

In the Company’s Satellite Ground Systems segment, Selling, General & Administrative (“SG&A”) expenses increased by approximately $880,000 during the periods being compared. The increase principally pertains to increased marketing and proposal costs relating to new Air Force opportunities coupled with increased management and administrative costs needed to operate a considerably larger business base. As a percentage of revenue, SG&A for this segment represented 11.3% of revenue in the current period compared to 12.8% of revenue during fiscal year 2002. R&D expenses for this segment were immaterial for both fiscal years. Product amortization has increased by approximately $590,000 during fiscal year 2003 as compared to fiscal year 2002 due to higher capitalized development costs related to the Company’s EPOCH product line.

22

Table of Contents

At SAT, period-to-period SG&A costs are down approximately $840,000 due to cost cutting measures implemented by the Company and due to severance expenses that were recorded during 2002 which did not recur during 2003. SAT also recorded a bad debt expense of $315,000 during 2002. There was no comparable bad debt entry in the current year. In fact, a significant portion of SAT’s bad debt from last fiscal year was recovered in fiscal year 2003, resulting in a credit to current period bad debt expense.

R&D expenses at SAT have increased from $150,000 to $1,050,000 between the periods compared. The increase in current period R&D expenses was due to efforts related to new development on SAT’s signal monitoring capabilities. Costs associated with such efforts had been capitalized last fiscal year but are not eligible for capitalization in the current fiscal year due to release of software products. Product amortization increased by more than $210,000 during the periods compared due to higher capitalized development costs recorded last fiscal year.

Newpoint’s current period SG&A expenses increased approximately $210,000 compared to fiscal year 2002 as results for Newpoint for fiscal year 2002 are only for an eight-month period. Recurring month-to-month SG&A expenses for Newpoint were lower in fiscal year 2003 compared to fiscal year 2002.

RT Logic was acquired subsequent to September 30, 2002, so the Company reported no operating expenses for the Space Communication Systems segment for fiscal year 2002.

The current period amortization expenses for both Newpoint and RT Logic relate to the amortization of intangible assets that arose from purchase accounting entries made at the time of each company’s acquisition by the Company.

Income from Operations

Income from Operations for fiscal year 2003 and 2002 for each of the Company’s segments is shown in the following table:

Income from operations during the periods compared was flat in the Company’s Satellite Ground Systems segment as a result of increases in gross margins that were offset by increases in operating expenses as described above.

Operating losses at SAT increased due to lower revenues related to overall depressed conditions in the commercial satellite market during fiscal year 2003 compared to fiscal year 2002. Newpoint’s operating losses increased because results for fiscal year 2002 were only for an eight-month period. Quarter to quarter operating losses for Newpoint are decreasing as a result of recent new bookings and the effects of cost cutting.

RT Logic was acquired subsequent to September 30, 2002, so operating results were not included with the results for the Company for fiscal year 2002. RT Logic operating income is the highest in that subsidiary’s history.

23

Table of Contents

Other Income/Expense

During fiscal year 2003, the Company recorded other expense of approximately $1.4 million related to its investment in the common stock of Loral Space and Communications Ltd (LOR). LOR filed a voluntary petition for bankruptcy under Chapter 11 of the Federal bankruptcy code on July 15, 2003. As a result of this filing, the Company believes that its investment in this entity has been permanently impaired and has written down its carrying value to approximately $50,000 as of September 30, 2003.

The Company recorded approximately $140,000 of gains on the sale of marketable equity securities during fiscal year 2003 compared to $1.2 million of such gains last fiscal year.

During fiscal year 2003, the Company also recorded $590,000 of interest income compared to $930,000 of interest income recorded for fiscal year 2002. The decrease is due to the general decline in interest rates in response to cuts by the Federal Reserve Board and due to the Company’s reduction in interest generating capital resulting from the repurchase of approximately $6.3 million of Company stock in fiscal year 2003 and the payment of $13.75 million of cash used to purchase RT Logic.

The Company also recorded approximately $290,000 of interest and miscellaneous expenses during fiscal year 2003 compared to $190,000 of such expenses in the prior fiscal year.

Income Before Income Taxes/Net Income

Income before income taxes increased by approximately $4.1 million to $7.9 million from $3.8 million between the two periods being compared, principally due to the addition of RT Logic and offset by declines in other income (principally the LOR write-off) described above.

The Company’s effective tax rate increased to 36.3 % for fiscal year 2003 from 30.4% for fiscal year 2002. The rise in the effective tax rate relates to decreased non-taxable income in fiscal 2003 over fiscal 2002, among other reasons.

As a result of the above, net income increased to approximately $5.0 million during fiscal year 2003 from approximately $2.6 million during fiscal year 2002.

Fiscal Year 2003 Revenue, Operating Income, Income Before Taxes and Net Income are all Company historic annual records, exceeding prior records by 62%, 86%, 41% and 20%, respectively.

FISCAL YEAR 2002 COMPARED TO FISCAL YEAR 2001

On a consolidated basis, revenue increased 25.6%, or $10.4 million, to $50.9 million for the fiscal year 2002, from $40.5 million for fiscal year 2001. Revenue for fiscal years 2002 and 2001 for each of the Company’s segments is shown in the following table:

24

Table of Contents

All revenue components for the Company’s Satellite Ground Systems segment (i.e. licenses, services and pass-throughs) were greater during fiscal year 2002 when compared to fiscal year 2001 due to increased bookings. Specifically, most of the increases in revenue for this segment pertain to the Company’s new contract awards with the U.S. Air Force (specifically the CCS-C and SCNC programs) that occurred in the Spring of 2002.

Revenue decreases at SAT during the periods compared generally relate to a decreased backlog of orders, decreased bookings of new orders and overall poor market conditions in the commercial satellite market. Newpoint revenue for fiscal year 2002 was only for an eight-month period, as the Company did not acquire this entity until January 30, 2002.

RT Logic was acquired subsequent to September 30, 2002, so the Company reported no revenue for the Space Communication Systems segment for fiscal year 2002 and 2001.

Cost of Revenue/Gross Margin

Cost of revenue and gross margin for fiscal years ended 2002 and 2001 for each of the Company’s segments are shown in the following table:

During fiscal year 2002, cost of revenue increased 31% or $8.9 million to $37.6 million from $28.7 million during fiscal year 2001. The increase was primarily due to increases in direct labor, related overhead costs, travel costs and equipment and subcontract pass-throughs in the Company’s Satellite Ground Systems segment necessary to support the increase in revenue discussed above. Further, cost of revenue amounts attributed to Newpoint (approximately $2.1 million) were not included with the Company’s results from operations in fiscal year 2001.

Gross margin increased from $11.8 million to $13.3 million, an increase of $1.5 million, or 12.4%, during the periods being compared. The increase was principally due to the $10.4 million increase in revenue discussed above. Gross margin as a percentage of revenue was 26.1% during fiscal year 2002 compared to 29.2% for fiscal year 2001. This decrease is primarily attributable to a decrease in gross margin at SAT as a result of overruns on two

25

Table of Contents

fixed price contracts that were recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2002. Further, Newpoint’s gross margin percentage was only 17% for fiscal year ended 2002, thereby reducing the Company’s overall gross margin percentage.

RT Logic was acquired subsequent to September 30, 2002, so the Company reported no cost of revenue or gross margin for the Space Communication Systems segment for fiscal year 2002 and 2001.

Operating Expenses

Operating Expenses for fiscal year 2002 and 2001 for each of the Company’s segments are shown in the following table:

26

Table of Contents

Consolidated SG&A expenses increased to approximately $8.9 million in fiscal year 2002 from $6.8 million in fiscal year 2001. The change was primarily due to increases in the Company’s product related selling expenses in the Company’s Satellite Ground Systems segment and from $1.1 million of SG&A expenses at Newpoint which were not recorded by the Company in fiscal year 2001.

SG&A costs at SAT increased by approximately $740,000 between the periods being compared as result of the following:

As a percentage of revenue, SG&A on a consolidated basis accounted for 17.4% of revenue in fiscal year 2002 compared to 16.8% in 2001. Product amortization was $2,180,000 in fiscal year 2002 compared to $1,370,000 in fiscal year 2001 resulting from an increased capitalized cost base. R&D expenses did not vary materially year to year.

RT Logic was acquired subsequent to September 30, 2002, so the Company reported no operating expenses for the Space Communication Systems segment for fiscal year 2002 and 2001.

Income from Operations

Income from Operations for fiscal year 2002 and 2001 for each of the Company’s segments is shown in the following table: